Alex Profile picture
Sep 23 24 tweets 15 min read Read on X
Weekday Analysis: Chelsea's Defence 🔵

Chelsea did not have a good weekend, and their start to the season has been mixed...

I watched all of their games so far: Here's what I think Maresca is trying to do, what's working (more than you think!), and what's not 👍 Image
The plan 📋

We can split defending into what Chelsea do with, and without the ball. Starting with the in-possession stuff, which is more fun...

Last season, Chelsea could often look quite rigid against low blocks. I think Maresca's response to this has been to adopt more fluidity like PSG, basically allowing his forward players to have more freedom on the ball.

Here's what I think that looks like *roughly*
▪️RW (Estevao, Palmer) floating inside, while Gusto pushes on
▪️Fernandez pushing forward on either side of midfield
▪️LB pushing inside, allowing Gittens/Neto space on the touchline - but also has freedom to overlap too
▪️Caicedo anchoring things at the backImage
Image
You can call this a 3-1-6, but I think that's an oversimplification and a poor way of looking at it.

Not least because Chelsea are a lot more fluid, but the point of this setup is that Chelsea's midfielders have the freedom to drop in and across the pitch. The defenders have also been given licence to run forward too.

Now, the plus of this is that Chelsea are obviously much more dangerous going forward. Their NPxG this season is high - even including the MUFC game, they rank 4th for that metric, higher than Arsenal Liverpool and Spurs 👍

The consequence though, is that when they lose the ball, there's a large burden on their defenders + Caicedo to quickly snuff out attacks.Image
So, that's on the ball, what about without it?

Well, I've watched all of Chelsea's games this season, and there have been some common threads in all of those games, even though there have been different approaches.

Generally speaking: Chelsea have pressed in something like a 4-1-4-1. The main feature of this though, has been the RW pressing the opposition LCB. This means, when the RW goes, the RB has to jump up to press the LB too.Image
Image
Against Palace and Brentford, this extended to the other side too. Chelsea's front three pressed the back three, while the FBs had to jump to the WBs.

Furthermore, the player on the far side of the pitch was also having to track the central midfielder, so the WBs are often having to switch between marking two different players.
So, now we know what Maresca is trying to do, let me talk through what I think is working, and isn't. And we'll start with the positives, as I'm trying to be a lil more positive this season on things! ;-)
Moises Caicedo 🟢

Caicedo had a great season last year, and maybe this campaign is just a continuation of that. But he's *really* stood out to me this season (perhaps that's also because I have him in my FPL team).

His reading of the game is just on another level, and he's quite clearly one of the best midfielders in the world at this point. This is crucial to Chelsea's approach on the ball, because not many players could fulfil that single defensive midfield role, and mopping up loose balls.

Caicedo though, can. Moments like this have been abundant throughout the season.Image
Image
Image
Image
Back line collecting the ball 🟢

Okay, this is definitely not all perfect. I know Chelsea fans have been left pretty miserable with their centre-back pairing of Tosin + Chalobah. I do have critiques of them coming up...
...but, it has to be said that Chelsea have improved at dominating territory compared to last season.

Before the Man Utd game, they were top of the league for the least touches conceded in the final third, per FBref. I believe they were at 90 touches against per-90 (hah), which was 20 touches down from last season.
In English?

Chelsea have largely stayed strong in the air, Caicedo has helped hugely in midfield, and opponents aren't reaching their goal that often. We all remember the goals conceded against Brentford and United, but you don't remember the countless attacks that just don't form into anything.

Here's a graphic from @mygameplanai showing the touches in their 'funnel' from this season, again not including Man Utd game.

In this timeframe, Chelsea were second in the league for this metric, only behind Liverpool 👍Image
I also want to re-emphasise that, before we move into the negatives, I do think Chelsea have improved a lot on the ball. Especially considering Colwill and Delap's injuries.

I have a lot of confidence that, once Delap comes back and if he can stay fit, and when Gittens/Garnacho get up to speed to reinvigorate the LHS, they'll be strong in all areas.

Throw in set pieces as well! They're doing excellently in that regard, and Arsenal have proven how important a good record in that department can be 🟢
Okay, let's talk problems. First up, the FBs jumping up in the press 🔴

Now, when I was explaining this before, you may have detected an issue with this approach.

Firstly, if the opposition can play passes/switches directly to their FB/WB before Chelsea's can press...then it's free progression.

This happened WAY too easily against Bayern, with them easily bypassing Chelsea's press. A simple switch here takes out Chelsea.Image
Image
Image
But even if you're not playing against a high quality opponent, like Chelsea weren't against Brentford, issues can still come up.

The distance that Chelsea's FBs had to cover in this game to reach the Brentford WBs was huge. I thought that Hato and Fofana were pretty good at closing down quickly...but it still gave Brentford's FBs a lot of time to take a touch, and pass inside. 🤷‍♂️

I don't think Brentford exploited this a lot, but if Chelsea continue this approach going forward, where the opponent drops their WBs to increase that distance, problems will occur more frequently.

All it takes here is Kayode to pass inside and Brentford are away - he has enough time to do it.Image
Image
Image
Now, another issue I have with Chelsea's pressing comes back to what many fans are complaining about: why do they look so vulnerable to direct attacks? 🔴

Well, personally, I think this is about confusion in the back line, and unwillingness/inability to keep a high line.

Across multiple games, Chelsea just don't seem universally aligned on when to drop off, or jump up.

