Kevin Bass Profile picture
Sep 5, 2025 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
March 29, 2021 Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC:

"Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick."

Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it.

1/12
See for yourself.

Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would have been much more difficult to argue in court.

That's why she lied.

2/12 Image
The claims made by Walensky ended up in arguments at the Supreme Court, influencing Biden vs. Missouri (a 5-4 decision) about COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers at facilities receiving federal funding.

And a huge impact on vaccine mandates more broadly.



3/12web.archive.org/web/2022010802…Image
The outcome, as @galexybrane reported, were mass persecutions and the destruction of people's lives throughout the Western world.



4/12 tabletmag.com/sections/scien…Image
Some of those who did go along with the mandates experienced life-threatening complications, like myself. Some people died. All because we were brainwashed or bullied into getting a vaccination that didn't stop the spread of the virus.



5/12 substack.com/@kevinbass/p-9…Image
Furthermore, without these lies about transmission, the global campaign stigmatizing the unvaccinated people (who were largely low-income) and scapegoating them for the pandemic would not have been possible.

6/12 Image
Image
Image
Image
Now, the science.

Immediately after Walensky made these claims, the scientific community erupted, expressing concerns that they would undermine public trust.

Here's from the New York Times.



7/12 archive.ph/PCl7BImage
Here's an article published in Nature in March 2020 that articulated similar concerns, though more systematically.

This article would turn out to be remarkably prescient, but the points made were widely known by the scientific community.



8/12 archive.ph/9BnBNImage
Image
Take a World Health Organization virtual press conference back in December 2020.

Repeatedly the top scientists at WHO emphasized the lack of impact of the vaccine on transmission, the problem of new variants, waning immunity, etc.



9/12who.int/multi-media/de…
Yet, Walensky presented only one side of the story, which scientists knew risked undermining trust.

Why?

She had an agenda. Deceive the courts, browbeat the employers, impose the mandates by fiat.

Truth, science, transparency, honesty, public trust be damned.

10/12
Later, at an event at Washington University at St. Louis, Walensky would express astonishment that her claims would have all turn out to be wrong and that nobody predicted what happened with the vaccine.

But as we have seen this is a complete lie.

The formula: lie, lie, lie.

11/12
After her claims on MSNBC, Walensky didn't stop spreading these lies, and neither did Fauci.

They went on a media campaign for months making these claims.

Where were the doctors and scientists who are saying that RFK Jr. is undermining the CDC when this was happening?

You were silent then. You are silent now. You do not care about science.

You care about social media engagement, about propagandizing to your braying and ignorant colleagues.

You are partisan liars.

You spent the last 5 years destroying science and supporting the CDC in doing so.

The hypocrisy of you people saying ANYTHING about RFK Jr. and the CDC now is disgusting.

12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Bass

Kevin Bass Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kevinnbass

Jan 26
I am horrified. I cannot believe it.

I analyzed public databases and media reporting on violent confrontations with ICE over the past year.

Just 9 counties accounted for TWO-THIRDS of violent confrontations with ICE in America.

This is twice all violent confrontations in the remaining 3,134 counties COMBINED.

A violent confrontation in these 9 counties was 590 TIMES more likely than any of these other 3,134 counties.

590 times.

I plotted these 9 counties, and I found that all 9 counties are sanctuary jurisdictions run by Democrat politicians that resist immigration law enforcement.

These violent confrontations are RARE in states and cities where local officials cooperate with law enforcement.Image
For the above figure, I excluded all counties with 3 or fewer incidents to highlight the counties with the highest concentration of violent confrontations.

For transparency, here is the full figure, which includes the remaining 65 of 175 violent confrontation spread elsewhere. Image
The major cities in these top 9 counties are well-known:

Chicago is at the top, with Brandon Johnson as mayor.

Then, in order:

Los Angeles (Karen Bass)
Minneapolis (Jacob Frey)
New York City (Zohran Mamdani)
Portland (Karen Wilson)

Then San Francisco, Seattle, Newark, and Denver.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 21
Americans are fleeing Democrat-run states in droves.

Do Democrats incentivize illegal immigrants to replace them?

I crunched data from 2023.

I found: the more Americans fleeing their states, the more benefits these states provide to illegal immigrants, p<0.0001.

Democrats are replacing Americans with illegal immigrants.Image
In 2023, states that provide welfare benefits to illegal immigrants had a net flight of 0.26% of the population.

Meanwhile, states that provided no benefits to illegal immigrants had a net inflow of 0.32%. Image
17 states provide welfare benefits to illegal immigrants.

Of the top 10 states that show the biggest flight of Americans, NINE provide such benefits.

Of the top 10 states with the biggest inflow of Americans, just ONE provides them.

You can see the top 10 of each below. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 16
In Dem states, illegal immigrants receive welfare, attracting them to the state.

Lack of voter ID allows them to vote.

This creates an incentive for illegal immigrant voting.

But it's not just theory. It's election outcomes.

Illegals are swinging elections.

A thread. Image
Why do Democrats insist on providing welfare to illegal immigrants?

Why are they so hostile to voter ID laws?

In 2024, Trump won almost every state that required voter ID.

He also won almost every state that did not provide welfare to illegal immigrants.

In contrast, Kamala won almost every state that did NOT require voter ID.

And she won almost every state that DID provide welfare to illegal immigrants.Image
For voter ID laws, almost all states had election outcomes that aligned with the policies.

Strict voter ID law states went to Trump almost every single time.

Likewise, effective no-ID law states went to Harris almost every single time.

Only 8 of 51 states did not. (DC included.)Image
Read 16 tweets
Jan 4
I crunched the data. Again.

I made a map. Again.

The picture is now even CLEANER.

States without voter ID requirements are 16x more likely to offer welfare benefits to illegal immigrants than states requiring ID (67% vs 4%, p<0.0001).

Dems are importing and paying illegals for votes.

Details👇Image
Just one state out of 27 with effective voter ID provides welfare to illegal immigrants. Rhode Island.

Specifically, healthcare to children.

That's the 4%.

16 of 24 states without effective voter ID provide welfare to illegal immigrants.

That's the 67%. Image
The data are highly statistically significant across most categories. Image
Read 18 tweets
Oct 29, 2025
Christopher Caldwell in his Age of Entitlement (2020) offers the best analysis that I have seen for why the universities are now all left-wing. It's not that left-wing ideas have "won". It's that universities (and govt institutions) have no choice, LEGALLY. Here's his argument: Image
The civil rights revolution created a second constitutional order.

This order, though its stated intention is equality, gradually displaced the older liberal order of procedural neutrality.

Federally funded institutions MUST pursue identity politics.
Over time, civil rights compliance obligations (Title VI, Title IX, affirmative action enforcement, diversity mandates, DEI bureaucracies, etc.) forced every major institution that takes federal funds--including universities--into a permanent left-coded institutional culture.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 12, 2025
The modern Western political ideologies LIBERALISM, PROGRESSIVISM, and MARXISM should be understood as fundamentalist secularized denominations of Protestant Christianity.

All three descend from the same post-Reformation religious/moral structure:
PROTESTANTISM's faith alone became moral agency.

Inner conscience guided by God became secular trust in Reason, Science, or Justice.

Salvation became Progress.

Priesthood of all believers became moral equality.

Without God though, moral worth became performance to others.
Notably, all three ideologies inherit the DISTINCTIVE Protestant anthropology: a) the conviction that the individual conscience is the supreme authority, b) the suspicion that hierarchy is inherently corrupt, and c) a belief in history as a story of redemption from bondage.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(