Ukraine’s war has turned veterans into Europe’s new defence entrepreneurs.
Reuters: Ex-soldiers now run 1 in 4 of the region’s 80 defence startups. VC funding hit $5.2bn in 2024 — up 500% from pre-war levels — as Ukraine’s frontlines forced rapid testing and scale. 1/
Frontline use in Ukraine cut development from years to months.
Units return faults after missions in Bakhmut or Kharkiv, and startups issue fixes within weeks. Civilian-only firms cannot match this pace. 2/
Veteran-founded Quantum Systems, now valued at $1bn, supplies reconnaissance drones to Ukraine.
Other firms include Stark (drones), Arondite (battle-planning software), and Kyiv-based Terminal Autonomy, which shifted from kamikaze drones to cruise missile work. 3/
German veteran Matt Kuppers co-founded Defence Invest.
He spotted that an Austrian anti-drone gun lost accuracy when the barrel overheated — an error missed by civilian founders. His firm now tests the system with Austria’s army. 4/
Ex-German officer Marc Wietfeld built ARX Robotics. His unmanned ground vehicles are already in Ukraine. “You can’t solve a problem you don’t know,” he said, explaining why combat experience shaped the design. 5/
Ukraine’s 3rd Assault Brigade lost €300k on an unmanned vehicle that broke down in combat.
Soldier Viktoriia Honcharuk said: “I wish more companies were founded by military people,” after the failed system cost both money and time. 6/
Procurement knowledge gives veterans an edge. They know NATO and defence ministry standards, helping startups pass certification and deliver systems to Ukraine that civilian founders struggle to get approved. 7/
McKinsey data: European defence tech VC rose 500% in 2021–24 compared to 2018–20.
NATO Innovation Fund and Dealroom tracked $5.2bn raised in 2024, much of it tied to equipment tested or deployed in Ukraine. 8X
Zelenskyy: The US is strong enough to act alone. Trump can send air defense, impose sanctions, make Putin afraid.
Europe should stop buying oil and gas, but we can’t wait for 27 bureaucracies. EU passed 18 packages — now we need a strong US sanctions package.
1/
Q: Are you ready to meet Trump and Putin without conditions? In Moscow?
Zelenskyy: I’m ready to meet both, no conditions — but not in Moscow. Russia bombs us daily. We can meet elsewhere.
2/
Zelenskyy: They want to continue the war. They postpone meetings on a ceasefire — but it’s never about a ceasefire. Hard to understand their thinking. We must recognize: they don’t want peace.
Boris Johnson: Ukraine needs all economic package — sanctions, unfreezing assets. More military help, permissions, missiles.
Package to flip a switch in the Kremlin's brain, make them realize this is over: Ukraine is independent.
Ukraine decides what military forces come. 1/
Boris Johnson: We’re in chicken and egg trap by Putin. Security guarantees and boots on the ground mean nothing until a ceasefire, which is in his gift. Like Donbas, he keeps chipping away. He shows no sign to fix this. We need a package to change his psychology and goal. 2/
Boris Johnson: This is not about territory; this is about destiny. The destiny the Ukrainians have chosen is irrevocable: they've chosen to be part of the Western security architecture and part of that family.
They don't want to be part of the Russian Empire. 3/
He planned to take Ukraine in 4 days — it’s 4 years. He sought to divide the West — it’s more united than ever. He wanted less NATO spending — Trump raised it to 5%.
And Ukraine became very European and not Russian at all. 1/
Stubb: Russians have tolerated pain not only in the Soviet era but before, to a degree hard for the West to understand.
War may end when Putin no longer pays $80,000 “maternity packages” for dead soldiers or bonuses for military service. 2/
Q: Should Ukraine give up territory to end the war?
Stubb: I’m a Finn, so I won’t answer that.
Statehood rests on independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity. It’s a choice between Yalta’s carve-up and Helsinki 1975 accords. I’d prefer Helsinki. 3/
President of Finland, Stubb: It's not looking good. With the current regime and President Putin, I don't see a big change.
Nations that don't have a capacity to deal with their past have a very difficult time looking into the future. 1/
Stubb: This's imperialist DNA and an undertone in Russia that doesn't seem to go away.
Russia is built on empire. That's why Putin talks about the “Russkiy Mir,” the great Russia borders of the 18th cent, with one language, religion, and leader. 2/
Stubb: I'm not very hopeful about the future of Russia.
We thought that Russia and many other countries would just automatically revert to liberal democracy, but it didn't happen. 3/