@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX Doubtful Jefferson, Adams or founders of Texas would like this letter.

No ironclad authorities to compel obedience were used eg provisions in Texas Constitution generally, Article 1 Bill of Rights or specifically the people as in Art 1 Sec 2 where we claim all political power.
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX Texas Constitution Article 1 Section 2

“All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. …”
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX “The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.“
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX We done noticed y’all numerous times & ways to alter, reform & instead we get doubled down upon.

Get rid of govt disfranchisement IN ANY MANNER on our inalienable property which includes ALL our rights.

Y’all agreed to these terms by your oath per TX Art 1 Sec 19:
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX “No citizen of this State shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due course of the law of the land.“
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX Incontrovertible Maxims of Law applicable to numerous actions of Texas Art 3 & Art 4 against the people.

Delays in law are odious.
Branch’s Maxims of Law 5ed

The law always abhors delays.
Coke’s 2nd Institute 240

Law is established for the benefit of man.
Black’s Law 2ed 577.
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX According to the laws of nature, it is just that no one should be enriched through detriment and injury to another, i.e., at another's expense.

Digest of Justinian 50, 17, 200.
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX The law of God and the law of the land are all one; and both preserve and favor the private rights to the land.

Keilway’s English King’s Bench Reports
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX I could go on for a while but the people see a govt taking property from some people for various other ESP GOVT ITSELF w/o strict observance of TX Art 1 Sec 19, which incls precisely & specifically common law courts using Maxims such as I included.

Texas govt not in compliance.
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX A final maxim on that last.

“The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government.”
Common Law Maxim

If Texas govt does not obey the law in TX Art 1 Sec 2, then it SHALL reconstitute. IMMEDIATELY not next year or five years or w/e.

Now.
@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX @threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Who Made In-A-Lien-able Rights A-Lien-able?

Who Made In-A-Lien-able Rights A-Lien-able? Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WhitherTheBoR

Aug 22
@brianeharrison While Mr Harrison posts a lot on X about the takeover of Texas legislature, I have yet to see him acknowledge that TX Const Art 8 Sec 1 Ad Valorem taxes as applied to Texans’ private affairs ie homes are flat out unconstitutional & MUST cease forthwith.

@brianeharrison -

I’ll take another related path thru TX Constitution showing maladministration of taxing powers by TX Art 3 Legislature & Art 4 Executive.

Let’s start in Art 8 Sec 1, the Ad Valorem aka property tax aka AVT provision, from where all later AVT actions by govt are derived

cont:
@brianeharrison -

Art8 Sec1 Subsection(b)

All real property and tangible personal property in this State, unless exempt as required or permitted by this Constitution, whether owned by natural persons or corporations, other than municipal,

cont:
Read 26 tweets
Aug 15
@brianeharrison Not property tax relief but remedy, per Black’s Law 4th.

Relief extends & pretends some reducted TX Art 8 Sec 1 applied to the people does not violate TX Art 1 Secs 19 & 29 ie unconstitutional.

Remedy eliminates applying Art 8 Sec 1 to the people

@brianeharrison Property ie rights guarantees in TX Art I Sec 19 “except by the due course of the law of the land” are perverted by for example claiming TX Tax Code’s ARBs satisfy this constraint ie Notice & Being Heard.

Wrong.

Why?

Texas Constitution Article I Bill of Rights explains:
@brianeharrison A1S1 “local self-govt”. Govt is walled of from people except for stringent limits.

A1S2 “preserve republican govt” Govt is literally ‘things in the public’ & our PRIVATE ie non-public affairs incl rights are SEPARATE.

cont:
Read 18 tweets
Jul 24
@DocPeteChambers 👍 John Locke callout.

See “Two Treatises of Government”, Ch 19 “Of the Dissolution of Government” esp §214-§216.

Embodied in TX Const Art I Sec 27 & 2, people demand right of redress of grievances plus at AT ALL TIMES, inalienable right to reform govt.

Redress means SOLUTION
@DocPeteChambers Natural law of property rights secured by Texas Constitution

TX Bill of Rights Art I Sec 19 & 29 demand govt stay out of our affairs incl ALL forms of our property which incl rights but for disputes resolved by “due course ie process of law of the land”, an OG common law court.
@DocPeteChambers TX Art I Sec 8, common law courts must be open courts of record; jury decides the facts & the law, which is centuries old English law kept here in our Constitutions.

Govt only has jurisdiction to assist in court administration to resolve disputes.

Trial by JURY not by GOVT
Read 8 tweets
Jul 4
@ElimPropertyTax TX Const Art 1 & 8 provisions show prop tax on people unconstitutional:

A1S19 no property can be taken but by full due process of law

A1S29 no general govt powers over people’s rights

A8S3 taxation by general powers only

A8S1(b) prop taxes only on that not exempt eg previous
@ElimPropertyTax From A8S1(b)

(b) All real property and tangible personal property in this State, unless exempt as required or permitted by this Constitution … shall be taxed in proportion to its value, which shall be ascertained as may be provided by law.

(cont)
@ElimPropertyTax The phrase “unless exempt as required” by TX Constitution in A8S1(b) is ignored by everyone, people & govt alike. Govt esp as they have conflicts of interest.

A1S19,S29 & A8S3 expressly trigger phrase above & TX govt SHALL obey all laws as rights protection are DUTIES.

(cont)
Read 8 tweets
May 11
@abrahamgeorge Read TX Const Art I Secs 9, 19.

People’s privacy & our property incl rights walled off from govt except by due course of law of the land.

Defns older law dicts or Webster’s 1828 to discern founders intent. Black‘s 4th.

Attys are trained on statute, procedure & case law:
@abrahamgeorge Discern jurisdictions.

Statute is purview of legislative & case law is NOT consistent nor even of constitutional ‘due process of law’.

Attys & judges decades now trained on putting statute over common & constitutional law & arguably insurrection.

Eg:

@abrahamgeorge The conditioning of the people & govt is strong, but SCOTUS affirms repeatedly. SEC v Jarkesy, or:

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
there can be no rulemaking or legislation
which would abrogate them.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) page 491
Read 6 tweets
May 10
Recent TX House activity on speech is expressly forbidden TX Const Art 1 Sec 8; Art I Sec 29 also removes jurisdiction from TX Art 2.

Jurisdiction change as insurrection founding era Webster’s 1828?



@TxCourts
@GregAbbott_TX
@KenPaxtonTX
@abrahamgeorgewebstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Ins…
@TxCourts @GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @abrahamgeorge Beyond Texas Constitution, federal questions per Art VI para 2 & 3 Supremacy & oath clauses binding to Art IV Sec 2, 1A & even 5A constitutional due process of law.
@TxCourts @GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @abrahamgeorge Regarding the association known as the TX GOP, does this body share any accountability for aiding & abetting attempts to violate plain text of secured rights in the Texas Bill of Rights by its members?

At minimum, this body authorizes placement of those in question on TX ballots
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(