Post

https://x.com/gc22gc/status/1966881393759449221?s=61

More from @TonySeruga

Tony Seruga

@TonySeruga

Jun 9

1/8 🧵

🚨 YOUR OPINIONS ARE NOW A DIAGNOSIS — Canada Just Soviet-Style “Certified” a Biophysicist for an Opinion They Do Not Like — You’re Witnessing a Medical Kidnapping ☠️

They didn’t charge him with a crime. They didn’t need to.

Nicholas Jordan Wagter — 27 years old, Honors Medical Biophysics (Western), Master’s in Innovation Management (U of T), published peer-reviewed author in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience — was pulled over in Vancouver on May 23, 2026, by police and a CAR 87 mental health crisis team.

He’s been locked in a psychiatric ward ever since.

His offense? Handing out a document in coffee shops.

The document — titled “CHINA VANCOUVER ATTEMPT” — cites CSIS, RCMP, NSICOP, and the Hogue Commission on foreign interference.

It connects dots between CCP influence operations, illegal police stations, UNDRIP sovereignty issues, and federal bills C-8, C-9, C-15, and C-21. Whether you agree with every line or not, he’s citing official Canadian intelligence reports. This isn’t tinfoil-hat territory — these are documents Canada’s own spy agencies produced.

Here’s where it gets dystopian:

A psychiatrist — Dr. Christine Taylor of Vancouver Coastal Health — reportedly spotted Wagter in a café.

Not in a clinical setting. Not during a scheduled evaluation. In a Tim Hortons. She observed him, consulted his family, and issued a Form 4 certification under BC’s Mental Health Act. Wagter was never notified. Never given a voluntary assessment option. Never even told he’d been certified until police surrounded his vehicle three weeks later.

The officer’s own words on bodycam, captured by Wagter: “Dr. Taylor saw you in a cafe. She didn’t certify you then. And then she spoke with your family, got some more information, and... you’re going to have to turn that camera off.”

Turn the camera off. Of course.

When Wagter — calm, compliant, repeatedly offering to come in voluntarily for an appointment — refused to stop filming, Dr. Emery (senior resident, CAR 87) certified him a second time on the spot. Destination: Vancouver General Hospital, involuntary psychiatric ward. No judge. No hearing. No due process. Just a psychiatrist who didn’t like what she saw in a coffee shop.

#MedicalKidnapping #FreeNicholasWagter #PsychiatryIsTheNewGulag #CanadaPoliceState #Form4Tyranny #SovietStylePsychiatry #DissentIsNotDiagnosis #CivilLibertiesAreDead #VancouverDetention #CCPInCanada #SluggishSchizophrenia2026 #YourOpinionsAreADiagnosis #MentalHealthActAbuse #InstitutionalOverreach #WakeUpCanada

2/8

The “Sluggish Schizophrenia” Playbook Is Back

This isn’t new. It’s just been rebranded.

The Soviet Union perfected this technique from the 1960s through 1986. Dissidents who criticized the regime weren’t imprisoned as political prisoners — that looked bad internationally. Instead, they were diagnosed with “sluggish schizophrenia,” a conveniently vague condition whose symptoms included “reform delusions,” “struggle for the truth,” and “perseverance.” Professor Andrei Snezhnevsky and the Moscow School of Psychiatry cooked up a diagnostic framework so elastic that opposing the government became, by definition, a mental illness.

At least 20,000 Soviet citizens were locked in Special Psychiatric Hospitals for purely political reasons — no trial, no charges, indefinite detention — all under the benevolent banner of “treatment.”

Yuri Andropov, KGB chief, formalized the system in 1969 with Decree No. 345–209. The logic was airtight: anyone who rejected the best sociopolitical system in the world must be insane. There was no other explanation.

Sound familiar?

