In case you missed it, @MidwesternDoc just released one of the most shocking reports yet.
Yes, organ transplants save lives—but the system is absolutely riddled with corruption, misdiagnosed “brain death,” and multiple cases of patients showing signs of life as their organs were about to be harvested.
This is nothing short of disturbing.
The organ trade (yes, that’s a thing) is worth billions, and a single transplant can cost nearly $2 million.
Whenever we’re dealing with that kind of money, exploitation always follows. Always.
Investigations estimate 5–20% of kidney transplants worldwide come from black markets—often at the expense of the poor or the imprisoned.
One of the most disturbing revelations: the definition of death was deliberately re-engineered to make organ harvesting easier.
In 1968, Harvard created the term “brain death.” Not because science proved it was a thing, but because it allowed doctors to legally harvest viable organs from people whose hearts were still beating.
A beating hard is necessary for keeping organs alive and healthy for transplantation.
Since then, countless patients who were diagnosed as brain dead have later revived. This has even happened moments before their organs were to be removed for transplantation.
This isn’t just a conspiracy or a once in a million occurrence. This is happening to real people, some of whom have survived to tell their story.
Colleen Burns woke up on the operating table.
Jahi McMath was written off as dead but showed brainwaves and purposeful movement months later.
One of the most incredible cases of something called “Locked-in syndrome” happened to a 12-year-old boy named Martin.
Locked-in syndrome is when someone is still conscious but has lost all control of their body and all ability to communicate. Hence the term “locked-in—they’re literally trapped inside their own body.
Martin was left in a vegetative state after a bout with meningitis. He was eventually sent home where his parents waited for him to die. But he didn’t.
Four years later, Martin began to regain consciousness. By the age of 19 he was aware of everything around him, and at 26, a caregiver discovered signs that he was indeed aware.
Eventually, Martin recovered enough to get married.
Despite the fact that brain death is not straightforward and significant variations (like not actually being brain dead) are not as rare as they would like to admit, the New York Times recently argued that the definition of death should be broadened even more to meet the increasing organ demand.
They want to redefine what life means until the organ supply matches the system’s needs.
@MidwesternDoc Want the full report with cases and documentation? It’s all available in @MidwesternDoc’s article: midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-c…
Investigations into the U.S. organ procurement system (OPTN) have confirmed the worst: widespread corruption and dysfunction.
Congress found 80% of eligible organs are never even collected, whistleblowers are retaliated against, and families are misled and gaslit in moments of crisis.
A federal review revealed an absolutely chilling statistic. Nearly 30% of cases showed signs of consciousness during the organ harvesting process.
Patients were crying, moving, and even mouthing “help me.” Some brave surgeons have refused to operate while coordinators pressured them to continue the harvesting process despite obvious signs of life.
Nurses have testified that patients were sedated, and sometimes even purposefully paralyzed, to push forward organ harvesting procedures.
One ICU nurse: “All they care about is getting organs. They’re so aggressive. It’s sickening.”
This isn’t medical care—it’s straight out of a horror movie.
Even when transplants succeed, outcomes are often grim. Organ transplant isn’t easy.
Within 10 years, nearly half of kidney and heart grafts fail. In an effort to achieve success, patients are forced to take toxic immune-suppressing drugs for life, costing $10,000–$30,000 a year. Unsurprisingly, these drugs can come with severe side effects.
Survival comes at a steep price.
If this didn’t sound horrific enough, the COVID era added new layers of cruelty.
Around the world, unvaccinated patients were denied transplants. Some complied—only to suffer organ rejection soon after the shot. Others were told by their doctors that they were not eligible for the vaccine, due to their frailty—but that didn’t matter.
And guess what? Reports now link mRNA vaccines to graft failures in kidneys, livers, corneas, and hearts.
@MidwesternDoc The deeper you look, the darker it gets. @MidwesternDoc’s full report is a must-read.
An often unacknowledged feature of organ transplants is that they often transfer memories, emotions, even personality traits from donor to recipient.
Cases document recipients developing new cravings, habits, or even dreams reflecting their donor’s final moments.
Science can’t explain it. But it happens.
Dr. Paul Pearsall’s research in this phenomenon, The Heart’s Code, details dozens of these cases.
