In India, millions chase thousands of seats in elite institutions like IITs, IIMs, AIIMS. This brutal competition created the perfect opportunity for PhysicsWallah, from scrappy YouTube channel to ₹3,820 crore IPO filing. Here's how they built an edtech empire 🧵👇
India's ₹15 lakh crore education market breaks down into clear segments. K-12 dominates with over half the market, serving 37 crore school children. Higher education handles formal degrees, while test prep operates as a parallel industry unlocking competitive exam success.
The final segment, upskilling, is rapidly growing as working professionals need job-ready skills. But one theme runs deep across all segments, fragmentation. India's education market remains dominated by standalone institutions with limited franchise networks.
This contrasts sharply with the US, where public schools alone account for 76% of K-12. A consolidated system drives efficiency and scale, though whether it leads to better societal outcomes remains debatable. India's slow consolidation is clearest in test-prep.
For decades, coaching was dominated by small local centres. Now national players like PhysicsWallah snap up regional brands, standardise delivery, and scale offline networks. This consolidation has been the core investment thesis for most edtech startups.
Operating in India's education market offers different approaches. Go direct-to-student (B2C) through digital platforms or brick-and-mortar centres, or choose B2B routes with schools and corporates. Delivery modes range from traditional offline to fully online to hybrid models.
Regardless of model choice, building a strong education business requires mastering four fundamentals. First, figure out scale, education is one-to-many where costs shouldn't rise in step with revenues. This is the real key to making profits.
Second, keep customer acquisition costs in check. In education, word-of-mouth is powerful. Build an engaged community and students start marketing you to friends, keeping organic growth expenses controlled while driving sustainable expansion.
Third, the secret sauce is always great teachers. Platforms live or die on whether students feel engaged and understood. Good teachers build trust and keep learners coming back, making them the most critical component of any education business.
Finally, know who you're building for. A low-cost online package caters to one type of student, a high-priced offline centre to another. Each choice defines the boundaries of your addressable market and determines business model viability.
PW's story starts with engineering dropout Alakh Pandey, deeply unhappy with college teaching methods. He began teaching physics in small Allahabad coaching centres, then uploaded free lectures to his YouTube channel PhysicsWallah in 2016, a decision that became a force multiplier.
Curious students came for clarity, stayed, and spread the word. The channel gained traction, grew into millions of followers, ventured beyond physics. By 2018 it became an app, by 2020 the hustle formalised into a registered edtech company with Pandey as the face.
Today PW is a B2C powerhouse offering test-prep across every delivery method. Online students access live lectures, recorded sessions, doubt-solving through the website (2018) or app (2020). This low-cost, high-scale model first put PW on the map.
But PW diversified heavily into offline, mirroring industry trends. Offline channels have much higher ARPU, resulting in fatter margins. Pandey claimed the company would open "as many offline centres as it can" in FY25, even if it eats into profits.
The shift shows in numbers, what was a 60:40 revenue split favouring online two years ago is now almost 50:50. PW built two physical centre types: PW Vidyapeeths (large coaching hubs in tier-1/2 cities) and PW Paathshaala (smaller setups for tier-3/4 towns).
Diversification extended beyond delivery channels. Starting with NEET and JEE, PW replicated its playbook for post-graduate non-science exams like CAT and UPSC. Within 2 years, NEET and JEE's share in user-base fell by nearly half to 35% as other subjects increased.
Growth across channels and categories was powered by acquisition sprees starting 2022. iNeuron (online IT skilling) failed, forcing loss booking. OnlyIAS captured UPSC test-prep. Xylem Learning (2024) gave strong South India presence through multilingual capabilities. Put together, these deals show a clear strategy: go deeper into competitive exams, diversify into skilling, and expand offline across India.
Despite diversification, PW retained its YouTube channel soul. About 95% of 46 million students first signed up online. Cofounder Prateek Maheshwari calls it the 3C principle: content, community, commerce. Nail the first two, and the third follows naturally.
The funnel is real, about 70% of offline students had already engaged online before joining centres. Marketing eats 10% of revenue, moderate for an industry where ad spends spiral. Fun fact: ~23% of new IPO money will specifically target marketing efforts.
Teachers are the biggest cost at over 55% of revenue, whether booked under employee benefits or professional fees. Attrition runs 25-35% annually. In March 2023, five JEE/NEET faculty left for rivals. January 2024 saw eleven GATE faculty defect to competitors.
