This deal is a perfect example of clear signs you can look out for
This 68-unit deal arrived in my inbox a while ago with 5 massive red flags
1. The deal wasn’t listed on loopnet (came straight from a not-that-well-known broker). Means 90%+ of the market didn’t even see it 2. The location was not disclosed in the text of the initial email. Anytime there’s any sort of “effort barrier”, that further reduces the buyer pool 3. The link in the email directed you to an old listing. Another “barrier to entry” and also proof of an incompetent broker 4. The financials provided were horrible. Most notably, the broker underwrote essentially the same rent for the 1-bed and 2-bed units, which is obviously not true. This led to the broker’s proforma revenue being significantly lower than the actual market revenue, which presented an opportunity (most unsophisticated offers came in too low because they were relying on the broker’s numbers) 5. The asset was operating with higher-than-market vacancy with 5 evictions currently in motion (way too many). I know the market and this made it clear the owners were significantly mismanaging the asset
Basically there were clear signs of broker incompetence and owner mis-management. That means the deal is definitely worth looking into
Now let’s get into the deal itself
The Business Plan:
The deal is 68 units, split into 1/3 studios, 1/3 1-beds and 1/3 2-beds. The property is currently half renovated but management hasn’t done a good job of pushing rents
Business plan was to renovate the other 34 units and bring the other units to market, taking the revenue from $900k to $1.2MM and bringing the NOI from $491k to $756k, stabilizing the property at 9.11%, a 211 bps spread from the market cap rate – which would result in $2MM in profit and a 1.6x equity multiple
So the business plan was actually pretty simple. The tough part for this deal was the capitalization (how to structure the debt and equity). The deal was underwritten with a 60% LTV, 7% interest rate loan. Why’s that?
For a deal like this (where the in-place income is relatively low compared to the purchase price), you have to be a bit creative with the capitalization
You basically have 3 options: 1. Use high leverage bridge debt to fund the renovations 2. Use a low leverage bank loan and fund the renovations through equity 3. Increase the rents gradually and fund the renovations with cashflow
The problem with bridge debt is that it involves high leverage which drastically increases the risk of the deal. The problem with a low leverage bank loan and funding the renovations through equity is that it requires a huge amount of equity, which kills your returns
So how to solve this problem? I like to use a hybrid structure.
In this case, there are 68 total units and half of them have already been renovated by the current owners. I operate in the market and know that renovations should cost roughly $20k/unit. 68 units / 2 = 34 units left to renovate. 34 units * $20k/unit in renovations = $680k in total renovation dollars needed
As you can see, only $200k of renovation dollars have been funded up front
So where’s the rest coming from? Cashflow
The year 1 cashflow isn’t much (roughly $100k, NOI minus debt service). But the rents are well below market and there are 10 units we can renovate immediately ($200k renovation dollars/$20k per unit)
So by the end of year 1, 44 of the units would be fully renovated and the unrenovated units would be marked to market. That would bring the yearly cashflow to $200k-$300k
Then we would simply take the cashflow from the property and reinvest it into unit renovations every time a unit turns
Assuming cashflow was $250k/year after year 1, we’d be able to complete the renovations in 2 years and be ready to sell by the end of year 3
Very simple business plan but requires creativity to get it done.
This deal would never work if you weren’t able to be creative with the renovation funding
If you funded it through bridge debt it would require far too much risk. If you funded it through equity, it would require far too much equity, which would make the returns not worth it. So being creative is important
The last part to address about the business plan is the expenses. I’m sure I’ll get a dozen replies about how you “can’t run a lower expense load than the seller” from all the geniuses in the comments
There is zero reason why your G&A on a 68-unit building should be $63k. Even $10k (which I changed it to) is high. There’s simply not much overhead. Properties in this market should run at approximately a 65% NOI margin, which this asset is now hitting in the underwriting.
