Wait a minute - do you REALLY want me to write this thread?
Haven't I smashed enough idols yet?
Ok, if you insist...
There's no doubt that Monica is attractive. The question is whether she's a good ROLE MODEL for women who want to seduce. And the answer is usually NO.
Monica is the mistress of sophisticated elegance with a noir touch. And that's the HARDEST seduction style to pull off. Men don't actually like it that much. It's just that Monica does it so exceptionally well that they like it IN HER CASE.
Even Monica struggles against a serious attack of the cute.
So when women take Monica as a role model they're implicitly saying:
1. I want to seduce in the hardest possible way 2. With a style men don't actually care for that much 3. Even though it's very unlikely that I have what it takes 4. Even though there are other, easier ways
When you stop being distracted by how well Monica pulls this off, you'll notice that each of the points 1-4 above are individually dubious choices, and all four points taken together are pretty much insane.
So as you can see, it's entirely possible for Monica to be very attractive and an excellent seductress, but STILL a bad role model for women.
Meanwhile, the easy money is being left on the table.
In fact, basically every seduction style is easier. Not just bubbly. For instance, what about a little sass and spunk?
Sure, women might be impressed that Monica aged so well. But here's Salma doing sass and spunk at 58.
In short, Monica is so good at her particular high-wire act that it makes other women think they can walk the same tightrope. But very few can - and it's not even the most popular act at the circus.
Stop making your life harder than it needs to be, girls. Learn MUCH EASIER and more effective ways to seduce - right here.
Americans are being ripped off by low taxes. Wait - LOW taxes? Yes, low taxes.
Healthcare costs are skyrocketing to a significant extent because the US is insisting on a weird private insurance model instead of just taxing.
Building energy code is forcing huge costs on new...
homes that are very inefficient with respect to their stated goals. If reducing carbon is the goal, it would be cheaper and more cost effective just to build cleaner power plants instead of overregulating construction.
The results of the above are wasteful and clear for all to see. Thus, they erode trust in government. The irony is that this distrust makes Americans want to insist even harder on not solving these problem through taxation.
In other words, psychological lock-in, to a bad system.
Ideal tropical design that is extremely energy efficient - but illegal in America because the windows are not double-glazed. Very stupid energy code.
You probably don't believe me, so here's Grok. American performance modeling assumes no ventilation from windows and requires them to be double-glazed instead (unnecessary, expensive).
American performance modeling ALSO doesn't reward good building geometry.
This is a travesty and makes no sense in ANY state.
The large majority of men can never be fully satisfied with their relationships if their women don't make explicit efforts to please them. But it has now become a point of modern ideology that women should never make such efforts. The result is predictable. What's in it for men?
Let me explain further. Human nature is such that when all things are equal, men experience more desire and women experience more pleasure. This observation goes back to the ancient Greeks. We don't notice this unless we pay explicit attention to it. Why?
Markets are driven by desire, not pleasure. In fact, markets often fail to serve pleasure and instead create pain. Consider consumerism. People buy things that don't bring them enough pleasure to justify the expense. They have a craving similar to an addiction.
Men never disliked dyed hair for fundamental reasons. It's common in artistic representations of very attractive women. They disliked it because they associated it with bad personalities and bad politics. So as soon as Amelia changes that, they're good to go.
Also, more chokers please.
Learn more in the definitive account of feminine beauty:
Can AI answer the oldest question in the world? In this sciencey thread we're going to find out.👇
Let's start with some peer-reviewed data. Everyone loves peer reviewed data!🧪
So, apparently men typically last 10-20 seconds while women last 20-60.
Ok, seems reasonable at first blush.
But... you might have noticed those numbers are different. By a factor of almost THREE.
Hmm...
I was a bit surprised by this so I asked ChatGPT to check the data three different times in two different sessions. And, it came up with very similar answers each time.