The Epstein “Birthday Book” confirms the claims of one of the victims!!!
Maxwell put it together and wrote first-person stories from many old contacts, this one frames as a “Who Am I?”
It matches a victims claims that Maxwell said didn’t happen.
It begins:
2/11
The page goes on to say this person:
-met Prince Andrew, President Clinton, Donald Trump
-Sat on the throne
3/11
Johanna Sjoberg was a 22 year old hostess when she was recruited to work for Maxwell.
Her court testimony revealed she was sexually assaulted by Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew & other unnamed defendants
(Note her reddish brown hair in the middle picture with Epstein)
4/11
Sjoberg’s deposition is part of what resulted in Ghislaine Maxwell being locked up for trafficking.
It also supported the claims of Giuffre - but Maxwell and Epstein both claimed that Sjoberg and Giuffre were lying!
5/11
But the Birthday Book letter, either from her (unlikely) or written by Maxwell (like many of the stories in the book) recounts that she met Prince Andrew and travelled to Buckingham Palace with them on their UK trip, including “seeing the private residence”
6/11
That trip, was the same one the Victoria Giuffre photo was taken on.
The follow up trip the next year was when Maxwell and Kevin Spacey sat on the royal thrones.
7/11
Which you’ll note that this letter also confirms meeting Kevin Spacey and Bill Clinton, who went on that tour arranged by Prince Andrew.
8/11
Sjoberg claimed that in 2001 (two years before the Birthday Book) she was called to Epstein’s Manhattan residence, forced to sit on Prince Andrew’s lap for a picture, and groped.
9/11
Epstein, Maxwell (and Prince Andrew) all deny that Sjoberg met Prince Andrew.
Or that she was on their 2002 palace trip.
But beyond the description, the page includes a previously non-public photo, of someone with reddish brown hair as being who this story is about.
10/11
Either:
A) Maxwell wrote this story like others, and has proven Sjoberg’s case.
Or
B) Maxwell included this story written by Sjoberg, which she would have known as true or false, and in turn has proven Sjoberg’s case.
11/11
And if Sjoberg’s testimony is authentic, and she met these people, and went on these trips when Maxwell and Epstein denied it…
It means her corroboration of Giuffre is true as well.
Which means Giuffre’s claims against the President are supported now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is a lot of conspiracy out there, and they are quick to assume any questioning of the administrations actions must be conspiracy lacking nuance - and yet, they refuse to ask nuanced questions themselves.
3/17
Just 4 days ago, Kash Patel was on Fox News noting that they had a note that "was destroyed", that they did not "see" and that they got the contents of from "aggressive interview posture"
This has been the most *DANGEROUS* 48 hours in the Trump Presidency so far.
Trump has taken multiple unprecedent actions, that while individually they seem innocuous, together point to an alarming future that require us to act NOW.
Here is what you need to know:
2/29
What's important to understand, is that the only thing that droops more than Trump's face is his approval rating.
Hitting a new record low, even among Republican voters.
3/29
We see this echoed in the fact that Democrats are *massively* outperforming in special elections, including in districts that Trump won by more than 10 points.
Kimmel said nothing untoward, even were he a newscaster that take would be fair and balanced in that moment.
But late night show hosts are *comedians*
3/10
Let’s be clear the party that screeched about their “free speech” rights because they couldn’t spread misinformation on online platforms, is now using threats, coercion and political pressure to cancel their critics.