Ask Perplexity Profile picture
Sep 17, 2025 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🚨 Adobe vs. The AI Revolution: Adobe's share price is down 26% since ChatGPT launched (Nov 2022: ~$400 → Sep 2025: $349).

Instead of strengthening their 34% Photoshop market dominance, they've lost $75B in market value.

How did this happen for a company that had 3 years to prepare for the AI wave? Where is the $3.5B in R&D spend each year going? Here's the full breakdown:Image
1/ THE MARKET DOMINANCE

In November 2022, Adobe seemed invincible. For 40 years, they had built the ultimate creative monopoly where Design agencies built entire business models around Adobe expertise:

• 34% of the global creative software market
• 90% of professionals dependent on Photoshop
• 26 million subscribers paying $660 annually
• Revenue: $22.6 billion with 89% gross margins

Their stock traded at $400, market cap near $200 billion and CEO Shantanu Narayen called Adobe "the infrastructure for creativity itself."Image
2/ THE YEAR EVERYTHING CHANGED: 2025

Generative AI rewired demand and collapsed barriers to creating images/video.

Competitors from Midjourney, OpenAI to Google’s Gemini nano-banana pushed quality and speed, shifting value from tool mastery to prompt‑driven outcomes.

Adobe's leadership knew this was coming. But they completely misread what was actually happening...Image
3/ ADOBE'S RESPONSE

Adobe's response revealed everything wrong with their strategy. They rebranded “All Apps” to Creative Cloud Pro and raised prices:

• Creative Cloud prices jumped 17% to $70/month (+17%).
• Student plans are $29.99/mo first year, then $39.99/mo.
• New users on standard plan were limited to only 25 monthly credits (down from 500) with fewer AI features.

Meanwhile, competitors offered superior capabilities for nearly free. Google offered Nano Banana free (100 daily edits), OpenAI charged just $0.04 per image.
4/ THE $3.5 BILLION R&D SPEND

Here's where Adobe's story becomes perplexing. They spent $3.5 billion annually on R&D and in 2025 launched Firefly Video Model, Image Model 4 Ultra, enhanced mobile apps.

But inside Firefly, Adobe was using Google’s Gemini 2.5 Flash Image and OpenAI models.

The most damning evidence was yet to come...
5/ THE QUALITY GAP EXPOSED

Side-by-side tests reveal uncomfortable truth: AI tools often produce superior results.

Midjourney demonstrates artistic understanding with sophisticated lighting, compelling composition, realism and emotional resonance that Adobe's algorithm-trained models couldn't match.Image
6/ WALL STREET'S RESPONSE

Despite beating earnings every quarter, Adobe's stock dropped in value: $400 to $349 = 26% decline, wiping out $75 billion in shareholder wealth.

Meanwhile, Big Tech added $8 trillion since ChatGPT launched. Even with record Q3 earnings of $5.99 billion, Adobe stock traded 35% below analyst targets.

Wall Street's message was clear: we see your current profits, but we don't believe in your future.Image
7/ THE ENTERPRISE SPLIT

Here's the twist: Large enterprises actually increased Adobe spending 40%+ in 2025. They payed premiums for "commercially safe" AI and legal indemnification.

But mid-market companies (Adobe's growth engine) now questions ROI.

Why pay $70/month per employee when marketing teams can create campaigns using cheaper and better AI tools?
9/ BOTTOM LINE

Adobe built a $150B empire on the assumption that professional creativity required professional tools.

AI shattered that assumption overnight.

The company isn't dying, it's evolving into a high-margin enterprise niche player. But the days of creative software monopoly are over.

This isn't just Adobe's problem, it's a preview of how technological platform shifts can invalidate decades of competitive advantage.

The creative software revolution isn't coming. It's here.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ask Perplexity

Ask Perplexity Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AskPerplexity

Dec 26, 2025
Silver is quietly becoming a problem

Price just broke all-time highs after 14 years. Up 158% this year.

Electrification. AI datacenters. Grid. Defense. All need silver.

China is tightening export controls, and stockpiles are still depleting.

Here's what's actually happening: Image
Image
1/ China is restricting exports

Starting 2026, silver exports require government licenses. Only large, state-approved firms qualify.

In practice: more paperwork, more gating, more “approved players.”

That can act like supply loss when timing matters.

Some reports suggest some institutional positioning may be shifting and governments may be stockpiling.Image
Image
2/ The market was already short

Silver has run structural deficits for 4 straight years.

• Cumulative gap: 678 million ounces
• That's 10 months of global mine production
• 2025 is on track for year 5

Where'd the metal come from? Stockpiles built over 30 years.
Those stockpiles are nearly gone.Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 3, 2025
"Journalists keep saying AI is 'draining aquifers' and 'boiling oceans.'

One problem: they're citing a 2023 estimate that's now off by ~100×.

Google just measured it. A median Gemini text query uses:
- 5 drops of water
- 9 seconds of TV worth of electricity
- 0.03g of CO₂

Per-prompt energy has dropped 33× in one year.

So why does the myth persist?
Outdated research, good headlines—and a real issue buried underneath.

The actual concerns are local, not global.

Here's what's actually happening:Image
1/ Where the water actually goes

AI doesn't "drink" water inside the model. Data centers use water to move heat:

Heat from chips → cooling towers → water evaporates

Water use varies by location, cooling design, and power source. A data center in wet Oregon on hydro ≠ one in drought-stricken Arizona on natural gas.