3/8

BC’s Mental Health Act: The Legal Black Hole

Here’s what the law actually permits in British Columbia:

- A physician can issue a Form 4 medical certificate for involuntary 48-hour detention based on observation — not necessarily a formal examination

- BC’s own guidebook states that in “unusual cases,” a physician can certify someone by “listening to the person speak” and reviewing “information supplied by those who know the person”

- The certificate can be extended — up to one month with further certifications

- There is no requirement to notify the person they’ve been certified

- There is no judicial review before detention begins

- The certification paperwork, clinical notes, and police file are not public

That last point is the kill shot. Vancouver Coastal Health, the VPD, and the hospital can all say “trust the process” while hiding every document behind patient confidentiality.

Wagter can scream from inside the ward — and he has been, posting videos titled “UNLAWFUL CERTIFICATION UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT” and “Proof I’m still in here” — but the institution holds all the cards.

They can claim he’s paranoid. They can claim he’s manic. They can claim anything. And he can’t refute it because the evidence of what they actually wrote about him is sealed.

This is the perfect system for disappearing inconvenient people. No criminal charges. No public trial. No messy evidence standards. Just a psychiatrist’s signature and a police escort.

Read 8 tweets

Tony Seruga

@TonySeruga

Jun 9

https://twitter.com/TonySeruga/status/2064318029174112464

1/6 🧵

And for the record. Those morons still hanging onto the 2020 steal, “60 courts dismissed the cases” canard — the intellectual crutch of people who’ve never actually read a single one of those rulings.

Let me dismantle this for the slow kids in the back.

https://twitter.com/TonySeruga/status/2064318029174112464

2/6

⚖️ “Dozens of Courts Rejected the Claims!” — The Mother of All Misrepresentations

This talking point is a masterclass in conflating procedural dismissal with adjudication on the merits. The two are not remotely the same thing, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying to you or too lazy to check.

Standing: The Invisible Wall

The overwhelming majority of cases were tossed on standing — meaning the court never even looked at the evidence because it ruled the plaintiffs weren’t the right people to bring the suit.

Think about what that means: a judge says “you personally weren’t harmed enough to sue over this,” and the media reports it as “COURT REJECTS FRAUD CLAIMS.” That’s not a ruling on whether fraud happened. That’s a ruling on who gets to ask the question. It’s like a bouncer turning you away at the door and the newspapers reporting you lost the fight inside.

Laches: “You Waited Too Long”

Another chunk of dismissals came via laches — the doctrine that says you should’ve sued earlier. Again, zero examination of evidence. The court is saying, “we’re not even looking at your proof because of the calendar.” And this gets tallied as “another loss for Trump.”

Mootness: “The Election’s Over”

Several cases were dismissed as moot because the Electoral College had already voted or Biden had been certified. Translation: “You’re right that this might have been fraudulent, but it’s too late to do anything about it now.” Not an exoneration. An expiration date.

The Merits Cases That Weren’t

When you strip out standing, laches, and mootness dismissals, the number of cases that actually reached the merits — where evidence was examined and ruled upon — shrinks to a tiny handful.

And even in those? Several judges acknowledged irregularities but ruled the margin was too large for the specific violations to have changed the outcome. That’s not “no fraud.” That’s “not enough fraud that we can quantify to flip the result." There’s a difference, and it matters.

3/6

🧮 The Math That Makes People Uncomfortable

Let’s talk about what didn’t get litigated because the courts never got there:

- The statistical anomalies in the swing-state vote dumps — abrupt spikes at 3 AM with 100% Biden shares
- The Antrim County, Michigan, forensic audit that found a 68% error rate in the Dominion system
- The Georgia surveillance footage of suitcases being pulled from under tables after observers were sent home
- The Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that were counted in violation of the state’s own election code — something Justice Alito and two other justices explicitly noted was unconstitutional
- The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL grants that effectively privatized election administration in Democratic strongholds

None of this was “debunked.” It was never reached.

Read 6 tweets

Tony Seruga

@TonySeruga

Jun 9

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2063988297979085108

1/5 🧵

For the Morons Denying the Rigged Election Reality in California, the Same Morons Still Claim the 2020 Election Steal Was Adjudicated. HINT: IT WASN’T!