Deal Result:
After some back and forth, I maxed out my bid at $8MM. The winning bid was $8.3MM, which I simply wasn’t willing to go up to
The stabilized yield at $8MM was 9.11%. The stabilized yield at $8.3MM was 8.73%, which is below the 200bps spread (that I shoot for at minimum) between the market cap rate of 7% and the stabilized yield. Given that $8MM was already higher than I would’ve liked (I liked the deal far more at $7.6MM, almost a 10% stabilized yield) it didn’t make much sense to chase this deal
The real killer though is at an $8.3MM purchase price, the equity multiple drops from 1.6x to 1.4x. 3 years of work renovating 34 units just to get a 40% return on your money? Not great and not worth it. Better opportunities out there
Overall though, the bid-ask spread between buyers and sellers is getting tighter, which is very good. In this case, I was only ~4% off ($300k off) getting under contract on a deal with a 200bps+ spread between the stabilized yield and the market cap rate
A year ago I was regularly 20% off from a 200bps spread
Sellers are coming back to reality, which means there will very likely be great deals to be had on the horizon
// If you want to buy your own deals and make real money in real estate
Apply in the next post for the Acquisitions Bootcamp to work 1-on-1 with me
If you don’t have a deal within 2 months, I will work for free until you do //
Acquisitions Bootcamp is an 8-week program where you work 1-on-1 with me to craft an investment strategy to fit your skillset, resources & goals - & then find you a deal to fit that strategy
Since we focus on value add, the entry cap doesn’t matter, as long as we can service our debt
The stabilized yield matters because it shows the intrinsic cash flow of the deal
The stabilized yield is the stabilized (post-renovation) NOI divided by all the costs in the deal
Very simple calculation (see below for an example) but very important
We typically need to get to at least a 150 bp spread between the stabilized yield and the market cap rate for a deal to pencil (ex if market cap rate is 5%, need a minimum 6.5% stabilized yield)
For example, buy for an in-place 4 cap, increase revenue to get to a 6.5, sell for a 5 cap. If you buy for $10MM with an NOI of $400k, put in $2MM in renovations and bump the NOI to $780k, you stabilize at a 6.5 yield ($780k/$12MM)
Property is then worth $15.6MM ($780k/5% market cap), for a profit of $3.6MM
Speed matters as well (quicker the better for IRR)
Stabilized yield is a more important metric than IRR because it displays the intrinsic value of the cash flow
Whereas IRR is a bet on the state of the capital markets (debt financing available) at sale as well as cap rates at sale, which basically makes it a total guess
2. Basis (you can show us any IRR you want and we’ll toss the deal if the basis is bad)
What does this mean? It means that you want to look at comps and make sure that in any deal you buy, you’re paying less than the market average
For example, multifamily is valued per unit
So if you take 10 comps and the average price is $100k/unit, you want to be buying for well under that number
Otherwise (barring the real estate being markedly better), you’re not getting a good deal, you’re simply paying “market”
Furthermore that means, in order to sell for a profit, the next buyer will actually have to pay you “above market”. Which is a dangerous bet to make - you’re essentially betting on a “greater fool”, which brings us to the next metric
One of the biggest places beginners get tripped up is the property tour. They don’t know what to look for and they don’t know what anything costs
Here’s what to look for when touring a property so you can accurately price the renovation costs:
Generally a renovation for a Class C 1-bed unit costs me $10k-$15k
Below are the items I focus on when touring to maximize rent and minimize cost
You should think about the property in the 3 categories outlined below 1. Bathroom (~$5k) 2. Kitchen (~$8k, grouping in all appliances & materials) 3. Floors/Paint/Other (~$2k)
Bathroom 1. Shower/Tub: What’s there right now? Do you have to rip everything out or can you reglaze or tile over? Does the shower valve & fixture need replacing? Will you tile the shower or install an acrylic shell? [Costs to redo can run you between $250 & $2.5k] 2. Floor: Are you going to tile the bathroom or run LVP? Can you run the LVP over what’s there now? [LVP is going to run you ~$5/SF & tile will run you $7-15/SF] 3. Toilet/vanity/mirror/lights: Do you need new ones? [Price materials online, the labor for installation should be minimal (~$50-100/item)] 4. Extras: Do you want to add something extra to increase longevity or attractiveness? Embellish walls (tile, shiplap, wainscoting), shower niche, sliding glass shower door, stone countertop, shower ledge, etc [Here costs can get out of control. Way to avoid this is to look at the comps achieving the market rent in your market. Only renovate to that scope & do nothing more. Additional renovations won’t get you a higher rental rate]
What's the relationship between cap rate, return on cost, and stabilized yield?
