Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Why is it important to take a look at the Torah references to Amaleq and in a different way?
1)
The Torah tells of a tribe that attacked the Jewish People on their way out of Egypt 3400 years ago and that G-d ordered that this tribe, “Amaleq,” should be completely destroyed and that no spoils be taken.
2)
Our Sages have tried to interpret this story from a number of directions, from trying to discover who they were, tying them to Esau, to coming up with all sorts of spiritual explanations for what happened, to explain away what seems like a blood-thirsty end to a people.
3)
To really understand, put aside the nice stories used in explanation, and see how our Sages used metaphor to illustrate lessons. Why the connection with Esau? Because to our Sages, Esau was the personification of a people who put power above all other values, and
4)
who were willing to abandon normative morality and means in favor of a desired end. Esau was identified with the excesses of Rome, the power of Rome that ignored moral standards developed by many cultures over many many years.
5)
So, what was Amaleq? It was a people who chose to attack the Jewish population at its weakest, recently out of slavery, going through a barren land with little food, appearing to have little ability to defend itself.
6)
They attacked to murder men, women and children in the most brutal way, rape, hostage taking, pure barbarity and to steal what the Jews had if anything.
7)
And what are we told justice should be? Kill them all, destroy their flocks, destroy all that they have. But do not take anything of theirs.
8)
Get it? We were not destroying Amaleg to get anything from them. We were told not to take spoils. Not to do what they did. No kidnapping of their women and children nor of anything they had.
9)
We were told that we must remove a threat to our existence — remove it completely — because if we don’t, it will come back to haunt us, to damage us, sometime in the future.
10)
Now, think Hamas, the PLO, Islamic Jihad, and all the other names that all have the same general goal — killing Jews, ending Israel and then, ending Western civilization.
How are these organizations any different from Amaleq?
11)
Can't answer, can you? Because these groups are no different than Amaleq. They are Amaleq. That is the metaphor.
12)
They attacked Israel in 1973 on Yom Kippur. They attacked again on October 7, 2023 on another Jewish Holiday. They, when they had the opportunity, murdered, raped, tortured, burned babies alive, took prisoners and
13)
held them as hostages, continuing the torture and rapes on their victims. They are Amaleq.
And you do not negotiate with Amaleq. You do not make deals. You do not allow them to come back again in the future.
14)
And International law, the Geneva Conventions, agree, in that they excluded terrorists from any benefits or consideration. So, Jews & Christians, that claim to value Torah/ Bible should know what is necessary.
Destroy Amaleq — or whatever group of Amaleq today calls itself."
15)
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@PenninahBloom I truly miss Pope John Paul II because his legacy was improving Christian-Jewish relations and is defined by unprecedented efforts to heal centuries of division, foster mutual respect, and establish a foundation for lasting reconciliation.
1)
@PenninahBloom He is widely recognized as the most significant figure in transforming Catholic-Jewish relations in modern history, breaking down deep-seated prejudices and building bridges between the two faiths.
2)
@PenninahBloom His personal history, growing up in Wadowice, Poland, where he had Jewish friends and neighbors and witnessed the Holocaust firsthand, profoundly shaped his understanding and empathy towards the Jewish people. He often referred to Jews as "our elder brothers in faith,"
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Clearly, something needs to be said again:
Exchanging Terrorists for Kidnapped Innocents
This week, again, Hamas has agreed to continue negotiations on release of Jews taken hostage by Hamas.
1)
The simple fact is that kidnapping and hostage taking is nothing new in the Muslim world. The practice goes back to the early days of Islam in Mecca and Yathrib (Medina), when Christians and Jews were taken hostage and forced to convert to Islam or killed.
2)
It was a practice essential to the slave trade in West Africa, where Muslim forces kidnapped and sold captives to Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, and English interests. A lot of other examples could be noted over the past 1,400 years.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "UNICEF has embarked on a massive fundraising campaign worldwide, but mostly in the USA.
But one might ask—where is the money going?
1)
Well, in the past year, more than $480 million in UNICEF funds has been provided to the Palestinians, approximately 81% of spending, providing schoolbooks and food.
2)
Of course, the need for help is worldwide, but for some reason, UNICEF focuses on Palestinian Arabs. The rest seems to go to Muslim nations.
And remember what is in those schoolbooks—anti-Jewish, anti-USA propaganda, teaching lies, hate, and jihadism.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Comment About the Soon-to-Be Ireland Presidential Election
Frankly, I do not see much to differentiate the three top candidates. They all appear to be anti-American, Trump haters, and anti-Israel antisemites.
1)
I suggest that whoever wins this presidential race, Ireland, will solve none of its problems and will continue to take sides with those who want to destroy Western civilization.
2)
Further, as Ireland has already said they are blocking trade with Israel, Israel should block Irish goods in return, name Irish leaders present and future as persona non grata and ban them from entering Israel, and change visa rules for Irish citizens and passport holders.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote yesterday:
"SEPTEMBER 17 IS “CONSTITUTION DAY” COMMEMORATING THE DAY DELEGATES SIGNED TO RATIFY THE CONSTITUTION.
1)
JUST A REMINDER OF WHAT THE US BILL OF RIGHTS ACTUALLY SAYS, NOT WHAT SOME POLITICIANS CHOOSE TO TELL YOU WHAT IT SAYS.
2)
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
2)
This article quoting Candace Owens is very telling. Candace Owens started out as a Democrat. Recently, she said she was sorry she ever supported and voted for President Trump. For the record, Bill Ackman stated, in part:
1)
"For the record, at no time have I ever threatened Charlie Kirk, Turning Point or anyone associated with him. I have never blackmailed anyone, let alone Charlie Kirk.
2)
I have never offered Charlie or Turning Point any money in an attempt to influence Charlie's opinion on anything. In fact, my interactions with Charlie Kirk have been extremely cordial, albeit limited, regretfully so,
3)