In August the Russians occupied 430 sqkm of Ukrainian territory. This is down from the 502 sqkm in July.
However, looking at the numbers alone does not give a full picture of the Russian operations. Over the second half of August the situation became increasingly dynamic.
In the area of the Dnipropetrovsk border, the Ukrainians conducted a tactical counterattack, pushing Russia away from ~50sqkm of territory.
The area in orange was our assessment of Russian control on the 15th of August overlaid on current frontline.
In the Dobropillya direction the RU managed to breach the UA front to the depth of up to 16km and Ukraine was forced to divert forces from other sectors to prevent a breakthrough.
Assessed UA control on the 16th in purple, RU in orange. Current assessment in red/blue.
Without an operational level response from the UA, the Russians may have consolidated their gains on a much larger area.
Positions changing hands is not new, it happens constantly, but the scale of the the back and forth we saw in August was uncommon for this point in the war.
Thus downwards trend in gains from July is not necessarily indicative of Russian offensive operations winding down, but rather of successful Ukrainian tactical and operational responses to Russian advances throughout the second half of the month.
As the front becomes more porous it's possible that dynamics like these become more common, even as the Russian operations continue at a similar pace.
At the same time the Russian forces failed to make any significant operational gains over the summer months.
This lack of results over the summer likely lead to the reorganization and repositioning of forces over the last weeks of July, happening simultaneously with the Ukrainian counterattacks.
It's likely that Russian operations continue with largely similar tempo into the autumn.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We have updated the map to reflect the emerging situation in the Kursk salient, where recent Russian offensive have forced the Ukrainians to withdraw from large areas.
The northern part of the salient has been abandoned, with Russians capturing Malaya Lokanaya.
1/
According to Russian sources the Ukrainians had rotated some units out of the salient earlier. It's possible that the Ukrainians were preparing for larger withdrawals.
Recent Russian operations may have started as an pre-emptive attempt to disrupt any Ukrainian withdrawal.
2/
Russian actions throughout the area of operations seem coordinated, further reinforcing the assessment that instead of reacting to a sudden Ukrainian withdrawal, the Russians have the initiative and are forcing the Ukrainians to react to their operations.
3/
Why does our @J_JHelin keep rejecting the "human waves" narrative, instead calling the reported North Korean attacks in Kursk "basic infantry drills"?
Let’s dive into light infantry on the attack and why this distinction matters.
1/
What is light infantry?
At its core, light infantry are troops that:
Operate on foot in combat.
Have little to no support from vehicles.
Move organic support (mortars, MGs) on foot or trucks. Rely primarily on infantry weapons to fight.
Pictured: Finnish Jäger Company
2/
To put it in perspective:
Most WWII infantry would be classified as “light” today. No armored vehicles, minimal mechanization, and reliant on basic infantry tactics.
Modern light infantry is generally built for flexibility, not brute force, at least in the west.
With the news of ceasefire between IDF and Hamas, we're sharing some of our observations. We focus on military situation on the ground in Gaza based on open sources.
This is a short thread about the situation on the ground during the past month. /1
Background in short:
After Oct 7th attack by Hamas, highest casualty terror attack on Israels soil, IDF conscripted a record amount of troops from it's reserve: ~360 000 pax, whom were deployed to directions of Gaza, Blue Line, Golan Heights and West Bank. 2/
Oct 27th IDF started a ground assault on Northern Gaza. The attack begun from three directions by at least two divisions.
Attacking force consisted of mainly armored- and infantry brigades enforced with fe. land moving capabilities. 3/