Ask Perplexity Profile picture
Sep 13 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🚨 Did You Know: 10 years ago, Infosys was one of the earliest backers of OpenAI. They invested alongside Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, AWS, and others ($1B → ~$45B today).

Instead of doubling down, they fired their CEO Vishal Sikka, and now their stake is worth nothing.

How could this possibly happen? Who is Vishal? More below:Image
1/ December 2015: When Infosys Bet on OpenAI

While most tech executives were still googling "machine learning," one CEO saw the AI revolution coming.

Vishal Sikka, CEO of Infosys, committed the company to back OpenAI alongside tech's biggest names.

But he wasn't your typical IT services CEO.
He understood something most executives missed: AI was about to eat software.
2/ Meet the Visionary: Vishal Sikka

- First non-founder CEO of Infosys
- PhD in AI from Stanford
- Studied under John McCarthy (coined "Artificial Intelligence")
- Mentored by Marvin Minsky (AI's founding father)

He didn't join Infosys to run an IT services company.
He came to transform it.Image
3/ Sikka’s 2015 prediction: AI will reshape Infosys:

"Most of our work is in building and maintaining software systems, and AI will increasingly shape the construction and evolution of intelligent software systems, in all kinds of domains and industries."

"As a large services company, many parts of our work can transform fundamentally with AI."

His thesis was simple:
- Infosys had 150,000 engineers doing repetitive work
- AI would automate that work

He saw what other IT leaders missed.Image
4/ OpenAI, the Nonprofit (2015)

OpenAI was structured as a nonprofit research lab dedicated to ensuring artificial general intelligence would benefit all of humanity.

This seemed noble at the time. So Infosys structured their commitment as a charitable donation, not an equity investment.Image
Image
5/ The War Inside Infosys (Why Things Blew Up)

Inside Infosys, there was a fundamental cultural clash between Vishal Sikka CEO and Infosys co-founder N.R. Narayana Murthy:

Murthy's Ethos: Conservative financial management, modest compensation, proven business models. The values that built Infosys.

Sikka's Vision: Aggressive AI investment, Silicon Valley talent acquisition, fundamental business model transformation. What was needed to survive disruption.

By 2017, their public warfare forced a choice.
Murthy won. Sikka resigned.Image
6/ The Year Everything Changed: 2019

The critical inflection point came when OpenAI restructured from nonprofit to "capped-profit" model.

This was Infosys's last chance to convert their donor relationship into a strategic partnership.

But Infosys did nothing. They were consumed by Sikka-Murthy conflict and the new leadership had zero interest in AI partnerships.

Meanwhile, Microsoft turned Sikka’s thesis into action, secured the partnership of the century.
7/ How Microsoft Won Enterprise AI

Microsoft Invested $1B in 2019 (now ~$13B total) and negotiated exclusive partnership terms:
- OpenAI’s sole compute provider
- 49% profit share
- OpenAI IP rights for use in Microsoft products
- First access to new models

Result: Microsoft emerged as the enterprise-AI leader, with an AI annual revenue run-rate of ~$13B, and a (rumored) ~30% stake in OpenAI—about $150B at a $500B valuation.Image
8/ What Infosys Lost: The Math

OpenAI's valuation: $500 billion
Infosys's market cap: ~$70 billion

If Infosys had doubled down in 2019, a $1B bet could be worth $45B+ today.

The nonprofit they donated to in 2015 is now worth about 4.3x their entire company.

Let that sink in.
9/ Conclusion: The Price of Moving Too Slow

Vishal Sikka’s tenure at Infosys is one of corporate history’s great what-ifs.

He arrived with a comprehensive plan to ready Infosys for the AI era: shift from labor arbitrage to knowledge automation, from projects to platforms, from cost to value, and he began rewiring the company to make that pivot real.

His 2017 departure did not just end a CEO’s term. It interrupted a transformation that could have positioned Infosys, and by extension Indian IT, to own the AI economy rather than rent it.

Today, India’s mass layoffs, skills gaps, and creeping commoditization are exactly the shocks his strategy was built to absorb.

In the end, Sikka drew the blueprint, Microsoft built it, and Infosys pays the rent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ask Perplexity

Ask Perplexity Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AskPerplexity

Sep 10
🚨 What’s Actually Happening in Nepal Right Now

Nepal just went from social media ban to government collapse in 72 hours

On Sept 4th, they banned Facebook, WhatsApp, X, and YouTube. By Tuesday, the Prime Minister had resigned and parliament was literally on fire

🧵Here's how it all unraveledImage
The protests started with Gen Z angry about losing social media access. But it quickly became something bigger - rage about corruption and zero opportunities

Students in school uniforms marching against the government Organic, youth-led were impossible to dismiss Image
September 8th: Security forces fired live ammunition directly at protesting students. 19 people died that day.

