Since we focus on value add, the entry cap doesn’t matter, as long as we can service our debt
The stabilized yield matters because it shows the intrinsic cash flow of the deal
The stabilized yield is the stabilized (post-renovation) NOI divided by all the costs in the deal
Very simple calculation (see below for an example) but very important
We typically need to get to at least a 150 bp spread between the stabilized yield and the market cap rate for a deal to pencil (ex if market cap rate is 5%, need a minimum 6.5% stabilized yield)
For example, buy for an in-place 4 cap, increase revenue to get to a 6.5, sell for a 5 cap. If you buy for $10MM with an NOI of $400k, put in $2MM in renovations and bump the NOI to $780k, you stabilize at a 6.5 yield ($780k/$12MM)
Property is then worth $15.6MM ($780k/5% market cap), for a profit of $3.6MM
Speed matters as well (quicker the better for IRR)
Stabilized yield is a more important metric than IRR because it displays the intrinsic value of the cash flow
Whereas IRR is a bet on the state of the capital markets (debt financing available) at sale as well as cap rates at sale, which basically makes it a total guess
2. Basis (you can show us any IRR you want and we’ll toss the deal if the basis is bad)
What does this mean? It means that you want to look at comps and make sure that in any deal you buy, you’re paying less than the market average
For example, multifamily is valued per unit
So if you take 10 comps and the average price is $100k/unit, you want to be buying for well under that number
Otherwise (barring the real estate being markedly better), you’re not getting a good deal, you’re simply paying “market”
Furthermore that means, in order to sell for a profit, the next buyer will actually have to pay you “above market”. Which is a dangerous bet to make - you’re essentially betting on a “greater fool”, which brings us to the next metric
3. Exit basis: This is heavily tied to #2 - you don’t want to invest in deals where the projected exit basis is significantly above current the market basis
For example, if the current market basis is $100k/unit, you’d want to buy for $60k/unit and pencil a sale at $80k/unit
That gives you a lot of breathing room and allows the next buyer to make money as well
Know this is all easier said than done, but this is how disciplined underwriting works
4. Unlevered vs levered returns (IRR):
This is just a gut check to make sure that our leverage isn’t out of control
Basically you want to check to make sure that the levered returns aren’t drastically different than the levered returns
Otherwise you don’t have a good deal, you just have a lot of leverage
5. Equity Multiple:
Only check this to make sure that they’ll be enough profit for the deal to be worth it (no point in 20% IRR and 1.2x EM - waste of time)
6. Cash-on-cash:
A lot of amateur investors emphasize cash on cash returns but it’s a far less important metric than stabilized yield because it’s reliant on the debt capital markets at any point in time, which isn’t intrinsic to the property
So it’s “downstream” of the yield
It’s also less important for quick flips (which is predominantly what PE firms do) because a lot of units turn over during the stabilization process, which results in choppier revenue for those years
We essentially ignore this metric and expect cashflow to be very low during the hold period (unless we’re working with a specific LP who wants to optimize for cashflow)
Often even have to make (planned) capital calls and have earn-outs built into debt covenants to inject more capital for a value-add aspect of a deal (ex. tenant buildout)
7. Components of NOI:
Then you look at the cash flow itself
What are the components of the rev? What are the components of the expenses? What risks could cause major fluctuations in either one? Are you willing to accept these risks?
How do these risks compare to other deals?