All right, let’s walk through this step by step so even the densest observer can follow along. California didn’t suddenly “forget” how to count votes — they engineered a system where the outcome is perpetually malleable.

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2063988297979085108

2/5

🗳️ The Architecture of the Grift

The entire setup is a masterclass in manufacturing ambiguity. Here’s how the components fit together:

1. Universal Vote-by-Mail With No ID Requirement

California mails a ballot to every registered voter (see post below) — over 23 million of them — whether they asked for one or not. No voter ID required to cast it. No in-person verification. Just a signature match (sort of) against whatever scribble is on file from whenever someone registered.

The DOJ’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli put it bluntly:

“Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”

He’s not wrong. When you remove every friction point that verifies who is actually voting, you’re not expanding access — you’re expanding opportunity for abuse.

2. The 30-Day “Count” — A Feature, Not a Bug

Under California law, county election officials get up to 30 days to finish counting. The primary was June 2, 2026. Final certification isn’t until July 10. That’s over five weeks.

What happens during those five weeks? Ballots materialize. Leads evaporate. Magic ballots appear on demand. The numbers shift — always in the same direction. Never in favor of the right. EVER.

The poster child this cycle: Spencer Pratt had a 40,000-vote lead on Election Night in the LA mayoral primary. Then the “late-counted” ballots arrived, and suddenly progressive Nithya Raman (who had pretty much conceded, tears and all) advances instead. Same pattern, different election, every cycle.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s (can we unseal her criminal background?) defense is: “Accuracy comes before speed.” Spare me. Florida and Texas manage to count their votes within hours. California has 23 million registered voters and somehow needs a month? That’s not accuracy — that’s a window.

3. Ballot Seizures and Stonewalling

The Riverside County situation is revealing. Sheriff Chad Bianco (a Republican gubernatorial candidate) seized roughly 650,000 ballots from the county registrar after a watchdog group found discrepancies in the 2025 special election tally. Rather than investigate the discrepancies, what did Sacramento do?

Newsom signed SB 73 — making it a crime for law enforcement to take custody of ballots, punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to three years in prison. The message is unmistakable: looking too closely at the ballots will get you prosecuted.

Meanwhile, California’s Democratic AG Rob Bonta has been stonewalling federal requests for over a year to audit the voter rolls under federal law. That case is now before the 9th Circuit. What exactly are they hiding that requires a court battle to keep sealed?

4. Blocking Signature Challenges

SB 73 also prohibits election observers from challenging mail-in ballots on the basis of signature mismatches.

Think about that: the one and ONLY actual verification mechanism that exists for mail ballots, and they made it illegal to question it. You can’t make this up.

5. The Marina del Rey Case

Federal prosecutors already charged a woman in Marina del Rey for paying people — including the homeless on Skid Row — to register to vote. That’s not a hypothetical. That’s an actual federal case showing how California’s porous system gets exploited. And that’s just what got caught.

3/5

🧠 The “Nothing to See Here” Gaslighting

The institutional response follows a predictable script:

- “No evidence of widespread fraud” — because the system is designed to make detecting fraud nearly impossible. No ID, no chain of custody on ballot collection, signature challenges banned, voter rolls shielded from audit. You can’t find what you’ve structurally prevented anyone from looking for.

- “This is just how California counts votes” — as if a broken process becomes legitimate through repetition.

- “Trump has no evidence” — while simultaneously fighting tooth and nail to prevent anyone from examining the evidence that would settle the question.

The American Enterprise Institute’s John Fortier is trotted out to say the delays are “consistent with past cycles” and people should just trust the process. This is the same think-tank apparatus that’s been wrong about everything for decades, now asking for blind faith. Fortier would be selling “Clark Stanley’s Snake Oil Liniment” in the 1890s.

Read 5 tweets

Tony Seruga

@TonySeruga

Jun 8

1/7 🧵

🕵️ The Ukraine war was never just about Ukraine. It was the culmination of decades of Western meddling dressed up as democracy promotion.

