All the "IQ Discourse" doesn't take into account that above the median, IQ is diminishing returns-- elite midwits are the only people interested in just accumulating money & status for its own sake-- the highest IQ person I ever met was a "mentally ill" homeless person.
IQ is also correlated with executive function-- if you have really high executive function your basic principle is "leave me alone" & not wanting to have to follow orders. Lao Tzu was more high IQ than Confucius, & Confucius essentially admits this when he refuses the call to be emperor-- being emperor sucks, any extremely intelligent person would do everything to avoid that imposition on life. The highest IQ person in the world probably plays video games all day & schemes the disability system. The only people interested in public acclaim in the form of status & money are midwits.
This "mentally ill" homeless person got free money from the government to spend all day doing whatever he wanted to do, which was mostly reading & playing RTS games on his laptop. This was in a homeless shelter in Cambridge MA.
All his meals were paid for, he had a place to sleep, he had his laptop & he did whatever he felt like all day & laughed at everyone else. To put it this way "he was perpetually traveling and staying in hostels, didn't need a job"-- this is how you'd have to explain the appeal to midwits. "He was freer than either of us."
Oh wow you're so high IQ that you passed your LSATs & then took out debt to become a lawyer & now you're a corporate lawyer-- this homeless guy took the LSATs for fun & went back to playing Starcraft.
Nikola Telsa was more interested in his pigeons than in money or status. That's what actually "high IQ" looks like-- it doesn't look like "respectable normal high status wealthy" person-- it looks indistinguishable from "crazy homeless person."
That's the funny thing-- there's a bell curve, where it becomes difficult for the median to distinguish the poles-- is that person a genius or are they retarded? Hard to tell from the peak of mediocrity, where you're rewarded with status & wealth.
It's just funny to see "high IQ" associated with fucking JD Vance & other midwits like that these days. Oh wow he went to Yale, does that impress you fucking rubes? Yalies are retards. I know from experience, I have to have dinner with them.
The most "blackpilling" thing for midwits would be to enter the hallowed halls of their "elite high iq" conceptions of institutions. I was talking to a multimillionaire Silicon Valley wife the other day & her husband just watches Star Wars movies in his man cave.
Meanwhile, when I worked on an assembly line packaging fucking desserts there was this grad school drop out "bohemian" guy & we'd talk about Heidegger while packaging pies. His other job was working at a used book store. He was better read than any "elite" person I've met since.
What is it that these people in the "IQ" discourse really want? They want money & status. They wouldn't want "IQ" if it didn't provide them either of those things or hampered it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The funny thing about America is that the most honest people are the hedge fund managers. They don't bullshit you-- they say "the defense of my class interest is paramount." They tell you what they actually believe.
Now, a Politician who is backed by hedge fund managers (etc)-- they have to be very careful with their lies, they can't tell you their job is to serve the hedge fund managers (etc)-- they tell you something else, which is a lie.
What does Trump think? It doesn't really matter because if he runs afoul of the hedge fund managers he'll say the opposite next week. The hedge fund managers don't change their tune though. They will say "Trump is a retard" & then donate to him & when he's dead they'll piss on his grave.
Aliens: Earth is funny because all its engagement with 70s/80s scifi film canon is done rather tastefully & with subtlety— when it wants to make a literary reference, it has to hammer you over the head constantly to make it stick. You could have just named her “Wendy” & called them “The Lost Boys”— that was enough.
Look it’s a Peter Pan reference— you know because they hold the book in front of your face & read it & before that they show you the Disney animation— so it’s like a reveal that the book exists. I guess this is what it takes with modern audiences.
Meanwhile Timothy Oliphant is clearly meant to be Roy Batty & there’s a metatextual debate here about the metaphysical stakes of what makes a human a human & Hawley is trying to tastefully sublate Ridley Scott in a similar way as Blade Runner 2049– & that’s just communicated by wardrobe etc
All this "Eddington discourse" & no one is talking about tribal sovereignty in the US being used to build data centers in the same way it was used to build casinos after the 70s-- they're talking about if poking fun at White Girls doing BLM Activism is ontologically evil lol
People are still reading it as a "black comedy about 2020" & not a WESTERN. It's a WESTERN. It's Cowboys & Injuns! tribalbusinessnews.com/sections/energ…
“Really beginning with the Carter administration, when he was promoting immigration as a means of cutting wages in the southwest. It was Carter that began to realize that, well, there’s a lot of labor that’s making too much money in the southwest, we’ll spur immigration.” - Michael Hudson
To push inflation into assets rather than wages you need mass immigration.
What’s wrong with wage inflation? It means you have a stronger working class. Who benefits from that? The working class. Who loses? The “asset owning class.”
The status quo is a result of deindustrialization policies promoted by the Thatcherites to produce the status quo— yes, now there are only individuals, proletarians have been converted into petty bourgeois “individual contract workers” etc.
The most telling quote is “this working class business is in the past”— where are the proletarians now? Not so much in the center of the empire— we now have a “service” dominated economy of unproductive menial servants— servants are petty bourgeois, the bartender for instance is a great representative of the mercenary individualist petty bourgeois.
You don’t join the Trucker Union now, you are an “individual contractor” with your sole proprietor trucking llc. Legislatively this bourgeois socialist empire has done all it can to liquidate the proletariat as a class. That is its primary goal— to eliminate the proletariat.
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
Wouldn't this be taken as heretical by pretty much all Christian denominations now? That a subsequent Christian could be equal to, if not surpass, Jesus Christ himself in works?
This is my issue with debating about "philosophical theological Christianity" -- Christianity is not some finished product-- go read these books yourself, try to figure out what's going on there with all your sophisticated technology, your centuries of scholarship-- what is going on in John 14:12?
The humility of Christ regarding himself is not appreciated enough-- the paradox-- (though he never said of himself that he was any different than anyone else)-- Jesus Christ spoke very cryptically, very metaphorically, with much irony-- what he says here is completely serious.