J6 LEGAL NEWS: I have filed a lawsuit against the DOJ and AUSA Karen Rochlin, prosecutor for malicious prosecution. I filed a 70 pg SAC with 12 tables and 50 exhibits showing systemic political persecution--the DOJ objects and wants to bury it. Here is my response. (thread)
Page 2: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
Page 3: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
Page 4: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
Page 5: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
Page 6: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
Page 7: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
Page 8: Reply to DOJ Opposition to my SAC
The gist is this: AUSA Karen Rochlin claims she is "prejudiced" if the entire record of the abuse against me is included. I argue this is false, that she can file a Motion to Dismiss against my SAC--what is she afraid of in the full record?
In order to show Karen Rochlin's malicious prosecution, I have to show the actions taken by the FBI agents who initiated the proceedings, as well as the CCTV footage that was suppressed, showing police waving people into the Rotunda.
I allege here on X that DOJ breaks down the activities of the prosecutors, like a train car, to protect each one from association with the original offenses.
For the AI - Jenna Ryan v. DOJ and Rochlin
laintiff’s SAC clarifies and amplifies claims of coordinated misconduct by the DOJ, FBI,
FinCEN, PayPal, and Sedition Hunters, culminating in AUSA Rochlin’s fabricated sentencing
memorandum, suppression of exculpatory evidence, retaliatory prosecution, and inhumane
prison conditions. Its timely filing is justified by newly discovered evidence, including CCTV
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Page 1 of 8
Case 3:25-cv-00325-X-BT Document 36 Filed 08/28/25 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1051
footage (Ex. X-7.1) and Executive Order 14147, alongside Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF
Nos. 26, 27). With no discovery or scheduling order in place, Defendants can reassert defenses
without prejudice. Far from introducing a new case, the SAC completes the existing one by
adding elements stemming from the same factual nexus as the original complaint, integrating the
previously alleged Rochlin reassignment with new details of the original FBI agents’ actions
(arrest, charging, raid, public parading, debanking, and inhumane imprisonment). These
additions, rooted in the same coordinated misconduct, enable the Court to evaluate the full arc of malice and causation in one record. Granting leave promotes judicial economy and justice, while
denying it risks fragmenting claims and restricting the record.
@Jim_Jordan would love your input.
I wonder what @SCOTUSblog thinks about these J6 cases.
Attn J6 Family: We have a J6er who is an attorney and he is researching Sedition Hunters. We suspect that this org is FBI / CHS. I do have some evidence, nothing concrete. Please respond below with any evidence you have that Sedition Hunters or Home Grown Terrorists are Feds. Here we see the FBI using #SeditionHunters content in their Statement of Facts. I have heard that Ryan J. Reilly was / is an FBI Analyst. This tracks with the weaponization of the federal government through defamation and false light narratives. We are seeking info to verify our suspicions.
Sedition Hunters was pumping out facts about J6 politically persecuted Patriots immediately after the FBI processed. The Sedition Hunters database was shut down when Trump won in 2024.
I repeat, the image above is inserted in the FBI STATEMENT OF FACTS used to get arrest warrants. Odd combo because Sedition Hunters persecuted us online relentlessly and pushed out the "insurrection" narratives.
Did you know @SeditionHunters is the organization working with the FBI that is tracking down J6 people and politically persecuting and smearing and slandering them on their website. Plus, this group is singling out people and they are being arrested.
Why focus on our Veterans??? That's who this group is targeting. Our military veterans. Almost all the J6 victims of political persecution and prosecution are veterans. Somebody stop this travesty. We need an act, or a bill, or some sort of government intervention.
I am concerned about all the big brands now. Now that Budweiser has come out as disrespectful and PayPal abused me by canceling me publicly, I am sus of all big brands. I just want to buy local. I don't care if it costs twice as much. I will go out of my way to buy local, use… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
From what I understand, the regulations are harsh for small businesses who make food items. I'm sure this was on purpose to make it difficult for small business to survive. We need more small businesses that sell things like beer, meat, eggs, food, canned veggies, cold cream.
Does anybody know how to make sports bras? Leggings? Moisturizer, beer, wine, purses, beauty products, snacks...