#DRONES #POLAND ++
What's going on? A speculation.
I know of two ways to combat drones with electronic warfare.
1) GPS Jamming
A drone relies on GPS data received from satellites. These signals are weak but fairly reliable, as there are always several satellites in sight. ...
Jamming uses a strong local signal to mask the signals from the satellites. The aircraft chooses the strongest signal and suddenly receives data that appears to be in a completely different location or jumps around.
Of course, you quickly realize that the data is nonsense and can take countermeasures, e.g. using GPS sensors that compare the direction of different signals from different directions and suppress the obviously incorrect data.
2) GPS Spoofing
This method is very similar, with the difference that the jammer initially "takes over" the flying object with correct data. Then, the apparent position is gradually shifted further and further from the reality. The flying object doesn't become suspicious ...
...because the data appears to be reasonable.
However, this spoofing can also be counteracted with countermeasures similar to jamming, for example, when data from different directions increasingly diverge from each other.
3) Pokrova
The system is, of course, top secret, but it is known that it centrally controls an entire network of spoofers. This makes it virtually impossible for the drone to compare different signals because the same false signal is coming from different directions.
One can now "accompany" a swarm of drones flying from east to west with the signal, allowing virtually the entire Ukraine to "fly along" with the drone, only at a slightly slower speed. The swarm of drones doesn't notice anything because there is no data to compare.
The drone only appears to be flying against the wind and therefore making slower progress. In reality, it flies much faster, perhaps even with a tailwind, and flies well beyond the target.
The "awakening" comes when the Pokrova shield ends and the drone suddenly finds itself in a completely different location, such as Poland or Belarus. Drones that first enter foreign airspace and then suddenly turn around after 50 km sound very much like "Pokrova victims."
In contrast, it makes no obvious sense to overfly a target by 50 km or 100 km just to approach it from the other side. It exposes the drone to potential air defenses for a long time. Instead, one might make a tight turn if a target is easier to hit from the other side.
And Russian drones are certainly not so disorientated that they would accidentally fly 50 km or 100 km off course while still hitting their target accurately.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#DRONES #POLAND
The German newspaper FAZ claims, "NATO radar data shows, of course, that the drones were sent from Belarus to Poland, intentionally." Of course, no radar data was published. And conspiracy theorist Kiesewetter wants to attack Russia with Taurus again.
It's nonsense. What really happened becomes somewhat clearer in the article in "Future Warfare" magazine. According to the article, the drones flew in from Ukraine and two "directly from Belarus." fw-mag.com/shownews/687/r…
This is consistent with Ukrainian drone observations, although the drones that entered Polish airspace "directly from Belarus" only overflew Belarusian airspace, but came from Ukraine.
#NordStream
The interesting detail in the further development of the Andromeda story is not Serhii, nor is it Yevhen. It is above all the avoidance of any questions about Poland's role.
...and, of course, time travel. After the attack on Turkstream failed on September 22, Yevhen U. traveled 1,200 km back in time with a trunk full of HMX to deliver it to Andromeda on September 19. No problems at the Polish border.
It should be noted that an attack on Turkstream with divers seems highly unlikely. The shallow areas lie within Russian and Turkish territory. Between them, Turkstream lies in the deep sea, up to 2,200 meters deep.
Yesterday, BILD reported, “Russians bomb holiday camps – they don't even spare children playing.” What was striking about the overall reporting was that no one wanted to name the exact location or the weapon used.
REUTERS showed the same images but did not mention a holiday camp or children. WELT writes about a holiday camp but shows an archive photo from somewhere else. And SPIEGEL also writes about holiday camps, but shows an industrial plant.
Time for a little OSINT exercise. It is actually a holiday resort south of Zaporizhzhya on the northern shore of the Kakhovka Reservoir.
The front line is about 30 km away. Also 30 km away is the place from where the Ukrainian army has been shelling the ZNPP for years.
MOST CYNICAL PRODUCTION
The IDF has officially released a video allegedly showing senior Hamas members eating bananas in a tunnel. And it is specifically stated that the fruits in colorful plastic bags are not from the “relief supplies”.
So where do they come from?
It is noticeable that nothing in the video points to “senior Hamas”, no weapons, uniform parts, headbands... and not even the usual logo.
It's not even a tunnel. The room 3 meters deep room has a flat ceiling and is open at the top.
There is no electricity and no fuel in Gaza, but the bright light is not sunlight. It's not parallel as sunlight always is. It comes from a spotlight to the right of the cameraman.
So "Hamas" has funny plastic bags and a loud generator running nearby? Think twice!
THE BANA SYNDROM
Has the world changed? Have we changed? Or are we simply experiencing the results of all our actions with frightening straightforwardness? Could anyone have predicted all this without being a Norstradamus?
Well, who remembers Bana?
Bana and her father were exactly what we supposedly fight against in Hamas - no, in every single Palestinian: militant Islamists.
In this case, all the hate and terror was going in the right direction, our media loved it, and so we loved Bana. ....soooo badly.
#Gaza #Israel #AidWorkerMassacre pt3
Haaretz publishes further details of the massacre from Israeli sources. It confirms almost exactly the events I deduced from the video in pt1 and pt2, with one exception.
According to Israeli sources, the ambush was on the side opposite the white ruins, where I had suspected the soldiers to be in Part 2.
Haaretz reports that the soldiers were 20-30 meters away. I trust the 40 meters distance, which can be calculated from the first shot (see pt1).
This means that the soldiers in the ambush saw the medical personnel in about this way in front of them. According to Israeli sources, they were also equipped with night vision devices.