What seems harmless is quietly becoming the perfect surveillance tool.
It won’t just watch you. It will control you.
Picture a $5,000 fine ripped from your account instantly—no judge, no jury, no appeal.
How close are we to a future where freedom itself can be shut off like a switch?
🧵 THREAD
It's no secret that the surveillance state is growing, especially as AI capabilities advance. And yet many people still aren't fully aware of just how pervasive the surveillance network has become.
Glenn and Eric Meder from Privacy Academy have been battling for our personal liberties and our privacy for years, and they agree—it's getting scarier by the day.
We’ve reached the point when the government itself is talking about AI surveillance in the homes of private citizens. That is an actual conversation happening in the US as we speak.
Glenn and Eric say there is a solution to all of this, and it isn't too late. They join us today to discuss.
Glenn Meder opened the interview by tracing his passion for privacy back to Edward Snowden and the Patriot Act. But it was COVID that turned his concerns into urgency. What he witnessed, he said, was “COVID tyranny”—a globally coordinated campaign to “crush our liberties.”
Their weapon wasn’t just laws and mandates, but the technology itself. Surveillance has become the linchpin of authoritarian control, and Glenn is urging people to wake up to how quickly it’s being turned against freedom.
Maria pressed the point further, warning that repression didn’t stop with the pandemic—it accelerated. In Canada, retroactive prosecution for speech was floated. In the UK, she noted, there are now “30 arrests a day” for nothing more than opinions posted on the internet.
Eric added that he now avoids the UK entirely out of fear he’d be one of those arrested. The crackdown, he explained, is hidden behind the “Online Safety Act,” which claims to protect children but is really, in his words, “all about how do we gather more control.”
The message was chilling: COVID wasn’t just a moment of government overreach, it was the launchpad for a new era of censorship and surveillance, where even your words can put you behind bars.
FREE webinar on Wednesday, September 10th
In Glenn’s upcoming class, he’ll reveal easy, actionable steps anyone can use to protect their privacy online.
The class is free—sign up at the link below to reserve your spot.
Glenn then painted a darker picture of where surveillance has already gone. In Texas and Australia, citizens are being forced to prove their age just to access search engines and app stores.
He made it clear that this has nothing to do with protecting kids. “Google, Microsoft, Apple, they have AI on our computers right now that is watching us. It’s taking a screenshot of our screens every second.”
That AI, he explained, is like having “an FBI agent looking over your shoulder 24/7, never blinking.”
“This is already in place,” he warned, stressing that the acceleration is so fast, people should be terrified of where it’s heading.
The conversation turned to digital IDs and the “digital twins” governments are building to track us in real time.
Glenn tied it directly to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), warning that the danger isn’t just in the digital format—it’s in the programmability.
With CBDCs, punishment won’t even require arrest. “You’re just going to get a $500 fine instantaneously… There’s no appeals process.” The money, he said, would be pulled from your account on the spot.
“They’re going to train you like a dog, and it's going to be very effective,” Glenn added, making it clear this system isn’t about finance at all—it’s about “total control and total manipulation.”
When the topic shifted to VPNs, Maria pointed out that governments, like in the UK and Australia, are already planning to monitor their use.
Glenn admitted not all VPNs are trustworthy, but insisted that the right one remains a crucial tool. Then he took it a step further, framing the issue as a matter of principle.
“I don’t promote going against the government. I promote liberty and standing up for liberty,” he said. Using a VPN, he argued, isn’t rebellion—it’s defending “our God given rights” from illegitimate state power.
His warning landed with force: if VPNs are banned, every citizen must decide—
“Are you going to just comply or are you going to stand up for your God given rights?”
The interview closed with a sweeping look at what’s at stake. @zeee_media directed viewers to the free Privacy Academy webinar, noting it would give people real steps to protect themselves against the surveillance state.
Glenn followed by explaining that privacy is more than personal safety—it’s the front line in the fight against CBDCs, digital IDs, and social credit systems.
He stressed that people must “get their own house in order” first, controlling their data before they can take the fight to their communities. The old prepper model of hiding away, he warned, is no longer an option.
“What they’re trying to do is enslave humanity,” Glenn said. Once the system is locked in, he added, reversing it will be nearly impossible. “We have a small window of time that we can stop this.”
Maria echoed the urgency, pointing out that the plan is to corral people into heavily surveilled smart cities, not let them “willy nilly live out in the bushes.”
Eric brought it full circle with a sobering observation: “Our smart devices are Trojan horses… social media is designed to create addictions… and then it’s designed to manipulate you.” Yet he ended on a rare note of optimism, saying that if people take back control of their technology, we could build one of the freest societies the world has ever known.
The conclusion was unmistakable: liberty itself is on the line, and only awareness and action can preserve it for future generations.
Thanks for listening. Watch the full interview below. We hope this conversation opened your eyes to just how deep the surveillance state runs—and why protecting your privacy matters more now than ever.
In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.
Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.
The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.
When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.
How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?
An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.
And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.
Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.
If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?
Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵
The medical establishment built its reputation on one phrase: the gold standard.
Randomized controlled trials were sold as the cleanest way to separate real medicine from wishful thinking.
But once a trial costs tens of millions of dollars, the question changes.
Who can afford to define what everyone thinks is the “truth”?
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can indeed be extremely useful.
They can detect small effects that individual doctors would never notice, like a slight increase in heart attacks or a modest reduction in symptoms across thousands of patients.
Clearly that has real value.
The problem begins when RCTs become the only evidence medicine is allowed to recognize.
Because once that happens, medicine stops asking a simple and important question: What actually helps patients?
Instead, it starts asking what can be patented, standardized, funded, pushed through regulators, published in major journals, and written into treatment guidelines?
The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”
“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.
“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”
But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵
Something strange has happened in modern medicine.
For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.
But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?
What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?
When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.
But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.
Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.
Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.
But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.
Romantic partners feel distant.
Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.
Emotional warmth is harder to find.
And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.
This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.
For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.
Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.
A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.
Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.
What happened?
His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.
ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”
“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”
“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”
“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”
“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”
“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”
“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”
“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”
“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”
“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”
Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.
But his mother attests it was the DMSO.
The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵
Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.
A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.
It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.
It acts more like a cellular reset.
And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”
“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”
“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.
The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”
Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.
And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵
Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.
When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.
Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.
But it is.
What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.
Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.
Take a moment to let that really sink in.
In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.
Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.
That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.
We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.
Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.
And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.
The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.
We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.
Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.
So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.
The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.
Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.
Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.
The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.
The website also highlights:
• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.
• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.
• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.
• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.
• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.
• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.
•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.
According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.