I will always point to the X Files as the most important *modern* text for RW writers. It's about the American Empire trying to contain spiritual realities--which is a far stranger, more dangerous world than anyone wants to admit. It's a story set right before the collapse. 1/
The sword hanging over nearly every episode is either our protagonist Mulder breaking the news to the public or the monster getting out. In either case, American normalcy dies. The world of consumerism is traded for a plunge into reality. No one wants this to happen but... /2
If we were to take the show seriously, it's practically inevitable. The government (as villains) in the story aren't overlords. They are one bad day away from the whole thing falling into shambles. The empire is crumbling. Those not blinded can feel it in their bones. /3
And to take a far more serious tone for a moment, we are living in the reality where the monsters are breaking through. I make this comparison not to make light of the tragedy, but to highlight that the modern world is incapable of dealing or addressing with these things. /4
We are currently living through the times where the X Files monster gets out. Terrible, dangerous things are prowling out there. Things that are shattering norms and unraveling society. The show always ends with the status quo, but we are living post the status quo. /5
I think it is the duty of artists to confront the problems of the times they live in. This is why I drew the connection. I don't view fiction as childish. And I pray my comparison is not distasteful. The modern man is realizing good and evil actually exists. /6
This destroys the old world where we could contain the uncomfortable to an episode on television. It's viscerally present. We can't dismiss it come the next forty-five minutes. We have to live with the consequences. /7
And this comes to my lighter point. RW art, if it is to be meaningful, cannot take a status quo attitude to its commentary. You must depict the world after the X Files episode. There's no reset button. Yes, the horrific exists, and it can't be shuffled as *problematic* /8
I think RW art of the future is going to be the world after the X Files. It necessarily has to be to say anything True. This is why my favorite writings prompt is "Take an X File episode and follow the consequences to its natural conclusion" /9
The easy part for RW artists is that liberals already voiced every criticism of their ideology. They just pretended they had an answer and shoved the problem offstage. RW art is just picking up where they couldn't go any farther. /end
I 100% disagree. Avatar 3 was the most vivacious movie of the trilogy. It’s 3 hours of James Cameron losing the plot.
The aesthetics and symbolism that made the first Avatar movie a propaganda film are unraveling. The poor reception means even the Left are now against him. /1
This franchise could never handle the introduction of evil Na’vi. It completely shatters the oppressed people metaphor. Now the Na’vi do not work as a stand-in for Leftist marginalized groups. The whole point was that the Na’vi were hollow skin suits to hate “the bad people”. /2
Meanwhile even the “Good Na’vi” are so full of contradictions and confused messaging that they’ve destroyed audience sympathy.
There’s no way for humans to be on their side without getting f*****. Spider does everything right, and he’s nearly murdered by his own father. /3
The fantasy genre is full of authors trying to do Tolkien but bigger—more complex lore, nuanced morality, bigger cast of characters, etc. etc. They copy the shallow aspects while losing all the vision.
The lesson for authors is you will never beat Tolkien at his own game. /1
The next “Tolkien” will be doing something so radically different than LoTR that the comparison would seem absurd on its face. We’ve already seen the results of trying to have the “biggest” story. It leads nowhere.
Art needs clarity of purpose—which lends itself to brevity. /2
When you know *what* you are trying to write, that also entails knowing everything you need to cut. And since you are trimming the fat, that allows for real scope as there are no filler chapters or wastes of time. The whole narrative is the substance. /3
The issue with AI is not that it’s high-quality content. The problem is that it’s mass produced medium-grade content. Assembly line to the hand-craftsman.
In other words, it’s never been more difficult for up and coming indies to win the attention economy. /1
Hypothetically, you’re an average artist wanting to go pro. There used to be a ramp of steady improvement being rewarded with more attention—success. That ramp is now a crater. The hobbyist has to already be pro (or have institutional backing) to not drown in the digital sea. /2
If your art is passable but subpar, you’re less than disposable. If your art is average, you will never compete. If your art is above average, you’re treading water.
And this extends to the forms of art, which optimizes for visual/audio over text. /3
First, everyone and their mother has a f****** magic system. I’m so sick of it. No one ever asks *why* they want magic in their settings. They just want the slickest video game mechanics so their characters can be cool. I can’t tell you how many outlines I’ve been sent…
/2
Describing endless amounts of lore. It’s criminal. People run me by TTRPG campaigns thinking they are writing a book. I’m talking about essays describing a setting and not a *story*. Ideally, your world building should be the last thing you do. /3
Okay, so as the alien discourse has been flooding for my feed for the past few days, I am going to do what no scientist (or sci-fi author) has been able to do, and prove conclusively that aliens positively exist.
And also why Christians shouldn’t care.
Thread below. /1
BEHOLD, AN ALIEN.
Before you click away, this isn’t bait. The interesting thing about the alien discourse is that it’s taken on a religious dimension, so much so that this question has captured imaginations for centuries.
But why? We’ve known forever that we aren’t alone. /2
You can accuse me of copping out, but am I really? How does a Golden Retriever not fit the definition of an alien? Think about it. What quality defines a *true* alien?
But Arthur C. Clarke’s quote loses so much poignancy if I throw a puppy in his face! /3
40k impressions and 1.1k likes? F*** it. I'll do an analysis of Eragon. One major caveat I want to get out of the way is that I'm aware of Paolini's extraordinarily young age when writing these books, and none of my critique is meant to reflect badly on the artist. /1
In fact, I would say assembling a fantasy series of this length and coherency is a downright achievement, regardless of anyone's gripes. Now that that's out of the way, the most interesting thing I find about the Eragon series is how derivative it is. /2
You can immediately see all the influences, and it's clear Paolini grew up a huge fan of a lot of fantasy classics. It's a work where an author has mastered all the basic fundamentals, but I'm always interested in what separates *tropes* from *originality* /3