Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture
Sep 9 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/11

HOLY FUCK.

The Epstein “Birthday Book” confirms the claims of one of the victims!!!

Maxwell put it together and wrote first-person stories from many old contacts, this one frames as a “Who Am I?”

It matches a victims claims that Maxwell said didn’t happen.

It begins: Image
2/11

The page goes on to say this person:

-met Prince Andrew, President Clinton, Donald Trump
-Sat on the throne Image
3/11

Johanna Sjoberg was a 22 year old hostess when she was recruited to work for Maxwell.

Her court testimony revealed she was sexually assaulted by Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew & other unnamed defendants

(Note her reddish brown hair in the middle picture with Epstein) Image
4/11

Sjoberg’s deposition is part of what resulted in Ghislaine Maxwell being locked up for trafficking.

It also supported the claims of Giuffre - but Maxwell and Epstein both claimed that Sjoberg and Giuffre were lying! Image
Image
5/11

But the Birthday Book letter, either from her (unlikely) or written by Maxwell (like many of the stories in the book) recounts that she met Prince Andrew and travelled to Buckingham Palace with them on their UK trip, including “seeing the private residence” Image
6/11

That trip, was the same one the Victoria Giuffre photo was taken on.

The follow up trip the next year was when Maxwell and Kevin Spacey sat on the royal thrones. Image
Image
7/11

Which you’ll note that this letter also confirms meeting Kevin Spacey and Bill Clinton, who went on that tour arranged by Prince Andrew. Image
Image
8/11

Sjoberg claimed that in 2001 (two years before the Birthday Book) she was called to Epstein’s Manhattan residence, forced to sit on Prince Andrew’s lap for a picture, and groped. Image
9/11

Epstein, Maxwell (and Prince Andrew) all deny that Sjoberg met Prince Andrew.

Or that she was on their 2002 palace trip.

But beyond the description, the page includes a previously non-public photo, of someone with reddish brown hair as being who this story is about. Image
10/11

Either:

A) Maxwell wrote this story like others, and has proven Sjoberg’s case.

Or

B) Maxwell included this story written by Sjoberg, which she would have known as true or false, and in turn has proven Sjoberg’s case.
11/11

And if Sjoberg’s testimony is authentic, and she met these people, and went on these trips when Maxwell and Epstein denied it…

It means her corroboration of Giuffre is true as well.

Which means Giuffre’s claims against the President are supported now. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamscochran

Sep 19
1/17

The *dangerous* mistake that mainstream journalists make on the Tyler Robinson case, is the same mistake that Chuck Schumer makes in Congress:

-They assume that the Trump admin is "politics as usual"

But this is not normal.

They lie to us DAILY! Image
Image
2/17

There is a lot of conspiracy out there, and they are quick to assume any questioning of the administrations actions must be conspiracy lacking nuance - and yet, they refuse to ask nuanced questions themselves.
3/17

Just 4 days ago, Kash Patel was on Fox News noting that they had a note that "was destroyed", that they did not "see" and that they got the contents of from "aggressive interview posture" Image
Read 17 tweets
Sep 19
1/5

WOW!

According to reporting by the New York Times:

The suspicious text messages between Tyler Robinson and his partner were *REPRODUCED* for the charging document.

Raising even more questions about their authenticity! Image
Image
2/5

Not only do they not sound like a 22 year old gamer, but:

-No one has seen any timestamps

-We don’t know if they were text messages or on another platform like WhatsApp/Discord/Telegram

And most importantly:

-We don’t know if they are paraphrased Image
3/5

For all we know, the FBI interrogated Robinson’s partner, under what they called “aggressive interrogation posture”

Under coercion he could have “recounted” texts that they “reconstructed” Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 18
1/6

Since the Right Wing bots want to argue obscure FCC rules, here’s a crash course for you:

1) The “equal time” doctrine:

Applied to broadcast networks only means that they have to give candidates from each party, equal time on the air during an election, or
2/6

During coverage and advertising at best pricing, should they desire it.

BUT, it exempts a number of key situations such as:

-documentaries and interviews
-political debates
-talk shows from syndicators

So this rule, does not apply to Trump’s attack on Kimmel. Image
3/6

2) “The Fairness Doctrine:”

This rule used to mean that public broadcasters had to present all issues in a manner that fairly reflected both political viewpoints.

However this rule was abolished in 1987 to allow for “Conservative Talk Radio” under Reagan. Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 18
And there you have it!

The President *stupidly* admits on the record, that this was about “targeting Trump”

It was not about offensive jokes.

It was not about lies.

It was not about Kirk.

Trump threatened licenses because of how *HE* was portrayed.

1A beach.
What did I tell you! It’s about elections!
If you’re trying to catch up, here’s how this all developed, and the important context of what to do next:
Read 5 tweets
Sep 18
1/29

This has been the most *DANGEROUS* 48 hours in the Trump Presidency so far.

Trump has taken multiple unprecedent actions, that while individually they seem innocuous, together point to an alarming future that require us to act NOW.

Here is what you need to know: Image
2/29

What's important to understand, is that the only thing that droops more than Trump's face is his approval rating.

Hitting a new record low, even among Republican voters. Image
3/29

We see this echoed in the fact that Democrats are *massively* outperforming in special elections, including in districts that Trump won by more than 10 points. Image
Image
Read 30 tweets
Sep 17
1/10

Colbert had his show cancelled for critiquing Trump.

Papers and networks were sued into settlements for *accurate* reports over Trump.

Now Kimmel is getting pulled for after the FTC threatened the network over “comments related to Charlie Kirk”

Here’s what he said:
2/10

Kimmel said nothing untoward, even were he a newscaster that take would be fair and balanced in that moment.

But late night show hosts are *comedians*
3/10

Let’s be clear the party that screeched about their “free speech” rights because they couldn’t spread misinformation on online platforms, is now using threats, coercion and political pressure to cancel their critics.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(