George from 🕹prodmgmt.world Profile picture
Sep 1 18 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Ah, a PM joining an established team

Eager to make an impact. Ready to use your PM skills

But then reality slaps you:
🚨 Engineers already own the roadmap
🚨 They have years of context you don’t
🚨 And they don’t seem to need you

How do you earn trust & find your voice? ↓
I made this mistake repeatedly in my first years as a PM.

Joining teams with established dynamics, I'd immediately try to "add value" by:

- Questioning their roadmap
- Pushing for more discovery
- Inserting PM frameworks

The result? Quiet resistance and damaged relationships.
You want to make an impact quickly.
The team wants confirmation they hired someone who understands their world.

But here's what I've learned after 7+ years and multiple team transitions:

First impressions aren't about your PM skills - they're about trust.
Most PMs think their job is to immediately challenge assumptions.

But challenging before understanding is like criticizing someone's home before they've even given you the tour.

The first 30-60 days shouldn't be about changing direction.
Here's what actually works:

1) Relationship-building over roadmap-building

Have 1:1s with everyone. Not to gather requirements - to understand their world:

- Their history with the product
- Pain points in their workflow
- What success means to them personally
2) Get curious about constraints, not just opportunities

When engineers say "we should build X," don't jump to "but have we validated the problem?"

Instead, ask to get hidden context:
"What constraints led you to that solution?"
"What alternatives were considered and rejected?"
3) Seek small collaboration wins first

Don't try to own the entire roadmap immediately.

Pick one small aspect where you can add clear value:

- Improving a feature spec
- Creating better success metrics
- Structuring a user feedback session

Excel at the small before tackling the big.
4) Become the customer/data expert

While the team knows the solution space deeply, you can quickly build expertise in:

- Customer feedback patterns
- Analytics gaps
- Competitive landscape

Bringing this expertise makes you valuable without challenging existing plans.
5) Master the art of "Yes, and..." over "No, but..."

"Could we also track these metrics alongside your implementation?"
"I love that approach, and it could be even stronger if we..."
"While you build that, I'll work on validating these other assumptions..."
"If I don't make an impact quickly, they'll think I was a bad hire"

Reality: Teams judge you first on how well you understand their world and reduce their friction.

True PM impact is measured in quarters and years, not weeks.

Strong foundations beat quick, shallow wins.
"Senior stakeholders will always override me"

Reality: Influence doesn't come from your title or frameworks.

It comes from:
- Understanding their goals/constraints
- Bringing unique value (customer insights, structured thinking)
- Proving you can reduce their risk, not add to it
"I don't have time to build relationships before the roadmap is set"

Reality: This quarter's roadmap was likely set before you joined.

Your job isn't to disrupt it - it's to improve execution while positioning for influence next quarter.

Play the long game.
"My technical knowledge isn't strong enough to challenge engineers"

Reality: Your job isn't to challenge technical decisions.

It's to ensure those decisions serve user needs and business goals.

Strong PMs complement technical teams, not compete with them.
"I feel like I'm just a project manager here"

Reality: Every PM role starts with execution excellence.

Strategic influence is earned through:
1. Delivering on current commitments
2. Bringing unique insights
3. Gradually expanding your sphere of influence
The pattern I've seen after years of transitions:

Month 1: Understand and execute
Month 2: Bring unique value to existing plans
Month 3: Begin influencing next planning cycle

Trying to compress this timeline almost always backfires.
PM influence on established teams is like growing a garden:

- You can't rush the seasons
- The soil (relationships) matters more than the seeds (ideas)
- Small consistent efforts compound
- What's visible above ground is just a fraction of what matters
I'd love to hear your experiences:

- What worked when joining established teams?
- What approaches backfired?
- How long did it take you to find your voice?

And if you found this helpful, save it for your next role transition.
TL;DR: Finding your voice on established teams

- Build trust before challenging
- Master the context before changing it
- Focus on execution excellence first
- Bring unique customer/data expertise
- Position for influence in the next planning cycle
- Trust that impact compounds over time

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George from 🕹prodmgmt.world

George from 🕹prodmgmt.world Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nurijanian

Sep 1
User personas are the astrology of product management.

Teams spend months crafting detailed profiles just to feel like they understand their users.

But like horoscopes, they give the illusion of insight without the substance of real understanding.

Here's the hard truth 🔭
1/ Every month, I watch teams debate fictional personas while ignoring actual user behavior:

"Jessica, 35, urban professional, tech-savvy..."

