#SupremeCourt hears plea of Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez seeking quashing of the Rs. 200 crores money laundering case involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih
J Dutta: The allegation is that, it was given to you as gifts. Nothing has been proved. At the stage of framing charges, you have to accept what is the allegation.
We appreciate that the law is such that anyone can be involved. Take it as, they were two very close friends and now if one friend gives something to the other friend, ultimately if it is found that the other person is involved in a predicate offence, very difficult. That's why we say, Vijay Madanlal has considered this part and we are found by that.
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: I must know that this man is extorting, and want to send me part of the proceeds of extortion. With respect, otherwise I would be an accused in the main case. Now, please see one more crucial thing which the High Court missed. Along with predicate offence of extortion, there is MCOCA in Bombay. MCOCA is also extended to Delhi. MCOCA is identical to Section 3 [of PMLA].
So, the predicate offence is extortion and MCOCA, which is identical to Section 3. Now, I am charged with MCOCA which is identifical to PMLA extortion case and I am a witness. I am supposed to be a witness, what will I say? I came in touch with this man, I never went to any jail. I never asked him to give me any money, I met him because I am a film star, someone introduced me. If I am not charged under MCOCA, I can't be charged in the camouflage of MCOCA in the main case
Rohatgi: The prosecution case is you should have been more careful.
J Datta: come at appropriate stay, you withdraw it. We will not interfere.
Rohatgi: mylords may adjourn it
J Datta: Bench is in course of hearing the review [Madanlal, PMLA review]
Rohatgi: but the observation of the judgment on merits should not influence the trial judge
Order: Dismissed with liberty to approach the Court. The observations made in the impugned judgment were only for the purpose of disposing of the petition. At the time of framing of charges, the special court shall be at liberty to hear the petitioner and pass the order.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chief Justice of India Justice Bhushan Ram Gavai is addressing the 10th All India Conference of The Central Administrative Tribunal, 2025.
Follow this thread for updates.
CJI: these Tribunals were designed to improve efficiency and access to justice for government officials. CAT has worked tirelessly to achieve this goal in the 4 decades since its inception. The law commission in its 272nd report highlighted that CAT achieved disposal rate of 94% compared to the number of cases instituted annually
CJI: CAT also maintained an admirable 91% disposal rate between 2015 to 2019. CAT has disposed of nearly 4 lakh of the 6 lakh cases instituted so far. this number reflects the immense effort discipline and dedication that have gone into making it a functional and responsive institution.
#SupremeCourt hears pleas relating to conduct of local body elections in the State of #Maharashtra
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
In May, the Court had passed an interim order for holding of the local body elections, which were stalled since 2022 due to litigation relating to implementation of reservation for OBCs
J Kant: Have the elections been conducted? Order was passed in May, elections were to be conducted in 4 months (by Sept end)
Maharashtra counsel: Process is underway...delimitation done...State Election Commission seeking some extension...an interim application has been filed
J Kant: Why should we grant you time till January?
A counsel: There are 29 municipal corporations...for the first time, elections being done simultaneously
J Kant: Your inaction speaks of incompetence...tell us verbally the reasons
Counsel: We have 65000 EVM machines, require 50000 more...we have placed orders.
#SupremeCourt
J Kant: This was known to you even when we passed the first order
Petitioners: Within 2 weeks, they had to notify...they are now doing everything afresh...delimitation also not finalized in several cases...reasons are festivals, board exams, staff and EVMs not available...requirement of returning officers at polling stations...in Punjab, this Court directed and elections were held immediately.
#SupremeCourt hears batch of petitions challenging the constitutionality of laws in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand and Karnataka, dealing with religious conversions
#AnticonversionActs
Sr Adv CU Singh : in UP Act they have minimum sentence of 20 years coupled with twin conditions of bail and a reverse burden of proof
Singh: anybody who marries in an interfaith marriage, bail would become impossible...there is an urgency, several states are already enacted some are enacting, recently Rajasthan has also enacted a law
#SupremeCourt hears PIL filed by the mothers of Rohit Vemula and Payal Tadvi assailing caste discrimination in higher educational institutions (HEIs)
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
SG Tushar Mehta: 391 suggestions received after publishing of draft regulations…expert committee has said that suggestions need to be examined and accordingly, draft regulations need to be amended
J Kant: There are some very good suggestions…1 or 2 may be problematic
SG: Some suggestions found favorable by the Committee…report filed to UGC, matter pending at that level.
#SupremeCourt #CasteDiscrimination
Sr Adv Indira Jaising (for petitioners): This was filed in 2019…much water has flown under the bridge…many people have committed suicide even after filing of the petition…draft regulations have been published, we gave suggestions…2 coordinate benches of this court have tried to address the issues…we are interested in preventing student suicides...we came to court with a simple grievance that regulations were not being implemented...
J Kant: I read your note...I understand there are 10 points...protection of complainants, mental health counselling, personal liability for negligence, audits, action for non-compliance, etc...our proposal is now that matter is pending with UGC, we direct today that these points be also considered for incorporation in the proposed regulations
Jaising: Grateful. But a time limit may be imposed.
#SupremeCourt dismisses with costs a writ petition seeking reconsideration of its 2020 judgement that upheld the West Bengal Madrasah Services Commission Act 2008.
Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih.
The petitioner filed the writ petition in light of the recent Vasanta Dupare v UoI judgement holding that Article 32 can be invoked by the Supreme Court to revisit its own final orders if it is necessary to prevent a continuing breach of fundamental rights livelaw.in/top-stories/de…