In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce American social media personality David Freeman, AKA Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman). He’s best known for spreading political disinformation on X and shamelessly sucking up to Trump, Putin, and other authoritarian leaders.
1/22
David is a textbook example of someone profiting from MAGA grievance politics. He uses extreme, provocative language to farm engagement on X and never hesitates to flatter anyone who might give him more exposure — or money.
2/22
But David wasn’t always like this. At some point, in his mid-40s, he even tried a real job: he trained to become a cop. He spent three years with the Metro Transit PD, but after that he either got fired or quit, and never looked back.
3/22
Freeman also started several plastic companies in Texas, all using the same address. They looked serious at first, but like most of his projects, nothing came of them. The businesses and their web domains failed quickly and then quietly disappeared.
4/22
For a long time, “Gunther” hid behind his silly pseudonym. But recently he revealed his real identity during an interview. Since then, he’s been desperately trying to insert himself into the MAGA media ecosystem, with rather sad results.
5/22
As you can see, there’s nothing remarkable about David offline. He’s just a boomer who failed at pretty much everything he ever tried. That may explain why he created his online alter ego, Gunther Eagleman: a fantasy projection of himself as a political MAGA pundit.
6/22
And oh boy, does he commit to the bit. These days, David spends most of his time “owning libs” and losing arguments with 20-something Democratic influencers on X. Like Phillip “Catturd” Buchanan, Freeman’s only source of income seems to be social media ad revenue.
7/22
Elon’s monetization model on X is perfect for grifters: it doesn’t require facts and can be boosted by armies of bots and troll farms. Freeman’s content thrives in this system, sitting right at the center, and Elon himself has even retweeted many of his posts.
8/22
But that’s just the tip of the iceberg: behind the scenes is a much bigger system, one that gives large accounts far more money than Elon’s ad share ever could. Today, people are offered huge sums for posts pushing certain topics or agendas.
9/22
Marketing firms, crypto scammers, and political operatives are paying up to $500 per post to accounts willing to shill their agenda. One scheme was exposed by pro-Trump account @MJTruthUltra, who leaked messages from political scammer @RyanAFournier.
10/22
Fournier offered “$250 per post plus impression bonuses,” adding: “Never anything anti-Trump, MAGA, or his cabinet.” Amusingly, these rules are nearly identical to those given to Yevgeny Prigozhin’s trolls at Russia’s first troll farm, the “Internet Research Agency”.
11/22
Fournier himself once ran a crypto scam with a “Restore the Republic” coin, cashing out after pumping the price. He was also arrested in 2023 for allegedly beating up his girlfriend. In today’s MAGA world, these count as résumé highlights.
12/22
This shouldn’t be news to anyone who’s been reading my soups, but there’s once again an important point to make here: social media is not real. It’s completely fake, with fake/paid engagement on topics often coming not from the creator themselves but from external actors.
13/22
So whenever David posts, you should view his content through this lens.
When he claimed there was “no video content from the war in Ukraine” — one of the most well-documented conflicts in history over the last three years — who was paying him?
14/22
Or when he lies about “corrupt Ukraine,” claiming Zelenskyy bought a $75 million yacht or his wife a $5 million Bugatti — who’s paying him then?
Hell, even his infamous love letter to Putin in April 2024 was likely paid for by a MAGA pro-Kremlin marketing campaign. David has claimed he’s never taken money from a “foreign entity” or “foreigner” to post on social media, yet he gladly accepts BTC donations on X.
16/22
Recently, “Gunther” joined a campaign promoting India’s friendship with Trump and MAGA. The same effort was pushed by big accounts like @CNviolations and @DefiantLs, who, like David, are tied to the Resist the Mainstream (@ResisttheMS) network.
17/22
If you believe all of David’s 1.5 million followers are real, I’ve got a bridge to sell you. Most come from troll and bot farms, something Elon could wipe out instantly, but won’t, since they amplify his political agenda and make X’s user stats look prettier.
18/22
When David posts, facts don’t matter. On the Community Notes leaderboard, he ranks #146 with 63 corrections. Like many boomers, he often falls for AI slop, and much of his flagged content is either low-quality AI images (with bad spelling!) or blatant lies about Democrats.
19/22
“Gunther” is likely pulling in tens of thousands each month from his polarizing, rage-baiting posts, and that’s not even counting the grifter cash he pockets for pushing whatever topic MAGA pundits use to distract from the Epstein files.
20/22
David has no spine, and his political (cultist?) stance shifts entirely with whatever Trump says. Contradicting himself is never a problem. And that India campaign he was likely paid for? “Gunther” took the money — then turned around and attacked India once Trump did.
21/22
To conclude, David is basically a dumber, less dangerous version of @bennyjohnson. With no charisma and zero real skills, he sticks to boomer-level shitposting on X for profit, grifting for whoever pays him most.
How pathetic is that?
22/22
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5