Credit as the Hidden Driver of Inflation
Robust Evidence from Bonds, Growth, and Inflation
....."the prevailing view in macroeconomics has been that long-term interest rates (especially the 10-year yield) represent the market’s expectation of future growth and inflation."
....."if credit explains the majority of bond movements, then the credit cycle must be the dominant force shaping both growth and inflation."
....'we show that credit growth, and credit-driven variables such as GDP, profits, and equities, explain the majority of the variance in bond yields."
Granger p-values: p ≈ 0.002–0.01 for credit → yield;
Taken together, credit + GDP + stocks explain ≈ 70–75% of long-bond variance, leaving a small residual to monetary interventions and shocks.
If bonds represent the market’s discounted expectation of future growth + inflation, and if credit explains the majority of bond movements, then the credit cycle must be the dominant force shaping both growth and inflation.
Persistent inflation is not random nor expectation-anchored; it is mechanically linked to prior credit growth.
≈ 99.9% that credit drives long-term bond yields — and by implication, drives inflation.
Robustness Box: Credit as the Hidden Driver of Inflation
Objective:
Test whether credit growth, directly and through its downstream effects, explains the inflation component of bond yields.
≥ 99 % — based on multi-test convergence (Granger p < 0.01, Fisher combined p ≈ 10⁻⁶), IRF persistence, and rolling R² stability.
@threadreaderapp
unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"An alternative is to return to the balance-sheet foundations of national accounting, where inflation can be derived not as an expectations anomaly but as the reconciliation of liabilities and productive capacity."
..the reconciliation of liabilities and productive capacity.
Taken together, the two identities describe both where demand comes from and where output flows once created.
Bonds are driven by growth, then inflation — as debt-dilution inflation predicts...
Thesis. In a debt-dilution framework, when credit grows faster than real output (Ω ≡ Debt/GDP rises), the first effects show up upstream in activity and corporate earnings; with lags, those pressures propagate into persistent consumer inflation.
(DGS30 shows the same pattern; CPI ex-shelter explains the largest share at medium horizons, while CPATAX/GDP matter more early on.)
Wages are the main proximate channel moving Services LEH,....
.... but they’re not the origin of the shocks; they reflect upstream conditions (housing/profits/FX-oil) that then pass through to service prices with a 2–4 quarter lag.
Here’s the hierarchy
Putting it together (the hierarchy)
(Dollar ↔ Oil) interact at short horizons and, together with Housing and Profits, push Wages, and Wages pass through to SLE
Japan’s fertility decline is best understood as a long-run demographic adjustment to debt saturation. Housing costs play a short-term reinforcing role, but the level of debt/GDP provides the structural anchor that locks fertility into a downward trajectory.
Threshold testing suggests this relationship intensifies once debt/GDP exceeds ~160–170%, marking the onset of a “high-debt regime” where demographic adjustment is altered.