Take this chance against Brentford, the Schade one.
▪️Tosin gives the ball away and holds a deep position
▪️But Fofana actually jumps forward (looking to press the guy in front of him)
▪️While Caicedo retains an aggressive position

The result: 2v2.Image
Image
Image
Image
Here's another situation against Fulham. Now, Tosin mops this up, it doesn't lead to a goal...but I can't help but think the pair of them are way too isolated. Large gap between the midfield and defence.

If Fulham do collect this between their front two, they're in another 2v2 situation.Image
Image
Image
To me, it seems Chelsea are stuck in two minds.

They want to press high up the pitch, but don't trust Sanchez to sweep up, or the centre-backs to defend in a high line, so at the first sign of danger both CBs are quick to drop deep/unwilling to step up aggressively.

They may be dominating territory generally speaking, but I think this approach allows their centre-backs to become isolated way too easily.
🔴Another tactical note I want to hit on with the back line is how they defend in their block. Chelsea have been surprisingly man-oriented for me. By that I mean...

When Chelsea are near the edge of their box, their centre-backs aren't focused as much on space, but the opponents.

So, if Chalobah is marking a striker, and that striker drops out wide, he'll follow them. If Tosin is marking another striker, who holds a central position, he'll stay near them.

See them both in this image I quickly picked out.Image
This approach does give the opposition less time, but it has led to large gaps in the back line, and that requires Chelsea's midfielders to consistently track runners from deep to stop those gaps being exploited.

This was exposed against Bayern most I think. This sequence could have ended in a goal pretty easily, with Tosin and Chalobah both caught out by the switch of play, and nobody tracked the runner from deep.Image
Image
Image
Image
It's worth saying though, that this again is tactical. I think it's just a risky tactic by Maresca, and not necessarily the CB's fault. Well, entirely at least.

However, an area I feel much more individually critical in is rest defence 🔴
Put simply: if you want to keep players ahead of the ball, and often commit 6-8 players forward in attack, you can't let the opposition collect loose balls. If they do, you're EXTREMELY vulnerable to counters.

Fortunately, Chelsea have Moises Caicedo, who as we discussed, helps cover for this already. What you need from your CBs though, is them to stay near opposition strikers and mark them tightly when Chelsea lose the ball.

If they don't, then they can be left in 2v2 or 3v3 situations in an instant.Image
What I haven't liked so far is the distances these CBs have left between themselves and opponents.

Admittedly, I think Chelsea have got away with it mostly, but I think the disallowed Fulham goal shows signs of what can happen if you get it wrong.

When Fulham win the ball back here, Tosin is closest to Muniz, and I think he's slow to realise the possession loss. Perhaps that's why he looks to drop off, rather than jump up aggressively.

It's surprising that it's actually Chalobah who ends up coming across in this situation.Image
Image
Image
Image
If you want an example of how to do it, and why it's important, let's look at the Brentford game.

The ball deflects out of the box out wide, by chance, towards Schade. But, Caicedo is close enough to apply pressure, which eventually leads to Chelsea winning the ball back... Image
Image
Image
Image
...and to their first goal of the game.

There's the value of having aggressive players in your rest defence, when you're trying to squeeze teams in. Image
Image
So where does this leave us? 🤔

Well, I'm no coach, I'm not at Chelsea. Maybe progress is being made on all of these weaknesses and the benefits will outweigh the cons.

Personally, I think Chelsea were pretty impressive in their opening four league matches. I also think, in possession, there's been a vast improvement on last season.

But, if that's not matched with strong defensive solidity, is it worth it?

No. And Maresca will know this. So I say, keep an eye on Chelsea's next few games, to see how he gets around these issues.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex

Alex Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexanderBrkr

Sep 3
Weekday Analysis: Spurs ⚪️

Spurs have suffered their first defeat of the PL season. But, despite the good start, the Bournemouth game highlighted some issues...

Here's a look at Spurs' attack under Thomas Frank 🔎 Image
RHS reliance ➡️

Iraola's side based their entire press around forcing Spurs to play football through the left. Iraola clearly knew how limited they were there, compared to the right, so all of their players made sure to shape Spurs down their weak side.h

Every single Spurs goal in the Premier League, so far, has originated from their right hand side.

Now, on the one hand, that shows how well Pedro Porro and Mohamed Kudus are getting on as individuals.

However, I think it also shows two other things:
▪️That Spurs LHS has struggled
▪️ And their RHS is thriving mainly just down to the individuals

Let's start with the left, as it should (hopefully) be resolved soon.

In Djed Spence and Brennan Johnson, Spurs haven't had a left footer on that side so far. Nearly every time Spence has received the ball, he's ended up passing backwards. That's because it's not as natural for him to turn, and play a pass down the line with his left.

Johnson, meanwhile, has attempted three dribbles so far without succeeding in any. He looks painfully ineffective off the left.

This should, in theory, be resolved by the return of Udogie, and the arrival of Simons though. Simons may well play as a 10, but he also likes to drift out to the left and take players on. It should balance Spurs out going forward 👍

Still, I do feel like Frank hasn't really done much to make the LHS work so far.

Sure, you can say it's just down to waiting for the right players to arrive. But it's not like Spurs have tried to surround Spence or Johnson with players to build combinations. They've left them isolated, which only exposes their awkwardness on that side.

And this was best shown against Bournemouth.

Iraola's side based their entire press around forcing Spurs to play football through the left. Iraola clearly knew how limited they were there, compared to the right, so all of their players made sure to shape Spurs down their weak side.

In this game, Porro got just 45 touches, down from 66 against City.

This is something @htomufc noted too.Image
Image
But what of their right side?

