Flamingo missile’s untested performance and high cost raise doubts about its ability to deliver the strategic impact Ukraine needs.
Yet, Ukraine has shown it can rapidly develop weapons threatening Russia, showcasing remarkable wartime innovation, The Economist. 1/
Ukraine revealed the Flamingo cruise missile with a 3,000 km range and 1+ ton payload. Developed in just 9 months by a team with no prior defense experience, officials say they were initially skeptical but “stunned” on seeing the missile firsthand. 2/
The Flamingo began as a “napkin scribble” in late 2024 after the US denied Zelenskyy’s request for Tomahawks. Inspired by V-1 and Strizh designs, its engine sits above the body.
A similar “FP5” appeared at a UAE show, link to Fire Point unclear. 3/
Flamingo production is over 90% complete at secret, dispersed Ukrainian sites, with some work abroad. Its fiberglass body improves stealth versus metal missiles.
The AI-25 turbofan engine from Motor Sich in Zaporizhia, often attacked, poses production bottleneck. 4/
Current Flamingo production is one per day, aiming for seven daily by October 2025. Competitors question its authenticity, citing ties to the presidential office, non-competitive financing, and origin doubts.
At €1M each, it’s globally competitive but costly for Ukraine. 5/
Flamingo’s bulky design and steep launch make it radar-visible, with high expected interception rates. Aviation expert Kryvolap believes it can still exploit gaps in Russia’s weakening air defenses using creative, combined attack tactics. 6X
Gen. Jack Keane: For 6 months, Trump and Putin—and their teams—have negotiated. The Alaska summit was encouraging: Russians signaled they’re willing to meet Zelenskyy, a major step forward after long opposing it. Zelenskyy and Trump have backed it all along. 1/
Gen. Jack Keane: The second major issue was security guarantees for Ukraine. That, along with Russia agreeing to meet Zelenskyy, brought him and European leaders to the White House. The session showed unity, commitment, and resolve to move forward on peace and guarantees. 2/
Gen. Jack Keane: Putin talks peace but wages war—losing 30K troops a month, 40K before, while escalating strikes on civilians: 21 dead, 4 children, 50 wounded in one attack. He reneged on meeting Zelenskyy and on security guarantees, rejecting any Western troops. Trump is frustrated. 3/
Politico: European officials are considering a 40 km buffer zone between Russian and Ukrainian frontlines as part of a peace deal, Moscow embracing the idea. 1/
Proposal requires 4,000 to 60,000 troops for patrol duties, but no countries have committed forces yet and Trump has rejected U.S. troop presence. 2/
French and British forces would likely form the core peacekeeping contingent, while Poland and Germany refuse to send troops to Ukraine. 3/
WSJ: Putin wants to secure full control of Donetsk region through peace talks with Trump rather than battlefield conquest, which could take 4.4 more years.
[He also has failed to take it in 11 years since 2014] 1/
Seizing all 4 southeastern regions would cost Russia 2M killed and wounded troops, UK military intelligence. 2/
Controlling Donetsk would move Russia's front line beyond Ukraine's fortified cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, opening flatter terrain toward the Dnipro River. 3/
Applebaum: The Trump-Putin meeting achieved nothing. No serious negotiations, no Ukrainians involved, no ground discussion.
Russians regained legitimacy — Trump a big TV moment.
No deal, no progress made — just media amplifying Trump’s narrative. 1/
Applebaum: Putin has never said he wants the war to end or recognizes Ukraine’s sovereignty. People repeat Trump administration imaginary futures — wishful thinking.
Ukrainians would like war to be over, but Trump lies all the time. 2/
Applebaum: Americans put no pressure on Russia — militarily or economically. No progress toward peace.
Meeting Putin is fine, but Trump’s approach was misleading, giving the impression of achievement when it was just a PR stunt. 3/