Thomas Keith Profile picture
Sep 18 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
The controversy surrounding David Zini’s appointment as head of the Shabak has exploded into one of the sharpest internal disputes in the Israeli security establishment. Ministers have already lodged strong protests with the Gronis committee, warning that the choice reeks of political engineering rather than professional merit.Image
Critics argue that Zini lacks the qualifications to command such a large and intricate intelligence body, and fear he will be wielded as a political instrument by those who installed him. The process itself has raised red flags: the Prime Minister is accused of ignoring the legal advisor’s recommendations, while his private meeting with Zini in a closed car away from officials has fueled suspicions of hidden motives.
What truly ignites outrage, however, is the revelation that Sarah Netanyahu personally pushed Zini’s candidacy, just as she previously maneuvered to elevate him to Chief of Staff earlier this year. His appointment is now cast not as a routine transfer of power, but as a political intrusion.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Keith

Thomas Keith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iwasnevrhere_

Sep 18
What the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics just confirmed is more devastating than any battlefield headline: the Zionist project is bleeding from the inside.

In 2024 alone, 82,000 Israelis packed up and left, while only 31,000 came in. Migration is the euphemism; evacuation is the reality, masked by documents and forms.
The trend isn’t new, 55,000 departures against 27,000 arrivals in 2023 already signaled the crack. But the Gaza war, Tel Aviv under Yemeni ballistic fire, collapsing markets, and the total absence of political legitimacy have turned that trickle into a flood.

Zionist propaganda used to sell the dream of “aliyah”; now, the numbers show the reality of yerida, mass departure.
The economy is suffocating under war costs. Political divisions are ripping through the ruling class. Social cohesion is eroding under the pressure of conscription, casualties, and visible international isolation.

Israelis are voting with their passports: the occupation is no longer sustainable, and the settler-colonial experiment is becoming what it always was, temporary scaffolding on stolen land.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 18
The Saudi-Pakistan compact was the patch that removed a single-point failure; a second wave of Arab signatures turns that fix into an operating system. The control plane moves off U.S.-Israel’s permission stack and onto a sovereign grid where Arab treasuries and airspaces are callable resources Pakistan can task, with Chinese arsenals and sensors supplying depth.
When multiple Gulf courts underwrite Pakistan on term, deposits, swap lines, insured letters of credit, oil on structured swaps, the war budget stops breathing through Washington. Liquidity ceases to be a choke and becomes duration on tap: predictable import cover, stable rupee, funded surge orders, and fuel uplift that doesn’t spike with headlines. Remittances become signal, not noise, directed flows that reinforce reserves during pressure windows.
If the Saudi clause, aggression on one triggers both, propagates, Arab corridors graduate from permissive transit to treaty-bound shield. That anchors PAF forward detachments, shared early-warning tapes, GBAD drills, AEW rotations, and rules of engagement that don’t wait for an American key turn. Israeli overflight, once assumed, becomes contested across policy, radar, and narrative, all under a picture Pakistan helps compile.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 17
For Pakistan, the pact addresses its historical Achilles heel. While Islamabad has maintained a robust indigenous defense posture, backed by nuclear deterrence and a deepening weapons pipeline from China, it has always been vulnerable in two critical areas: energy supply and financial sustainability during prolonged conflict.
Wars are not won by missiles alone, they require sustained logistics, fuel, and liquidity to keep the war economy running under pressure. In the past, external shocks, sanctions, oil price spikes, or financial cut-offs, created a ceiling on Pakistan’s war endurance. With Riyadh’s oil wealth and financial backing formally locked in, that ceiling has been removed.
Pakistan now enjoys an unprecedented warfighting depth: Chinese arms and ammunition on one side, Saudi oil and money on the other. It is an industrial-scale supply chain that neutralizes the constraints India has historically counted on.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 16
Inside accounts show how Hamas in Jerusalem evolved from small student cells into a lattice that linked Gaza and the West Bank. Figures like Muhyiddin al-Sharif and Muhammad Aziz Rushdi sketched the early geometry: educated youth in quarters the occupier deemed “safe,” quietly building the embryo of a military network under the city’s skin.Image
By 1991-92 the first cells had formed. What began as social circles became organized groups, stretching from Jerusalem into Bethlehem, Hebron, and Khan Younis. Muhyiddin al-Sharif, the movement’s No. 2, framed the theory: Jerusalem’s own sons could wound the occupier from inside its claimed capital. Rushdi became the field executor, carrying responsibility after Sheikh Saleh’s arrest.
Operations followed: the capture of soldiers, the killing of settlers, infiltration of camps. Links ran southward to Gaza, with reciprocal flows of weapons and funds. The meetings with Muhammad Deif (Abu Khaled), who would later embody escalation dominance, fused Gaza’s fire with West Bank initiative. By then six groups were active across Ramallah, Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and Hebron.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 15
In the shadow of Israel’s regional war, another front has opened, this one not on the battlefield but in the refugee camps of Lebanon.

Behind closed doors, Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah and Nawaf Salam in Beirut are coordinating with U.S. and Saudi backers to strip Palestinians in Lebanon of their weapons.

Marketed as “reform” and “dialogue,” the initiative is in fact a liquidation project: dismantling the camps’ resistance backbone, coercing families into exile, and erasing the political presence of Palestinians abroad.
The early “disarmament” gestures, rusted rifles from Fatah cells, were symbolic, a soft opening before targeting the only forces that matter: Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and camp networks aligned with Hezbollah.
The plan is mapped out in eight steps.

First, a sweeping criminalization campaign: anyone refusing to disarm will be branded a fugitive, hunted inside and outside the camps.

Second, Ramallah-controlled security units will be rebuilt to work with the Lebanese army in joint raids.

Third, camp residents will have their civil and social rights tethered to disarmament, no aid, no schooling, no health care without compliance.

Fourth, non-Palestinians in camps will be expelled under the pretext of “law enforcement,” while Islamic factions listed as terrorists will be directly targeted.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 15
This Jerusalem Post “exclusive” is classic psychological warfare dressed up as revelation.

The claim that “dozens of Mossad women penetrated Iran” during the 12-Day War reads less like intelligence and more like a recycling of orientalist spy-fiction tropes.

By centering female operatives, the narrative borrows from the old Mossad Amazons mythos, seduction, disguise, infiltration, designed to glamorize Mossad’s reach and mask its actual dependence on U.S. coordination and foreign assets.Image
What the piece admits, buried under theatrics, is that Israel had to deploy hundreds of operatives and manage networks of Iranian dissidents just to enable airstrikes.

Mossad agents were not waltzing through Tehran unscathed; they were propping up a kill-chain reliant on aerial refueling, foreign basing, and informant networks vulnerable to Iranian counterintelligence.

The “female operatives” framing is cover for this wider dependence, turning an operational liability into PR spectacle.
The article also concedes the real failure: despite “destroying” (they didn’t) Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan, Israel left untouched over 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium, enough feedstock for several warheads if advanced to weapons-grade.

Even Israeli officials are split, with critics acknowledging that Iran could rush enrichment in months. Others admit it would take years to rebuild the bombed infrastructure.

Either way, the West’s immediate concern is access: forcing Iran to admit IAEA inspectors under threat of snapback sanctions.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(