Okay, there is stuff to like 😆

Frank's tactics are based around building up through a deep back four, with Porro given enough space to get his head up and play channel balls. Porro excels at playing this pass, so it's a good idea to create opportunities for him to play that pass.

It also helps that the man he's playing those passes to, Mohamed Kudus, has been exceptional so far. Not necessarily in terms of goal output, but in:
▪️receiving the ball as a wide target man
▪️ and dragging Spurs forward

For the former, Kudus is capable of backing into defenders and bringing down high balls with confidence. He's just a really strong footballer, and it's a crucial part of the Porro-channel-ball strategy working.

The second part is down to Kudus' quality 1v1.

Take this sequence against Bournemouth as an example. Kudus starts inside his own half, takes it past two players, dodges another incoming challenge and reaches their penalty box.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 18
One to watch: Hakon Haraldsson 🇮🇸

When I was planning my Sensible Transfers video for Crystal Palace, and I came very close to picking Haraldsson as their right-sided 10.

Here's why I liked him enough to consider, and what he can polish this season to reach the PL ⭐️ Image
History + Profile 📖

Haraldsson joined Lille in 2023 from FC Copenhagen, where he made his breakthrough in Europe after moving from Iceland.

Being a big Ligue 1 nerd, I've watched Haraldsson pretty closely since joining. A young No 10 that Lille have bought? Must be good 🤷‍♂️

Yet, Haraldsson is yet to establish himself as a first-choice starter. His starts run as:
▪️2023-24: 15 starts, with 2 G/A
▪️2024-25: 21 starts, with 8 G/A

So, last season definitely saw an improvement RE minutes as well as goal contributions, but he's still not there yet.

Now, part of that is circumstantial. Haraldsson suffered a broken foot in international training in September 2024, and missed two months of the season. From what I can gather, he took a while to regain fitness after this.

However, there are other areas where Haraldsson has taken time to adapt. One of those I read from Bruno Genesio was language, with Haraldsson struggling at first in a new country.

Another, on the pitch, was blindingly obvious: physicality😕

We'll break this down properly later (surprise, in the negatives section), but when he first arrived Haraldsson could get physically dominated pretty easily. Over the last year though, I'd say he's bulked up a bit, and looks stronger.

So, hopefully that paints a picture of life at Lille so far. Let's talk profile then.

▪️ Haraldsson is right-footed, but capable of shooting on his left
▪️ He's small, around 5ft 10
▪️ He's quite quick off the mark

Basically, he's a nippy No 10 and you can fit him in across the pitch. In fact, under Paulo Fonseca in his first season, he played mainly off the left wing.

Under Bruno Genesio however, Haraldsson was fielded as an 10 and even started games on the right. And as an 10, he's sometimes allowed to drop deep to help in build-up, or pushed forwards to play like a Shadow Striker.

He's a very flexible player, and a huge part of the reason why you can play him across the front line, is intelligence.
Positives 🟢

Haraldsson does plenty of the things you want from your No 10 without the ball.

There's his scanning, which I think is some of the best I've seen in scouting players this summer. Not only does he consistently check his shoulders, so he's aware of his surroundings, but his checks are done extremely quickly. He can scan both shoulders within the space of a second.

Then, there are also two sides to his movement.

The first is that he's pretty good at holding his position between the lines. He won't directly drop in to receive the ball, but just try and get into a nice pocket of space to eventually receive it.

What I think is more fun though, is how he attacks the box ⬆️

I mentioned Genesio plays Haraldsson as a Shadow Striker, and I can see why. Haraldsson is great at spotting gaps in defensive lines and exploiting them, he's incredibly dangerous as someone crashing the box.

That counts for both
🏃‍♂️ Running beyond the striker, and going through on goal
🧠 Or getting into a good position to receive a cross/cutback

There's end product to match this movement too, with five goals in the league last season.

I do think his shooting is a little mixed, as he is capable of some pretty poorly executed shots. However, Haraldsson's main technique is shooting hard across goal into the far corner. He's done this well on both left and right foot.

The power he can get on shots is pretty impressive, and it makes me think that if he can refine his shooting, he could become a pretty productive player from both short and long range.

In truth, I think this mixed-positivity can be applied to all of his technical qualities.

His passing, for example, hasn't got him much in the way of assists or expected assists. But I find that surprising, because Haraldsson is capable of threading passes between defenders into the path of team mates.

I want to emphasise that last point; I love how consistently Haraldsson aims his passes beyond the receiver, allowing them to continue their momentum.

And like I said, this wouldn't be possible without pretty strong passing vision. He's willing to play passes directly into the box, and will search for opportunities to do so.

Also, Haraldsson is a good passer over long distances, and a decent crosser. He takes set pieces for Lille, as he can play this nice wrapped-right-footed cross that has enough curl to make it difficult to defend.

----

It would be impossible to talk about Haraldsson's positives and not mention his agility.

The 22-year-old can stop/change direction incredibly easily. He boasts excellent balance, and tight close control.

As a result, you should just never dive into a tackle on Haraldsson, because he'll skip past at ease. He's too skillfull, too quick, and good enough to read body language that it's always better to hold your ground.

There's more reasons why it's better to hold your ground defending against Haraldsson, which we can get into now...
Read 5 tweets
Jul 19
Mythbusting: Xavi Simons 🇳🇱

"Why hasn't anyone signed Xavi Simons! He's amazing!"

Here's a thread on why I think Xavi Simons hasn't been signed yet. In short:
🔴His weaknesses make him an awkward positional fit
👀But I still really love him!Image
Profile 📖

No history?

