Batteries are the unsung heroes of FPV drones in Ukraine.
Motors and fiber optic control may get more attention, but it’s the chemistry inside lithium packs that sets limits on speed, payload, range, and battlefield effectiveness. 1/
FPVs in Ukraine use lithium-polymer (LiPo) batteries.
They’re lightweight, store a lot of energy for their size, and can discharge at very high rates.
That high “C rating” matters, because driving motors at full throttle demands extreme current in an instant. 2/
At its core, a LiPo battery is made of lithium-ion cells.
Each cell has a graphite anode, a lithium-metal-oxide cathode, and a liquid electrolyte.
When discharging, lithium ions flow from anode → cathode, releasing electrons through the circuit to power the motors. 3/
During charging, the process reverses: ions are forced back into the anode, storing energy.
The “polymer” in LiPo refers to the flexible pouch casing instead of a rigid cylinder.
This makes them lighter, but also more fragile and prone to swelling or fire if misused. 4/
Lithium cells pack far more energy per weight than older chemistries.
A LiPo can store ~150–250 Wh/kg, while a lead-acid battery manages only ~30–50 Wh/kg.
That’s a 4–5× advantage and explains why FPVs can fly so fast and far. 5/
Cells can be wired in series or parallel.
Series increases voltage (measured in “S,” e.g. 4S = 16.8V full charge), giving more motor RPM.
Parallel increases capacity (mAh), extending flight time.
Designers mix both to tune drones for payload vs. range. 6/
In Ukraine, 4S3P and 6S2P packs are most common.
6S packs provide higher voltage, which improves efficiency and reduces amp draw, but also requires motors, ESCs, and wiring rated for higher loads.
Choosing the wrong match can burn out components mid-flight. 7/
FPVs are often flown past manufacturer safety margins.
A heavier warhead or stronger video transmitter increases amp draw.
Packs heat up, cells degrade faster, and fires are not uncommon.
For one-way missions, endurance and reliability matter more than lifespan. 8/
As battery performance improved, so did drone range.
A few years ago, FPVs struggled to reach beyond a couple kilometers.
Now, better energy density combined with efficient motors allows strikes deep behind the lines, to reshape tactics and dominate the battlefield . 9/
Future trends point toward higher-density Li-ion cells, safer solid-state chemistries, and even hybrid systems combining batteries with compact fuel sources.
For now, lithium-polymer dominates, but every incremental advance in battery tech extends what FPVs can achieve.
10/
Russian blogger “Atomic Cherry” argues that much greater Ukrainian organizational flexibility has defeated Russian systems run by Soviet-style thinking.
“Within the framework of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, one can clearly see an interesting trend: … 1/
“…the mismatch of competencies of military structures regarding the technologies used on the battlefield. Sounds unclear, right?
2/
“Well, in reality, it is very simple– for example, the Air Force turned out to be extremely incompetent in the war of unmanned systems, although formally the vast majority of the weapons used are aircraft, ie, they correspond to the environment in which the Air Force operates. 3/
Russian nationalist and war critic Igor Girkin (aka Stelkov) writes from his prison cell that Ukraine doesn't need the 18–22 year olds now able to leave the country.
“Ukraine has started allowing men aged 18 to 22 to leave the country; the first conscripts have already left. 1/
“For some reason, everyone here insists on seeing some kind of PR in the enemy's actions and denies the enemy any rationality. We still haven't unlearned ‘throwing hats’ at the enemy,’ ‘laughing’ at Iskanders, and saying that if we want, if we strain ourselves, …
2/
“…we will be in Kyiv and defeat everyone.
Things are completely different. The enemy is smart, cunning, resourceful, ruthless, determined, and resilient. And after three and a half years of war, some propagandists, to put it mildly, have not appreciated or understood this. 3/
Ukraine's reports that strikes on Russian production and storage facilities of Shahed (Russian: Geran-2) strike UAVs reduced the number of their launches by a third in August, from 6302 to 4132. 1/ Militarnyi.com
The Russian practice of accumulating Shaheds for massive attacks every 3-4 days was also diminished, with the maximum attack in July of 728 drones reduced to 110 in August. 2/
The Izhevsk Electromechanical Plant "Kupol" that produces chips for military drones was struck in July, destroying four production workshops.
The company completely stopped working. 3/
The Ukrainian Telegram channel “Deep State” summarizes new Russian assault tactics that include bypassing infantry to target drone and mortar operators in the rear.
“Increasing the use of NPK, strike wings, and heavy FPV. The enemy is experiencing problems with infantry, … 1/
“…so they are betting on the robotization of certain processes. If in 2024 their idiot with TM [TM-62] went without small arms and threw a mine into a dugout, now they want to completely transfer this task to the drone component to prevent the detection of assault groups.
2/
“The enemy is abandoning the use of a large number of personnel. There are no longer columns of 30-60 heads. Assault actions by 2-4 assault troops have become the norm. Of course, there are more groups. 3/
Russian operators often claim that the Ukrainians hijacked their drone to explain its loss to their boss.
One of their own describes what really happens.
“So, we found out that you cannot hijack commercial drones (Mavics, Autelis, and Matrices) in the sense of taking control. 1/
“What can you do then?
The simplest thing is to let it fly away with the wind into the sunset. Again, to understand the problem, you need to know your hardware!
2/
“The Mavic 3 (the most common series on the front) determines its position in space by barometer (altitude), signals from navigation satellites (altitude, speed relative to the ground, drone's geographic location), and the Visual Positioning system…
3/
Israeli-Ukrainian military analyst Yigal Levin comments on Zaluzhnyi refusing to even speak to Vance when he called regarding replacing President Zelensky.
“This information from The Guardian that the US was looking for a replacement for Zelensky six months ago, … 1/
“…and that they even called Zaluzhny but he didn’t pick up, is not surprising at all.
I actually wrote about this six months ago — we Israelis know well the nature of the US and the essence of American strategy.
2/
“And yes, they are great masters of coups and replacing disobedient elites.
Back then, Zaluzhny, on the contrary, met with Zelensky, making it clear to the Americans that during the war he would not allow the political echelon to be split. 3/