@brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX Doubtful Jefferson, Adams or founders of Texas would like this letter.

No ironclad authorities to compel obedience were used eg provisions in Texas Constitution generally, Article 1 Bill of Rights or specifically the people as in Art 1 Sec 2 where we claim all political power. @brianeharrison @GregAbbott_TX Texas Constitution Article 1 Section 2

“All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. …”

@brianeharrison While Mr Harrison posts a lot on X about the takeover of Texas legislature, I have yet to see him acknowledge that TX Const Art 8 Sec 1 Ad Valorem taxes as applied to Texans’ private affairs ie homes are flat out unconstitutional & MUST cease forthwith.

https://x.com/WhitherTheBoR/status/1956713427839143958

@brianeharrison -

I’ll take another related path thru TX Constitution showing maladministration of taxing powers by TX Art 3 Legislature & Art 4 Executive.

Let’s start in Art 8 Sec 1, the Ad Valorem aka property tax aka AVT provision, from where all later AVT actions by govt are derived

cont:

@brianeharrison Not property tax relief but remedy, per Black’s Law 4th.

Relief extends & pretends some reducted TX Art 8 Sec 1 applied to the people does not violate TX Art 1 Secs 19 & 29 ie unconstitutional.

Remedy eliminates applying Art 8 Sec 1 to the people

https://x.com/WhitherTheBoR/status/1949463200182759773

@brianeharrison Property ie rights guarantees in TX Art I Sec 19 “except by the due course of the law of the land” are perverted by for example claiming TX Tax Code’s ARBs satisfy this constraint ie Notice & Being Heard.

Wrong.

Why?

Texas Constitution Article I Bill of Rights explains:

@DocPeteChambers 👍 John Locke callout.

See “Two Treatises of Government”, Ch 19 “Of the Dissolution of Government” esp §214-§216.

Embodied in TX Const Art I Sec 27 & 2, people demand right of redress of grievances plus at AT ALL TIMES, inalienable right to reform govt.

Redress means SOLUTION @DocPeteChambers Natural law of property rights secured by Texas Constitution

TX Bill of Rights Art I Sec 19 & 29 demand govt stay out of our affairs incl ALL forms of our property which incl rights but for disputes resolved by “due course ie process of law of the land”, an OG common law court.

@ElimPropertyTax TX Const Art 1 & 8 provisions show prop tax on people unconstitutional:

A1S19 no property can be taken but by full due process of law

A1S29 no general govt powers over people’s rights

A8S3 taxation by general powers only

A8S1(b) prop taxes only on that not exempt eg previous @ElimPropertyTax From A8S1(b)

(b) All real property and tangible personal property in this State, unless exempt as required or permitted by this Constitution … shall be taxed in proportion to its value, which shall be ascertained as may be provided by law.

(cont)

@abrahamgeorge Read TX Const Art I Secs 9, 19.

People’s privacy & our property incl rights walled off from govt except by due course of law of the land.

Defns older law dicts or Webster’s 1828 to discern founders intent. Black‘s 4th.

Attys are trained on statute, procedure & case law: @abrahamgeorge Discern jurisdictions.

Statute is purview of legislative & case law is NOT consistent nor even of constitutional ‘due process of law’.

Attys & judges decades now trained on putting statute over common & constitutional law & arguably insurrection.

Eg:

https://x.com/Catheri54564166/status/1860398235363267049

Recent TX House activity on speech is expressly forbidden TX Const Art 1 Sec 8; Art I Sec 29 also removes jurisdiction from TX Art 2.

Jurisdiction change as insurrection founding era Webster’s 1828?



@TxCourts
@GregAbbott_TX
@KenPaxtonTX
@abrahamgeorgewebstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Ins… @TxCourts @GregAbbott_TX @KenPaxtonTX @abrahamgeorge Beyond Texas Constitution, federal questions per Art VI para 2 & 3 Supremacy & oath clauses binding to Art IV Sec 2, 1A & even 5A constitutional due process of law.