The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states.
Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life.
Why?
We finally have some answers.
Today, for the first time in decades, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel is meeting to consider changes to the childhood vaccine schedule, including the hepatitis B shot.
Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing.
🧵 THREAD
For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question:
Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn?
@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years.
But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird.
Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.
Just yesterday, former CDC director Susan Monarez seemed unable to explain why we vaccinate newborns for hepatitis B.
The hepatitis B virus is, after all, a bloodborne pathogen with transmission typically occurring through unprotected sex, blood exchanges like shared needles, and mother-to-child transmission during childbirth.
Only one of these risk factors is relevant to a newborn, but expectant mothers are typically screened for hepatitis B during their prenatal care anyway.
So why exactly do we give it to newborns? Does anyone know? Are we protecting them for a lifetime of unprotected sex and drugs? Does any protective effect from the vaccine even last that long?
The many concerns surrounding giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns are not unfounded. The concern is not simply a matter of being anti-vax. And concern about this vaccine certainly isn’t anti-science.
Let’s take a look at the science.
The vaccine was first introduced in the 1980s. And early warnings came fast.
Respected vaccine researcher Bohn Dunbar exposed the pattern of autoimmune complications after her own brother was injured by the hepatitis vaccine in 1994.
A 1998 article in the journal Science highlighted the growing concerns surrounding the vaccine, including the fact that attorneys representing more than 15,000 people sued France’s government for downplaying the risks and exaggerating its benefits.
France then suspended hepatitis B vaccination in schools.
A 1999 Congressional hearing laid it out:
• Numerous severe adverse reactions including death, seizures, autism, dysautonomia, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and liver cancer.
• Adverse reaction reports were ignored or dismissed, and short trial durations missed delayed reactions.
• Parents were not informed of the risks, newborns were vaccinated without parental consent, and parents were threatened with intervention from social services.
• Vaccinating low-risk newborns for an adult-associated disease is just plain inappropriate.
• The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was denying most claims.
That same year, fewer than 100 U.S. children under age 2 got hepatitis B.
The math doesn’t add up. It never has.
@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Also in 1999, back when it was actually possible to find a little truth about Big Pharma on TV, ABC News aired an entire program addressing the hepatitis B vaccine.
They even included vaccine-injured patients and parents of severely injured children.
@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The untold history of the hepatitis B vaccine is jaw-dropping.
The science is and has been stacked against this vaccine.
Studies showed hepatitis B vaccination increased the risk of MS, lupus, arthritis, and other autoimmune conditions.
In France, cases of MS spiked 65% after a national campaign. A CDC dataset showed a 12X higher autism risk when given in the first 30 days of life!
Why does the hepatitis B vaccine cause so much damage?
Autoimmune conditions caused by the vaccine are likely due to its antigen having a significant overlap with human myelin.
The molecular mimicry of the vaccine was denied because it couldn’t be proven.
A 1994 Institute of Medicine report noted that, although preliminary data existed for many of the reactions attributed to the hepatitis B vaccine, no further research had been conducted.
Wow, thanks IOM.
@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The trials were a joke.
They monitored “side effects” for a mere 4–5 days. And the placebos they used? No, not saline—they were other vaccines or even aluminum adjuvants!
Are you kidding me??
Serious reactions—sometimes fatal—were reclassified as SIDS or coincidence.
If transmission is typically due to adult risk factors, why not give it only to adults at risk? Healthcare workers, IV drug users, and gay men with multiple partners…
Studies have shown that it can dramatically reduce cases in these groups.
Why infants? There is virtually no risk, and immunity does, in fact, wane.
So what is the point?
The CDC’s main argument is prevention of mother-to-child transmission.
But nearly all U.S. expectant mothers are screened for hepatitis B during pregnancy. And infection rates are under 0.5%!
By the numbers, millions of babies must be vaccinated to prevent a single severe outcome.
And that’s not an exaggeration.
And if mom’s status is unknown, it’s actually mandated in many states to screen newborns for hepatitis B anyway.
So why the universal newborn mandate?
A former ACIP insider revealed the dark truth:
It’s not about maternal transmission. It’s about capturing a “captive audience” in the hospital—before at-risk youth slip through the cracks later in life.
So, because the CDC was failing to reach inner-city teens, they decided to vaccinate every baby in America.
It was never, ever medically justified—it was bureaucratic convenience disguised as science.
Let that sink in.
@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B vaccine’s dark history will leave you speechless.
Were you vaccinated for hep B? What about your children?
The first hepatitis B vaccines were plasma-derived—actually using infected human blood. It even involved chimpanzee-human blood exchanges.
This was during the early AIDS crisis in New York, San Francisco, and LA. Remember: HIV is considered to have come from a chimpanzee virus. Sounds risky.
Merck then rushed out the first recombinant GMO vaccine in 1986.
From the start, the hepatitis B vaccine was expensive—about $145 for three doses compared to $2 for other vaccines.
Uptake was low among the high-risk groups it was meant for.
So regulators shifted strategy: add it to the childhood schedule, where government funding guaranteed sales.
By 1991, ACIP mandated hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns. By 1999, it expanded to all children and adolescents.
Parents objected. Pediatricians resisted. Even gay activists called it a failure of public health outreach.