These threads are meant to be digestible, and they've recently been hitting 15,000 characters (sorry). So, in this section, we're not going to delve too much about Simons' background, and just about how he's been used at RB Leipzig.

---

Now, the 22-year-old did get an injury last season, so the following words reflect his position over the last two seasons.

RB Leipzig, under Marco Rose (in charge for the majority of Simons' time), have switched between a 4-4-2 and a 3-4-3 system.

Either way, Leipzig want to attack quickly, mainly through short passes, so Simons often leads fast breaks, driving with the ball through the middle. A context that can be replicated at many teams.

But, let's talk about more settled possession 🧐

The former system, the 4-4-2, is definitely the one Simons has played the most football in. He has started as a LM, but really, a LAM. He has a free role to drift across the pitch, both horizontally and vertically.

For example, during early build-up, you might see Simons:
▪️Receive out wide around the halfway line, with a full-back right behind him
▪️ Drift behind the opposition midfield, looking to eventually receive the ball between the lines
▪️ Drop deep, almost like a double pivot, playing a one-two with his centre-back and looking to race into the space he just created behind him
▪️ Or, drifting all the way over to the right! (This is rarer though)

In general, I think you can describe Simons as a ball-to-feet player. He wants to be driving towards defenders, making the final pass or taking a shot from outside of the box. A true number 10, in a way! 🔟

That said, he can do this in wide areas. He's not uncomfortable on the touchline. Wouldn't describe him as a winger though, for reasons we'll get into...

The final point on his profile I'll mention, is that at Leipzig, he's obviously expected to work hard off the ball. At around 5ft7, he isn't the strongest player, so he tends to focus on pressing full-backs.

Basically: behaves like a midfielder in possession, but defends like a winger.

That should be enough preparation to dive into the deep end of the positives!
Positives 🟢

I had to give myself a couple of hours break before writing this, after finishing my Simons watch. I love watching him so, so much - that I knew this would be wayyyy too rose-tinted if I dived in straight away 😂

And, you know what, that was worth it.

Because even Simons' biggest strengths do come with a consistent caveat...

Still, let's start in the pure, positive areas. Agility, balance, body positioning being one. That's a lot of buzzwords, but basically, Simons is just incredibly hard to read when he has the ball.

He can change his body position as fast as anyone I think I've seen, going from "I'm going to cut inside here", to "no I'm running down the line" in an insanely quick time. I've not seen a player in ages do a Cruyff turn as sharply as Simons 🏃‍♂️e

This means he can weave through challenges incredibly easily, like he's working at a different speed to defenders.

It also helps he has this excellent burst of acceleration, and that's not just from a standing start. He'll often be carrying the ball towards goal, then switch into a faster gear to drive through a gap.

This counts for his final action too, as he'll disguise his direction of pass through body position. Shaping to switch it, but reversing it and playing it in behind instead.

Now, another pure positive: movement/receiving ✍️

Simons went to La Masia, and it really shows. He's not just a sharp, skilful player, but a really intelligent one.

A lot of it comes down to scanning. Simons is consistently aware of his passing options, his marker's position, and how much space he has.

Now, throw in the fact he can play clever flicks and backheels, and you have a very dangerous player to allow to receive the ball. He can:
▪️ Draw his marker in and flick it off to a team mate
▪️ Quickly turn and play a forward pass
▪️ Or, and my favourite: drop into to receive, play it back to the passer, spin in behind into the space and receive once more. Pass and move, pass and move.

Whatever the case, everything Simons does is quick. He's a dream in midfield to build combinations, occupy space, pull markers around, etc.

-----

Okay, we're now moving onto flawed positives. And, 'flawed', is a touch mean.

Basically, Simons has a heavy bias towards using his right foot.

I don't think it's because he's 'bad' on his left foot, he just prefers to use his right for passing, dribbling, and shooting.

I'm not sure I'd describe him as 'one-footed', because he's shown the ability to take a ball in his stride on his weaker foot. But, like I said, he clearly just trusts himself under pressure more on his right foot.

However, this does have knock-on effects for two of his biggest strengths: passing, and dribbling 😅

Let's start on the former, because as I suggested before, Simons is a very intelligent player. His vision is superb, not just for short-range passes but also balls in behind.

And, may I say too, his passing is incredibly satisfying to watch. Not only does he consistently aim it in front of players, making sure they're able to run onto the ball and continue their momentum...But, his weight is nearly *always* superb, never overhitting it or underhitting it ⚽️

There's a range of technique used too. Simons can hit these heavy drives across the pitch, or these cheeky trivelas round the corner of the defender.

However, I think those trivelas too often act as a substitute for a left-footed pass. There have been occasions where Simons is:
1⃣ On the LW
2⃣ Sesko is making a curved run in behind
3⃣ Simons uses the outside of his foot to play the pass
4⃣ The ball falls a little short, not hit with the power a left-footer could have got on the inside of their foot

This is something that holds Simons back compared to more two-footed midfielders. It's minor in the grand scheme of things, because Simons puts up world class expected assists numbers.

But in central areas, you ideally want your midfielder to access all angles. Simons, can't, a lot of the time.

Let's talk about his dribbling, which I think suffers a tad more than his passing. (Still, it's overall a positive 🟢)

Simons is capable of using his left foot for a first touch, but after that, it's alllll right foot for moving the ball forward.

Now, again, Simons can be an excellent dribbler. That agility helps a lot, but more than anything, Simons is just incredibly skilful. So many tricks in his arsenal, and quick reactions. I trust him to dribble through crowds in the middle

However, out wide, he almost never dribbles on the outside. Even though he's good at hiding his intention, ultimately, Simons nearly always wants to cut inside onto his right foot.

