Let's see how well this excerpt from Wade's first public announcement of his now 12-year running civil suit against the estate & MJ companies has aged.
(Spoiler: Not very well at all.)
Lauer asks: "Why didn't you go to the lawyers and do this quietly?"
Wade doesn't tell him that he did exactly that initially, but it didn't work: "They are filing the petition to file a civil suit today, in court. They feel very good about this all being done confidentially..."
Wade: "I've lived in silence & denial for 22 years & I can't spend another moment in that."
Wade was 22 in May 2005 where he had the most opportune chance to "speak my truths" in a criminal court of law. Where he credibly underwent 11 rounds of intense examination by both sides.
Wade: "That's one thing you'll never see from me. I'm never gonna go away with this for the sake of money."
But in court his attorneys have expressed an interest in mediation, as well as a desire to settle privately if the defense would concede, to "get on with [our] lives."
Wade and James would accept a settlement, with a current ask of $400M per court filings, to avoid "the stigma" of CSA.
But they voluntarily chose to make much of their lives revolve around it.
Including a "trauma" podcast, multiple TV specials, media tour interviewing & more.🤔
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ARCHIVES: A day after the verdict in 05, Ron Zonen was already on a media tour to rewrite it. Part of this was painting the Arvizo family as outstanding citizens, Gavin as an astute student and athlete.
21 years later Zonen still continues this crusade of defending the grifters.
Note how Zonen continued stating—as fact—that MJ plied the kids with alcohol & how Janet rushed the family out of Neverland "within 36 hours" of learning this.
He says this despite witnesses and the jury roundly rejecting those claims in court and all related charges against MJ.
About that 36 hours: During the grand jury and Janet's testimony, it was stated they left March 10—as soon as she found out about son's alcohol use at 4 a.m.
This was corrected to March 12 for indictment. Because on March 10th, Janet was still enjoying pedicures at MJ's expense.
THREAD: A highlight of the many factual errors, deliberate omissions, timeline falsities and other material mistakes made in @AndrewHammel1's piece published by @Quillette.
Where fact-checking was clearly not of interest—but sourcing from Dimond and Gutierrez somehow made sense.
"MJ would later invite James to visit him at Hayvenhurst"
You omit how it was the Safechucks who kicked off this correspondence by sending him letters. This is also true with the Robsons. MJ had no communication with them; they spent 2 years trying to reach him from AU and USA.
"MJ repeatedly invited large groups of children to Neverland"
...and their families. Many of these occurrences were formal arrangements with organizations like D.A.R.E., Make A Wish, local churches and non-profits. They included an entire range of adult chaperones and staffers.
Perfect example of the way Diane Dimond operates and why anyone using her as a source is destined for failure.
This quote Quillette uses originates from Dimond's 2019-revised self-narrated version of her 2005 book, which she released amid the publicity of LN.
But wait a minute!
Dimond not only never mentioned this claim in her original 2005 book despite having all the "law enforcement sources" at her beckoning then, she outright dismissed these very claims as myth in 2013:
"There's no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs."
In the interest of creating sensational bits to pad her 2019 release, Diane recycled this "20-24 victims—$200M in payouts" story first circulated by Stacy Brown, Page 6 and other tabloids, and reattributed it to herself and her own sources despite knowing it had no truth to it.🤣
10 hours of "sworn testimony 🤡" but King played only a moment's worth for estate.
Flashback to 2005 when King told the media he had 100s of damning, frantic messages from MJ then circulated several seconds worth, unverified and misleading, to the media.
The way King & Geragos are attempting to reframe the story as if it is the estate seeking to bury it. It has always been THEIR side presenting in private—to solicit millions.
Big brain idea? They could had just uploaded the 10 hours raw to YouTube. But where's the money in that?
Others who told hours of "horrific abuse" stories on video:
Daniel Kapon, who sold his tapes to the tabloids but had never met MJ.
Joseph Bartucci Jr., who claimed kidnapping & abuse while MJ was across the country.
Canada teen Dimond pursued for months only to admit the hoax.
Epstein's 95-page black book was published in full 5 years ago. MJ's "contact" in it was really Sam Gen, an attorney for a very short-term adviser to MJ.
But in new DOJ release you'd believe this was MJ's direct details within it.
One-upped by White House Press Secretary tweeting a 2003 pic of MJ, Ross, their kids and Clinton at a well-known event—no connection to Epstein at all.
Now with the children as "redacted individuals" and a byline implying it could be because they are victims of Epstein. Really?
"We redact the faces of victims and/or minors" has the same absurd energy as the Comedy Central skit from Nathan For You...Where a singular billboard housed the faces of "popcorn sharers and theater masturbators"—one or the other, let the public guess which one each might be. 🤦