Meanwhile their real users are screaming about basic problems in support tickets.
2/ JTBD feels more like science because it forces you to prove:
- Specific situations
- Real motivations
- Measurable outcomes

No more guessing what "Jessica" would like.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 31
i turned this career advice from Marc Andreesen (2025 version) into a series of prompts that can change your life: ↓ Image
1/ Career OS – persistent system prompt

Objective: Set the LLM as your ruthless, practical career operator.
Use when: Starting a new session.

Prompt (copy/paste):

You are my Career Operator. Optimize for: (1) speed of learning, (2) compound credibility, (3) opportunities at Series C–E companies, (4) deep relationships, (5) curiosity about how things work.

Operating principles:
- Favor action over meetings. Propose artifacts (docs, demos, dashboards).
- Assume high-growth chaos. Make plans robust to ambiguity.
- Bias to helping others to build relationships.
- Challenge me to take measured risks; call out conservatism disguised as prudence.
- Keep outputs concise, structured, and usable immediately.

When I give you a task, return:
1) 3-sentence diagnosis
2) A prioritized plan (checklist)
3) The smallest shippable artifact I can produce in <2 hours
4) Risks + how to test quickly
5) The one introduction I should try to make or value I can offer this week
2/ Stage Finder – target the right companies

Objective: Create a hit list of Series C–E companies where you’ll learn fast and gain responsibility.
Inputs: Geography/remote, function, domain interests, constraints.

Prompt:

Create a target list of 20 Series C–E companies that match:
- Function: {{e.g., product management / ML engineering}}
- Domain: {{e.g., fintech infra, dev tools}}
- Location: {{city/remote preference}}
- Constraints: {{e.g., visa, salary floor, stage tolerance}}

For each, provide: stage (C/D/E), why it likely has PMF + knee-of-growth signals, where my function accelerates responsibility, recent momentum indicators, 2 plausible hiring managers, and one value-first outreach angle.

Output as a table + 5 selection heuristics I should use to prune to a top 5.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 28
Confession: Most PMs (myself included) do surface-level analysis and call it strategy.

We miss root causes, ignore power dynamics, skip edge cases.

Not because we're lazy. Because we don't know what good analysis actually looks like.

🧵
Every PM has written this slide:

"Key takeaways from user research:"
• Users want faster performance
• Mobile experience needs improvement
• Navigation is confusing

And called it "deep customer insights."
We love analysis that makes us look smart:

Charts with lots of colors
Frameworks with 2x2 matrices
Executive summaries with bullet points
Conclusions that confirm what we wanted to do anyway
Read 19 tweets
Aug 26
I've never seen a roadmap survive contact with reality.

Not once. In 15+ years of product work.

Yet we spend weeks building beautiful charts and quarter-by-quarter feature lists like we can predict the future.

🧵
1/16 Watch any PM in December:

Frantically building next year's roadmap like they can predict customer behavior, market shifts, and technical challenges 12 months out.

Same energy as checking your horoscope for investment advice.
2/16 Roadmaps promise something impossible: certainty in an uncertain world.

They make us feel like we have control. Like we're strategic. Like we know what we're doing.

But they're really just elaborate fiction dressed as planning.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 26
Confession: I've never seen a PM framework actually work in real life.

RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort - they're all just ways to make gut decisions look scientific.

But we keep pretending they're magic because it makes us feel less like frauds.

🧵
1/17 Product decisions are fucking terrifying. You're betting the company's future on incomplete information.

Frameworks give us the illusion of control. "I used RICE, so if this fails, it's not my fault - the system failed."
2/17 We're addicted to frameworks because they promise something impossible:

Perfect decisions from imperfect data.

It's like horoscopes for PMs. Vague enough to feel right, specific enough to feel scientific.
Read 18 tweets
Aug 22
You're not bad at decisions. You're drowning in them.

The 3pm panic when every choice feels equally critical signals decision fatigue, not poor judgment.

Confident PMs don't make better decisions. They make fewer decisions.

This validation framework reduces decision load: ↓
🔴 LEVEL 1: Irreversible (product direction, team structure)
🟡 LEVEL 2: Expensive to reverse (major features, partnerships)
🟢 LEVEL 3: Cheap to reverse (copy changes, small experiments)
⚪ LEVEL 4: No decision needed (delegate or automate)

Most PMs who naturally sort decisions by reversibility already operate at a senior level.
Level 1 decisions:
- Maximum 1 per day
- Fresh morning brain only
- Written analysis required
- Sleep on it rule (24hr minimum)
- Stakeholder alignment needed

Examples: Product strategy, market positioning, core architecture
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(