One of the things that the Liverpool-Arsenal game got me thinking about was the gradual shift we're seeing in build-up intentions in the European game.
In the first half, Arsenal were able to press Liverpool well enough to prevent them from getting the sort of settled possession that they want to build their more direct attacks.
And at the other end of the pitch, Liverpool weren't able to stop Arsenal from being able to progress the ball down the field in the way that they want to: with controlled possession ending up forcing the opposition deep into their own half.
In the second half, things flipped over. Liverpool started going much more m2m oop and they found solutions in build up to enable them to generate the sort of settled possession that they need progress quickly and the momentum shifted.
Two very different approaches: the first (Arsenal's) being very much in the dominant theory of the last decade and a half: you build up in order to arrive cleanly with control into the final third and then look to break down the opponent;
the second (Liverpool's) being much more focused on moving from unsettled possession to settled possession to afford yourself better access to the areas higher up the pitch through more direct means.
Of course, all of this has been prompted by the difficulty of doing first phase build up vs more man-oriented presses. It's now much more functional to generate overloads in build up (underloading as it's confusingly called within coaching circles...) and then look to attack...
...more directly but with fewer players. Because oppositions are much more ready to throw players forward in their press against first phase build up, there is space in behind that can be exploited if you access it well enough.
So yes: we need to think about build-up a little differently to the way we used to. For some teams, it's beginning to be less about sustainable controlled ball progression through the thirds and much more about achieving the settled possession that can trigger direct attacks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Guys, I have to get this off my chest because I'm analysing Brighton vs City and the City out of possession approach is blowing my mind...
This is the set up vs goal kick. Here's the thing. City are going m2m with their front 5 players. Nothing odd there on paper until you realise they're going m2m against the GOALKEEPER as well. So it's CF->GK, WFs->CBs, CMs->CMs...
Brighton are doing the thing where they want to abandon the last line with their forwards and leaving their wingers high and City are MARKING THE WINGERS WITH THEIR CBs...
#DidYouNotice how Arne Slot swung the game in Liverpool’s favour against Arsenal this weekend?
It’s pretty clear when you look at the per half data that @markrstats put out that this was a game of two halves…
In the first half, Arsenal were able to smother Liverpool’s build up but progress the ball relatively comfortably themselves. But in the second, the balance shifted so that Liverpool were more successful at building up than their opponent. So.. what happened?
In this week’s #DidYouNotice, I want us to have a think about Man United’s build up. You can catch the video at the end of this [thread]:
Because there has been a lot of criticism of their build up under Amorim and rightly so.
For example, last season according to @footovision despite the fact they were one of the most likely teams to build up in the league, they were below the league average for successful build ups and even worse when it came to navigating a high press.
It’s Monday! And the first Monday after my annual leave! So what better way to spend it than by noticing how my beloved Andoni Iraola lost to Manchester City!!!
So, yes. Here’s a thread on how Pep Guardiola used Bournemouth’s famous press against them [thread]
Let’s start with some pressing theory: under Iraola, Bournemouth use a kind of press that I like to call “hybrid” pressing.
It is “hybrid” because it moves between two different phases: a more conservative zonal phase where the priority is protecting space and a man-to-man phase where the players try to put their opponents under tighter pressure.
And what a game we have at our disposal today with Newcastle’s first trophy win in 70 years which was achieved through Eddie Howe's creative use of this guy [thread]
It was actually an incredibly interesting game on a number of levels but I think it can only truly be appreciated by viewing it through the lens of the 2-0 win Liverpool managed against Newcastle in the PL a few weeks ago.
In that game, Eddie Howe tweaked things from the usual approach, setting up Newcastle in a 442 shape out of possession rather than the more common 451 into 433 idea that they usually employ.
And today we’re noticing things about the Man United - Arsenal fixture which I thought gave us a new angle on some of Arsenal’s same-old problems in possession… [thread]
Across the last few seasons, we’ve spent a lot of time talking about Arsenal’s ball progression.
The fact of the matter is, when they’re looking to build from the back, Arsenal have tended to play around the opposition block.
Which means rather than trying to play through the opponent’s defensive structure,
They look to move the ball around it.