It means, in wide areas, he can be a tad predictable. So if you're a team looking for a winger, then you might be put off by Simons' one-footedness.

Now, that said, I do adore him in central areas. His dribble success rate has fallen off a lot this season, and I do think he could protect the ball better. He often doesn't keep himself between ball and defender.

However, I do think much of the decline is related to A). Leipzig being worse last season, leaving Simons with more work to do. B). Simons trying to dribble through central areas more.

This will lead to him losing the ball, but he can make it work. And, when he does, he is capable of driving straight through the heart of a team 😍

Okay, so, let's have a quick recap.
▪️ In terms of dribbling, Simons probably suits central areas more.
▪️ In terms of passing, creative actions, his angles can be a little limited in the middle, and would probably suit a wider position.

Clearly, there's a bit of a clash here. So, let's see if we can determine where Simons would work best by discussing his weaknesses.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30
Mythbusting: Carlos Baleba 🇨🇲

Sooner or later, there's bound to be a bid lodged for Brighton's latest No 6 off their conveyor belt of talent. But, how well do you actually know Baleba?

Here's some detail on what's great about him, and how ready he is for the elite level ✍️ Image
History + Profile 📖

Baleba is still a relative newcomer to senior football. He was snatched from Lille before even making 7 Ligue 1 starts two years ago!

He doubled that in his first season at Brighton under Roberto De Zerbi, but it was only last season where the 21-year-old became a full starter.

It's worth saying, that Brighton have changed approach both with and without the ball a lot this season under Fabian Hurzeler. Baleba has been part of a double pivot, played as a lone No 6, and even filled in as a CB...

Still, there has been some clear changes compared to RDZ. For example:
▪️ Brighton made around 50 touches less p90 in their own defensive third last season, showing a weaker emphasis on building out from the back.
▪️On top of that, they attempted more long passes.

This makes sense, as Hurzeler has wanted to access 4v4 scenarios more directly than RDZ, often bypassing midfield to do so.

These are pretty significant stylistic changes, and as a result, Baleba's output across the two seasons has changed.

▪️ He's gone from 66 touches p90 to 57, receiving the ball 10x less p90
▪️ A larger proportion of those touches are coming in the final third, and he's getting on the ball less often in the def third
▪️ Despite this, his progressive passes have increased
▪️ As have his progressive carries

On those latter two points, it's worth talking about how Baleba receives the ball ahead of a full nuanced breakdown.

You might think that it's No 6's job to drop in front of the defenders, receive the ball, and move it forward. Be that through turning their marker, or evading them to get into a good position to receive the ball from a CB.

Conversely, we sometimes consider midfielders who do not do that as 'bad' in football discourse. I still remember Fred/McTominay getting slammed for their lack of movement behind opposition pressers.

Now, I may just be speaking for myself here, but that's certainly the way I tended to view things. Which meant, until Jon Mackenzie banged my head a bit, I was underwhelmed by Baleba - because he is not dropping in a way you'd expect.

Think of it like this:

We think of No 6s being the 'second' man. CB passes to DM -> DM moves the ball forward to the third man.

Well, Baleba wants to be the third man.

So, when there's a marker infront of him, he'll hold position. The idea being...
1⃣ CB has the ball
2⃣ Guy in front of Baleba presses CB
3⃣ CB moves it out to LB
4⃣ LB passes inside to Baleba
5⃣ Baleba is now in a ton of space, free of his marker, and he can carry/pass forward

This is very nerdy stuff, especially for the history + profile section, but I wanted to get this context in early. It's hugely important to keep in mind, as we dive into the following sections.
Positives 🟢

Assuming you read the above (I hope you didn't skip ahead!), let's start the positive section with something a little less dense.

Baleba, is a lovely dribbler. He's quick off the mark, he's agile, he has pretty good physicality, and lovely footwork.

So, if you're a defender thinking you've trapped Baleba in a tight space, think again! He holds a 58% dribble success rate, which is strong ✅

*One note, Baleba does rely a lot on his left foot to carry, rather than his right. He can use his right foot, so I definitely wouldn't describe him as one-footed, but I do think he's a bit guilty of closing off his dribbling/passing angles.

Still, in terms of evading challenges, I think Baleba is really solid. Some may describe it as his best skill, as it helps him remain largely press-resistant.

Also, in terms of carrying, this is a useful trait given the space Baleba gets himself into as we detailed above, further forward into enemy lines.

Once he receives that pass, he can charge forward into space and drive Brighton up the pitch.

Still, I wouldn't actually describe this as the best part of his game; that's easily his defensive work.

I've actually found this pretty difficult to word, because Baleba is quite simply, just really really good at anticipating danger + timing his challenges. He uses his body really well to block challenges, places his feet well to win the ball...

It's all just very clean. We're years ahead of the time we used to reductively describe any players who completed lots of tackles and interceptions as simply 'good', but - I don't find it surprising Baleba ranks on FBref:
🟢 84th percentile for tackles vs dribblers
🟢 91st for interceptions
🟢 70th for tackles won

Bare in mind, that's on a team that held over 52% possession last season...

Also, like I said, he's very quick and pretty strong.

I mentioned before that he's a quick accelerator, but Baleba can maintain high speed over large distances.

I think all of this puts him into that very small category of midfielders who could play as a lone defensive No 6 👍

Now, let's talk about an area where Baleba does seem to rank poorly: passing.

I mentioned his progressive passes p90 had increased since last season, but Baleba still ranks as one of the least progressive midfielders in the Premier League.

So, what's going on?

