Ian Roberts, the Des Moines school superintendent arrested by ICE, has so many inconsistencies in his public biographies that it’s amazing that no one questioned his identity before.
I’ll keep adding receipts to this thread as I find information. 🧵
Court records show Roberts’s birthdate as December 18, 1970. But his original Wikipedia entry, created by an account that nearly matches a handle Roberts uses, says he was born December 18, 1978. And records from athletic competitions list his DOB at December 18, 1973.
Roberts is quoted in 2020 referring to Guyana as his birthplace and saying that his father immigrated to the United States in the 1980s and his mother in the 2000s. But in a 2024 local news story, he claims he was born in Brooklyn and raised by a single mother. His Facebook lists two secondary schools in Guyana as alma maters.
Roberts’s LinkedIn lists a lot of universities, though notably, the degrees are absent. Elsewhere, he claims two master’s degrees and two doctorates, in addition to a bachelor’s. (I found some sources that claim he has a PhD, but I will presume these were honest errors.) It appears he does have a EdD from an online university. He also claims he did a postdoc at Harvard.
During the years that Roberts supposedly was earning numerous graduate degrees, he also claims to have been continuously employed, as a teacher for a few years, then as a school administrator for almost two decades. His LinkedIn indicates that he was moonlighting as an “Executive Leadership Coach/Chief Thought Partner” for a private company since 2020, while he was a superintendent for two difference school districts. (I am not going to bother to share all the bios that inflate his job titles to the point of lying.)
Roberts’s official bio from his current employer, Des Moines Public Schools, states, “While in the nation’s capital he was named the George Washington University’s 2013 Washington D.C. Principal of the Year.” I have searched and search and cannot find any record of this award. Nor can I find a record of George Washington University giving out a “Principal of the Year” award to anyone, ever. Roberts was a principal at Anacostia High at the time, if any sleuths want to look into it.
One of Roberts’s more interesting claims, from his bio in his 2009 self-published book, is that he was a “Commissioned Military Officer” and a “Police Officer/Detective.” He dropped this service from his resume until 2022, when a run-in with law enforcement became public. After pleading guilty to violating Pennsylvania gun laws, he released a statement that insinuated the officer was motivated by racism and mentioned that he was “a trained Commissioned Military Officer with a wealth of experience in firearms training and safety.” I found some indications that he was in the Guyanese military, and this would explain the gap he had before entering college in the US in 1995. (Depending on which birth year is accurate, he was either 17, 22, or 25 in 1995.)
More on Roberts’s military service in a self-published book he wrote. He says he graduated from officer candidate school when he was 22 and then worked at security detail for Queen Elizabeth. Her visit was in 1994. (It was her first visit in 28 years, not 50 as he says.) If true, he was born prior to 1973.
Here is Roberts’s marriage certificate from his 2017 marriage. (I removed a couple of identifying details of other parties, and SSNs were redacted by the county.)
He married a woman who lived in Arkansas, and who now lives in Texas, according to her online bios. Although Roberts has worked in many different places, there is no sign of a connection to either locale. They both worked for Lighthouse Academies at the same time, which is likely how they met.
His date of birth on the marriage certificate is 1970, and his place of birth is Guyana. He was previously married and divorced in 2006. It appears he put a Social Security Number on the form.
Some of these court cases from Maryland are not Ian Andre Roberts, the Des Moines superintendent, but most of them appear to be. The records show he had children with a previous wife, who he divorced in 2006, and it appears he had at least one child out of wedlock with another woman. Roberts has continued to have his wages garnished due to one of these lawsuits, which still has not been closed.
As others have reported, the Chair of the Des Moines school board that hired Roberts was Michelle Obama’s Chief of Staff.
Roberts also met Michelle Obama when she was the graduation speaker at the high school where he was the principal. That speech featured prominently in his self-published book.
Oops, I posted the wrong image in the prior post. I meant to share this image that shows that Jackie Norris, Michelle Obama’s former Chief of Staff, helped get Roberts his position as Superintendent in Des Moines.
This is a new one for me! For his 2017 wedding, Roberts essentially had his resume written on a cake. It’s hard to make out, but it appears that he claims degrees from St. John’s (2000), Morgan State (2007), and Georgetown (2014).
Sadly, his children’s birth do not get a mention in his life chronology.
