Kirk's assassination didn't represent the first incident of political violence against an SPLC target.
In 2012, a terrorist targeted @FRCdc for a mass shooting, using the map.
The SPLC condemned the attack, but it has kept FRC on the map ever since.
🧵3/10
In fact, at the same time as the SPLC put Turning Point USA on the map, it also put @FocusFamily on the map, revealing—by its own standards—that the SPLC is, indeed, anti-Christian.
🧵4/10
In 2017, Bernie Sanders supporter James T. Hodgkinson, who "liked" the SPLC on Facebook, opened fire at a Congressional Baseball Game practice, nearly killing @SteveScalise. The SPLC condemned the attack, but it had also attacked Scalise.
🧵5/10
We don't know who killed Charlie Kirk in cold blood, and we don't know if the SPLC played any role in inspiring the assassination.
The SPLC rightly condemned the assassination.
But, given the violence the "hate map" has inspired, that's not enough.
🧵6/10
If the SPLC wants to prove it opposes political violence & wants to put its money where its mouth is, it should remove Turning Point USA from the "hate map" immediately. This wouldn't come close to reversing the harm SPLC has caused, but it would be a show of good faith.
🧵7/10
The SPLC has no credibility.
It systematically smears good, law-abiding upstanding conservative and Christian organizations by putting them on the "hate map" with Klan chapters, trying to cut them off from polite society.
I'd know, I wrote the book on it.
🧵8/10
The Left is constantly lecturing us about turning down the temperature, and toning down the rhetoric.
Here's SPLC's golden opportunity to practice what it preaches.
I want SPLC to remove every good conservative from its map, but it can make a start with Turning Point.
🧵9/10
If you agree, please repost this thread, bookmark it, and read my story below.⬇️
Let's all demand the SPLC prove its dedication to peaceful dialogue by removing Turning Point USA as a pledge to do better.
If you want to support my work, learn how the SPLC became this way, and read about how woke groups like the SPLC called the shots in the Biden admin, you can read my books.
Can we please stop lying around here? Here's the grand jury indictment laying out why Don Lemon was charged.
At the pre-op briefing Chauntyll Louisa Allen briefed Lemon and the other conspirators about where and what they were doing.
On camera, Nekima Armstrong tells Lemon—who knows the location but is hiding it from his audience—that they're going to "disrupt business as usual" at what we later learned was Cities Church.
When did the disruption start? As the pastor was beginning his sermon.
The agitators "oppressed, threatened, and intimidated the Church's congregants and pastors by physically occupying most of the main aisle and rows of chairs near the front of the Church, engaging in menacing and threatening behavior (for some) chanting and yelling loudly at the pastor and congregants, and/or physically obstructing them as they attempted to exit and/or move about within the church."
🧵2/7
In this indictment, we learn that it was William Kelly ("DaWoke Farmer") who shouted at a little kid, "Do you know your parents are Nazis? They're going to burn in hell."
When Don Lemon observed others leaving the service, he described people as "frightened," "scared," and "crying," which he said was understandable because the experience was "traumatic and uncomfortable," which he said was the purpose of the invasion.
Again Lemon said "the whole point of [the operation] is to disrupt."
The invasion of Cities Church was even worse than we thought.
Agitators blocked stairs so "parents were unable to get to their children" at Sunday School.😡
One told a kid, "Do you know your parents are Nazis, they're going to burn in hell?"
🧵1/7
William Kelly, "DaWoke Farmer," shouted, "This ain't God's house. This is the house of the devil."
🧵2/7
About 50 members of the congregation were "stuck" towards the front of the church. Not only did the agitators take over the service, but they "made it nearly impossible for parishioners to get out and leave."
The Congressional Black Caucus and 270 left-leaning groups tried to block me from testifying in Congress. Their rationale was extremely hypocritical and, dare I say, Orwellian.
CBC Chair @RepYvetteClarke said the hearing—which focused on my research on the SPLC—was a "deliberate effort to intimidate and discredit an institution that has spent decades defending civil rights, exposing hate, and advancing opportunity for all Americans."
🧵2/12
She said the hearing "undermines the very civil institutions that give everyday people voice, protection, and power."
So, she's endorsing the SPLC's "hate" accusations and failing to admit that the SPLC itself has undermined "civil institutions." More on that later.
Here's @RepCohen's press release touting that he questioned the "smear" that the SPLC is anti-Christian, suggesting that he stood up against supposedly false claims.
But I know what really happened, because I was the witness.
🧵1/7
Cohen did mention that some Christians support the SPLC. I don't disagree. It seems he thought I wouldn't be able to defend my assertion that the SPLC is anti-Christian, however.
I came ready to defend the claim.
🧵2/7
Here's theclip. Thanks to @chiproytx for allowing Cohen's questions to go over the 5 min in the @JudiciaryGOP hearing.
I noted that the SPLC, when branding @RuthInstitute a "hate group," cited as evidence @DrJrobackmorse's quoting the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Gov-elect Abigail Spanberger apparently doesn’t consider it disqualifying for someone to endorse an activist group that considers the official teaching of your faith “hateful.”
The whistleblower account @Minnesota_DHS went viral after accusing Tim Walz of retaliation against whistleblowers amid the massive fraud scandals. X suspended the account. Conservatives think this was more retaliation.
“Certainly it was retaliation, the question is by whom?” @billglahn with @MNThinkTank told me.
He said the X account had been feeding him information only insiders would know.
🧵2/8
State Rep. @KRobbinsMN suggested "someone went to X and said, 'They're not who they say they are,' which just is not true." Robbins told me that she has met in person with the whistleblowers behind the account.