Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 28, 2025 • 13 tweets • 8 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

KNIVES OUT.

The media thought they had their opening to derail MAHA.

They filled the White House briefing with loaded questions about Susan Monarez’s firing—painting Trump and RFK Jr. as “reckless.”

But Karoline Leavitt CRUSHED their scripts on the spot.

“Just do your job. That’s what this president wants to see.”

It was a total reckoning.

🧵 THREAD

The knives came out for Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. the moment former CDC Director Susan Monarez was fired.

And during today’s White House press briefing, the media didn’t even try to hide it.

When @PressSec Karoline Leavitt opened the floor to reporters, NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez led the charge, reading aloud from Monarez’s lawyer...who claimed she was let go for refusing to “rubber-stamp unscientific reckless directives.”

Then he tried to trap Karoline Leavitt with a question:

“What specifically did she do wrong?”

But Leavitt wasn’t rattled. She shut it down cold.

“What I will say about this individual is that her lawyer’s statements made it abundantly clear themselves that she was not aligned with the president’s mission to make America healthy again.”

Leavitt then revealed something that the public hadn’t heard yet.

The president was the one who personally dusted Monarez and she reminded Gutierrez that the president was well within his rights to do so.

“The secretary asked her to resign. She said she would. Then she said she wouldn’t, so the president fired her which he has EVERY right to do.”

“It was President Trump who was overwhelmingly reelected on November 5th, this woman has never received a vote in her life and the president has the authority to fire those who are not aligned with his mission.”

She ended with a promise: a new CDC leader is coming…and this time, the public will know who they are and what they stand for.

“A new replacement will be announced by either the president or the secretary very soon and the president and Secretary Kennedy are committed to restoring trust, transparency and credibility to the CDC by ensuring their leadership and their decisions are more public facing, more accountable.”

@PressSec An NBC narrative crushed on the spot.

Leavitt’s response echoed what Secretary Kennedy himself said earlier that morning.

Monarez simply wasn’t aligned with the MAHA vision.

And that’s a problem.

“President Trump has very, very ambitious hopes for CDC right now and CDC has problems.”

“We saw the misinformation coming out of Covid. They got the testing wrong, they got the social distancing, the masks, the school closures that did so much harm to the American people.”

The agency, Kennedy said, has lost its way.

“We need to look at the priorities at the agency, if there’s really a deeply, deeply embedded—malaise at the agency.”

“We need strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on President Trump’s broad ambitions.”

Monarez wasn’t the one to do that. So she’s out.

Then another reporter tried to set a narrative around Monarez’s firing in motion...that disagreeing with Trump or his cabinet is now grounds for being fired.

“Bouncing off the CDC, situation at the CDC, I’m curious, if administration officials are pushing back on the president’s agenda privately, publicly, however, should they fear to lose their jobs going forward?”

Leavitt didn’t take the bait.

She explained that this isn’t about loyalty pledges.

It’s about results and a shared vision, in this case to make America healthy again.

Not repeating the old woke dogmas that haven’t worked for decades.

“I think if you’re doing your job well and if you’re executing on the vision and the promises that the president made to the public who elected him back to his office, then you should have no fear about your job.”

“Just do your job. That’s what this president wants to see. He wants to see people solving problems.”

“He wants to see that people who have the privilege of serving the American taxpayer and the federal government abiding by the wishes of the American taxpayers who overwhelmingly reelected him and this cabinet to make America great again or in this case make America healthy again.”

In other words: perform or pack up.

@PressSec Guess the script didn’t survive first contact with Karoline.

@PressSec Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.

Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.

→ @VigilantFox

That’s when Jasmine Wright from Notus jumped in for one final ambush.

Leavitt and Wright have a history…and Wright usually leaves the room with egg on her face.

This time was no different.

Wright tried tying Monarez’s firing to recent changes in Covid vaccine policy, hoping to corner Trump on whether he still supports vaccine access.

“There was reporting some of the initial problems between RFK and the CDC Director stemmed from miscommunications or differences on vaccine policy.”

“So I wonder if you could say whether or not the president believes that the Covid vaccine should be available and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and pre-existing conditions?”

Leavitt calmly flipped through her notes.

She was ready and waiting for this.

“What I will tell you is the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three Covid vaccinations, while simultaneously green lighting four new Covid-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas.”

Then she dismantled the entire media narrative in one sweep.

“The reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because the Covid pandemic and the public health emergency is over but to correct the record because there has been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of Covid vaccines for Americans who want them.”

“We believe in individual choice. That’s the promise the president and the secretary have made and it’s a promise they have delivered on.”

Crystal clear.