Ian Roberts was offered the position of superintendent at Millcreek Township School District in Erie, Pennsylvania in May 2020. School board minutes from July show that they were struggling to ratify the contract because Roberts could not produce the documents necessary to obtain a letter of eligibility. In particular, he had not provided the necessary proof of his doctorate and had not completed the FBI check. An attorney advised them that they could use an “alternate route” to confirm his eligibility for the position. The plan was to employ him, and “hopefully” the FBI clearance would come through within 90 days. Roberts became superintendent in August 2020, and I cannot anything in the board’s records that indicates whether they revisited the matter.
Roberts was superintendent for Millcreek Township for three years. Each year the board gave him a rating of “meets expectations”—the equivalent of a grade of C on their 5-point scale. His replacement has received a rating of “outstanding”—their top mark—each year.
These poor ratings for Roberts came before the board even knew that he would make personnel decisions that would cost the district significant sums in legal settlements.
Roberts is currently registered to vote in Maryland. When he registered in 2017, he reportedly had been working in St. Louis for years. There’s no indication from his resumes that he’s lived in Baltimore since he registered to vote there.
h/t @beautyinnis
@beautyinnis I can’t believe I missed this before!
After offering Roberts the position of superintendent in 2020, the Millcreek board discussed the problem that he hadn’t submitted proof of his doctorate.
At the July 21, 2020 meeting, the Millcreek board reported that Roberts was still working on establishing his eligibility to hold the superintendent position. But records show the Pennsylvania Department of Education issued the required qualification letter on July 1, 2020.
Roberts was using the “Dr.” honorific for many years before he obtained a Ed.D. from an online university in 2021. He used to claim to have a doctorate from Morgan State. Here is that claim made in a grant application submitted to @usedgov in 2019.
I confirmed that Roberts did obtain a master’s degree from Georgetown. However, it was an Executive Master’s in Leadership (EML) designed specifically for school principals in DC. It was a one-year, part-time course of study—not the 2-year, full-time studies required for a traditional master’s.
This newspaper clipping from Newsday on June 3, 1999 says that Roberts came to the US in 1994 to play soccer for St. Francis College in Brooklyn. His mom was still in Guyana, consistent with the version of his story that she came to the US in the 2000s.
The article says he was 23. Assuming the December 18 birthdate, that means he was born in 1975, five years after every official source.
Another clipping from the Baltimore Sun in 1998 indicates he was a sophomore, despite apparently four years of college study at that point.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
University President J. Luke Wood, who identifies as African American, launched a “Black Honors College” at Sacramento State University last year. His stated goal is to transform it into the “HBCU of the West.” As he explained in an interview: “So we can’t be an HBCU—we weren’t founded in time, right? But we can be everything but the historical part.”
But that “historical part” is not incidental. “Historically Black Colleges and Universities” are called that because they were historically black, founded during a time of legal segregation. The designation came about in 1965 after the Civil Rights Act made it illegal for HBCUs to refuse to admit non-black students. When Wood laments that the program wasn’t “founded in time,” he is expressing a yearning for the time of segregation, which the Civil Rights Movement fought to dismantle.
The Black Honors College website claims it does not discriminate based on race, yet Wood has described the program as “specifically designed to serve Black students.” He and other university officials have emphasized that its primary purpose is to address the problem of lower graduation rates among black students. Notably, the program does not require applicants to show that they have personally faced any disadvantage or hardship.
Given President Wood’s own descriptions, it is difficult to see how this program complies with federal anti-discrimination laws, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court.
This thread contains a number of clips that give you an idea of Luke Wood’s views on race.
Sacramento State President J. Luke Wood was interviewed by Nigerian media during an official visit to the country last year. Wood said that the trip’s purpose was to recruit Nigerian students to attend the university, who he says are “the best students on the planet.” He advertised that studying at Sac State is affordable because the costs are partially subsidized by Californian taxpayers. He announced the university intends to sign a memoranda of understanding with Nigeria, South Africa, and Rwanda to facilitate the enrollment of African students.
In an article a Sacramento newspaper from around the same time, Wood is quoted as saying, “I believe in Pan Africanism.” He said the Black Honors College is “purposely and intentionally trying to be reflective of the diaspora” by staffing the program with black people from around the world. The goal is to “have a Black-centric experience in California.”
I also suspect that the goal is to improve his university’s statistics for black students by recruiting from the elite classes in foreign countries. It would obviously be easier to pack their numbers with black people from wealthy, educated families, who are likely to perform well, than it would be to figure out how to support disadvantaged African-American students.
The central, unanswered question is: How does a global effort to recruit students based on the color of their skin conceivably benefit California taxpayers?
