Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture
Sep 12, 2025 19 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/18

If you want to have an intelligent conversation about violent rhetoric and political extremes in this country, then you need to understand the fracturing on the alt-right these days.

Between MAGA and groups like Groypers or the “Groyper Army” Image
2/18

These groups, believe that “mainstream conservative organizations” are “insufficiently nationalist” and not “pro-white” enough… Image
3/18

They broke with the likes of Kirk, even though Kirk said “black women do not have the brain processing power” to “be taken seriously”

And that “black people were ‘better’ in the 1940s” before civil rights.

This man wasn’t “pro-white” enough for this movement. Image
Image
4/18

The movement rallies around Nick Fuentes as a figure head.

Whose ultra-white, anti-feminism and ultra Christian orthodox views fuel the movement.

He infamously started the phrase “Your body; my choice” after the over turning of Roe vs Wade. Image
5/18

When Kirk started his 2019 campus tour, Fuentes declared a “Groyper War” against the “fake conservative” asking his followers to go to Kirk events and press him on stances that weren’t “conservative enough” to “expose him” Image
6/18

This continued with their second “Groyper War” splitting with the Trump campaign. Image
7/18

After the first “Groyper War” the ISD (Institute for Strategic Dialogue), an organization focused on combatting online extremism, put out an entire case study on Groyper’s for law enforcement. Image
8/18

The ISD report noted that Groyper’s were leaking from just online trolling to real world violent action.

In part because their native use of meme culture, perceived edginess and overt praise of white males led to capturing some of the most mentally vulnerable individuals. Image
Image
9/18

A large part of the problem stems from the fact that Fuentes is a personality.

When you read his unhinged statements such as his rant on being an “incel” you can see he leans into a caricature of himself.

It’s hard to separate true beliefs from the clickbait. Image
10/18

But, what we know from long histories of online indoctrination in places like 4chan, is that’s exactly what makes these outlets dangerous.
11/18

>a community develops a crass hyperbole meme on the most extreme version of their real view

>They celebrate it constantly as culture

>new community members join not knowing the origin or having a social/mental impairment being unable to grasp that it’s a meme

>within one generation of a userbase, many users now think the meme is a true belief
12/18

These groups are the ones that have openly called for the killing of media, and a pro-Christian war in America attempting to normalize the speech.

And while its hateful, horrible language no one should say, I believe many like Fuentes mean it as hyperbole BUT it normalizes it among the crazies who don’t see it that way.Image
13/18

How many unhinged alt-right accounts have you seen shout “this is war” or “we need to end the left” or “this is a war on Christian America” since Kirk’s passing? Image
14/18

How many accounts have you seen with AI avatars, or a MAGA banner image, or a Roman statue profile picture, or some frog meme, tell you they are a “true American tired of the dangerous rhetoric of the left that made someone die” - it’s a constant.
15/18

Much of that is foreign bots, amplifying messages of groups like Groypers.

Like I outlined in the Good Ol USA project coverage.

And even if the bots, or Fuentes don’t believe their words, they normalize it for the most vulnerable and radical. Image
16/18

We have to understand these online hate groups.

We have to understand why their rhetoric is dangerous.

Why their “jokes” and hyperbole get amplified and cannot be ignored.
17/18

It’s also why I take the time to reply to disinformation bots.

You’ll never change the mind of a bot.

But it’s not about that.

It’s about making sure the passive reader doesn’t think that the disinformation is true, popular or normal.
18/18

Fwiw, Fuentes finally seems frustrated with his audience these days, realizing what he has created.

And maybe, he’ll start to walk back some of the ideologies he’s put out there.

While that isn’t a redemption story, the world would be better off if he did it.

Because people who are mentally ill, cling to communities like this.

They take the hyperbole and meme culture as reality, and that leads to very dangerous places.

Even when we don’t mean for it - words have tremendous power.

But it’s not calling someone hateful a “Nazi” that leads to violence. It’s calling for hangings and wars, and the glorification of hate, that corrupts the minds of societies most lost and vulnerable.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamscochran

Jan 30
1/23

This is WILD.

A *HUGE* fuck-up in the Trump DoJ strategy means Luigi will:

* Not face the death penalty

* Technically NOT even face a formal "murder" charge AT ALL?!

All because Pam Bondi cared more about political theatrics than the law.

Let me explain:
2/23

In the State of New York, the charge of murder is § 125.25.