But Wright wasn’t done making herself look foolish.

As Leavitt tried to move on, Wright pushed forward with one last attack on MAHA…this one completely detached from reality.

“Sorry, I wondered if you could ask—I wonder if you could answer why the president hasn’t acknowledged the shooting at CDC headquarters that took place earlier in August, where a police officer was killed and it was reported that the motivation for the shooting was somebody who was really unhappy with the effects of the Covid vaccine.”

Wright was using anything she had to try to fire at Trump and Secretary Kennedy, obviously upset about Monarez.

Leavitt didn’t miss a beat, she pointed Wirght directly to the proof.

“We absolutely were very much aware of that shooting.”

“The Secretary of Health and Human Services put out a statement immediately.”

Then Leavitt threw an undeniable final haymaker:

“He was in touch with the CDC and he actually traveled to Georgia to assess the situation and to mourn with the people who work in that building there. So…..”

[Silence]

Wright had no bullets left in the chamber.

Leavitt had successfully repelled another media onslaught, this time their target was the MAHA agenda and all that it stands for.

@PressSec As a quick refresher, this was one of their most infamous clashes—Leavitt called her question “stupid,” and Wright’s expression at the end said everything.

@PressSec A VERY big thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together and for all of the clips!

This was a long one!

If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack:

—> @overton_news
—> .overtonnews.com/p/who-is-overt…

@PressSec @overton_news I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for defying mainstream narratives.

If censorship strikes again, you’ll always find my latest threads at VigilantFox.com.

I sift through the news so you can live your life.

Stay Informed Here: vigilantfox.com/p/how-to-stay-….

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1961101161924100211

@PressSec @overton_news Thanks for reading. For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.

—> @VigilantFox

Looking for something else to read?

RFK Jr. Says SSRIs Now Under Federal Investigation After Mass Shootings

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1961101161924100211

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 19

In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.

Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.

The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.

When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

Here’s what the study revealed:

• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.

• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).

• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.

• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.

• 4.5 times more speech disorders.

• Three times more developmental delays.

• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.

• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”

When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.

How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?

An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.

And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.

Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.

If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?

Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵

The medical establishment built its reputation on one phrase: the gold standard.

Randomized controlled trials were sold as the cleanest way to separate real medicine from wishful thinking.

But once a trial costs tens of millions of dollars, the question changes.

Who can afford to define what everyone thinks is the “truth”?

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can indeed be extremely useful.

They can detect small effects that individual doctors would never notice, like a slight increase in heart attacks or a modest reduction in symptoms across thousands of patients.

Clearly that has real value.

The problem begins when RCTs become the only evidence medicine is allowed to recognize.

Because once that happens, medicine stops asking a simple and important question: What actually helps patients?

Instead, it starts asking what can be patented, standardized, funded, pushed through regulators, published in major journals, and written into treatment guidelines?

That shift changes everything.

Read 31 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 17

The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”

“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.

“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”

But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.

In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.

“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵

Something strange has happened in modern medicine.

For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.

But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?

What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?

When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.

But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.

Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.

Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.

But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.

Romantic partners feel distant.

Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.

Emotional warmth is harder to find.

And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.

This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.

For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.

Read 26 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 16

Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.

A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.

Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.

What happened?

His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.

ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”

“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”

“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”

“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”

“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”

“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”

“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”

“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”

“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”

“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”

Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.

But his mother attests it was the DMSO.

The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵

Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.

A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.

It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.

It acts more like a cellular reset.

And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-dmso-hea…

Read 25 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 15

It’s hard to believe this ever made TV news.

But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”

“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”

“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.

The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”

Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.

And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵

Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.

When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.

Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.

But it is.

What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.

Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.

Take a moment to let that really sink in.

In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.

Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.

That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.

Read 29 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 13

The most powerful healing molecule you’ve never heard of can cure common ailments faster than anything Big Pharma ever made.

It’s great for:
• Chronic pain
• Burns
• Sinus infections and more.

You’d think something this potent would cost thousands, but it only costs about $20 online.

Like ivermectin, this forbidden remedy belongs in everyone’s medicine cabinet.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-mixture…

DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) penetrates the body like nothing else. It passes through biological membranes without damaging them.

Once applied, it spreads everywhere. Depending on how you use it, it can deliver vitamins, herbs, or painkillers right where they’re needed.

It’s literally medicine’s missing transport system.

Read 29 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 13

We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.

We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.

Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.

And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.

The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.

We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.

Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.

So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.

The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.

The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.

Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.

Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.

The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.

The website also highlights:

• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.

• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.

• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.

• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.

• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.

• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.

•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.

This is where things start to look overwhelming.

According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.