May a new NIH preprint rewrite the COVID textbooks?
Turns out SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t start with ACE2. It latches onto heparan sulfate clusters on the cell surface. ACE2 only acts later, inside endosomes. Robust methods. Still preprint.🧵
Why that matters - NIH labs have the time, tools, and independence to go deep. When they drop a preprint, it’s worth paying attention.
The tech here is next-level.
MINFLUX nanoscopy (1–3 nm precision)
STED super-resolution (60 nm)
electron microscopy
You can literally see individual virions docking.
What they saw surprised even them.
The virus doesn’t land on ACE2 at the cell surface.
It latches onto heparan sulfate (HS) clusters - tall sugar antennae that stick out far above the membrane.
These HS clusters aren’t random.
6 to 137 molecules each
Protrude up to 400 nm
About 1 per 6 micro m²
They form dense docking posts. Perfect for a virus looking to grab on.
ACE2, by comparison, barely pokes out of the membrane (10 nm). HS simply wins the race for first contact.
Once bound, the virus is swallowed into the cell by endocytosis.
Only inside the endosome does ACE2 take over - changing spike conformation, enabling fusion, releasing the viral genome.
So the new model is two-step.
HS clusters = the real docking receptor
ACE2 = downstream enabler
That flips the script on how we’ve thought about SARS-CoV-2 entry for 5 years.
And this isn’t just in petri dishes.
They tested it with the Omicron JN.1 variant in primary human airway cells (grown at air–liquid interface).
That’s as close as it gets to real lungs.
The results.
Block HS - virus can’t attach.
Block ACE2 - virus attaches fine, but infection stalls later.
It matches the two-step model perfectly.
They even tried pixantrone, a drug that binds HS.
It almost completely prevented JN.1 from sticking to and infecting airway cells.
This has big implications.
We’ve been targeting ACE2 and proteases.
But maybe the smarter move is blocking HS first.
Or even a combination - HS blockade up front, ACE2/protease blockade downstream.
And it’s not just about COVID.
HS is known to bind many viruses - HIV, Ebola, herpesviruses, papillomaviruses.
If HS clusters are a universal docking platform, then HS blockers could be a broad antiviral strategy.
Imagine a nasal spray that blocks HS binding. Cheap, broad, protective against multiple respiratory viruses.
Important - this is still a preprint (Sept 11, 2025).
No peer-review yet. Results need replication.
But if confirmed, this is a paradigm shift.
ACE2 isn’t the doorknob of the cell.
It’s the backroom lock.
The real doorknob is heparan sulfate.
Han at al., Nanoscopy Reveals Heparan Sulfate Clusters as Docking Sites for SARS-CoV-2 Attachment and Entry. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Behind each number is a child. After COVID, kids had 2× higher risk of self-harm. Now, the same lead author Kim et al. 2025 shows: kids depression & anxiety diagnoses rise by 49% in the year after infection🧵
This was no small study. Researchers tracked 154,000 children aged 6–15 in Utah.
In 2021 -
9.2% of those with COVID developed new depression or anxiety vs 5.3% in children who never had COVID.
That’s almost a doubling of risk.
Severity mattered.
Mild COVID +40% risk.
Severe (hospitalization/ER) +59% risk.
The more severe the illness, the heavier the psychological toll.
A new preprint study shows that the SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF6 directly kills human neurons.
Not by accident, but through necroptosis - a kind of cell death where neurons burst and fuel inflammation.
This may underlie the long-term brain symptoms of Long COVID.🧵
Researchers tested 22 viral proteins. The most toxic? ORF6.
In neurons, it flipped on the necroptosis switch - RIPK3 and MLKL.
Biologically - these molecules punch holes in the cell membrane until the neuron literally ruptures.
In patient brain tissue, especially the hippocampus (memory center), they found the same pattern
dead neurons + necroptosis markers.
That’s a direct biological link between infection and symptoms like brain fog and memory loss.
Human data.
In a cohort of 44M+ people, those hospitalized with severe COVID-19 had a 19% higher risk of being diagnosed with lung cancer compared to uninfected controls!
Mild infections didn’t carry this risk - it’s the severity that matters.
Animal models.
Mice that had recovered from severe COVID-19 or flu showed faster tumor growth and worse survival after tumor initiation.
The effect persisted for weeks to months after the virus was cleared.
A new Danish study shows what many of us feared - putting kids protection only on vaccines is a dead end.
The real failure has been ignoring clean air, filtration, transmission prevention.
That’s what harms children most.
317 000 kids, followed for 11 months.🧵
The study looked at the basic 2-dose Pfizer vaccine (BNT162b2) in adolescents 12–15.
From July 2021 to June 2022 - across the shift from Delta to Omicron.
Effectiveness was modest and faded fast.
First weeks - about 50% protection against hospitalization, less against infection
After 1 year - protection against mild infections was almost gone
Protection against hospitalization fell to 20%
That means - after one year, out of 100 vaccinated kids, about 6 fewer got infected compared to unvaccinated.
Chen et al., 2025 looked at school-age kids (6–18) and found brain changes after COVID.
What about toddlers?
This new study shows that even mild infection left detectable alterations in their developing brains.🧵
Data in Scientific Reports (2025):
Even mild COVID-19 in toddlers leaves measurable changes in the brain.
Researchers used advanced MRI to look at brain shape, connectivity, and the system that clears waste (glymphatic system).
Who was studied?
19 children who had mild COVID (avg age 3.4 yrs)
22 healthy controls (3.9 yrs)
Scans were done about 30 days after infection.
All were recruited from a hospital cohort, but none had severe disease.
New study: Omicron ≠ harmless for kids
We often hear - Omicron is just a mild flu, harmless for children.
A new study in Pediatric Neurology shows otherwise - even mild infections can leave measurable marks on the brain and cognition.🧵
Cohort: 60 children (6–18 y), infected during the 2022 Omicron wave in Taiwan.
All had mild disease (no breathing problems).
They underwent MRI brain scans, visual perception tests, and symptom tracking at 3 and 6 months.
Persistent symptoms
37% still had neuropsychiatric issues at 3 months
28% at 6 months (sic!)
Most common - headaches/dizziness, attention & memory problems, mood changes, sleep issues.