Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Sep 4, 2025 • 14 tweets • 9 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

RFK Jr. just walked into Congress and took down his biggest critics in one fell swoop.

This was a masterclass.

Elizabeth Warren erupted over Kennedy “taking” COVID vaccines away—only to have her $855,000 in pharma bucks exposed.

That’s when Bernie Sanders made a fatal error:

He blurted out that nearly EVERY POLITICIAN is taking Pharma dollars — as if that somehow excused Warren, himself, and his colleagues.

This is one of those head-scratching moments that leave you wondering… did he really just say that?

Before CNN starts spinning this hearing, watch all these clips they don’t want you to see.

🧵 THREAD

For the past week, Democrats have been mounting pressure to get RFK Jr. to resign. They hoped this hearing would be their chance to make it happen — but things didn’t go as planned.

Right out of the gate, Kennedy announced that the CDC will be cleaning house — removing the health officials responsible for the catastrophic COVID failures.

“The people at CDC... who put masks on our children, who closed our schools, are the people who WILL BE LEAVING.”

Moments later, Kennedy articulated further exactly why he’s cleaning house. He grew emotional and dropped a harrowing statistic that brought the room to silence.

“This morning, I got the latest numbers from the CDC that 76.4% of Americans now have a chronic disease. This is stunning. When my uncle was President, it was 11%. In 1950, it was 3%... That’s why we have to fire people at CDC. They DID NOT do their job. This was THEIR JOB to keep us healthy. I need to fire some of those people to make sure this doesn’t happen again.”

Kennedy quickly received pushback from Senator Michael Bennett (D-Colorado).

Bennet took issue with Kennedy appointing Dr. Robert Malone to the ACIP committee, a body of experts that advises the CDC on vaccine use and policy.

Bennett asked, “Are you aware that Dr. Robert Malone claimed that the commonly used mRNA vaccine ‘causes a form of AIDS and can damage children’s, quote, brains, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future?’”

Kennedy gave him an answer he didn’t want to hear.

“Dr. Malone is one of the inventors of the mRNA vaccine. So he knows a lot more about it than I do.”

This left Bennet frozen, with no rebuttal except to declare: “That statement is not true!!!”

Bennet pressed further, leaving Kennedy no choice but to put him on the hot seat and expose his hypocrisy.

KENNEDY: “You were never there complaining when the pharmaceutical companies were… running their products through with no safety testing.”

BENNETT: “You can characterize it any way you want. I quoted them today. What I said was accurate. What you said were lies.”

KENNEDY: “Are you saying, Senator, are you saying that the mRNA vaccine has never been associated with myocarditis or pericarditis in teenagers?”

BENNETT: “I am simply trying to say that the people that you have put on that panel after firing—”

(Kennedy interrupts)

KENNEDY: “You’re evading that question.”

BENNETT: “I’m asking the questions.”

KENNEDY: “Well, I asked you a question.”

BENNETT (raising his voice): “I’m asking the questions for Mr. Kennedy on behalf of PARENTS and SCHOOLS and TEACHERS all over the United States of America who deserve so much better than your leadership.”

KENNEDY: “They deserve the truth, and that’s what we’re going to give them for the FIRST TIME in the history of that agency.”

Watching this exchange is even better than reading it. Kennedy turned the tables and left Bennett looking completely unstable.

Mid-hearing, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) gave his Senate floor time to Kennedy to expose the corporate capture of America’s health agencies.

Kennedy wasted no time, calling out the CDC for deliberately lying about childhood autism rates tied to MMR vaccines.

JOHNSON: “Do you want to just talk about what you’ve witnessed in terms of the capture of the agencies that you’re now in charge of? The corruption of science—federal health agencies being being captured by pharmaceutical industries, by Big Pharma, by Big Food.”

KENNEDY: “I’ll just tell you one example. I could sit here and give you thousands, but in 2002, CDC did an internal study of—Fulton county, Georgia, children and looked at children who got the MMR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later.”

“So, in other words, kids who got them before 36 months and kids who got them afterward.”

“The data from that study showed that Black boys who got the vaccine on time had a 260% greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.”

“The chief scientist on that, Dr. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety scientist at CDC was ordered to come into a room with four other co-authors by his boss, Frank Destefano, who’s the head of the immunization safety branch….and ordered to destroy that data.”

“And then they published it…without that fact.”

“So, you know that story. I know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time.”

“We are being lied to by these agencies and we are going to change that right now!”

Senator Johnson also used his time to share some big news.

He revealed that a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will finally be made public on Tuesday, September 9.

Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now.

And what did the data suggest?

“…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.”

Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday.

RFK Jr.’s next major showdown came when Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) erupted over his promise not to “take” vaccines away.

Kennedy replied that he isn’t taking vaccines away — but he also won’t promote pharmaceutical products without clinical data to support them.

Warren kept pressing, and Kennedy exposed her $855,000 in donations from the pharmaceutical industry.