Well, I think it simply comes down to volume.

As we mentioned, Baleba's job for Brighton isn't actually to progress the ball forward; quite often, it's to be the person receiving the ball in advanced positions.

That's why his touches in the final third have increased, his midfield touches stayed stable, and his def third touches declined.

Or in other words: in the first phase, it's Van Hecke's job to play progressive passes to Baleba or someone beyond him. Baleba focuses on getting into pockets of space to receive them.

However, when Baleba DOES get on the ball, facing a block...I actually think he's a pretty strong passer ✅

🟢His vision is pretty impressive, especially over long range. He's pretty reliable at spotting wingers making out-to-in runs
🟢 His execution is generally nice, with good clipped balls over the top, and powerfully hit passes through the middle. The latter really showed under RDZ
🟢 He tries to make first-time passes to keep up the tempo, especially after winning the ball back.

I agree with those that say he could do this more. I think he can be a little hesitant on the ball. Still, I rate him highly.

Here's a screenshot from @mygameplanai that shows his successful progressive passes that end in the centre third (🔵= ends in shot, 🟢 = ends in goal)

The thing I like about this is the range, as there's a mix of short to medium range balls coming from the sides, or straight down the middle.Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 23
Mythbusting: Alejandro Garnacho 🇦🇷

I think there's quite a negative perception of Garnacho online, not just for off-field stuff, but for his actual ability.

However, when watching him across his time at United, I actually really liked what I saw...mostly 👀 Image
History + Profile 📖

I'm not sure you need a full dive into Garnacho's history, as we've seen it in the Premier League in front of our eyes.
▪️He broke in to Manchester United's first team under Erik ten Hag
▪️ He played a bit-part role in the Dutchman's first season, making 19 league apps (mostly as a sub)
▪️That went up to 36 in 2023-24, including 30 starts, as Garnacho became an important player
▪️ He put up fewer starts, 23, in 2024-25

Perhaps this will go down badly, but I'd like to take a different look through this time, from the perspective of: just how hard has it been to perform in this Man Utd team? 🤔

So, what you need to know about him profile wise for now, is:
🔹 Garnacho prefers playing on the LW, cutting in on his right, but is still pretty good on his left
🔹 He's fast, agile, thrives in transition
🔹 Good at linking up for one-twos
🔹He's not particularly strong, and can get bulldozed with his back to goal
🔹Finally, he thrives with an overlapping FB, because he tends to drive inside (not cut), leaving space for the overlap. He tends to weight the passes to them pretty well.

I know he hasn't played these passes as much recently, but this is DEFINITELY a positive thing seen in earlier footage, I'll die on that hill.

Anyway, let's take another look then, at the past two seasons in Manchester 🔴

2023-24:

This is Man Utd's worst season in the Premier League era, so already, not the best place to bring in talent.

Garnacho does get platformed in a decent way, as he's able to cut in on the LW, his preferred position.

However, Man Utd have a problem: their RW position. Antony isn't playing well, Amad doesn't get brought in until near the end of the season, which means that Garnacho ends up getting shifted to the right.

This isn't the end of the world, and to his testement, Garnacho does perform pretty well on this side. However, it's still unnatural for him, he wants to cut in on his right but is having to do so on his left instead.

That's not the only issue though, because when Garnacho does get minutes back on the left, he's not supported particularly well from his FB.

This is because, in Tyrell Malacia and Luke Shaw, Man Utd basically didn't have a left-back from August 2023 until January 2025, when they signed Patrick Dorgu.

So, remember me saying Garnacho's showed positive signs of linking up with an overlapping FB?

Well, this was quite often the result in this time:
▪️ Garnacho receives the ball out wide, drives through space into the middle
▪️He lures the opposition RB inside towards him, and there's a gap left
▪️ Man Utd's LB makes a run, inbetween the boundaries of the edge of the box and the goal
▪️Garnacho plays a pass between the RB and RCB, into the path of this LB
▪️ It's a well-weighted pass, it's a great opportunity for them to play a cross or cut the ball back
▪️ Unfortunately, this isn't Luke Shaw, it's Diogo Dalot playing on the wrong side. He tries to cross on his left foot, it's bad, and it goes out for a goal kick.

That wasn't a theoretical situation, this was something I noted down on more than one occasion in 2023-24 and the beginning of 2024-25.

Speaking of which...

2024-25:

This is Man Utd's worst season in the Premier League era, so already, not the best place to platform talent.

Of course, the defining feature of last campaign was the managerial change from Erik ten Hag to Ruben Amorim.

Now, Amorim's issues have been VERY well documented. We've also already covered the LB problem - Dalot still goes on to play around 1.7k minutes at LB/LWB in 2024-25.

However, perhaps something you haven't thought about is how Garnacho got shifted around, again.

Let's focus back on the early part of my profile. He's someone who likes to connect with teammates in one-twos, then run into space.

That works as a winger, because you often have a LCM and a ST to connect with, as well as a LB overlapping.

As a No 10 in a 3-4-3 however, you effectively shift into one of the more advanced positions on the pitch. This means, for Garnacho:
▪️ He's now receiving with his back to goal
▪️ He's duelling with CBs rather than RBs
▪️ He's often got limited forward passing options
▪️There's often less space for him to exploit

It may not *seem* like a huge change, especially as he likes to drift inside anyway. But, the starting position means a lot here. It's not surprising that as the season went on, Amorim started allowing Garnacho to take up wider positions in this role, with the LWB often coming inside.

Still, EVEN if you think this is rubbish and he shouldn't be defended in this way due to the context of the team...He's contributed to 48 goals and assists in 148 appearances for Man Utd.