You want to make sure you going into each deal with eyes wide open
There’re risks to every deal (that’s unavoidable) but you want to make sure the deal makes sense on a risk-adjusted basis
And you want to make sure there are downside mitigants and multiple exit options
Lastly, this isn’t really a metric, but the most important part of our analysis is whether the deal is actually viable on a risk-adjusted basis and whether the property is actually good real estate
Investing in only *great* RE has allowed us to outperform
If you want to make real money in real estate but don’t know where to start,
Apply in the next post for the Acquisitions Bootcamp where I’ll work 1-on-1 with you to find you a profitable deal
If you don’t have a deal within 2 months, I will work for free until you do
Acquisitions Bootcamp is an 8-week program where you work 1-on-1 with me to craft an investment strategy to fit your skillset, resources & goals - & then find you a deal to fit that strategy
One of the biggest places beginners get tripped up is the property tour. They don’t know what to look for and they don’t know what anything costs
Here’s what to look for when touring a property so you can accurately price the renovation costs:
Generally a renovation for a Class C 1-bed unit costs me $10k-$15k
Below are the items I focus on when touring to maximize rent and minimize cost
You should think about the property in the 3 categories outlined below 1. Bathroom (~$5k) 2. Kitchen (~$8k, grouping in all appliances & materials) 3. Floors/Paint/Other (~$2k)
Bathroom 1. Shower/Tub: What’s there right now? Do you have to rip everything out or can you reglaze or tile over? Does the shower valve & fixture need replacing? Will you tile the shower or install an acrylic shell? [Costs to redo can run you between $250 & $2.5k] 2. Floor: Are you going to tile the bathroom or run LVP? Can you run the LVP over what’s there now? [LVP is going to run you ~$5/SF & tile will run you $7-15/SF] 3. Toilet/vanity/mirror/lights: Do you need new ones? [Price materials online, the labor for installation should be minimal (~$50-100/item)] 4. Extras: Do you want to add something extra to increase longevity or attractiveness? Embellish walls (tile, shiplap, wainscoting), shower niche, sliding glass shower door, stone countertop, shower ledge, etc [Here costs can get out of control. Way to avoid this is to look at the comps achieving the market rent in your market. Only renovate to that scope & do nothing more. Additional renovations won’t get you a higher rental rate]
What's the relationship between cap rate, return on cost, and stabilized yield?
This is arguably the most important relationship in real estate and most people don’t understand it at all
It’s actually really simple
Let’s start with the basics:
- The cap rate is the NOI divided by the purchase price. When you buy a deal, you buy it for an in-place cap rate
- The return on cost is the NOI increase of a specific action (usually a renovation) divided by the cost of that renovation
- The stabilized yield is the new NOI divided by all the costs in the deal
Stabilized yield is an extension of the cap rate through the duration of the deal by adding the NOI changes to the numerator and by adding the additional costs to the denominator of the formula
For example, if a property was purchased for $1MM and the NOI was $100k, the *cap rate* would be 10% ($100k NOI / $1MM PP)
If you executed a $100k renovation and that increased the rents and therefore the NOI by $20k, the *return on cost* of that specific renovation would be 20%
($20k NOI increase / $100k renovation cost)
Then you add the NOI increase to the numerator ($100k + $20k = $120k) and the cost increase to the denominator ($1MM + $100k = $1.1MM)
Which leads to the *stabilized yield* being 10.9% ($120k new NOI / $1.1MM total costs in the deal)
So you take the initial cap rate and add in each return on cost action (the new revenue gets added to the numerator and the new costs get added to the denominator) to get to the stabilized yield
It’s that simple. People try and complicate RE a lot but it’s literally division
1. Go to tertiary market 2. Find a product type that’s profitable to build 3. Check zoning code and figure out the zoning that allows for that product type 4. Reach out to every property zoned for that use but currently operating as a *different* use 5. Buy, profit
// THREAD //
This takes the “off-market property” strategy one step further
The issue with most off-market strategies is that the owner actually has some idea of the value of the property
For example, most owners know approximately what a multifamily property should be worth in the area
That’s because of three reasons
1. They can base the value off the in-place cashflow 2. They can base the value off comps (and there’s always a ton of multifamily comps) 3. They can call up a broker to tell them what the value should be (and the broker will actually know)
This isn’t to say you can’t get multifamily properties for a discount off-market (you absolutely can)
Just that it’s harder to get a steep discount on them because the market for them is so transparent
The brilliance of the strategy laid out above, however, is that the market becomes a black hole when you switch uses (ex from industrial to self storage)
It works so well because the owner legitimately has no idea what the value of their land should be once you change uses
The valuation methods used above no longer work
1. The owner can’t base the new value off the in-place cashflow because the cashflow obviously changes when you change uses
2. There are barely any comps for switching uses and the ones that exist are almost impossible to look up
Anyone can look up a multifamily sale, how many unsophisticated owners can look at sales in their market and ascertain which properties have switched uses?