This is arguably the most important relationship in real estate and most people don’t understand it at all
It’s actually really simple
Let’s start with the basics:
- The cap rate is the NOI divided by the purchase price. When you buy a deal, you buy it for an in-place cap rate
- The return on cost is the NOI increase of a specific action (usually a renovation) divided by the cost of that renovation
- The stabilized yield is the new NOI divided by all the costs in the deal
Stabilized yield is an extension of the cap rate through the duration of the deal by adding the NOI changes to the numerator and by adding the additional costs to the denominator of the formula
For example, if a property was purchased for $1MM and the NOI was $100k, the *cap rate* would be 10% ($100k NOI / $1MM PP)
If you executed a $100k renovation and that increased the rents and therefore the NOI by $20k, the *return on cost* of that specific renovation would be 20%
($20k NOI increase / $100k renovation cost)
Then you add the NOI increase to the numerator ($100k + $20k = $120k) and the cost increase to the denominator ($1MM + $100k = $1.1MM)
Which leads to the *stabilized yield* being 10.9% ($120k new NOI / $1.1MM total costs in the deal)
So you take the initial cap rate and add in each return on cost action (the new revenue gets added to the numerator and the new costs get added to the denominator) to get to the stabilized yield
It’s that simple. People try and complicate RE a lot but it’s literally division
1. Go to tertiary market 2. Find a product type that’s profitable to build 3. Check zoning code and figure out the zoning that allows for that product type 4. Reach out to every property zoned for that use but currently operating as a *different* use 5. Buy, profit
// THREAD //
This takes the “off-market property” strategy one step further
The issue with most off-market strategies is that the owner actually has some idea of the value of the property
For example, most owners know approximately what a multifamily property should be worth in the area
That’s because of three reasons
1. They can base the value off the in-place cashflow 2. They can base the value off comps (and there’s always a ton of multifamily comps) 3. They can call up a broker to tell them what the value should be (and the broker will actually know)
This isn’t to say you can’t get multifamily properties for a discount off-market (you absolutely can)
Just that it’s harder to get a steep discount on them because the market for them is so transparent
The brilliance of the strategy laid out above, however, is that the market becomes a black hole when you switch uses (ex from industrial to self storage)
It works so well because the owner legitimately has no idea what the value of their land should be once you change uses
The valuation methods used above no longer work
1. The owner can’t base the new value off the in-place cashflow because the cashflow obviously changes when you change uses
2. There are barely any comps for switching uses and the ones that exist are almost impossible to look up
Anyone can look up a multifamily sale, how many unsophisticated owners can look at sales in their market and ascertain which properties have switched uses?
My guess is literally zero
3. Brokers (especially in tertiary markets) have no clue how to value a property when you switch uses so the off-market seller can’t even go to them for advice
For example, a property I’m prospecting off-market is currently operating as 3,000 SF owner-occupied industrial facility
But it sits on 10 acres and can accommodate ~200k SF of self-storage. The owner has no idea
I get asked all the time “how do you choose a market” & to be honest it’s pretty simple
Instead of approaching it from the statistical jargon perspective, I approach it from the “can I actually find a deal in this market” perspective
Here’s how I choose a market to invest in:
First let’s talk about how institutions look at deals & why it doesn’t make sense to look at deals that way as a smaller investor
Way I see it, there’re 2 strategies when choosing a market
1. “rising tide lifts all boats” 2. search for dislocations/discounts
Strategy 1 is used by institutions who need to deploy a lot of capital
This involves them playing “economist”. They need to find markets with high population growth, rent growth & appreciation
They operate in a competitive segment of the mkt ($20MM+) & it’s difficult to pick up assets for a “discount” in that range
So instead, they have to find mkts where competitors are underpricing future growth
This is dangerous since if you guess wrong, it could be a disaster. But institutions are built for this as they have analysts & data they can use to correctly pick the next high-growth mkt
As a smaller investor, you don’t. You have no edge over large firms. It’s not a smart place to compete
But as a smaller investor you don’t need to deploy a lot of capital
So you can use strategy #2
Instead of playing economist, you search for the least competitive mkts, where there’re the most pricing dislocations &, therefore the most discounts
Basically I look for the market with the least competition that’s stable
// Choosing a Market //
Ignore the data & focus on making money (finding markets where you can stabilize over the market cap rate)
A 4 step process:
Step 1: Look for cities/towns under 250k pop
Step 2: Vet supply
Step 3: Vet demand
Step 4: Make sure there’re mispricings