Greg Bagwell Profile picture
Sep 3, 2025 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The UK’s Carrier Strike Group is about to conduct a transit of the South China Sea after its time in Japan. It now finds itself having to manage a complex and changing diplomatic context. Is this crunch time for UK strategy & credibility in the region? - a🧵1/8 Image
Image
2/ The S. China Sea is a contested region because of China’s claim of a wider EEZ, demarked by the so-called 9-Dash line, and their “designs” on Taiwan. Their actions around Taiwan, in particular, are increasingly active, hostile and encroaching. Image
Image
Image
3/ This period is notable for the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting, where the ties between China, Russia & India were clear for all to see. It was followed by China’s biggest ever military parade Image
4/ US policy towards any and all of the SCO countries is unpredictable and worsening, especially in the case of India. Also, Trump’s tariffs are harsher against Indo-Pac region states - friend & foe, so it’s not clear how alliances will develop in the region. Image
Image
5/ The UK is on the horns of a dilemma, with a major military deployment to the region, it is about to embark on a trade visit to China that takes on even greater relevance with stretched finances back home. There are rumours that the MoD & FCDO have differing views on options. Image
Image
6/ Because those options are: 1️⃣ Transit CAG quietly, well clear of the Taiwan Straits. 2️⃣ Send at least one warship through the straits to conduct freedom of navigation (although we conducted one recently in June). China gets a vote too of course and they will respond. Image
7/ Hard core Maritime enthusiasts will vote for 2️⃣, but the only sensible option in the National Interest is 1️⃣. But regional actors are watching too, and the UK has to sail a fine line between upholding International Law, and not upsetting trade talks/relations with China.
8/ The UK is about to discover, that whilst you can use military deployments for soft power effect, you can’t ghost hard power under a soft power cloak as and when you choose. We should be ready for some Chinese taunting of any show of strength and regional ambition.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Bagwell

Greg Bagwell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gregbagwell

Jan 20
1/10 Here’s a handy thread about NATO funding that may prove useful when confronted by an innumerate American, who thinks Europe owes them a refund. NATO has two principal means of funding: Direct and Indirect. nato.int/en/what-we-do/…Image
2/10 Direct funding pays for common NATO budgets. It amounts to c$4Bn and is shared out using an agreed formula based around gross national income. The US pays a 16% share as does Germany, other notables are: France & UK 10%, Italy 8%, Spain & Canada 6%. usafacts.org/articles/what-…
3/10 Next comes the more significant but far more variable Indirect funding. This is the infamous 2% rule (now raised to 5% by 2035 at the Vilnius Summit in 2025), where all nations have pledged to spend a minimum of 2% of GDP on defence. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 3, 2025
The UK’s F-35s are under the microscope. But you need to cast your mind back to the 1998 SDR when the Joint Combat Aircraft (JCA) programme was formally announced alongside the decision to build two new aircraft carriers. But in the noise a few facts are forgotten. A JCA 🧵1/10 Image
2/ The F-35 debate often centres around the Carriers and its Air Wing, but the letter J in JCA is often ignored. So what was around in 1998, and what was being replaced. Well the 2 x Invincible class Carriers were being replaced by 2 x much larger QEC class - the good news. But…
3/ The FAA had two small, under strength Sea Harrier squadrons (later to merge with the RAF Harriers and adopt the GR7 in JFH). And the RAF had 11 IDS Tornado and 3 Harrier squadrons. And all of this was eventually to be replaced by the 3 squadrons of JSF. A case of 16 into 3!
Read 10 tweets
Oct 18, 2025
In a recent interview with @MishalHusain for @business, Nigel Farage, in trying to play down his Russian links, referred to his speech in the European Parliament where he predicted war with Russia. Seeing as he brought it up its worth a closer look.🧵1/5
2/ He spoke in Sept 14, seven months after Russia annexed Crimea. But, he appears to be predicting a war with NATO rather than an invasion of Ukraine - an important distinction. This of course has been a consistent Kremlin line to try and warn off any NATO assistance in Ukraine.
3/ He even comments in the speech about removing NATO troops from exercises in Ukraine. What he is referring to is a NATO agreed policy to strengthen support to Ukraine after Crimea’s annexation. So Farage is speaking out against NATO policy here. nato.int/nato_static_fl…Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 16, 2025
As Nathan Gill’s sentencing date approaches for bribery by Russian agents when serving as an elected MEP, it’s worth noting that he wasn’t the then BREXIT party’s only link to Russia. So, the question is how much further did it go? 🧵1/17 Image
Image
2/ Gill has admitted 8 counts of bribery between 6/12/18 and 18/07/19. He was handled by Oleg Voloshyn, although his wife Nadia Sass (aka Borodi) was never far away. They both worked on behalf of Ukrainian pro-Russian politician Viktor Medvedchuk, a personal friend of Putin. Image
Image
3/ There have been photographs and other links between these two characters and other members of the Brexit Party at the time, but only Gill has been formally charged with any crime. Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Aug 12, 2025
A stark appraisal of the state of the RN. But we must be wary of playing victim here and learn lessons as to what a Service must do to thrive . Because the underlying issues identified here are not unique to the RN. Let’s explore where and how it can and does go wrong: 🧵1/18
2/ OVER- AMBITION: is a killer, it’s ok to have a vision or aspiration, but if your plans exceed your budget you have no margin of safety. And the first clue that it’s not going to work is when you start fitting “for and not with”, because you can only afford the former. Image
3/ IGNORING THE BASICS: Under investing in your core services and capabilities to afford more shiny kit has only one outcome, unless you have a recovery plan and can mitigate the additional costs of that recovery. But it’s a slippery slope that is hard to come back from. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 28, 2025
There is a lot of commentary on this rather alarming video of a fly past that very nearly had a tragic ending. Lots of theories out there - here’s mine! I’ll use snapshots from the second video to explain what I think happened. Spoiler alert: I think it was pilot error.🧵1/7
2/ An EF-18 of the Spanish Air Force was performing at the Gijón Air Festival held on Sunday July 27 over San Lorenzo Bay in Asturias, Spain: it’s not clear if it was meant to be a full display or an “enthusiastic” flypast - I suspect the latter. festivalaereogijon.com/#programaImage
Image
3/ The aircraft approaches from the North and follows the coastline of the grassy promontory (see below). There are a few birds around but I don’t think they are a factor. As the pilot points at the beach they should just reverse the turn to follow the coastline, but they don’t Image
Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(