Revenue hit ₹2,887 crore in FY25, up 49% year-on-year. Offline contributed ₹1,352 crore vs just ₹281 crore two years prior. But costs grew nearly as fast, employee expenses rose 21% to ₹1,401 crore, advertising jumped 41% to ₹276 crore.
Despite losses, the IPO story is compelling. ₹3,820 crore raise: ₹3,100 crore fresh equity, ₹720 crore founder exit (₹360 crore each). External investors WestBridge, GSV, Lightspeed, Hornbill staying put. Fresh money targets offline expansion, South India growth via Xylem, server capacity.
India's brutal university system creates millions chasing few reputed seats. PW went from YouTube channel to listed education empire, a rare feat. The IPO will be market's verdict, is this the next great Indian education story or ambitious coaching company riding on hype?
We cover this and one more interesting story in today's edition of The Daily Brief. Watch on YouTube, read on Substack, or listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Most people obsess over the stock market—which makes sense, since it directly affects their portfolios. But the bond market often tells us just as much, if not more, about the economy. The problem is that not a lot of people pay attention to it.🧵👇
So we decided to take a closer look. And honestly, it looked strange at first glance. Since the start of the year, the RBI has been slashing repo rates aggressively, front-loading cuts to jumpstart growth. In theory, this makes borrowing cheaper across the economy.
On top of that, in August, S&P Global upgraded India's long-term sovereign credit rating for the first time in 18 years, which is a big vote of confidence. You'd think investors would be very comfortable buying Indian bonds, making them cheaper for the government to issue.
Imagine building a new house. You think cement and steel, but what about plumbing, wires, paint, tiles, woodwork, sanitaryware? That simple cement exercise pulls in a whole bunch of industries, collectively known as "building materials."🧵👇
A house isn't just walls and a roof. To actually live in it, you'll need water and electricity. That means plumbing, wires, cables. Then comes the part where you want it to look good. So you paint it, do waterproofing, lay tiles.
For finishing touches, you'll add woodwork, sanitaryware, and furniture. What started as simple exercise in cement ends up pulling in whole bunch of industries. Each sub-segment is massive, worth thousands of crores with mixed organized and unorganized players.
While headlines focus on farmer distress and export restrictions, the latest RBI bulletin reveals a quieter transformation across India's farmlands, a story about how Indian agriculture has grown over the past three decades that matters for nearly half a billion people.🧵👇
Agriculture remains central to India's economy in ways GDP numbers don't capture. While farming contributes less than one-fifth of GDP, it still employs 46.1% of India's workforce, that's almost half the population affecting food security for 1.4 billion Indians.
The RBI study examines agricultural growth from 1992-93 to 2022-23, breaking it down into four key drivers, expanding farmland, improving yields, price changes, and crop diversification. The standout finding is farm growth came primarily from two sources.
Picture the world in 2050, just 25 years from now. Will factories in Bangladesh produce goods as efficiently as those in Japan? Will India's economy finally rival that of the United States? These aren't just abstract questions, they're about the economic futures of billions.🧵👇
For decades, economists held what seemed like ironclad logic, poor countries should grow faster than rich ones. If you're starting from almost nothing, you have enormous room to grow, right? You can copy technologies, learn from mistakes, and leapfrog entire stages of development.
This "convergence hypothesis" suggested developing nations would naturally catch up to developed ones. It painted a picture of a world where global inequality was just a temporary phase. It was a beautiful, hopeful theory. Unfortunately, reality has been far more complicated.
Something fascinating is happening in Andhra Pradesh. Companies across sectors, from clean energy to electronics to oil, keep announcing massive projects there. We noticed this pattern in conference calls and interviews, and we're not alone.🧵👇
SOIC founder Ishmohit spotted the same trend. Why is a single Indian state getting this much attention? What's driving this investment rush? The answer lies in a story that began 11 years ago with a painful division.
In 2014, old Andhra Pradesh was split into Telangana and a smaller AP. This wasn't equal, Hyderabad, the capital that made up 30% of the old state's GDP, now belonged to Telangana. Most economic heft was gone overnight.
There's a fundamental question about our fate as an economy that we all keep coming back to, how did China, a country as complex as ours, beginning from roughly the same point in the 1980s, leave us so far behind?🧵👇
Many different answers have been offered, ranging from our political systems, to our respective cultures, to when and how our two countries liberalised their laws. And all of them get to some of the truth.
Today we're looking at a piece of this puzzle that generally receives less attention, the different choices we made in developing the human capital of our two countries. A fascinating paper by Nitin Kumar Bharti and Li Yang reveals the story.