"Right to housing is a fundamental right under Article 21": Supreme Court asks Centre to come up with a revival fund to provide financing for stressed real estate projects undergoing insolvency, in order to prevent liquidation of viable projects and protect homebuyer interest.
The Court passed directions to safeguard home buyers while upholding an NCLAT judgement which it held that claims of speculative buyers cannot be admitted to insolvency proceedings.
Court: Speculative participants driven purely by profit motives cannot be permitted to misuse the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which is a remedial framework for revival and protection of sick companies and in the case of real estate, genuine homebuyers.
Court: Such investors have alternative remedies under consumer law or RERA and even recourse to civil courts in appropriate cases.
Court: To admit speculative claims into insolvency proceedings would dilute the intelligible differentia underlying the legislative scheme, destabilize the residential real estate sector and erode the social purpose embedded in housing as a fundamental right.
Court: the government is constitutionally obliged to protect the interest of home buyers and the economy at large. It is not nearly about houses or apartments. The banking sector, allied industries and employment of a large populace are also at stake.
Court: Before parting, we observe that the right of housing is not merely a contractual entitlement but a facet of fundamental right to life under Article 21. Genuine homebuyers represent the backbone of India's urban future and their protection lies at the intersection of constitutional obligation and economic policy.
Court: Through these directions, this Court seeks to restore faith in the regulatory and insolvency framework, deter speculative misuse and ensure that the dream home of the Indian citizen does not turn into a lifelong nightmare.
Court: Registry is directed to circulate a copy of this judgment to the Cabinet Secretary as well as Chief Secretaries of all states, who shall take necessary steps at the earliest.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt will shortly begin the constitution bench hearing of the issue -
Whether a judicial officer, who has already completed 7 years in the Bar, is entitled to be appointed as a District Judge against the Bar vacancy
The 5 judge bench constitution bench was constituted after the 3-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai 5-judgepassed an order on August 12, referring the matter to a larger bench. The reference order can be read here :
The Kerala High Court continues hearing #suomotu case registered in the aftermath of #Wayanadlandslides
ASGI Sundaresan submitted that there is still some ambiguity as to which ministry has to take a call on loan waiver.
During the last posting, the Court had given a last chance to the Central Government to revert on the issue regarding waiver of loans taken by the victims of the Wayanad landslides.
Regarding recovery proceedings against loans taken, the Court orally observed: There is no recovery being done now. If there is any recovery being resorted to, you can bring it to our notice.
Delhi High Court to hear shortly the suit filed by children of Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor seeking share in personal assets of their late father Sunjay Kapur.
Matter will be heard by Justice Jyoti Singh.
#KarismaKapoor #SunjayKapur #DelhiHighCourt
The suit has been filed by Samaira Kapur and Kiaan Raj Kapur against their father's second wife Priya Kapur and others.
The children have alleged that the purported Will allegedly executed by their father is not a legal document, is forged and fabricated.
Read details of the suit here:
Karisma Kapoor's Children Move Delhi High Court Seeking Share In Assets Of Late Father Sunjay Kapur
#SupremeCourt constitution bench to continue hearing Presidential Reference by #President Droupadi Murmu(@rashtrapatibhvn) on 14 questions on the power to #assent on Bills, including whether Court can fix timelines for the President/Governor to decide on Bills.
@rashtrapatibhvn Senior Advocate S. Niranjan Reddy(@MPNiranjanReddy), for the State of Telangana, to continue his arguments.
@rashtrapatibhvn @MPNiranjanReddy Sr Adv Arvind Datar: We have filed 34 cases where a two-judge bench decided issues of constitutional interpretation. I have also included cases where court has struck down statutes on important constitutional issues.
Bollywood Actress Aishwarya Rai Bachchan moves Delhi High Court seeking protection of her personality rights.
Matter being heard by Justice Tejas Karia.
#AishwaryaRaiBachchan #DelhiHighCourt
Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi appearing for the actress.
Sethi: I am enforcing my publicity and personality rights.
He takes Court through defendants and impugned content.
Sethi refers to a defendant website, says the actress has not authorised it.
Sethi: Please see second defendant. “Aishwarya Rai wallpapers, photos etc.” The third defendant is a collection of tshirts, her pictures on tshirts are sold.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: earlier they were not included in ECHS but since August 29 they have been included in ECHS - all cadets who have been boarded out due to a disability that is attributable or aggravated to the training. The one time subscription fee has also been waived off for them. So that is one achievement