How much higher might that tally have been if he:
A). Consistently played on the left
B). Consistently had a top LB overlapping
C). Consistently played in the same system

Also, a reminder: he's still 20 years old. There are definitely negatives to discuss, but let's continue the positivity...
Positives 🟢

Going to make camp on a hill that I'm willing to die on here: I think Garnacho isn't just passable defensively, I think he's actually very, very underrated.

He seems to have a reputation of being a poor worker, someone with a bad attitude, something that's no doubt bled in from discussions about his off-pitch behaviour.

However, when it comes to defending from the front, I'm not having it. Garnacho ranked as one of the best wingers in the PL for possession gains in the final third last season through data with @mygameplanai , in that Man Utd side. Not aimless pressures - possession gains.

Some more detailed notes:
🟢Garnacho looks to adapt the shape of his run to close options off
🟢There's genuinely good intensity due to the speed he accelerates
🟢 He's generally aware enough to change position for an interception

It's not just the effort going forwards, it's tracking back too. I noted him looking around during transitions, seeing who he could pick up.

The only thing I had negative here was a bit of overaggressiveness. Which is, fine, he's 20.

Look, I'm sure this can be quoted with clips or comps of bad moments. I imagine particularly so in recent months. But, as someone who - in prep for this - watched a lot of matches before the Amorim era, I feel pretty positive on this.

Anyway, as I mentioned, I think Garnacho's defensive work often shines due to his pace.

He's got a really good burst of speed, and can maintain top speed over really long distances. Garnacho is capable of running 50m and still outpacing defenders 🏃‍♂️

That applies to changing direction too, as I think Garnacho is pretty agile. He can spin/twist quickly, and is very fluid on the ball.

This not only helps him defensively, but it pairs excellently with Garnacho's attacking movement. And oh boy, is this aspect of his game underrated.

Underrated by me in fact. I failed to include it in my video about him recently, because I just didn't have space. Let's right that wrong.

Garnacho, quite simply, is very eager to attack space in behind. Whether thats:
🟢 Running behind a FB out to in
🟢 Running between CB and FB through the middle
🟢 Attacking the back post as a far-side threat

It's all there. And it's not just the intelligence to recognise when these opportunities come up, after all that's not incredibly hard. It's that he knows how to make these runs impactful.

For example: Garnacho will look to aim for the blindside of the defender, and he'll change direction throughout. He maintains distance well, not letting the defender keep contact.

My friend @amonizfootball mentioned to me in DMs when I was prepping for the video, that it's this part of Garnacho's game that explains why his xG is so high. I completely agree. Put Garnacho in a functioning attacking side and I think the goals go right up 📈

It's not just scoring goals though that I think would improve in another side, it's assisting them.

I would NOT go as far as to say, Garnacho is 'two-footed'. Just because, for me, that should be reserved for the likes of Cherki (extreme example but, ya get me).

However, I do think Garnacho is very capable on his weak foot, particularly for cut backs. In other words, he's capable of hitting the byline, and pulling balls back into dangerous areas with good weight + no bounce, and decent accuracy.

If anything, his right-footed inswinging crosses need more work. He seems to vary a lot more in success on them, struggling to beat the first man.

That's not the case on his shooting though. From range, I think Garnacho could be a threat for years to come.

Quite simply, I think this comes down to power. Garnacho can rifle shots at very high speeds.

The accuracy, does range. But, as a 20-year-old, to have two outside of the box goals in the league last season is promising stuff.

I think that number will tick up if he can consistently hit the target more often. He tends to focus on power over accuracy, or at least, struggles to place his shots. Maybe that doesn't improve enough of course, but if it does, that's a dangerous goal threat right there.

It's worth saying too, that he shows good power on his left foot from range. Not as impressive as his right, but it's another rare trait that will attract clubs. It means, when running through, he's dangerous at hitting the far corner, across goal, with his left foot 👍

Anyway, that was one of the longest positive sections for a while. The negatives are overdue.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 13
Mythbusting: Nick Woltemade 🇩🇪

It was only a matter of time until Nick Woltemade started getting links across Europe. He's a unique striker, with a ton of qualities, a few weaknesses, and some myths to bust... Image
History + Profile 📖

Woltemade is a 23-year-old German ST, and a product of Werder Bremen's youth setup. He only transferred to Stuttgart last summer!

Going back further than the move to Seb Hoeness' side, it's quite interesting to see how Woltemade struggled to make an impact at the seemingly lesser club in Werder 🟩

Werder went down to the Bundesliga 2. in 2021, and since being promoted in 2022, they've finished 13th, 9th, and 8th this season.

You'd think that Woltemade's path to Stuttgart, a side that had just qualified for the Champions League in May 2024, would have been earned off the back of excellent goalscoring form.

However, after being loaned to SV Elversberg in 2022-23, a third-tier side at the time, Woltemade managed just 2 goals in 30 Bundesliga apps 😅

Of course, most of these weren't starts. But it wasn't glowing form, which is also surprising, considering Woltemade's profile and Werder's playstyle.

Now, if you're unaware, Woltemade is *massive*. He's a whopping 198cm tall, around 6ft 6/7.

Werder meanwhile, attempted the fifth-most long balls in the Bundesliga last season. They're a counter-attacking side that like to play quite direct. Why didn't Woltemade the giant work out there?

I have a theory we'll come back to...👀

Anyway, since moving to Stuttgart, Woltemade has made a pretty seismic impact.

Not necessarily in terms of goals (although, 10 non-penalty goals in 17 league starts/28 apps is still very impressive); but impact on how Sebastian Hoeness' side have played.