One woman craved beer and chicken nuggets—her donor’s favorites. A child dreamed vividly of her donor’s murder and later helped police identify the killer.
Sounds unbelievable, doesn’t it? If true, what happens in the final moments before organs are removed is significant and must be considered.
Chinese medicine has long linked organs with emotions. For example, the liver with anger, the lungs with grief, and the heart with joy.
Modern transplants appear to validate these beliefs, with recipients suddenly overwhelmed by new emotional states they had never experienced before.
But is this being considered in the process?
The psychological burden of transplant recipients is immense.
Many recipients describe feeling like a stranger suddenly lives inside them. Some resist the new organ because of the way this makes them feel, while others embrace it as a “guardian angel.”
Studies suggest even one’s attitude toward the organ can affect whether or not the transplant succeeds.
It seems that “trapped emotions” may transfer with organs. That means traumas embedded deep within the donor may end up with the recipient.
Therapies to release these emotions have reportedly improved organ acceptance and even function.
Ignoring them only compounds suffering and increases the chance of rejection.
@MidwesternDoc While it sounds unbelievable, these aren’t isolated anecdotes—they’re documented patterns. The stories in @MidwesternDoc’s report will leave you with goosebumps:
Medicine presents a false and dangerous choice. They currently want to relax the definitions of death to make it even easier to harvest organs and increase supply, or we allow black markets to flourish. Both are unacceptable.
There are alternatives to harvesting organs. These include lab-grown organs, xenotransplants, and therapies that restore failing organs before transplant is needed.
@MidwesternDoc One such therapy is DMSO.
Decades ago, IV DMSO was shown to reverse brain injuries that often lead to “brain death.”
If adopted, using DMSO could save patients who are now written off as hopeless. This could even reduce the demand for organs altogether.
At its core, this is much bigger than medicine.
Organ transplantation forces us to confront questions about consciousness, death, and the very nature of memory.
Where do our emotions really live? Where is our identity stored? And what happens when those things are transplanted into another body?
If we’re going to remove organs from one human and put them into another, we must answer these questions. It is irresponsible not to.
Organ transplantation is sold as a miracle. Yes, the practice has saved countless lives. Maybe even someone in your own life has been touched by organ transplantation.
But behind the curtain lies corruption, redefined death, live harvesting, and spiritual questions that modern science refuses to face.
The truth is disturbing. And it can’t be ignored.
@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-c…
@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:
EXCLUSIVE: Big Pharma’s War on a Cheap Cancer Treatment That Endangered Their Billions
In the 1970s, a Loyola researcher wiped out deadly tumors in mice using nothing but vitamins, enzymes, and Laetrile (B17).
The results were groundbreaking—and that’s exactly why the cancer industry buried them.
This is the cancer story they never wanted you to hear.
🧵 THREAD
Dr. Harold Manner, former biology professor and chairman of the biology department at Loyola University in Chicago, dropped a devastating discovery into the heart of the cancer establishment in the late-70s.
On September 10, 1977, he announced an 89% regression of breast tumors in laboratory mice thanks to enzymes, vitamin A, and Laetrile. Dr. Manner, a courageous pioneer researcher, said cancer is not a medical problem; it is a metabolic problem.
If it was known as far back as 1977 that metabolic therapy could effectively control breast cancer, how many lives since then have been needlessly lost, how many lives were irreversibly damaged, and how many unnecessary mastectomies were performed?
John Richardson Jr., Founder and Chief Visionary Officer of Operation World Without Cancer and Founder of the Richardson Nutritional Center, joins us today to discuss what the medical establishment doesn’t want you to know about cancer treatment.
Richardson opened with what he called “the Vault,” a 60-year paper trail exposing how Laetrile (vitamin B17) was driven out of mainstream medicine. At the center of that buried history is Loyola University’s Dr. Harold Manner, a respected researcher who dared to put the therapy to the test against breast cancer in the 1970s.
Manner quickly realized that the studies used to dismiss Laetrile weren’t science—they were sabotage. Researchers injected healthy animals with live cancer cells, guaranteeing they would die within weeks, no matter what treatment was given.
“That just doesn’t happen in real life,” Richardson stressed.