It's an infrastructure question, not a "prompt is evil" question.Image
2/ Per-prompt impact: small and falling

Google's Gemini data (May 2025):

- 5 drops of water (0.26 mL)
- 9 seconds of TV (0.24 Wh)
- 0.03g CO₂

Efficiency is improving fast: Google reports 33× lower energy and 47× lower carbon per prompt compared to one year ago.

The direction is clear: more usage, less water per useful token.Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 28, 2025
🐋 The Whale is back!!

DeepSeek just dropped an IMO gold-medalist model.

On ProofBench-Advanced—where models prove formal mathematical theorems—GPT-5 scores 20%. Gemini Deep Think IMO Gold hits 65.7%. DeepSeek Math V2 (Heavy) scores 61.9%.

That's second place—but Gemini isn't open source.

This is the best open math model in the world. And DeepSeek released the weights. Apache 2.0.

Here's what they discovered:Image
Image
1/ Why Normal LLMs Break on Real Math

Most large language models are great at sounding smart, but:
- They’re rewarded for the final answer, not the reasoning.
- If they accidentally land on the right number with bad logic, they still get full credit.
- Over time they become “confident liars”: fluent, persuasive, and sometimes wrong.

That’s fatal for real math, where the proof is the product.

To fix this, DeepSeek Math V2 changes what the model gets rewarded for: not just being right, but being rigorously right.Image
2/ The Core Idea: Generator + Verifier

Instead of one model doing everything, DeepSeek splits the job:
1. Generator – the “mathematician”
- Produces a full, step-by-step proof.

2. Verifier – the “internal auditor”
- Checks the proof for logical soundness.
- Ignores the final answer. It only cares about the reasoning.

This creates an internal feedback loop:
One model proposes, the other critiques.Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 27, 2025
Batteries Just Became AI Infrastructure

Battery storage is already scaling—159 GW deployed globally, 926 GW projected by 2033.

Renewables needed it first. Now AI needs it too.

Tesla is deploying Megapacks at data centers. China is deploying 30 GW this year, integrating storage directly into AI buildout.

Why? Data centers can’t scale without solving three problems:
- 7-year interconnection queues
- power quality GPUs demand
- backup without diesel permits

Batteries solve all three ↓
Why AI Data Centers Need Batteries

Interconnection is broken. Utility connection takes 7+ years. Batteries bypass it. Skip the queue.

GPUs break traditional power. Training loads swing 90% at 30 Hz. Batteries smooth it in 30 milliseconds.

Diesel doesn’t scale. Permitting is hard. For 20-hour backup, batteries are cost-competitive.

The math: ~1% of data center capex.Image
The Scale

Global capacity: 159 GW by end-2024. Up 85% from 86 GW in 2023. Projected: 926 GW by 2033.

Cost curve: $115/kWh in 2024, down 84% from $723/kWh in 2013. Still falling.

Economics flipped. Solar plus 4-hour storage runs ~$76/MWh. New gas peakers cost $80-120/MWh.

Storage wins in sunbelt markets now.Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Nov 25, 2025
The universe isn’t just expanding — it’s speeding up

13.8 billion years after the Big Bang, astronomers expected gravity to slowly slow cosmic expansion. Instead, when they looked deep into space, they found the opposite: the universe is accelerating.

Whatever drives that acceleration makes up ~70% of the cosmos.

We call it dark energy.

We can measure it. We can see its effects. So what is it, really?
How we figured this out

Cepheid stars: the distance trick

Henrietta Leavitt discovered that certain stars (Cepheid variables) get brighter and dimmer with a regular period — and that period tells you their true brightness → lets us measure distance to faraway galaxies.

Redshift: galaxies on the move

Vesto Slipher used spectra of galaxies to show many had their light stretched to longer, redder wavelengths.
Redder → moving away faster.

Hubble & the expanding universe

Edwin Hubble and Milton Humason combined Cepheid distances with redshift and found a pattern:

>The farther a galaxy is, the faster it’s receding.

That’s the Hubble–Lemaître law: clear evidence that the universe is expanding.Image
Image
Image
Image
The shock: expansion is accelerating

In the 1990s, two teams studied Type Ia supernovae, stellar explosions so consistent in brightness that they act like “standard candles.”

By comparing how bright they should be to how bright they look, you can get distance.

By measuring redshift, you get how fast they’re moving away.

The surprise:

• The supernovae were dimmer and farther away than expected.

• That only made sense if, over billions of years, the universe’s expansion had sped up instead of slowing down.

This cosmic acceleration is what we now attribute to dark energy.Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 24, 2025
🚨The White House just launched the Genesis Mission — a Manhattan Project for AI

The Department of Energy will build a national AI platform on top of U.S. supercomputers and federal science data, train scientific foundation models, and run AI agents + robotic labs to automate experiments in biotech, critical materials, nuclear fission/fusion, space, quantum, and semiconductors.

Let’s unpack what this order actually builds, and how it could rewire the AI, energy, and science landscape over the next decade:Image
1/ At the core is a new American Science and Security Platform.

DOE is ordered to turn the national lab system into an integrated stack that provides:
• HPC for large-scale model training, simulation, inference
• Domain foundation models across physics, materials, bio, energy
• AI agents to explore design spaces, evaluate experiments, automate workflows
• Robotic/automated labs + production tools for AI-directed experiments and manufacturing

National-scale AI scientist + AI lab tech as infrastructure.Image
2/ The targets are very explicit and very strategic.

Within 60 days, DOE has to propose at least 20 “national challenges” in:

• advanced manufacturing
• biotechnology
• critical materials
• nuclear fission & fusion
• quantum information science
• semiconductors & microelectronics

This is about energy dominance, supply chains, and defense.Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(