#SupremeCourt hears PIL filed by the mothers of Rohit Vemula and Payal Tadvi assailing caste discrimination in higher educational institutions (HEIs)
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
SG Tushar Mehta: 391 suggestions received after publishing of draft regulations…expert committee has said that suggestions need to be examined and accordingly, draft regulations need to be amended
J Kant: There are some very good suggestions…1 or 2 may be problematic
SG: Some suggestions found favorable by the Committee…report filed to UGC, matter pending at that level.
#SupremeCourt #CasteDiscrimination
Sr Adv Indira Jaising (for petitioners): This was filed in 2019…much water has flown under the bridge…many people have committed suicide even after filing of the petition…draft regulations have been published, we gave suggestions…2 coordinate benches of this court have tried to address the issues…we are interested in preventing student suicides...we came to court with a simple grievance that regulations were not being implemented...
J Kant: I read your note...I understand there are 10 points...protection of complainants, mental health counselling, personal liability for negligence, audits, action for non-compliance, etc...our proposal is now that matter is pending with UGC, we direct today that these points be also considered for incorporation in the proposed regulations
Jaising: Grateful. But a time limit may be imposed.
#SupremeCourt
J Kant: Let them apply their mind and see how they revert
Jaising: We are looking forward to a judgment which addresses discrimination based on caste. Please leave it open for me to address you on these issues before anything is finalized, that's my only request. We have been waiting for a patient hearing since 2019
Order: Ld. SG informs that suggestions received against the draft regulations were considered by an expert committee and opinion of the Committee is under active consideration of UGC-the competent authority to notify regulations.
#SupremeCourt
Order: Sr Adv Jaising has submitted a brief note highlighting various suggestions that according to her deserve to be incorporated in the regulations...we find that following issues have been broadly highlighted in the note...
Court records the issues highlighted in its order.
#SupremeCourt
Order: Since a copy of the brief note has been handed over to ld. SG, let the same be forwarded to UGC alongwith this order for consideration of the suggestions that have come from the petitioners. We have no reason to doubt that UGC, upon consideration of the above suggestions, as also those incorporated in the report of the Expert Committee, or such suggestions that may have been received from other stakeholders, shall make an endeavor for publication of the final decision on notification [within 8 months].
#SupremeCourt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt dismisses with costs a writ petition seeking reconsideration of its 2020 judgement that upheld the West Bengal Madrasah Services Commission Act 2008.
Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih.
The petitioner filed the writ petition in light of the recent Vasanta Dupare v UoI judgement holding that Article 32 can be invoked by the Supreme Court to revisit its own final orders if it is necessary to prevent a continuing breach of fundamental rights livelaw.in/top-stories/de…
#BiharSIR: #SupremeCourt to hear today the pleas challenging Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
A plea seeking nationwide SIR across India also listed before the bench
Previously, Court directed that Aadhaar Card be accepted as a '12th document' for proof of identity of voters, subject to verification of its genuineness and without it serving as a proof of citizenship
ECI filed an affidavit stating that it has issued communications to Chief Electoral Officers of all States/UTs, except Bihar, to initiate preparatory steps for SIR of electoral rolls and 01.01.2026 has been set as the qualifying date
Adv Ashwini Upadhyay (who has filed the petition seeking nationwide SIR) mentions an application seeking modification of the Court's earlier order on acceptability of Aadhaar
Upadhyay: I wish to bring on record addl documents...it may be taken on record for today's hearing...there are 6 judgments that Aadhaar is neither age proof nor residence proof...
J Kant says judgments can be shown at the time of hearing.
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
J Kant: Mr Dwivedi (for ECI), what's the current status? Should we not wait for actual assessment as to how many individuals left out?
Sr Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan: EC is moving ahead as far as other states are concerned
J Kant: How can we stop? If other states have filed petitions, ofcourse they will be heard
Gopal S: Just give us a date on which legal issue will be taken up.
"Right to housing is a fundamental right under Article 21": Supreme Court asks Centre to come up with a revival fund to provide financing for stressed real estate projects undergoing insolvency, in order to prevent liquidation of viable projects and protect homebuyer interest.
The Court passed directions to safeguard home buyers while upholding an NCLAT judgement which it held that claims of speculative buyers cannot be admitted to insolvency proceedings.
Court: Speculative participants driven purely by profit motives cannot be permitted to misuse the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which is a remedial framework for revival and protection of sick companies and in the case of real estate, genuine homebuyers.
#SupremeCourt will shortly begin the constitution bench hearing of the issue -
Whether a judicial officer, who has already completed 7 years in the Bar, is entitled to be appointed as a District Judge against the Bar vacancy
The 5 judge bench constitution bench was constituted after the 3-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai 5-judgepassed an order on August 12, referring the matter to a larger bench. The reference order can be read here :
The Kerala High Court continues hearing #suomotu case registered in the aftermath of #Wayanadlandslides
ASGI Sundaresan submitted that there is still some ambiguity as to which ministry has to take a call on loan waiver.
During the last posting, the Court had given a last chance to the Central Government to revert on the issue regarding waiver of loans taken by the victims of the Wayanad landslides.
Regarding recovery proceedings against loans taken, the Court orally observed: There is no recovery being done now. If there is any recovery being resorted to, you can bring it to our notice.
Delhi High Court to hear shortly the suit filed by children of Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor seeking share in personal assets of their late father Sunjay Kapur.
Matter will be heard by Justice Jyoti Singh.
#KarismaKapoor #SunjayKapur #DelhiHighCourt
The suit has been filed by Samaira Kapur and Kiaan Raj Kapur against their father's second wife Priya Kapur and others.
The children have alleged that the purported Will allegedly executed by their father is not a legal document, is forged and fabricated.
Read details of the suit here:
Karisma Kapoor's Children Move Delhi High Court Seeking Share In Assets Of Late Father Sunjay Kapur