Yesterday, a trans activist attacked a man protesting against boys in girls’ sports at the California track and field championships. He was in his car with his wife and 4-year-old child at the time. He fought the attacker off with pepper spray before police intervened. 1/3
The attacker had been interviewed by local media earlier. The person appears to be a female who identifies as male. She rambled about oppression, Palestine, etc. “If you’re a Nazi, or complicit, I mean, f*ck off,” she said. 2/3
The victim is a conservative activist, and the attacker identifies him by name as she approaches. It’s a sad commentary on the state of free speech culture that comments on this post indicate people believe his political views justify the attack. 3/3
Matt Taibbi is suing Congresswomen Kamlager-Dove for libel.
Members of Congress are shielded from liability for defamation for statements made during legislative activities, but Kamlager-Dove apparently didn’t realize this doesn’t extend to her social media communications, unless they were within the scope of her official duties as a member of Congress.
FYI, I was going to follow up my initial post with more detail about the law, but I realized what I wrote might be misleading without a qualification, so I edited the post.
I initially thought this looked like a strong case for Taibbi, but there’s a 6th Circuit case that held tweets from congresspeople falsely accusing the Covington Catholic student of hateful conduct were protected. I don’t find the reasoning persuasive, but another court might.
🧵 UPDATE on the lawsuit against the executive affecting trans people in the military.
Judge Reyes called a hearing this afternoon, because the plaintiffs filed their amended complaint today, five days after it was due. The attorneys were adding new plaintiffs and said they had issues communicating with them.
Judge Reyes decided the solution is to give plaintiffs a do-over so that they file a new motion for a preliminary injunction next week. (She used the analogy of shaking an Etch-a-Sketch to start over.) 1/x
After addressing the issues around the briefing schedule, Judge Reyes questioned attorneys for both sides on what arguments they intended to make around the definition of “sex.”
At the hearing last Wednesday, Reyes raised this topic and lectured the defense attorneys on her belief that there are more than two sexes. She then ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefing on the topic. Plaintiffs filed their brief last Friday, and defendants (Trump et al) were supposed to file their response this coming Friday.
It seems unusual to me that the judge expected defendants to respond orally in court to these arguments, when they haven’t had a chance to draft their brief, especially given the fact that she was announcing they would start anew with with a new preliminary injunction motion. 2/x
Judge Reyes noted that the government definition revolved around the type of reproductive cells a person makes, which she believed to be incorrect: “My understanding is that according to scientists, determining what sex someone is, is not dependent on their reproductive cell.” She said that she believed that reproductive cells were just one factor, and that anatomy and chromosomes are also taken into account when determining a person’s sex.
She said that she would not make any determinations on the topic of the definition of sex without hearing expert testimony. 3/x
A squirrel ran across the stage while everyone was waiting for Kamala's concession speech. 👀
For those questioning whether this is a real video, multiple videos of the squirrel of been shared.
I do appreciate the skepticism! This link will take you to the moment the squirrel enters the frame. Check the live chat, where people start commenting on it. 🙂 youtube.com/live/WckEFzGku…
Kamala Harris was admitted to law school under a program for students “who have experienced major life hurdles, such as educational disadvantage, economic hardship, or disability.”
Kamala Harris’s mother came from the highest caste in India, but by moving to the U.S. and Canada, obtaining a prestigious degree, marrying a future Stanford professor, having a successful career as a cancer researcher, and sending her daughter to private schools, her daughter became unusually disadvantaged?
Strange how that works.
In 1992, three years after Kamala graduated from Hastings Law School (a public university), there was a controversy after the dean of the law school realized the extent of student group involvement in admissions to the program for disadvantaged students (called LEOP).
Students who claimed to be eligible for the LEOP because of some special hardship they suffered would have their claims of being disadvantaged verified via a phone call by members of the student organization associated with the applicant’s race. The phone interviews were used by some students to screen out conservative candidates—to avoid future “Clarence Thomases,” as one student explained.
This would have been the process in place when Kamala Harris applied to law school in 1986. According to her resume, she also served as President of the “Black Law Student’s [sic] Association,” so she likely participated in the process of selecting admittees to the LEOP program while she was a law student as well.
While the program was advertised as a class-based affirmative action program—which Kamala Harris wouldn’t have qualified for—in practice it was based on race and politics, during her time.
In 2004, Kamala's mother recounted to an LA Times reporter how she was taken aback when an educator didn't realize Kamala came from a privileged background.