So Manner changed course. He relied on animals with naturally developed tumors and treated them with pancreatic enzymes, vitamins A, C, D, and Laetrile. And the results were absolutely astonishing. Over five years, cancers disappeared—even in mice whose tumors were half the size of their bodies.
Richardson believed this information was undeniable proof that cancer is a metabolic deficiency disease, not a random genetic curse. But instead of recognition, Manner was censored, stripped of support, and his research erased.
In other words, show that cancer can be beaten naturally, and the system will come after you.
#10 - Tucker Carlson gets angry when he learns nearly 1 in 5 Americans are on antidepressants RIGHT NOW.
He couldn’t believe it.
When his guest confirmed the number referred to CURRENT prescriptions, Carlson’s reaction said it all:
First, psychiatrist Josef Witt-Doerring told Carlson that we’ve seen a 500% INCREASE in antidepressant use since the 1990s.
Carlson asked if the depression problem has gotten better or worse, and Witt-Doerring replied: “There’s more psychiatric prescribers now, there’s more drug prescribing, and the outcomes are actually getting WORSE.”
After hearing that, Carlson made this blistering statement:
“I’m just going to skip ahead to my opinion, then I’m going to pull back. But that suggests that we should BAN the drugs and IMPRISON the people selling them. That’s my personal view. But you’re the psychiatrist.”
KEEP READING: 9 MORE STORIES BELOW
#9 - Stephen Miller eloquently DEFENDS RFK Jr. as reporters try to stick their daggers in over the firing of former CDC Director Susan Monarez.
This is how you SHUT DOWN the MSM narrative on the spot.
#8 - Data from the Family Research Council shows a disturbing surge of attacks on churches in America.
Instances of hostility [including vandalism] against U.S. churches from 2018 to 2024:
• 2018–2021 combined: 286 incidents
• 2023: 485 incidents
• 2024: 415 incidents
Each of the last two years alone exceeded the previous four years combined...and together, 2023–2024 are over 3× the 2018–2021 total.
RFK Jr. Hits the Medical Cartel Where It Hurts With Bold New HHS Announcement
This is Big Pharma and Big Medicine’s worst nightmare.
What makes them so rich is finally getting gutted.
🧵 THREAD
Imagine this: you go to your doctor, and they give you ten minutes. You say, “Hey, Doc, I got a problem. How do I fix it?”
The doctor writes you a prescription, you take it to the pharmacy, and then you take that pill for life—until you die.
This is what most people experience when they see a doctor.
But RFK Jr. is changing that with a bold new vision to improve the doctor-patient relationship for good.
He announced that he’s leading a team at HHS to overhaul the medical education system and finally put a focus on what’s been ignored for too long—nutrition training.
EXCLUSIVE: The Lawsuit That Could Collapse the CDC’s Vaccine Empire Overnight
This could bring down the CDC’s vaccine empire once and for all.
Instead of battling at the state level, attorney Rick Jaffe went straight for the source—demanding the CDC downgrade its 72-dose childhood schedule from “mandatory” to “shared decision-making.”
If the court agrees, state mandates collapse and the CDC’s grip on parents shatters overnight.
“They want to claim the program is safe? Fine, prove it.”
🧵 THREAD
For the first time ever, a federal lawsuit challenges the CDC's staggering 72+ dose childhood vaccine schedule on the grounds that it has never actually been safety tested.
And it turns out the government's own outside advisers have been urging safety studies for nearly 25 years.
The case was filed in federal court on Friday, August 15, on behalf of Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. Kenneth Stoller, and Stand for Health Freedom. The case goes right to the heart of the CDC's Childhood Immunisation Program.
Rick Jaffe, who filed the lawsuit, joins us today to discuss the case.
Rick Jaffe has spent forty years on the front lines as a healthcare lawyer. He’s defended doctors, taken on the medical establishment, and seen more than most.
But this time, his lawsuit goes after the CDC’s very foundation: the childhood vaccine schedule itself.
In preparing the case, Jaffe uncovered a fact that floored even him. Despite requiring American children to follow a 72-dose regimen, the CDC has never once tested the safety of the schedule as a whole.
Each vaccine is looked at only in isolation, and only for a few days. “You’re giving 72 doses plus medical interventions over 18 years,” he said, “and they’ve never tested the effect of the total dose.”
