Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture
Sep 9, 2025 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/11

HOLY FUCK.

The Epstein “Birthday Book” confirms the claims of one of the victims!!!

Maxwell put it together and wrote first-person stories from many old contacts, this one frames as a “Who Am I?”

It matches a victims claims that Maxwell said didn’t happen.

It begins: Image
2/11

The page goes on to say this person:

-met Prince Andrew, President Clinton, Donald Trump
-Sat on the throne Image
3/11

Johanna Sjoberg was a 22 year old hostess when she was recruited to work for Maxwell.

Her court testimony revealed she was sexually assaulted by Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew & other unnamed defendants

(Note her reddish brown hair in the middle picture with Epstein) Image
4/11

Sjoberg’s deposition is part of what resulted in Ghislaine Maxwell being locked up for trafficking.

It also supported the claims of Giuffre - but Maxwell and Epstein both claimed that Sjoberg and Giuffre were lying! Image
Image
5/11

But the Birthday Book letter, either from her (unlikely) or written by Maxwell (like many of the stories in the book) recounts that she met Prince Andrew and travelled to Buckingham Palace with them on their UK trip, including “seeing the private residence” Image
6/11

That trip, was the same one the Victoria Giuffre photo was taken on.

The follow up trip the next year was when Maxwell and Kevin Spacey sat on the royal thrones. Image
Image
7/11

Which you’ll note that this letter also confirms meeting Kevin Spacey and Bill Clinton, who went on that tour arranged by Prince Andrew. Image
Image
8/11

Sjoberg claimed that in 2001 (two years before the Birthday Book) she was called to Epstein’s Manhattan residence, forced to sit on Prince Andrew’s lap for a picture, and groped. Image
9/11

Epstein, Maxwell (and Prince Andrew) all deny that Sjoberg met Prince Andrew.

Or that she was on their 2002 palace trip.

But beyond the description, the page includes a previously non-public photo, of someone with reddish brown hair as being who this story is about. Image
10/11

Either:

A) Maxwell wrote this story like others, and has proven Sjoberg’s case.

Or

B) Maxwell included this story written by Sjoberg, which she would have known as true or false, and in turn has proven Sjoberg’s case.
11/11

And if Sjoberg’s testimony is authentic, and she met these people, and went on these trips when Maxwell and Epstein denied it…

It means her corroboration of Giuffre is true as well.

Which means Giuffre’s claims against the President are supported now. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamscochran

Jan 30
1/23

This is WILD.

A *HUGE* fuck-up in the Trump DoJ strategy means Luigi will:

* Not face the death penalty

* Technically NOT even face a formal "murder" charge AT ALL?!

All because Pam Bondi cared more about political theatrics than the law.

Let me explain:
2/23

In the State of New York, the charge of murder is § 125.25.

It:

* Does NOT allow for a death penalty

* Does not allow life without parole

* Charges 15 - 25 years.

LWOP (life without parole) requires § 125.27, it requires one of these aggravating factors: Image
3/23

Last January, when Trump took power, he signed EO 14164, requiring the DoJ to pursue the death penalty where possible.

He specifically made a media push about the Luigi Mangione case. Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 29
1/7

This is Kenneth Chesebro.

The MOST important figure in the Fulton case.

He was the lawyer who designed the scheme.

He was:

-deposed in Fulton

-pled guilty

-told ALL the details about Trump’s plots.

These DIRECTLY dispute Trump’s current Fulton claims: Image
Image
2/7

Kenneth was responsible first and foremost for arranging the fake electorate scheme.

He admitted:

* He knew Trump did NOT win the election.

* Trump knew it.

* They planned to use it regardless of election outcome.

* He came up with the false claim that it was standard practice to cover-up this plot.Image
3/7

Legally for the fake elector scheme to work, there *HAD TO* be an active lawsuit in each of those states contesting the election.

Both Cheesebro admitted the Sidney Powell case was that filing for Georgia.

Sidney Powell confessed the Fulton Georgia case was fraudulent, and pled guilty.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 29
1/18

Here’s my fact check on EVERY one of Trump/MAGA claims regarding Fulton:

1) “Trump has the power to seize paper ballots”

No.

State infrastructure and vote archives have specific protections (see Miles’ post below). Paper ballots are supposed to be the untouched records we compare against.

Taking them means any evidence he would have is now tainted.

It is also likely a criminal act.
2/18

2) “Trump has proof the election was stolen!”

No.

In fact, we have:

* His voice recorded on the phone telling Kemp to “find” him 11,000 votes because he lost.

* Him in multiple conversations with other Republicans admitting he lost (cited in Jack Smith case)

* Him in conversations with other Republicans admitting he knew there was no issue with the voting machines (Jack Smith case)

* Him in writing planning a plot to seize voting machines preemptively, before he claimed any issue. (Barr step down)

* His own lawyers in their election fraud cases, admitting on sworn record, that there was no evidence.
3/18

3) “Trump wasn’t fairly heard in his cases”

No.

MAGA claims all cases were dismissed solely on standing, but that’s not true.

Even when he lacked standing courts often still reviewed the merits of the case.

They didn’t have any. Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Jan 24
1/12

Frame by frame breakdown of this MURDER shows ICE is lying!

-ICE had ALREADY disarmed the man before shooting.

-The man NEVER drew his gun.

At the 0:06 second mark we see the man’s hands on the ground covered in large gloves.

His hands are empty. Image
2/12

At 00:15 one of the agents begins to pistol whip the man in the head.

Showing the orientation of the man’s body and how his hands were NO WHERE near his waist. Image
Image
3/12

At 00:13 we can see the man is on his knees.

An officer in a gray jacket is pulling up his shirt.

You can see the gun in his waistband at 00:16 Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Jan 16
DHS deleted this one because:

-The family was driving home and got blocked.

-ICE deployed flashbangs and tear gas INSIDE the car.

-The 6-month old child stopped breathing and had to be rushed to hospital.

DHS did NO investigation & rushed to lie to defend the officers. Image
I've verified from prior reporting and 911 call log data the location where ICE tear gassed a 6-month old child:

The 600 block of 23rd Avenue North in Minneapolis.

An entirely residential area.

It did NOT take place at the Whipple Building protest like MAGA has suggested. Image
It is also worth noting multiple people HAVE been blocked in at the Whipple building protests, as a low income Section 42 housing complex is on the edge of the Federal complex and must drive through the complex to get in/out: Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14
1/24

As someone writing a book on Epstein’s crimes, I try and validate all claims I hear, and only talk about them when I’ve proven or disproven them.

I’ve not yet commented on Sascha Barros/Riley’s claims because they are harder than most to verify.

Here is where I’m at:
2/24

First, I believe Sascha has absolutely experienced abuse.

In investigating these cases, you do learn to hear that pain in a victims voice.

But, due to the nature of trauma, experiencing abuse and accurately retelling it, are not always the same thing.
3/24

Let’s start with what’s clear:

Sascha’s claims about being adopted in the late 1970s by William Kyle Riley, are accurate.

Sascha also has done military service, although I did have trouble tracking down some specific claims about that service. Image
Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(