In October 2022, the activist investor Starboard Value bought 7% of a small provider of Data Center Solutions.
On month later, ChatGPT was released.
The Data Center market exploded, and the stock is up 12x in 2 years. A masterclass in activism investing (or market timing)🧵
1) Data Center and Vertiv Overview 2) Data Center Tailwinds 3) Lack of Urgency 4) Valuation Discount 5) Margin Opportunity 6) Multiple Opportunity
1) Data Center and Vertiv Overview
To understand Vertiv, you need to understand its end market data centers.
Google defines data center is a physical facility that houses computing and networking equipment, used to store, process, and distribute an organization's critical data and applications, essentially acting as a centralized location for managing large amounts of digital information.
Vertiv sells into some of the most attractive areas of the data center market including the racks (where the GPUs are placed), power supply, cooling systems, testing services, and software management
Vertiv Competitive Position
Vertiv dominates this market.
Vertiv’s #1 market position in thermal and services, which are critical for compute-intensive and hyperscale data centers, allows it to win across the product portfolio.
Vertiv’s leading market position in critical categories serves as a pull-through for other data center needs.
2) Data Center Tailwinds
This is where Starboard (almost) nailed its thesis. They saw something the rest of the market was ignoring, the huge tailwinds of data consumption.
I say "almost" because they listed 5G ahead of AI, while AI is what has changed the narrative much more than 5G here.
Demand for data centers is ultimately driven by data consumption, which is expected to increase significantly for the foreseeable future.
This presentation was published at the end of October 2022, a month later, OpenAI would shock the world with the first release of ChatGPT
3) Lack of Urgency
Vertiv was owned by Platinum Equity from 2016 to 2019, when it went public with a SPAC.
The SPAC Deal Gave Vertiv Unique Access to Former Honeywell CEO Starboard believes Dave Cote saw a unique opportunity for a turnaround with Vertiv but...
...because the Stock Was Performing Well (consistent beats), Vertiv Lacked a Sense of Urgency
Things were good, until they were not.
In Q4 2021, Vertiv drastically missed earnings expectations, which took the Street and management by surprise.
Vertiv was trading in the high ~$20s before Q4 2021 results, which cut the Company’s share price nearly in HALF.
Worth noting how this miss was company specific, with its peers staying roughly flat
Luckily, In response to Q4 2021 results, Executive Chairman Dave Cote promised shareholders increased involvement and complete oversight over the Company’s operations.
“In short, we screwed up…We significantly underestimated the magnitude of the material and freight inflation…”
Up until October 2022, Investors were Waiting for Vertiv to Deliver on Operational Execution with the stock underperforming the S&P500 and its peers.
In addition, Starboard believed Vertiv’s Status as a De-SPAC Has Weighed on Performance
4) Valuation Discount
Despite its strong market position in a highly attractive industry, Vertiv was currently trading near multi-year low valuation levels and far below peer multiples.
Fundamentals, as always, were the answer: its margins trail peers significantly.
5) Margin Opportunity
Looking at its peers, Vertiv had an opportunity to more than double margins.
They had operating margin of 9%, and Starboard believed they could achieve 16% in medium term and 20% in long term.
Curious about what happened? In the LTM financials as of Dec-24, Vertiv has revenue of $7.5Bn with $1.2Bn of Operating Income for a 16% margin.
Absolutely nailed it.
6) Multiple Opportunity
At the time of this pitch, Vertiv was trading at 9x NTM EBITDA. If the operating improvements were achieved, the stock would have implied a 6x 2025 EBITDA.
This compared to 13x for its peers. The discount (especially if you believed the margin story) was massive.
Curious about what happened? Vertiv now trades at 22x NTM EBITDA (13x turns of expansion!). For comparison, Eaton went from 14x to 16x (2x turns of expansion), and Schneider Electric went from 12x to 22x (10x turns of expansion).
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a masterclass in market timing. Take a bow.
