Big Breaking:
Rahul Gandhi's Vote Chori Atom B0mb turn out to be a Sutli B0mb.
Congress will cry after this thread because I have destroyed their PR worth of Crores with just a small X thread.
Read this exclusive thread now and share it maximum
Rahul Gandhi's Vote Chori Atom B0mb turn out to be a Sutli B0mb.
Congress will cry after this thread because I have destroyed their PR worth of Crores with just a small X thread.
Read this exclusive thread now and share it maximum
2. In his PPT, on Page 4, Rahul has made the first claim that, ‘The Maharashtra results confirmed our suspicions about Mass Scale Vote Chori’
He has cited one of the articles from the Propaganda website, Newslaundry, as a reference.
However, there were numerous red flags!
He has cited one of the articles from the Propaganda website, Newslaundry, as a reference.
However, there were numerous red flags!
3. Now read all these tweets. Tweets are full of hate against Hindus.
The words he has used for Hindus and Hinduism are so hateful that even algorithm is not allowed it to write.
The person behind this account is Vishal Vaibhav.
The words he has used for Hindus and Hinduism are so hateful that even algorithm is not allowed it to write.
The person behind this account is Vishal Vaibhav.
4. Surprisingly, extremely Hindu-hating and politically biased Vishal Vaibhav is a coauthor of the article, which Rahul Gandhi has used in his PPT.
All of his articles are riddled with misinformation and half-truths, creating a conspiracy theory out of nothing.
All of his articles are riddled with misinformation and half-truths, creating a conspiracy theory out of nothing.
5 Another co-author of the propaganda article, which was used as a reference in Rahul Gandhi’s Vote Choti PPT, is Sumedha Mittal.
She began her career with CPR, a think tank owned by the daughter of a Congress leader, which is funded by deep state players like Ford Foundation.
She began her career with CPR, a think tank owned by the daughter of a Congress leader, which is funded by deep state players like Ford Foundation.
6. Later, she has also worked with the deep state-funded OCCRP and for another outfit, IndiaSpend, where Praveen Chakravarty, the Chairman of the Data Analytics department (which has played a role in preparing Rahul Gandhi’s PPT), was a founding trustee! What a collaboration!
7 Now let’s move forward to page 5 of Rahul Gandhi’s PPT.
He has cited his own article in the reference, which was based on the same report by Vishal Vaibhav and Sumedha Mittal.
He has cited his own article in the reference, which was based on the same report by Vishal Vaibhav and Sumedha Mittal.
8. On Page 6, Rahul said that the EC has refused to share digital voter rolls
Fact: EC is right because digital data can become a tool for manipulation with the use of AI
Especially when there is a history of the Congress with data manipulation outfits like Cambridge Analytica
Fact: EC is right because digital data can become a tool for manipulation with the use of AI
Especially when there is a history of the Congress with data manipulation outfits like Cambridge Analytica
9. On Page 7, Rahul made a laughable claim.
He said that Internal polls indicated 16 wins in the Karnataka Lok Sabha, but he won only 9!
Fact: Internal polls conducted by political parties are often biased and contain errors.
Only a fool can compare it with the real results.
He said that Internal polls indicated 16 wins in the Karnataka Lok Sabha, but he won only 9!
Fact: Internal polls conducted by political parties are often biased and contain errors.
Only a fool can compare it with the real results.
10. On Page 8, Rahul Gandhi has tried to create an impression that his team has done some extensive work. But he lied!
How? He claimed that his team had read lakhs of papers, which were over 7 feet tall, in three lines.
How? He claimed that his team had read lakhs of papers, which were over 7 feet tall, in three lines.
11. In reality, one page of ECI has 30 entries, and the total number of voters in Mahadevpura is approximately 6 lakhs, so you need to check only 20k pages, not lakhs as claimed by Rahul Gandhi.
12. Claim: The documents were 7 feet plus height in 3 lines
Fact: Thickness of one sheet = 0.1 mm
For 20,000 sheets: 20,000×0.1 mm=2,000 mm
1 mm = 0.00328084 feet
Total height in feet:2,000 mm×0.00328084 ft/mm=6.56 feet
In 3 parts, it becomes 6.56 feet/3 =2 feet 2.24 inches
Fact: Thickness of one sheet = 0.1 mm
For 20,000 sheets: 20,000×0.1 mm=2,000 mm
1 mm = 0.00328084 feet
Total height in feet:2,000 mm×0.00328084 ft/mm=6.56 feet
In 3 parts, it becomes 6.56 feet/3 =2 feet 2.24 inches
13. On Page 10, He used the example of Gurkirat Singh Dang.
But in reality, it turned out to be a fake. Due to rejection issues, four IDs were mistakenly created. This is a management issue, not a matter of vote theft.
But in reality, it turned out to be a fake. Due to rejection issues, four IDs were mistakenly created. This is a management issue, not a matter of vote theft.
14. One page 11, similarly, he has used the example of Aditya Srivastava.
However, it was a case of system update, not vote theft.
Here is the news report explaining the issue.
However, it was a case of system update, not vote theft.
Here is the news report explaining the issue.
15. On page 13, he raised the issue of bulk voters in a single address!
Fact: This issue occurred because tenants moves after every few months and fail to update their new addresses..
Fact: This issue occurred because tenants moves after every few months and fail to update their new addresses..
16. On page 15, he raised about micro-sized photos.
Fact: Again, it is a system issue. There is no evidence to suggest that these individuals are fake voters or have a particular party affiliation.
Fact: Again, it is a system issue. There is no evidence to suggest that these individuals are fake voters or have a particular party affiliation.
17. On page 16/17, Rahul gave an example of Shakun Rani to highlight the alleged misuse of Form 6.
Fact: “Shakun Rani said that she voted only once. A preliminary probe also found that the tick-marked document Gandhi showed was not issued by the polling officer.” India Today.
Fact: “Shakun Rani said that she voted only once. A preliminary probe also found that the tick-marked document Gandhi showed was not issued by the polling officer.” India Today.
18. This is how Rahul Gandhi’s PPT is!
Full of lies, used references to articles that were prepared by people who are politically biased, mentally unfit, or have a career with a Congress-owned think tank, and with a head of the Congress data research team.
Full of lies, used references to articles that were prepared by people who are politically biased, mentally unfit, or have a career with a Congress-owned think tank, and with a head of the Congress data research team.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