Let’s break this down properly. 🔥🔥🔥🔥

👇

2/7

🗺️ The Color Revolution Playbook

The CIA and allied intelligence agencies have been running regime-change operations under the “democracy promotion” banner since at least the 1950s — Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973, and on it goes.

After the Cold War, the method shifted from coups to color revolutions — ostensibly organic popular uprisings that were anything but.

The formula is well-documented by people who’ve actually studied it rather than just repeating State Department press releases:

- Identify a strategically important country with a leader resistant to Western interests

- Fund NGOs, student groups, and “independent” media through cutouts like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) — which Allen Weinstein, one of its founders, admitted does “what the CIA did covertly 25 years ago”

- Train activists in protest tactics, media manipulation, and parallel government formation

- Trigger the uprising around a contested election or corruption scandal

- Amplified through Western media, which frames it as a spontaneous democratic awakening

- Install a Western-aligned government, then move on to the next target

Serbia 2000. Georgia 2003. Ukraine 2004. Kyrgyzstan 2005. The attempted one in Belarus in 2006. The Arab Spring wasn’t organic either.

3/7

🇺🇦 Ukraine 2014 — The One That Actually Worked (Sort Of)

The 2014 Maidan coup — and yes, it was a coup, regardless of what the New York Times calls it — followed this blueprint precisely.

What the mainstream narrative omits:

- The intercepted call: Victoria Nuland, then-Assistant Secretary of State, was caught on an unsecured line hand-picking Ukraine’s next government. “Yats is the guy,” she said, referring to Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who became Prime Minister after the coup. She also told the EU Ambassador to “f*ck the EU” when they hesitated. This wasn’t a leak — it was Russian intelligence releasing an intercepted call that the US never disputed was authentic.

- The NED money trail: NED openly bragged on its own website (before scrubbing) about funding 65+ projects in Ukraine, spending millions on “civil society” organizations that formed the backbone of Maidan.

- The snipers: The deaths that turned the protest into a massacre came from buildings controlled by the Maidan opposition, not Berkut police. The Georgian sniper confession and the Estonian foreign minister’s leaked call discussing this are matters of public record that Western media buried.

- The broken agreement: Yanukovych agreed to early elections in a deal brokered by EU foreign ministers on February 21, 2014. The next day, armed opposition factions stormed government buildings and parliament voted to remove him — in violation of Ukraine’s own constitutional impeachment procedures. The West recognized this illegal government within hours.

The goal was to pull Ukraine into NATO’s orbit, strip Russia of its Black Sea naval base in Sevastopol, and create a Western-aligned state on Russia’s most sensitive border. The same thing the US would treat as an act of war if Russia did it in Mexico or Canada.

Read 7 tweets

Tony Seruga

@TonySeruga

Jun 8

1/7 🧵

🚨 Neal Kelley: The Architect of California’s Mail-In Ballot Empire

Let me give you the full picture on this guy, because most people have no idea who he is or how central he’s been to the transformation of American elections.

2/7

🗳️ The Orange County, California Laboratory

Neal Kelley ran the Orange County Registrar of Voters for 17 years (2005–2022), overseeing the fifth-largest voting jurisdiction in the United States — 1.9 million registered voters. That’s not a small operation. That’s a testing ground big enough to pilot methods that can be exported nationwide.

What happened under his watch?

- Orange County flipped from red to blue in 2016 — the first time since 1936 that OC went Democratic in a presidential election. This was Reagan country. Nixon’s home turf. The spiritual heart of California conservatism.

- Congressional seats flipped in 2018 — the so-called “blue wave” that wiped out GOP representation in what had been safe districts for decades.

- Record-breaking turnout in 2020 — with Kelley bragging they’d surpassed 2008, 2012, and 2016 total ballots cast, all while running a system he’d deliberately shifted away from electronic voting machines and toward mail-in paper ballots.

3/7

📬 The Paper Ballot Pivot — and Why It Matters

Kelley was the first Registrar in California to fully shift Orange County from electronic voting to a paper system. His stated justification sounds reasonable on its face: “paper ballots are much more auditable than electronic systems.”

