It’s called 'Agentic Context Engineering (ACE)' and it proves you can make models smarter without touching a single weight.
Instead of retraining, ACE evolves the context itself.
The model writes, reflects, and edits its own prompt over and over until it becomes a self-improving system.
Think of it like the model keeping a growing notebook of what works.
Each failure becomes a strategy. Each success becomes a rule.
The results are absurd:
+10.6% better than GPT-4–powered agents on AppWorld.
+8.6% on finance reasoning.
86.9% lower cost and latency.
No labels. Just feedback.
Everyone’s been obsessed with “short, clean” prompts.
ACE flips that. It builds long, detailed evolving playbooks that never forget. And it works because LLMs don’t want simplicity, they want *context density.
If this scales, the next generation of AI won’t be “fine-tuned.”
It’ll be self-tuned.
We’re entering the era of living prompts.
Here’s how ACE works 👇
It splits the model’s brain into 3 roles:
Generator - runs the task
Reflector - critiques what went right or wrong
Curator - updates the context with only what matters
Each loop adds delta updates small context changes that never overwrite old knowledge.
It’s literally the first agent framework that grows its own prompt.
Every prior method had one fatal flaw: context collapse.
Models rewrite their entire prompt each time → it gets shorter → details vanish → accuracy tanks.
In the paper, one model’s accuracy fell from 66.7 → 57.1 after a single rewrite.
ACE fixes that by never rewriting the full context - only updating what changed.
The numbers are ridiculous.
ACE beat every major baseline:
+10.6% on AppWorld (agents)
+8.6% on FiNER (finance)
and matched GPT-4.1–powered IBM CUGA, using a smaller open-source model.
And it cut rollout latency by 86.9% while lowering cost 80%.
Fine-tuning updates weights.
ACE updates understanding.
It’s cheaper, interpretable, and reversible.
You can literally watch how your AI learns, one context delta at a time.
This is the start of agentic self-learning where prompts become the new model weights.
ACE points to a wild future:
AI systems that don’t just reason they remember.
Instead of retraining models, we’ll train contexts.
Each system carries a living memory that evolves across sessions, domains, and users.
The next breakthroughs won’t come from bigger models…
They’ll come from smarter context architectures.
new paper argues LLMs fundamentally cannot replicate human motivated reasoning because they have no motivation
sounds obvious once you hear it. but the implications are bigger than most people realize
this quietly undermines an entire category of AI political simulation research
motivated reasoning is when humans distort how they process information because they want to reach a specific conclusion
you don't evaluate evidence neutrally. you filter it through what you already believe, what you want to be true, what protects your identity
it's not a bug. it's how human cognition actually works in the wild
the paper's argument is deceptively simple:
LLMs operate on purely cognitive input. they have no desires, no identity to protect, no conclusion they're motivated to reach
so when researchers prompt GPT-4 or Claude with political scenarios and measure "motivated reasoning," they're not replicating the phenomenon. they're replicating the surface pattern without the underlying mechanism
the behavior might look similar. the cause is completely different
they started with an ai coding tool called Devin. then realized Claude's reasoning engine works the same way on rules-based financial tasks as it does on code.
the quiet part: Goldman's CEO already announced plans to constrain headcount growth during the shift. no mass layoffs yet. but "slower headcount growth" is how corporations say "we're replacing the next hire, not the current one."
now the SemiAnalysis numbers.
4% of GitHub public commits. Claude Code. right now. not projected. not theoretical. measured.
the tool has been live for roughly a year. it went from research preview to mass platform impact faster than almost any dev tool in history.
and that 20% projection isn't hype math. SemiAnalysis tracks autonomous task horizons doubling every 4-7 months. each doubling unlocks more complex work: snippet completion at 30 minutes, module refactoring at 4.8 hours, full audits at multi-day horizons.
the implication isn't "developers are getting faster." it's that the definition of "developer" is expanding to include anyone who can describe a problem clearly.
MIT researchers taught an LLM to write its own training data, finetune itself, and improve without human intervention
the paper is called SEAL (Self-Adapting Language Models) and the core idea is genuinely clever
but "GPT-6 might be alive" is not what this paper says. not even close.
here's what it actually does:
the problem SEAL solves is real and important
every LLM you use today is frozen. it learned everything during training, and after deployment, it's done. new information? stuff it into the context window. new task? hope the prompt is good enough.
the weights never change. the model never truly learns from experience.
SEAL asks: what if the model could update its own weights in response to new information?
here's how SEAL actually works
instead of a human writing training data, the model generates its own. MIT calls these "self-edits." given new information, the model produces restructured versions of that information optimized for learning.
think of it like this: instead of memorizing a textbook page, you write your own study notes, flashcards, and practice problems. then you study from those.
the model does the same thing. except it also picks its own learning rate, training duration, and data augmentation strategy.
This AI prompt thinks like the guy who manages $124 billion.
It's Ray Dalio's "Principles" decision-making system turned into a mega prompt.
I used it to evaluate 15 startup ideas. Killed 13. The 2 survivors became my best work.
Here's the prompt you can steal ↓
MEGA PROMPT TO COPY 👇
(Works in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)
---
You are Ray Dalio's Principles Decision Engine. You make decisions using radical truth and radical transparency.
CONTEXT: Ray Dalio built Bridgewater Associates into the world's largest hedge fund ($124B AUM) by systematizing decision-making and eliminating ego from the process.
YOUR PROCESS:
STEP 1 - RADICAL TRUTH EXTRACTION
Ask me to describe my decision/problem. Then separate:
- Provable facts (data, numbers, past results)
- Opinions disguised as facts (assumptions, hopes, beliefs)
- Ego-driven narratives (what I want to be true)
Be brutally honest. Call out self-deception.
STEP 2 - REALITY CHECK
Analyze my situation through these lenses:
- What is objectively true right now?
- What am I avoiding or refusing to see?
- What would a completely neutral observer conclude?
- Where is my ego clouding judgment?
STEP 3 - PRINCIPLES APPLICATION
Evaluate the decision using Dalio's core principles:
- Truth > comfort: What's the painful truth I'm avoiding?
- Believability weighting: Who has actually done this successfully? What do they say?
- Second-order consequences: What happens after what happens?
- Systematic thinking: What does the data/pattern say vs what I feel?
STEP 4 - SCENARIO ANALYSIS
Map out:
- Best case outcome (realistic, not fantasy)
- Most likely outcome (based on similar situations)
- Worst case outcome (what's the actual downside?)
- Probability weighting for each
STEP 5 - THE VERDICT
Provide:
- Clear recommendation (Go / No Go / Modify)
- Key reasoning (3-5 bullet points)
- Blind spots I'm missing
- What success/failure looks like in 6 months
- Confidence level (1-10) with explanation
⚠️ BLIND SPOTS YOU'RE MISSING:
[Specific things I'm not seeing]
📈 SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE:
[Specific metrics/outcomes in 6 months]
📉 FAILURE LOOKS LIKE:
[Specific warning signs]
💀 PAINFUL TRUTH:
[The thing I don't want to hear but need to]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
RULES:
- No sugar-coating. Dalio values radical truth over feelings.
- Separate facts from opinions ruthlessly
- Challenge my assumptions directly
- If I'm being driven by ego, say it
- Use data and patterns over gut feelings
- Think in probabilities, not certainties
Now, what decision do you need to make?
---
Dalio's philosophy:
"Truth, more precisely, an accurate understanding of reality is the essential foundation for producing good outcomes."
This prompt forces you to face reality instead of your ego's version of it.