Victor Davis Hanson just laid waste to the Democrat Party and EXPOSED they’re collapse heading into the midterms.
He says their ONLY message is to “destroy Trump.”
But Hanson revealed a demographic CRISIS no one’s talking about—that could spell the END of the party itself.
🧵 THREAD
Powerless. Rudderless. Leaderless.
The Democrat Party is in full-blown crisis mode.
Victor Davis Hanson just laid it all out, explaining why the party is in flames and heading into the midterms with no clear path forward.
When asked if Democrats could rally behind any coherent message before next November, Hanson went off.
He made it clear: they have nothing left except trying to destroy Donald Trump.
“Well, they only have one, unifying theme, and that is they all want to destroy, and they hate Donald Trump.”
Rather than offer voters a compelling new agenda, Hanson says they’ve devolved into distractions and circus acts…anything to avoid talking policy.
“So sometimes they hit watermelons, sometimes they do the filibuster, Cory Booker style. Sometimes they make those obscene videos, sometimes they kind of go crazy, but otherwise they’re not offering any counter agenda.”
He pointed out that even on core issues, they’ve abandoned offering real alternatives.
“They don’t say, well, we would prefer this on the border, and here’s what we’re going to do, or here’s why we should return to the New Green Deal.”
Instead, they’ve locked themselves into positions that only appeal to a small slice of the country…and they’re alienating the rest.
“They’re on 30 to 40% of every issue. They don’t own the House or the Senate or the White House or the Supreme Court.”
“So they lost the popular vote and the Electoral College, first time since 2004.”
And it’s not just political control they’ve lost…it’s their entire identity.
Hanson says the radical base has completely taken over the party, driving out any last semblance of moderation.
“So I think they’re very frustrated, and they’ve got this Jacobin radical base—and I’m not sure that’s the right term for it anymore—‘base’, because I think they’ve taken over the entire party.”
It only got worse from there.
Hanson laid out the brutal reality for Democrats heading into the midterms: every key indicator is flashing red.
“Every data point is negative for them.”
He explained that Republicans didn’t just gain 2 million voters, they did it while Democrats were losing them.
“They not only did not register as many, 2 million as the Republicans in additional registration, but they lost registration.”
And when voters flee the party, Americans are also physically fleeing blue states at a staggering rate.
“They’re bleeding about 5 million people a year, leaving the blue states.”
That’s just from the 30 states that track registration.
Hanson then dropped a NUKE on the party.
He went deeper into a long-term crisis few are even mentioning, the fertility collapse in deep blue states.
“In addition to that, if you look at the fertility rate long term, the top ten red states are up to 1.8 to 2, and the bottom of the 50 states down to 1.3 and 1.4 are all blue states.”
“So the long term is not good for them, and I think that is a lot of their hysterias.”
Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.
→ @VigilantFox
The numbers don’t lie.
According to CDC data from 2021, the top five states with the highest fertility rates are all solid red: South Dakota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Utah, and Alaska…all Trump 2024 states.
Meanwhile, the five lowest fertility states are deep blue: DC, Vermont, Rhode Island, Oregon, and Massachusetts…every single one won by Kamala Harris.
This trendline isn’t just about birth rates, it could reshape future elections entirely.
Fewer children, fewer future voters, and no real plan to reverse the trend other than importing illegals, which has been CRUSHED under President Trump.
It’s a demographic time bomb, and Democrats seem completely unprepared.
So if the long-term future is bleak, can Democrats turn to any “rising stars” to save them?
Hanson says don’t count on it, and then delivered a scathing takedown of the party’s most talked-about contenders.
First up: Pete Buttigieg.
Podcast host Tony Kinnett pointed out, a recent Echelon poll showed Buttigieg polling at 0% among Black voters.
Hanson didn’t mince words.
“Yes. He comes off as sanctimonious, self-righteous scorer of a elite scold.”
“He has no charismatic appeal to anybody, and so he’s not going to be—he’s not going to be a candidate.”
From there, Hanson turned to Gavin Newsom...and absolutely torched him.
“Gavin Newsom’s strategy, he thought, was to sound like the moderate candidate when he had Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon, and then he realized that he would never be nominated in this lunatic party.”
He walked through Newsom’s disastrous track record in California, from botched fire management to failed public infrastructure.
“So he’s got this disaster in the Palisades where they haven’t done anything. The whole thing was created by DEI people going to Uganda, the public works people not having hydrants that work, a reservoir was empty, they wouldn’t let people clear the brush.”
It just kept going.
Each disaster is an Ace up the sleeve of Newsom’s Republican rival, if he does plan to run in 2028.
Those campaign ads would be brutal.
“It was a self-created disaster and it’s now it’s even worse. They won’t allow them [to rebuild]. We got the highest taxes in the country, highest gas taxes, highest number of poor people.”
“It goes on and on.”
At the end of it all, Hanson explained why Democrats are acting so erratic.
They’re out of moves. The only card left to play is chaos.
“So I think their only strategy is just to create so much anger and hysteria and street theater about Trump that people will say to themselves, well, I don’t know who’s right. I don’t know who’s right, but I just can’t take it.”
“I’m in a fetal position. I have my hands over my ears. Just make it all go away.”
It’s a psychological operation…one that depends on Americans forgetting how they arrived here in the first place.
“Maybe it didn’t happen until Trump came. And their attitude is, well, it was legal to break the law and bring in 10 million [illegals] and that was an easy thing to do.”
“But for Trump to enforce the law, that’ll be amoral. And it’s very difficult to find the people we let in. So we’re going to stage these performance art protests against enforcing the law.”
“And people with amnesia will not remember that we broke the law.”
No plan. No message. Just distraction and denial.
Special thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack:
In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.
Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.
The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.
When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.
How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?
An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.
And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.
Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.
If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?
Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵
The medical establishment built its reputation on one phrase: the gold standard.
Randomized controlled trials were sold as the cleanest way to separate real medicine from wishful thinking.
But once a trial costs tens of millions of dollars, the question changes.
Who can afford to define what everyone thinks is the “truth”?
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can indeed be extremely useful.
They can detect small effects that individual doctors would never notice, like a slight increase in heart attacks or a modest reduction in symptoms across thousands of patients.
Clearly that has real value.
The problem begins when RCTs become the only evidence medicine is allowed to recognize.
Because once that happens, medicine stops asking a simple and important question: What actually helps patients?
Instead, it starts asking what can be patented, standardized, funded, pushed through regulators, published in major journals, and written into treatment guidelines?
The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”
“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.
“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”
But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵
Something strange has happened in modern medicine.
For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.
But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?
What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?
When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.
But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.
Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.
Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.
But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.
Romantic partners feel distant.
Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.
Emotional warmth is harder to find.
And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.
This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.
For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.
Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.
A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.
Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.
What happened?
His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.
ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”
“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”
“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”
“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”
“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”
“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”
“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”
“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”
“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”
“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”
Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.
But his mother attests it was the DMSO.
The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵
Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.
A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.
It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.
It acts more like a cellular reset.
And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”
“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”
“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.
The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”
Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.
And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵
Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.
When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.
Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.
But it is.
What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.
Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.
Take a moment to let that really sink in.
In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.
Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.
That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.
We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.
Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.
And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.
The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.
We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.
Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.
So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.
The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.
Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.
Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.
The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.
The website also highlights:
• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.
• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.
• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.
• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.
• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.
• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.
•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.
According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.