My guess is literally zero
3. Brokers (especially in tertiary markets) have no clue how to value a property when you switch uses so the off-market seller can’t even go to them for advice
For example, a property I’m prospecting off-market is currently operating as 3,000 SF owner-occupied industrial facility
But it sits on 10 acres and can accommodate ~200k SF of self-storage. The owner has no idea
I get asked all the time “how do you choose a market” & to be honest it’s pretty simple
Instead of approaching it from the statistical jargon perspective, I approach it from the “can I actually find a deal in this market” perspective
Here’s how I choose a market to invest in:
First let’s talk about how institutions look at deals & why it doesn’t make sense to look at deals that way as a smaller investor
Way I see it, there’re 2 strategies when choosing a market
1. “rising tide lifts all boats” 2. search for dislocations/discounts
Strategy 1 is used by institutions who need to deploy a lot of capital
This involves them playing “economist”. They need to find markets with high population growth, rent growth & appreciation
They operate in a competitive segment of the mkt ($20MM+) & it’s difficult to pick up assets for a “discount” in that range
So instead, they have to find mkts where competitors are underpricing future growth
This is dangerous since if you guess wrong, it could be a disaster. But institutions are built for this as they have analysts & data they can use to correctly pick the next high-growth mkt
As a smaller investor, you don’t. You have no edge over large firms. It’s not a smart place to compete
But as a smaller investor you don’t need to deploy a lot of capital
So you can use strategy #2
Instead of playing economist, you search for the least competitive mkts, where there’re the most pricing dislocations &, therefore the most discounts
Basically I look for the market with the least competition that’s stable
// Choosing a Market //
Ignore the data & focus on making money (finding markets where you can stabilize over the market cap rate)
A 4 step process:
Step 1: Look for cities/towns under 250k pop
Step 2: Vet supply
Step 3: Vet demand
Step 4: Make sure there’re mispricings
You want to start your own real estate private equity firm but you don’t know how much it’ll cost
Here’s how to think about start-up costs:
There are basically 2 ways to set up a real estate private equity firm
1. First way is to start a fund. This means you raise the money first and find the deals later
2. The second way is to operate deal-by-deal, which means you only raise money for specific deals as you need it
Starting a fund involves a ton of legal costs, compliance costs, administrative costs
Wouldn’t recommend even thinking about this path unless you’re planning on raising a lot of money ($50MM+)
It involves a ton of startup costs and a ton that can go wrong
So I’d recommend option 2 instead: operating deal-by-deal
It allows you way more flexibility with how you operate
It also involves minimal startup costs. Why’s this? Because all the “startup costs” are layered on the deals themselves (which investors pay for), not your firm
Legal costs are registered as “deal costs” for the specific deal
“Administrative costs” are the asset management fees you receive yearly
You’re able to off-load your startup costs onto each deal, meaning that your actual startup costs are very low (sub $25k if you do it right)
This means that the hardest part isn’t the startup costs. It’s the *ongoing costs*
Real estate is a long game. It takes years for a deal to pan out (even a great deal)
How’re you going to put food on the table in the mean time?
That’s the main question you have to answer
You can’t eat IRR - you need money to live off of before your first deals sell
And you need money to invest as a co-invest into any new deals (REPE GPs usually contribute ~10% of the equity). So you have to get creative
You basically have 4 options to “navigate” this tricky initial period