The Co-CIO at Lone Pine Capital, one of the most storied and successful hedge funds in history
She sat down today with ILTB and revealed how to pick stocks and lead an investment firm
Here are 7 key insights: 1) What Every Great Business Has in Common 2) Lone Pine’s Biggest Mistake & How They Fixed It 3) The Short-Termism Epidemic 4) Strategies & Opinions on AI 5) Finding Value Beyond Tech 6) Balancing Fundamental & Macro Awareness 7) The Investing Mindset That Separates the Best from the Rest
A (Long) Thread 🧵
1) What Every Great Business Has in Common
Kelly believes the best investments have a competitive moat, strong business models, and outstanding leaders. A great company has a desirable product, scales efficiently, and can continue to grow for years with minimal risk. However, paying too much for a company can make it a negative investment, even if it is good. Valuation and timing are crucial.
One major signal is a leadership change. If a good CEO takes over a company that has a strong base but isn't doing well, the upside can be massive. Ulta Beauty is a good example. It had a fundamentally strong business, but its marketing and culture were bad. When Mary Dillon, who is experienced in consumer goods, became CEO, she changed the company's strategy and image. This unlocked huge value. Lone Pine kept an eye on her career and invested early because they knew she could fix the problems.
The best turnaround investments happen when a company’s biggest weakness aligns perfectly with a new leader’s expertise. Some businesses, however, don’t need superstar leadership to succeed. Their models are so strong that they compound naturally over time. Visa and Mastercard are great examples. Their revenue grows as global transactions increase, and their business model is nearly impossible to disrupt. Lone Pine invested in them early but should have held longer. For these companies, leadership matters less than buying at the right price. Great investing is about balancing leadership-driven turnarounds with long-term compounders—and knowing when the market is mispricing both.
2) Lone Pine’s Biggest Investing Mistake & How They Fixed It
In 2021, 2022, the market was rewarding high-growth firms that were burning through their cash flow. Lone Pine’s valuations focused more on long-term projections than near-term realities.
Lone Pine recognized early that the Fed was behind on inflation and that a rate-hiking cycle was coming. While they started adjusting their portfolio, they didn’t move quickly or aggressively enough to reduce exposure to high-growth names before the market turned. When the sell-off hit in early 2022, all high-growth stocks collapsed together.
The mistake wasn’t just in valuation. It was also a portfolio imbalance. Lone Pine had too much exposure to e-commerce, payments, and software, sectors that had thrived in a low-interest-rate environment. When the market changed, having so much invested in just a few stocks hurt them. In early 2022, they totally revamped their investments.
They sold off a lot of their tech stocks and put their money into industries they had experience in. This shift led Lone Pine to try a wider, more diversified investing plan. Instead of depending on just a few big names, like Nvidia, they went with a mix of industries and investing methods that fit their main philosophy.
Mauboussin just published its latest 88 pages research piece on “Capital Allocation”
These are the 7 key findings you should study and master:
1)Lack of Capital Reallocation
2)Sources and Uses of Financial Capital
3)Sources of Capital over Time
4)Debt-to-Total Capital over Time
5)Capital Deployment Breakdown + Overtime
6)Private Equity as a Percentage of Total M&A Volume
7)Cash Conversion Cycle by Sector
A Thread 🧵
1) Lack of Capital Reallocation
This behavior is consistent with status quo bias, which suggests that people tend to continue doing what they are doing even in the presence of preferable alternatives.
It is also compatible with the escalation of commitment, the idea that we would rather escalate a commitment to a prior action than change course.
2) Sources and Uses of Financial Capital
An important clarification is made here.
"One way to assess whether a company will require external capital is to compare its growth rate in net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) to its return on invested capital (ROIC). Firms, young or old, that grow faster than their incremental ROICs need to access external capital. This is fine, indeed desirable, if the company’s ROIC is in excess of the cost of capital.