Instead of backing down, protesters got angrier. They organized with One Piece anime flags and decentralized coordination. No leaders, just collective digital rage Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 22
🚨 BREAKING: The United States just created its first-ever Chief Design Officer and selected Joe Gebbia, the co-founder of @Airbnb to lead it.

Why did the US do this, what is the CDO supposed to do, and what’s next? Here’s the inside story: Image
The driving force behind the Chief Design Officer (CDO) role was an urgent need to modernize thousands of outdated federal websites and deliver better user experiences for Americans.

With over 26,000 federal web portals, the landscape had become fragmented, costly, and notoriously ugly. The government was spending billions maintaining legacy systems, yet citizens, businesses, and even other agencies struggled to access essential services quickly.
This illustrated a problem: design wasn’t just about making things prettier; it was about making them work better for everyone.

So, in August 2025, the Trump administration signed Executive Order 14318, launching the “America by Design” initiative and establishing the CDO to lead this transformation from the inside out. But how would this actually work?
Read 10 tweets
Jul 1
🚨 BREAKING: Figma, the collaborative design powerhouse, has just filed its S-1 to go public on the NYSE under the ticker “FIG.”

After years of explosive growth, a failed $20B Adobe acquisition, and a wave of AI innovation, Figma is finally opening its books. Here’s what the S-1 says:Image
Let’s start with the financials. Figma reported $228.2M in revenue for the first quarter of 2025, with net income of $44.9M for the same period.

That puts the company on pace for $821M ARR, a staggering leap from $400M in 2024 and $190M in 2022. Gross margins remain sky-high, reportedly around 91%, and NRR has hovered near 132%.
Figma’s growth isn’t just about numbers. The company’s user base is global, with over 85% of customers outside the U.S. and marquee clients like Google, Microsoft, Netflix, and Airbnb. Over 78% of the Fortune 2000 rely on Figma for their design.

Its valuation has soared from $10B in 2021 to $17.8B in private markets this year, reflecting investor confidence even after the Adobe deal collapsed.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 25
🚨 BREAKING: Two of the UK’s oil giants - Shell and BP - are reportedly in early talks for what could become the largest energy merger in decades.

What's the point? Why is Shell denying these talks? How does this affect energy prices? More below: Image
Let’s start with the backstory. BP, once Shell’s equal in size and ambition, has struggled over the past year. Its market value plunged nearly 33%, dropping to about £58 billion, while Shell surged ahead to over £150 billion.

BP’s pivot to renewables under former CEO Bernard Looney was met with mixed results. Meanwhile, Shell’s disciplined focus on profits and shareholder returns has made it the stronger player—setting the stage for this potential takeover.
Why is Shell interested? The rationale is all about scale, synergies, and survival in a rapidly consolidating industry. By combining BP’s strong U.S. oil operations (which generate 40% of BP’s cash flow) with Shell’s global reach, the merged company could rival ExxonMobil and Chevron in size.

Analysts estimate $3–4 billion in annual cost savings from overlapping refining and distribution networks alone. Plus, BP’s Castrol lubricants and Shell’s North Sea assets would diversify the new entity’s portfolio, reducing reliance on volatile oil prices.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 22
🚨 WHILE YOU SLEPT: The US bombed three of Iran’s most fortified nuclear sites, codenamed "Operation Midnight Hammer".

As Tehran vows “lasting repercussions” and missiles rain down on Israel this morning, the world is bracing for what comes next. Here's the breakdown: Image
Let’s start with what happened today. Early Sunday, US B-2 stealth bombers and submarines launched a coordinated attack on Iran’s Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities.

These sites, especially Fordow—buried deep under a mountain—were considered nearly impregnable, but the US used 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs and Tomahawk missiles to inflict maximum damage.
President Trump declared the operation a “spectacular military success,” claiming Iran’s nuclear enrichment capabilities were “obliterated.”

Iran, however, insists the damage is limited and has vowed to defend itself with all options on the table.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 2
🚨 BREAKING: After a years-long battle, Taylor Swift has reclaimed ownership of her entire music catalog for a reported $360 million.

Here’s everything that happened: Image
Let’s start with how we got here.

In 2019, music executive Scooter Braun acquired Swift’s former label, Big Machine Records, and with it, the rights to her first six albums.

Swift described this as her “worst case scenario,” because Braun had been involved in what she saw as bullying from one of his clients, Kanye West.

She was devastated that someone she didn’t trust now controlled the recordings of her life’s work.
Instead of accepting the situation, Swift took an unprecedented step: she announced she would re-record her entire back catalog, releasing new versions called “Taylor’s Version.”

By doing this, she could devalue the original masters and regain control over her music’s future. Fans rallied behind her, streaming the re-recorded albums and turning the Eras Tour into a global phenomenon.

The result? The original masters lost value, and Swift’s leverage skyrocketed.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(