What makes this worse, Jaffe added, is that the National Academy of Medicine has urged the CDC to conduct these studies for more than 20 years—yet the agency has refused.
That refusal became the cornerstone of Jaffe’s case: if the CDC has never tested the very system it enforces, how can it possibly claim America’s children are being kept safe?
The media thought they had their opening to derail MAHA.
They filled the White House briefing with loaded questions about Susan Monarez’s firing—painting Trump and RFK Jr. as “reckless.”
But Karoline Leavitt CRUSHED their scripts on the spot.
“Just do your job. That’s what this president wants to see.”
It was a total reckoning.
🧵 THREAD
The knives came out for Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. the moment former CDC Director Susan Monarez was fired.
And during today’s White House press briefing, the media didn’t even try to hide it.
When @PressSec Karoline Leavitt opened the floor to reporters, NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez led the charge, reading aloud from Monarez’s lawyer...who claimed she was let go for refusing to “rubber-stamp unscientific reckless directives.”
Then he tried to trap Karoline Leavitt with a question:
“What specifically did she do wrong?”
But Leavitt wasn’t rattled. She shut it down cold.
“What I will say about this individual is that her lawyer’s statements made it abundantly clear themselves that she was not aligned with the president’s mission to make America healthy again.”
Leavitt then revealed something that the public hadn’t heard yet.
The president was the one who personally dusted Monarez and she reminded Gutierrez that the president was well within his rights to do so.
“The secretary asked her to resign. She said she would. Then she said she wouldn’t, so the president fired her which he has EVERY right to do.”
“It was President Trump who was overwhelmingly reelected on November 5th, this woman has never received a vote in her life and the president has the authority to fire those who are not aligned with his mission.”
She ended with a promise: a new CDC leader is coming…and this time, the public will know who they are and what they stand for.
“A new replacement will be announced by either the president or the secretary very soon and the president and Secretary Kennedy are committed to restoring trust, transparency and credibility to the CDC by ensuring their leadership and their decisions are more public facing, more accountable.”
Another mass shooting. Another transgender perpetrator.
But Secretary Kennedy just went on live TV and UNLEASHED a firestorm:
For the first time, the NIH is investigating whether SSRIs and other drugs are fueling this wave of violence.
And the CDC? It’s about to be SHAKEN to its core.
🧵 THREAD
In the wake of yesterday’s horrific mass shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the facts are beginning to come in, and once again, the shooter was transgender.
It’s a data point on a disturbing and increasingly visible trend.
Transgender Americans make up less than 1% of the adult population.
Yet they are appearing in mass shootings at a rate that demands attention.
The question now falls on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy: What’s behind this troubling trend?
Kennedy has made it clear he’s determined to find out…and one possible clue may lie in the medications these individuals are being prescribed during gender transition.
Specifically: SSRI drugs.
For the first time, the federal government is openly exploring a possible link between these psychiatric medications and violent behavior.
Appearing on Fox News this morning, Kennedy was asked by Brian Kilmeade:
“You are dealing with a person who is trans, there was transitioning. Are you going to be examining at all some of the drugs that are used in order to make that transition happening, to see if it plays a role?”
That’s when Secretary Kennedy made the announcement:
“We are doing those kind of studies now at NIH.”
“We’re launching studies on potential contribution of some of the SSRI drugs and other psychiatric drugs that might be contributing to violence.”
“Many of them—have black box warnings that warn of suicidal ideation and homicidal ideation. We can’t exclude those and those are studies we’re doing.”
This was BIG.
So why hasn’t this already been investigated?
Kennedy pointed to a major blind spot in the system: HIPAA privacy laws, which have long shielded the data needed to examine the effects of these medications.
But the troubling warning signs have been there all along.
They were just ignored.
“There are black box warnings on some of these psychiatric drugs that warn about in their clinical trials, they saw suicidal and homicidal ideation.”
“We are going into that with an open mind.”
“A lot of studies have not been done in the past because of HIPPA regulations, which protect the privacy of patients.”
That’s no longer going to stop him.
“But it’s something that right now we are looking at.”
“We NEED to look at it and we need to explain why all this violence is happening and need to look at every possibility.”
They’re not ruling anything out. No more excuses.
And for the first time in years, the federal government is actually asking the hard questions.