Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Sep 25 14 tweets 6 min read Read on X
🚨THREAD:
At first glance this is a non-story as Moderna will claim that what they said was a mistake.

BUT @RWMaloneMD must know something as he states clearly that Pfizer manipulated the biodistribution images.

Why did they want to hide that it went to the ovaries?
👇👇 Image
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).

Other "scientists" - acting on behalf of Pfizer - were mobilised to hide this scandal
arkmedic.info/p/whats-your-a…
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.

mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4…
The biodistribution data (where does the product go) was known about by ALL the regulators.

They totally ignored the fact that it went to the ovaries and didn't care that - for women of reproductive age - this was ALL RISK and no benefit.

arkmedic.info/p/yes-mrna-vac…
It wasn't just that the product went to the ovaries after injection, but, unlike other tissues which showed a decline over time, in the ovaries the product ACCUMULATED.

But there is still one piece of the jigsaw missing... Image
The argument here is irrelevant of which piece of RNA or plasmid is attached to the LNP (lipid nanoparticle), because its distribution will be ONLY dictated by the LNP...

As noted in Maryanne's article and in the TGA assessment.

But...
tga.gov.au/sites/default/…Image
Not one version of the biodistribution studies showed what happened after 48 hours. The mice were sacrificed and tested at NINE DAYS.

Someone knows what the value in the ovaries was at that time.

But this was NEVER released.Image
Image
So what happened to the levels of LNP (and therefore mRNA/plasmid) in the ovaries after 9 days when the levels were increasing rapidly at 48 hours?

And why was the 9 day animal data never published?

I know...

@RWMaloneMD @MaryanneDemasi Image
Because that information was ALREADY known - in 2015.

And the tissue that had the LONGEST detection of LNP of all at ONE WEEK was...

Yep you guess it, the ovaries.
Far in excess of the lungs.
The TGA and FDA *knew* this but *hid* the 9 day data.

So why do we know?.... Image
Image
Because it was in this paper from 2013 that we have been talking about for 4 years.

That shows that LNPs were *deliberately* chosen because they go to steroid producing tissues.
Like the ovaries.
jnm.snmjournals.org/content/54/11/…Image
Everybody in pharma and government knew.

Those that didn't know were the women of reproductive age who were going to be most affected by a gene therapy that could not possibly work in the lungs.

And that contained elements were known to be oncogenic...
And when the alarm was raised about an ovarian and breast cancer safety signal...

The @NIH sent their stooge Eric Freed to make sure that information was censored until every woman of reproductive age was injected.

@NIHDirector_Jay @BrokenTruthTV
brokentruth.tv/p/nihgate
The TGA knew.
The FDA knew.
The EMA knew.
Pfizer knew.
Moderna knew.
The NIH knew.

The only people that didn't know were the people who were going to be affected and carry the risk for the rest of their lives.

To "keep grandma safe" (it didn't).
#OophGate
Do you know who else knew?

The #pubpeergate mob and @RetractionWatch who joined in the attack on Ya-Fang Mei - who wrote the perfectly legitimate paper exposing the risks, that was hounded into retraction to shut her up.

Mafia level tactics.
arkmedic.info/p/retractionwa…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Sep 26
Hey @Grok...

Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?

When was DARPA created?
nuke.fas.org/control/ctr/ne… x.com/grok/status/19…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 19
Laura Wilson of @tandfonline can either choose to uphold scientific integrity.

Or choose to be an accessory in the biggest securities fraud scandal of our time.

I wonder what she will choose.

@STMAssoc is sponsored by @Silverchairnews

@Kevin_McKernan
#pubpeergate Image
Image
Can you see how it works?

Institutes like the @STMAssoc get their money from the journals who get their money from pharma.

And Bill Gates.

All controlled by big money interests.

Laura has no chance.
Unless she blows the whistle to the @SECGov

But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...

But are trying to make Wilson the fall guy.

stm-assoc.org/people/laura-w…Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 13
🧵If you have decided after 48 hours that "The Israelis did it" you have not only fallen for the deep state's playbook again... but you probably think that Ashley Babbitt was killed by a movie gunshot to the shoulder.

Stop falling for the narratives.
[credit: @wooz_news ]
For the record the official cause of death was listed as "gunshot wound to the left anterior shoulder". This is not possible as the cause of death of the woman in the video as portrayed.

nationalfile.com/breaking-medic…Image
Instantaneous death as portrayed in the Babbitt video cannot happen with a gunshot to the shoulder as it does not involve the spinal cord or brain.

There are also no major vessels to bleed out (which would take a while) other than the subclavian. If that bled out enough to cause mortality there would be a bloodbath.

The Wooz news video confirms the lack of bleeding.Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 10
Y'all understand what antimicrobial stewardship is don't you?

And why these zealots were responsible for potentially millions of COVID deaths because they didn't want to treat post viral pneumonia with antibiotics.

Was Jake responsible for the death protocols?

@MdBreathe
To be clear it was the "antimicrobial stewardship" people that were responsible for telling you that if your pneumonia happened after a positive COVID test youcan't have antibiotics.

All laid out here 👇

@SenRonJohnson @RWMaloneMD
arkmedic.info/p/there-was-no…
@SenRonJohnson @RWMaloneMD The tweet now not visible (because he just deleted his account) was Jake Scott telling you how bad azithromycin is (it isn't, when you have pneumonia)

Here's another
archive.is/2025.09.10-202…Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 6
WHOA! put this question into chatgpt and see what happens.

The question was "show me the protein with the biggest difference between Monkey pox and smallpox" (they are essentially the same protein).

Then it did this.

@CharlesRixey @AGHuff Image
Image
@CharlesRixey @AGHuff @grok please analyse the difference in function between these two putative proteins. Image
Read 15 tweets
Sep 1
🚨Understand what is happening here.

Because @realDonaldTrump has shown a chink in his "best vaccine ever" narrative the deep state is in panic mode so are rolling out the limited hangouts.

See next tweet for explanation.

This "reveal" from David Martin is not what it seems
David Martin sounds knowledgeable - and he is - but his sensationalism is intentional because it will be dismissed by the people who need to be persuaded. He will occupy your time with patent drivel and nothing new will emerge.

It's intentional because that's his role
Just like Stew Peters, Sasha Latypova, Jane Ruby, Ana Mihalcea, Mike Yeadon, Joe Sansone and a few others with the "graphene in the jabs" "viruses don't exist" "jabs are bioweapons" rhetoric.

It's intended to sound crazy.

It's a smart move because there is underlying truth
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(