Watching Kennedy's exchange with Warren prompted Senator Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont) to make a fatal error:

He blurted out that nearly EVERY POLITICIAN is taking Pharma dollars — as if that somehow excused Warren, himself, and his colleagues.

But it only made him look like a complete fool.

SANDERS: “Just for the record, every single Republican... has received PAC money from the pharmaceutical industry. Are they all corrupt as well?”

KENNEDY: “And I’m telling you the American Heart Association has been co-opted by the food industry.”

SANDERS: “Every Republican got corporate PAC money from the pharmaceutical industry, Democrats as well. Everybody is corrupt but you? Is that what we’re looking at? I don’t think so.”

This is one of those exchanges that leave you scratching your head. Kennedy was confused by what Sanders was trying to accomplish here.

Kennedy got backup firepower from Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) — a licensed OB-GYN — when he silenced the room by revealing the shocking number of shots kids are expected to take by age 18.

“On day number one, they get their first jab, a hepatitis vaccine. By the time they’re 18 months, they’ve had 18 jabs. By the time they get to be able to vote, they have 76 jabs.”

Dr. Marshall explained that he doesn’t see the point in vaccinating every newborn on the first day of life for Hepatitis B when the mother tests negative, leaving no plausible risk to the child.

This opened up the opportunity for Kennedy to hammer that point even further, revealing that “prior to the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was 1 in 7 million.”

“That means you need to give 7 MILLION hepatitis B vaccines to prevent ONE death,” Kennedy explained.

This reality leaves many wondering why this particular shot is mandated in 46 states for children to attend public school.

After three hours of relentless partisan attacks, Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) delivered a sharp observation that summed up the entire hearing in just two sentences:

“I said at the outset of this hearing [that there] was going to be some partisan battling going on. That is something that is VERY OBVIOUS to anybody who’s paid any attention to what’s happened in the last three hours.”

The hearing was adjourned, and Kennedy walked away with a smile.

Democrats threw everything they had at him and still came up empty-handed.

If they want RFK Jr. gone, they’ll have to wait for another political opportunity—because today, they struck out.

Thanks for reading.

A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.

That’s when I started this page.

Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.

Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.

If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place.

Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative.

—> @VigilantFox

Want more? Get every thread delivered straight to your inbox at vigilantfox.com:

SIGN UP HERE 👇
vigilantfox.com/p/how-to-stay-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 19

In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.

Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.

The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.

When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

Here’s what the study revealed:

• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.

• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).

• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.

• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.

• 4.5 times more speech disorders.

• Three times more developmental delays.

• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.

• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”

When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.

How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?

An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.

And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.

Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.

If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?

Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵

The medical establishment built its reputation on one phrase: the gold standard.

Randomized controlled trials were sold as the cleanest way to separate real medicine from wishful thinking.

But once a trial costs tens of millions of dollars, the question changes.

Who can afford to define what everyone thinks is the “truth”?

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can indeed be extremely useful.

They can detect small effects that individual doctors would never notice, like a slight increase in heart attacks or a modest reduction in symptoms across thousands of patients.

Clearly that has real value.

The problem begins when RCTs become the only evidence medicine is allowed to recognize.

Because once that happens, medicine stops asking a simple and important question: What actually helps patients?

Instead, it starts asking what can be patented, standardized, funded, pushed through regulators, published in major journals, and written into treatment guidelines?

That shift changes everything.

Read 31 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 17

The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”

“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.

“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”

But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.

In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.

“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵

Something strange has happened in modern medicine.

For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.

But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?

What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?

When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.

But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.

Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.

Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.

But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.

Romantic partners feel distant.

Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.

Emotional warmth is harder to find.

And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.

This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.

For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.

Read 26 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 16

Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.

A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.

Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.

What happened?

His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.

ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”

“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”

“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”

“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”

“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”

“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”

“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”

“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”

“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”

“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”

Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.

But his mother attests it was the DMSO.

The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵

Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.

A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.

It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.

It acts more like a cellular reset.

And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-dmso-hea…

Read 25 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 15

It’s hard to believe this ever made TV news.

But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”

“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”

“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.

The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”

Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.

And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵

Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.

When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.

Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.

But it is.

What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.

Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.

Take a moment to let that really sink in.

In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.

Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.

That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.

Read 29 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 13

The most powerful healing molecule you’ve never heard of can cure common ailments faster than anything Big Pharma ever made.

It’s great for:
• Chronic pain
• Burns
• Sinus infections and more.

You’d think something this potent would cost thousands, but it only costs about $20 online.

Like ivermectin, this forbidden remedy belongs in everyone’s medicine cabinet.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-mixture…

DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) penetrates the body like nothing else. It passes through biological membranes without damaging them.

Once applied, it spreads everywhere. Depending on how you use it, it can deliver vitamins, herbs, or painkillers right where they’re needed.

It’s literally medicine’s missing transport system.

Read 29 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 13

We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.

We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.

Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.

And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.

The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.

We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.

Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.

So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.

The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.

The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.

Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.

Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.

The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.

The website also highlights:

• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.

• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.

• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.

• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.

• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.

• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.

•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.

This is where things start to look overwhelming.

According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.