A classic example is Walmart, a global retailer, which grew faster than its ROIC in its first 15 years as a public company. The important point is that the company created a lot of value because its ROICs were well above its cost of capital. Even though Walmart required external capital to support its growth, the stock delivered an annual total shareholder return of 33 percent during that period, three times that of the S&P 500."
1) EV / EBITDA Transaction Multiples 2) Comparison of Transactions Over and Under $1.0 Billion of Enterprise Value 3) Size of Deal and EBITDA over Time 4) Maturity Wall 5) PIK Interest Usage – Trend Analysis 6) Lender Foreclosures🧵
1) EV / EBITDA Transaction Multiples
Great PE datapoints:
- multiples are ATH (even above 2021 peak)
- sponsors are more conservative and leverage is down slightly
2) Comparison of Transactions Over and Under $1.0 Billion of Enterprise Value
Great data, perfect overview of size premium and multiple trajectory over time
Interesting that small businesses are highest multiple even, even higher than 2021
60 Pages on Public Markets every investor should read
Get the Full Deck below ⬇️
1) AI continues to drive markets higher while... 2) In addition, new names are winning the AI Race 3) The market is very expensive, but...
.... 6) Coatue is not selling, the AI Bull Case 7) Coatue ROIC Math on AI 8) AI Bull and Bear Case comparison 9) AI Apps Landscape
1) AI continues to drive markets higher but...
Mag 7 is no longer outperforming
1) On pursuing PE vs. other paths 2) Good work ceases to be enough once you become seasoned — a web of relationships is more important 3) It's all just selling at the end of the day. Communication and charisma. 4) Don’t expect fairness. Respect the powers of collateral damage. 5) Founders, management and industry operators are sometimes very underrated 6) The myth of the mighty senior partner 7) Even PE work becomes just a people, projects and admin job after some years. 8) Don’t allow PE to be your main thing 9) You need to make some mistakes to learn from them. It probably won't make a difference that you read this post. 10) Careers are often made out of nothing, or everything 🧵
1) On pursuing PE vs. other paths
2) Good work ceases to be enough once you become seasoned — a web of relationships is more important
We have all seen the email below, but what do it mean?
What are factoring facilities? And what is going on here?
1) Factoring Basics 2) Dummy Example 3) Common Factoring Structures 4) Reasons for Factoring 5) The infamous Weil email explained
1) Factoring Basics
Factoring is a form of financing that allows companies to convert their accounts receivable into immediate cash.
Traditionally, when a company sells goods or services, it issues an invoice to its customer, which is often not paid for thirty, sixty, or even ninety days. Instead of waiting for the cash payment, some companies opt to sell the invoice to a third party, known as a “factor”, at a discount, typically around 95 to 98% of the receivables face value (this discount represents the fee charged by the factor).
Importantly, factors often won’t advance the entire cash balance upfront. Typically, 75% to 90% of the receivable’s face value is advanced upfront, and the remaining balance is transferred, less the abovementioned discount, once customer accounts have been collected.
Therefore, once the customer has paid the invoice, the operating company will have collected the full receivables balance, less the factoring fee.
The Factor’s fee represents its earnings for providing upfront liquidity and assuming the risk that the customer may not pay on time, or at all.
2) Dummy Example
To numerically illustrate concepts, we’ll use ABC Co. as a hypothetical example.
First, imagine ABC Co. sells $100k worth of goods to a customer on sixty-day terms. Instead of waiting two months to collect, ABC Co. sells the invoice to Factor Co.
On the day of the sale, Factor Co. advances 85% of the invoice, or $85,000, to ABC Co.
When the customer eventually pays the full $100,000 on day 60, Factor Co. sends the remaining $15,000 back to ABC Co., but subtracts its $3,000 factoring fee.
In total, ABC Co. has collected $97,000, with $85,000 upfront and $12,000 later, with the $3,000 difference in cash collected and face value representing the cost of accelerating cash flow.