1/ When newly elected Korean President Lee Jae-myung was set to meet President Donald J. Trump, I expected a positive event.
For 75 years, the U.S. has defended South Korea. My father fought there in 1953 and returned in the ’60s. Under our protection, South Korea became an economic powerhouse.
2/ South Korea now builds ~35% of the world’s merchant ships-second only to China.
I’ve argued their advanced shipbuilding could help solve America’s naval crisis. U.S. shipyards are outdated, leaving our Navy and Coast Guard with inadequate fleets.
3/ On that front, the visit was a major success:
President Lee proposed billions in South Korean investment to modernize U.S. shipyards and help rebuild our Navy and Coast Guard.
4/ But shocking news overshadowed this win:
-Raids on churches and opposition leaders with 1,000+ police
-Demands for church and party membership rolls
-Even a raid on a joint U.S.–Korean air base without notifying American personnel
Secretary of State Marco Rubio canceled key meetings in protest.
5/ President Trump raised these abuses directly with President Lee. Will Lee pull back from these tactics or risk decades of U.S. partnership? The next few weeks will tell.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Comments by @elonmusk should start national conversations about: Reestablishing a Constitutional balance among the three branches; determining how best to bring the Courts back under the Constitution; and formulating executive orders & legislative proposals to establish a constitutional framework for reining in lawless judges.
The Founding Fathers felt strongly about limiting the power of judges because they'd suffered under tyrannical & dictatorial British judges.
Reforming the judiciary (along with “no taxation without representation") was among the American colonists’ principal complaints about the British Empire prior to the Revolution.
A number of the grievances in the Declaration of Independence relate to judges' dictatorial and illegal behavior.
This is why the Constitution provided for a narrowly defined and limited judiciary — as Alexander Hamilton made clear in the Federalist Papers.
Since the New Deal of the 1930s, the power of the American judiciary has increased exponentially at the expense of elected representatives of the people in the other two branches.
The judiciary has acted on the premise of judicial supremacy. Courts should review and apply laws, but they shouldn't actively seek to modify and create new constitutional law from the bench.
When 41% of Baltimore City School students earn BELOW a 1.0 grade point average we face a moral, humanitarian and national security crisis. Morally how can you exercise your right to “pursue happiness” if your school fails to educate you? -more
As a humanitarian reality how can we accept a community in which 4 out of 10 students have been cheated by the school system and can’t get a job and are surrounded by violence, crime and drug dealing? As a national security issue how can students at 1.0 compete with China. MORE
The fact is the Chinese are serious about education (as are Indians, Koreans, Japanese, Singaporeans and many other countries). The teacher’s union bureaucratic failure (collapse when you think of 4 out of 10 students below 1.0 GPA) is a national security crisis. More
Governor Kemp may have an opportunity to make real progress on election reform in Georgia.Last friday November 20 he called for the Secretary of State Raffensberger to audit the absentee ballot envelopes for signature match with applications.He also called for election law reform
Would have been better if Governor Kemp had acted on November 12 when Trump Recount Chair Doug Collins and GOP state chair David Shafer wrote Raffensberger asking for a review of the signatures on absentee ballot applications and envelopes.
Why did Governor Kemp wait until AFTER certification to ask for an audit of the absentee envelopes? In 2018 3.5% of the absentee votes were thrown out for not matching signatures and not being valid. In 2020 with 4 times as many absentee ballots only 0.3% have been rejected.
W. Times reports “In April 2014, President Obama made Mr. Biden the point man in Ukraine, after the Russian invasion, to persuade leaders to rid the country of rampant corruption.
“The next month, Hunter Biden showed up on the board of directors of the energy company Burisma “
W Times:on Burisma “ the State Department considers corrupt, as it does its oligarch owner, Mykola Zlochevsky.
“Over the years, Burisma paid the two [HunteBiden and business partner Devon Archer]more than $4 million. “More
W Times: “Treasury records show that 48 wire transfers from May 2014 to February 2016 totaled $3.4 million. The money went to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, a shell company run by Mr. Archer in partnership with a Chinese investment fund.” More
Biden’s 245 word,97 second long Fourth of July statement may be the most anti-American speech ever given by an American presidential candidate. He omits the Creator in his shortened version of the Declaration of Independence.
Biden admits “all men are created equal”but in the modern secular left fashion forgets to mention that they are created by God and their rights come from God.Then he defames Jefferson limiting the Founding Father, Founder of the University of Virginia, etc to one idea-slaveowner
He reduces the Union’s war which led to abolishing slavery to “ravages” when the Union Army marched to the Battle Hymn of the Republic singing “as Christ died to make men Holy let us die to make men free”—and they did die for freedom. Biden’s snub of these brave men is tragic
Joe Biden came out for reparations for African Americans this week. Newsweek:
"If, in fact, there are ways to get direct payments for reparations, I want to see it. But why are we waiting around for the study?" Reparations is both morally wrong and totally impractical.
Why should people who have never owned slave pay reparations to people who have never been slaves? Would Europeans, Asians, and Latinos who came to the US in the last 50 years be taxed to transfer their money to other people? Furthermore eligibility would be a nightmare.
How would we decide who was eligible and for how much. Would first generation Africans who just migrated to the United States be eligible for reparations? If yes why? If no why not? Would there be an income limit or would millionaire atheletes and movie stars be eligible?