It:

* Does NOT allow for a death penalty

* Does not allow life without parole

* Charges 15 - 25 years.

LWOP (life without parole) requires § 125.27, it requires one of these aggravating factors: Image
3/23

Last January, when Trump took power, he signed EO 14164, requiring the DoJ to pursue the death penalty where possible.

He specifically made a media push about the Luigi Mangione case. Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 29
1/7

This is Kenneth Chesebro.

The MOST important figure in the Fulton case.

He was the lawyer who designed the scheme.

He was:

-deposed in Fulton

-pled guilty

-told ALL the details about Trump’s plots.

These DIRECTLY dispute Trump’s current Fulton claims: Image
Image
2/7

Kenneth was responsible first and foremost for arranging the fake electorate scheme.

He admitted:

* He knew Trump did NOT win the election.

* Trump knew it.

* They planned to use it regardless of election outcome.

* He came up with the false claim that it was standard practice to cover-up this plot.Image
3/7

Legally for the fake elector scheme to work, there *HAD TO* be an active lawsuit in each of those states contesting the election.

Both Cheesebro admitted the Sidney Powell case was that filing for Georgia.

Sidney Powell confessed the Fulton Georgia case was fraudulent, and pled guilty.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 29
1/18

Here’s my fact check on EVERY one of Trump/MAGA claims regarding Fulton:

1) “Trump has the power to seize paper ballots”

No.

State infrastructure and vote archives have specific protections (see Miles’ post below). Paper ballots are supposed to be the untouched records we compare against.

Taking them means any evidence he would have is now tainted.

It is also likely a criminal act.
2/18

2) “Trump has proof the election was stolen!”

No.

In fact, we have:

* His voice recorded on the phone telling Kemp to “find” him 11,000 votes because he lost.

* Him in multiple conversations with other Republicans admitting he lost (cited in Jack Smith case)

* Him in conversations with other Republicans admitting he knew there was no issue with the voting machines (Jack Smith case)

* Him in writing planning a plot to seize voting machines preemptively, before he claimed any issue. (Barr step down)

* His own lawyers in their election fraud cases, admitting on sworn record, that there was no evidence.
3/18

3) “Trump wasn’t fairly heard in his cases”

No.

MAGA claims all cases were dismissed solely on standing, but that’s not true.

Even when he lacked standing courts often still reviewed the merits of the case.

They didn’t have any. Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Jan 24
1/12

Frame by frame breakdown of this MURDER shows ICE is lying!

-ICE had ALREADY disarmed the man before shooting.

-The man NEVER drew his gun.

At the 0:06 second mark we see the man’s hands on the ground covered in large gloves.

His hands are empty. Image
2/12

At 00:15 one of the agents begins to pistol whip the man in the head.

Showing the orientation of the man’s body and how his hands were NO WHERE near his waist. Image
Image
3/12

At 00:13 we can see the man is on his knees.

An officer in a gray jacket is pulling up his shirt.

You can see the gun in his waistband at 00:16 Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Jan 16
DHS deleted this one because:

-The family was driving home and got blocked.

-ICE deployed flashbangs and tear gas INSIDE the car.

-The 6-month old child stopped breathing and had to be rushed to hospital.

DHS did NO investigation & rushed to lie to defend the officers. Image
I've verified from prior reporting and 911 call log data the location where ICE tear gassed a 6-month old child:

The 600 block of 23rd Avenue North in Minneapolis.

An entirely residential area.

It did NOT take place at the Whipple Building protest like MAGA has suggested. Image
It is also worth noting multiple people HAVE been blocked in at the Whipple building protests, as a low income Section 42 housing complex is on the edge of the Federal complex and must drive through the complex to get in/out: Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14
1/24

As someone writing a book on Epstein’s crimes, I try and validate all claims I hear, and only talk about them when I’ve proven or disproven them.

I’ve not yet commented on Sascha Barros/Riley’s claims because they are harder than most to verify.

Here is where I’m at:
2/24

First, I believe Sascha has absolutely experienced abuse.

In investigating these cases, you do learn to hear that pain in a victims voice.

But, due to the nature of trauma, experiencing abuse and accurately retelling it, are not always the same thing.
3/24

Let’s start with what’s clear:

Sascha’s claims about being adopted in the late 1970s by William Kyle Riley, are accurate.

Sascha also has done military service, although I did have trouble tracking down some specific claims about that service. Image
Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(