Kevin Bass PhD MS Profile picture
Sep 5 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
March 29, 2021 Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC:

"Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick."

Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it.

1/12
See for yourself.

Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would have been much more difficult to argue in court.

That's why she lied.

2/12 Image
The claims made by Walensky ended up in arguments at the Supreme Court, influencing Biden vs. Missouri (a 5-4 decision) about COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers at facilities receiving federal funding.

And a huge impact on vaccine mandates more broadly.



3/12web.archive.org/web/2022010802…Image
The outcome, as @galexybrane reported, were mass persecutions and the destruction of people's lives throughout the Western world.



4/12 tabletmag.com/sections/scien…Image
Some of those who did go along with the mandates experienced life-threatening complications, like myself. Some people died. All because we were brainwashed or bullied into getting a vaccination that didn't stop the spread of the virus.



5/12 substack.com/@kevinbass/p-9…Image
Furthermore, without these lies about transmission, the global campaign stigmatizing the unvaccinated people (who were largely low-income) and scapegoating them for the pandemic would not have been possible.

6/12 Image
Image
Image
Image
Now, the science.

Immediately after Walensky made these claims, the scientific community erupted, expressing concerns that they would undermine public trust.

Here's from the New York Times.



7/12 archive.ph/PCl7BImage
Here's an article published in Nature in March 2020 that articulated similar concerns, though more systematically.

This article would turn out to be remarkably prescient, but the points made were widely known by the scientific community.



8/12 archive.ph/9BnBNImage
Image
Take a World Health Organization virtual press conference back in December 2020.

Repeatedly the top scientists at WHO emphasized the lack of impact of the vaccine on transmission, the problem of new variants, waning immunity, etc.



9/12who.int/multi-media/de…
Yet, Walensky presented only one side of the story, which scientists knew risked undermining trust.

Why?

She had an agenda. Deceive the courts, browbeat the employers, impose the mandates by fiat.

Truth, science, transparency, honesty, public trust be damned.

10/12
Later, at an event at Washington University at St. Louis, Walensky would express astonishment that her claims would have all turn out to be wrong and that nobody predicted what happened with the vaccine.

But as we have seen this is a complete lie.

The formula: lie, lie, lie.

11/12
After her claims on MSNBC, Walensky didn't stop spreading these lies, and neither did Fauci.

They went on a media campaign for months making these claims.

Where were the doctors and scientists who are saying that RFK Jr. is undermining the CDC when this was happening?

You were silent then. You are silent now. You do not care about science.

You care about social media engagement, about propagandizing to your braying and ignorant colleagues.

You are partisan liars.

You spent the last 5 years destroying science and supporting the CDC in doing so.

The hypocrisy of you people saying ANYTHING about RFK Jr. and the CDC now is disgusting.

12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Bass PhD MS

Kevin Bass PhD MS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kevinnbass

Aug 29
Here is a picture of the man resigning from CDC

Here he is wearing BDSM attire with a pentagram, a Satanic symbol, on his chest

He hates Trump and RFK Jr.

These are the kinds of freaks who used to oversee public health in this country Image
Here are some more pics.

In the one where he is posing with a man dressed as a dog, you can see an inverted pentagram tattooed on his upper chest.

He/him/his former CDC official. Image
Some are questioning whether the star is really Satanic. Here is his Instagram. It is explicitly Satanic (bottom left). This is not speculative. Again, this guy was a high-level official at CDC, and he appears to be a Satanist. Can you imagine?? Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 21
Wall Street Journal has launched another dumb attack--this time at Trump FDA appointee Marty Makary.

This article is filled with wild representations.

I explain in depth below.

I also explain the role of science in medicine and why WSJ Editorial Board is not smart. Image
WSJ is very dumb lately, and I believe that this is for an obvious reason: the people who are writing for it are dumb.

This thread will explain the dumb.

I implore you, dear reader:

As I explain, revel in the dumb. Wonder at it. Laugh at it.

Be not perturbed by the dumb.
The Editorial Board opens with an accusation: Makary is "torpedoeing" "life-saving drugs", which "raises big questions".

This is completely wrong. Image
Read 46 tweets
Jul 27
If you want to understand why the universities have become stupid, you have to understand that the universities have literally become stupid.

The average undergraduate IQ has fallen by nearly 20 points in 80 years--massive.

This drop has happened at every level of education. Image
Image
Undergraduates have become much dumber. Graduates have become much dumber. Graduate students have become much dumber. Lawyers have become much dumber. Doctors have become much dumber. PhDs have become much dumber.

And the steady increase in dumbness continues to the present day.
And while we do not have the data showing it directly, it is extremely likely that professors have also become much dumber--and keep getting dumber.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 6
March 29, 2021

Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick."

Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it.

1/5
See for yourself. Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would not have been possible.

That's why she lied.

2/5 Image
The scientific community knew she was wrong, too.

Here is an article in Nature just weeks before Fauci and Walensky's PR campaign--where they repeated these lies--about the vaccine started in March 2021:

3/5archive.ph/9BnBN
Read 5 tweets
Jun 24
NEW PAPER

21,041 clinical trials were analyzed to determine whether they followed basic principles of experimental design and reporting

These studies are the core scientific pillar informing the care that patients receive

The results are shocking👇 Image
Fewer than 10% of published studies even explained how patients were assigned to each group

Since these are RANDOMIZED controlled trials, this is hard to fathom

There is no information provided about the most important design feature in >90% of trials
Fundamentally, this means we don't know if we can really trust the results in >90% of randomized controlled trials

This is because we do not have any information about how these results were actually obtained
Read 21 tweets
Jun 23
New study published in the BMJ

Investigators counted 1330 clinical trials that had been retracted for misconduct or fatal errors

The researchers looked at how these bad studies corrupted healthcare guidelines used to treat patients

Their findings are horrifying

🧵 Image
Each retracted trial on average contaminated 3 systematic reviews, and 3 clinical guidelines

1-in-4 were still included in systematic reviews EVEN AFTER THE RETRACTION NOTICE

157 guidelines used to guide healthcare decisions were corrupted
When the retracted studies were removed out of meta-analyses used to inform clinical guidelines:

Nearly 10% reverse direction of their conclusions

Nearly 20% lose statistically significance

Nearly 20% see effect sizes swing by more than 50%
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(