But the CDC pressed forward—insisting it was “safe and effective” for day old newborn babies, despite what the science said.
Decades later, the outcome couldn’t be more clear.
Acute hepatitis B cases declined—but chronic hepatitis B rates never budged.
The very condition the program was supposed to eliminate hasn’t even changed since 1976.
Severe injuries from the vaccine, however, skyrocketed.
So was it worth it?
@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Today, for the first time in decades, the ACIP will actually do its job and will reconsider the hepatitis B newborn mandate.
@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:
DISTURBING: A bombshell study has found the genetic “fingerprint” of the COVID vaccine embedded in the DNA of a 31-year-old cancer patient—the first direct proof that mRNA fragments can integrate into the human genome.
The finding shatters years of assurances from Big Pharma and health officials who swore the shots could never alter DNA. Researchers described a “perfect storm”: tumor-suppressing genes switched off, DNA repair mechanisms broken, and cancer-driving pathways ignited.
The woman, once healthy, developed stage 4 bladder cancer within a year of three Moderna doses. Genetic fragments in her tumor matched vaccine sequences with odds of “one in a trillion.” Co-author @NicHulscher warned the world “cannot afford to ignore” what may point to turbo cancers, strokes, and even inherited DNA damage.
The implications are staggering. @zeee_media's report exposes what regulators are desperate to bury—don’t miss it.
In this faith-based book, Alin Armstrong explores biblical principles of fair trade, honesty, and sound money.
“Unequal weights are an abomination to the Lord,” he writes, reminding us that since Eden, gold has been God’s standard for honest money—a safeguard no one can print away or corrupt.
Discover these timeless principles for yourself—get your FREE copy now at goldbiblepulse.com.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Congress just blew the lid off geoengineering. MTG forced a hearing that exposed cloud seeding and undisclosed “other” chemicals raining down on America.
The danger isn’t theoretical—it’s happening now.
Scientists warned that spraying sulfates could spark acid rain and devastate crops. RFK Jr. once vowed, “we are going to stop this crime,” yet testimony suggested the real power may rest with DARPA—raising the chilling question of whether even the head of HHS can stop it.
Rep. Tim Burchett demanded a federal ban. “If there’s any doubt about safety, the practice must end now,” he said. This isn’t theory—it’s about America’s food supply and who controls it.
@zeee_media uncovers which agencies are implicated, what “other” really means, and why geoengineering could push the nation to the brink of food and environmental collapse.
The weight comes right back when you stop taking it. Why? Because it doesn’t fix anything. It just shuts off your hunger.
And the side effects are far worse than they’re telling you.
We’re talking about stomach paralysis, bowel obstructions, suicidal thoughts, vision loss, facial wasting, and sagging breasts—some of which are PERMANENT.
They once pulled a drug just like this. So why are they pushing an even worse one now?
This report exposes the Ozempic playbook—and the corruption behind it.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, another major development has surfaced: two NATO nations now claim Russian drones crossed their airspace.
Martin Armstrong fears it’s a false flag to spark war and force global CBDCs onto the population.
And when it comes to Charlie Kirk’s murder, there is “no going back,” he warns.
Here’s what he believes is coming next.
🧵 THREAD
Over the weekend, a major escalation towards World War 3 occurred—yet again. And understandably, a lot of people just weren’t paying attention to Europe and NATO this weekend… but we need to be.
Why? Because both Poland and Romania have accused Russia of entering their airspace with drones. And the United States has responded to these claims, vowing on Friday to defend “every inch of NATO territory.”
But there are many unanswered questions about this alleged attack. According to economist Martin Armstrong, the consensus is that it was a false flag designed to drum up support for a full fledged war with Russia.
@ArmstrongEcon joins us to discuss.
Economist Martin Armstrong opened by blasting Western strategists for toppling regimes with no plan for what comes next. He drew a straight line from Iraq to today’s Russia policy, warning that the rhetoric has already crossed into dangerous territory.
When Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas says, “Russia’s too big and should be broken up,” Armstrong argued this isn’t about borders, it’s about destruction. Leaders act as if their adversary won’t respond, but anyone under existential threat will use every weapon available—just as a homeowner would reach for a gun if their house were stormed.
Maria piled on, mocking the weekend’s flimsy drone claims and pointing out what looked like duct tape holding it together, while highlighting the “new world order” language out of Brussels. Armstrong said the real driver isn’t security—it’s Europe’s economic collapse pushing escalation, dressed up in a packaged storyline obvious to anyone who is paying attention.
It set the tone for the episode: elites manufacturing consent for a wider conflict, and ignoring the consequences while the public grows more alert as the stakes rise.
Propaganda works. In fact, it’s one of the most powerful invisible forces in modern society.
Professional PR firms create narratives that most people believe, even when they very obviously go against our self-interest. And most people never notice it’s happening.
The COVID vaccine roll out was the largest PR campaign of our lifetime.
*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*
Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.
Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.
Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.
The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?
🧵 THREAD
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
The pharmaceutical playbook has always relied on one thing: Public Relations.
From fake incubator stories during the Gulf War to anti-sunlight fearmongering by dermatologists, the strategy has been the same: create panic, then sell the cure.