But here’s what that framing conceals:

Paper ballots are also much harder to verify at scale. Electronic systems leave digital fingerprints — every vote, every change, every access log can be traced. A paper ballot system, especially one built around mass mail-in voting, creates a chain-of-custody nightmare. Once a ballot leaves the elections office, enters the postal system, lands in who-knows-whose mailbox, and comes back — what actual verification exists that the person who filled it out is the registered voter it was sent to?

Kelley positioned himself as the “security” guy — the one running audits, “not even required by law” — while simultaneously building the infrastructure that makes meaningful auditing functionally impossible.

Read 7 tweets

Tony Seruga

@TonySeruga

Jun 8

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2063742509420069172

1/6 🧵

🚨 “But wait, Tony, wasn’t FISA Section 702 used against U.S. citizens, specifically the right?”

Yes. And this is exactly why the question cuts both ways — and why it’s more complicated than either side wants to admit.

🕵️ FISA 702: THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD

Section 702 was sold to the American people as a tool to spy on foreigners abroad. That was the promise. The reality has been something else entirely.

👇

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2063742509420069172

2/6

🔴 HOW IT WAS WEAPONIZED AGAINST AMERICANS

The FBI conducted what are called “backdoor searches” — queries of the 702 database for information on U.S. citizens without obtaining warrants. A FISA court opinion declassified in 2023 revealed the FBI ran nearly 300,000 warrantless searches of the 702 database in 2020 and 2021 alone. The targets weren't ISIS operatives.

The Carter Page FISA abuse (2016-2017): The FBI used the Steele Dossier — unverified opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign — to obtain FISA warrants against Carter Page, a Trump campaign advisor. The FBI knew the dossier was garbage. They used it anyway. The DOJ Inspector General later found 17 significant errors and omissions in the FISA applications. The warrants were ultimately deemed invalid.

January 6th and beyond: After January 6, the FBI ran warrantless 702 queries on Americans who attended the rally, donated to conservative causes, or were simply flagged by informants. A 2023 FISA Court opinion revealed the FBI improperly searched the 702 database for information on:

- People suspected of participating in the January 6 protest
- Donors to a congressional campaign (unnamed in the opinion, but the context strongly suggests conservative)
- Individuals flagged during racial justice protests in 2020 — but the standard was applied asymmetrically

Catholic traditionalists: The infamous Richmond FBI memo in 2023 targeted “radical traditionalist Catholics” as potential domestic terrorists, suggesting infiltration of parishes that favored the Latin Mass. The memo explicitly discussed the use of FISA-derived intelligence. The FBI withdrew the memo after it was publicly exposed, but the impulse was documented.

Parents at school board meetings: Attorney General Merrick Garland’s 2021 memo directing the FBI to investigate “threats” against school officials led to the National School Boards Association letter that likened concerned parents to domestic terrorists. The FBI used counterterrorism resources — the same infrastructure that should be hunting ISIS cells — to investigate moms and dads arguing about mask mandates and CRT.

3/6

🔵 WHY 702 ALSO STOPPED THE KANSAS ISIS CELL

Now here’s the uncomfortable part for anyone who wants to simply burn 702 to the ground:

The ISIS Kansas-California investigation started with an anonymous tip about pro-ISIS social media posts. When the FBI identified the Discord servers and messaging groups these three were using, they needed to determine: are any of these communications with actual ISIS operatives overseas? That’s exactly what 702 is designed for — intercepting foreign terrorist communications.

If the FBI couldn’t query the 702 database to cross-reference Discord usernames, crypto wallet addresses, and messaging patterns against known foreign terrorist communications, the investigation could stall. The undercover operation might never get the green light. The RPG with Ghafoor’s name on it might have been a real RPG purchased by real ISIS members rather than an FBI prop.

The tool that was abused against Catholic traditionalists and school board parents is the same tool that caught these three jihadists.

Read 6 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Tony Seruga

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @TonySeruga

Tony Seruga

Tony Seruga

Tony Seruga

Tony Seruga

Tony Seruga

Tony Seruga

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!