In 2023-24, they were a team that looked to bait opponents forward before trying to cut through them with short passes, and go forward. Think De Zerbi.

This season, they have retained this objective - it's clearly a strong principle for Hoeness.

However, rather than always playing short passes, Woltemade has added another dimension to their ball progression, enabling them to go long at times.

Still, it's important to point out early on that Woltemade isn't really a target man!

Yes he is huge, yes he can dominate physically, but what he really likes doing is getting on the ball. He'll often drop quite far off centre-backs, and even out to the left wing, to turn and run at defenders.

And I mean run - we'll get into it, (spoiler alert, in the positives section), but Woltemade ranks HIGH for dribbles/carries.

This is showcased in what I'd describe as his general responsibilities on the pitch:
▪️ Be ready to receive long balls
▪️ Lay off passes to surrounding team mates
▪️ Spray passes to runners out wide
▪️ Navigate tight spaces and carry the ball forward
▪️ Drop off defenders in the final third to link play, and create chances
▪️ Get into the box for shooting chances
▪️ Press high, usually pressing the CB then moving on to the FB

To really leave you with this impression, here's two maps from @mygameplan of Woltemade over the past season.

First are his successful ball receipts, which show how Woltemade consistently likes to drop into wide areas, rather than stick to the middle like a target man.

Second is dribbles attempted, which again shows that he's often taking players on in wide areas, where you might expect a winger to do so. (🟠 unsuccessful, rest are successful in some form)

So, now we have a better understanding of what type of striker Woltemade is, what's actually good about him?Image
Image
Positives 🟢

Well, since I mentioned it, let's talk about Woltemade's dribbling.

It would be very easy to fall into the classic cliche here, "he's got good feet for a big man". I want to make it clear; Woltemade has great footwork, full stop.

He just doesn't move on the ball like someone who's close to 2m tall. He can control the ball with all parts of both feet, and is genuinely pretty skillful.

He'll look to ball roll it past tackles, or drop a shoulder and beat a defender. He's aware of opportunities for nutmegs.

There are obviously limits to Woltemade's mobility both on and off the ball. He can't turn that fast. Still though, I do think there's good speed to how Woltemade can sidestep challenges, and make small spins with defenders behind him.

The numbers are pretty reflective of this: Woltemade attempted 71 dribbles last season, completing 31 of them at a 44% success rate. That's around 1.7 per game 👀

Is it astonishing numbers? No, the success rate isn't amazing. But Paul Onuachu is 4cm taller, and completed 0.6 dribbles p90 last season.

That skill is also shown in Woltemade's linkup play too. His first touch is generally excellent, and he's more than capable of executing disguised flicks, getting the ball to teammates first-time in good positions.

He's also pretty flexible in using not only both feet to pass, but, again, different parts of each foot. In particular, Woltemade clearly likes the trivela pass on his right foot, and he uses this to make quick stab-like passes which can often catch defenders off guard 👍

In general, I like the security he tends to bring in tight spaces. Not just in first-time passes with the feet, but also those with his chest. If you fire the ball into Woltemade under pressure, there's a good chance he can:
▪️Bring it under control
▪️ Lay it off to a team mate in a good position

Don't believe me, as he only got 2 assists in the Bundesliga last season?

Well, Woltemade may only have got 2 assists, but that was from an expected assisted-goal total of 4.6!

Only two players in the Bundesliga were let down by their teammates, so to speak, more than Woltemade.

This is a great moment to mention how often Woltemade scans. I looooove his awareness, both before he receives a pass, and afterrwards.

He's constantly checking both shoulders, and I find that helps him in various ways.

▪️ When he's getting on the ball with his back to goal, he has a good idea of if and where there's space behind him he can run into. It means he can quickly transition from receiving -> running at goal

▪️ When he's around the box, back to a defender, he's scanning to the wings to see where he's going to pass the ball too. This means he can often set team mates up with a first time pass

▪️ When he's carrying the ball forward, I again think Woltemade shows good awareness of runners around him, helping find the right option on the attack

Take all of these skillful and psychological qualities, and you have a pretty fun player.

Add in freakish size, and you have something pretty special - although, that's still a work in progress...

🔻

I went through early-season footage as well as later matches of Woltemade, and I think I made a fun observation.

For most of the season, Woltemade was often reliant on just being the biggest and strongest guy on the pitch.

Sure, a defender could get close to him when he's dribbling with the ball; they'd often end up on the floor as they tried to make a tackle, with Woltemade unharmed.

Also, when receiving a pass, he wouldn't care that much about getting very tight with the defender. Sure, they might be able to hook a foot around at times, but he's just so wide that it's hard to do even that.

But the point is, despite his size, he didn't actually use it that well. Someone like Lautaro Martinez for example, did and probably does more to actually protect the ball, bully defenders etc, than Woltemade. That's not an insult: Martinez is great. But it's just to illustrate the point.

In recent matches though, I think Woltemade has enhanced his ability to deal with pressure by adding in more technique. Particularly, the use of his arms. He's more likely to use them to keep defenders at bay now.

Say, when he's receiving with his back to goal, he's more likely to turn side-on, with one arm pinning the CB further away from the ball, improving the protection of it. It's a nice sign of improvement.

I will say, as a transition into the negatives, it's still not quite excellent.

I had a good conversation with @sthsthburner about Woltemade's reliance on his size and lack of an ability to actually use it. We just disagreed on how much it can be improved upon, and there is no right answer here.

But keep that debate in mind, because it may shape your outlook on Woltemade's future career.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(