Ya”ll ready for the thread that got my OG account attacked, and suspended by Q “Anons”
🚨EXPOSE: QANON WAS A PSYOP - AND IT WAS USED TO TARGET TRUMP & FLYNN, NOT DEFEND THEM. 🚨
What follows is a deeply-researched breakdown that every patriot, journalist, and digital soldier should see. You have been lied to.
Donald J. Trump didn’t create QAnon, didn’t even back it outright-just nodded along like, yeah, cool fans.
But the whole cult ( Bernie Bro’s ) draped itself in his flags, his chants, his crowd.
Made people think it was legit White House intel.
First sucker punch: Thinking Q rode for Trump. Nah-it was built to gut him, herd his base like sheep with lies, guilt-trips, and mind-games.
Don’t go off the cliff 🤦🏻♂️
Setting the stage: Q was not what it seemed.
Contrary to mainstream belief, Donald J. Trump did not create QAnon, nor did he directly endorse it.
At most, he acknowledged its popularity, sometimes playfully, other times ambiguously-but never claimed ownership or origin.
Yet the movement wrapped itself in his imagery, his slogans, and his base-giving millions the false impression that Q had official backing.
That assumption was the first trap.
The second trap? Believing Q was created for Trump.
Our research indicates it was designed to destroy him-or at minimum, to control and corral his movement through disinformation, psychological framing, and guilt-by-association.
Listen to how @RepRaskin weaponized QAnon Against @nicksortor rather than answer his very important questions.
The architects-General Paul Vallely and psywar veterans. Let’s talk about General Paul Vallely.
In nineteen eighty, Vallely co-authored a paper called ‘From PSYOP to MindWar’ with then-Major Michael Aquino, a specialist in psychological operations. (QAnons don’t want you paying attention to this ask Gen. Vallely is the only one to give Credence to Q 😬)
This document didn’t just advocate for propaganda. It called for total psychological dominance over populations, through all media, symbols, beliefs, and behavioral cues.
Now fast-forward to the Obama era-Vallely was a key advisor in shaping narratives.
Coincidence? Hardly. Vallely pushed ‘MindWar’ tactics: win without firing a shot, by controlling perceptions.
Listen to Alex Jone who tried to warn you, Qanon called him MOSSAD agent. 🤣
The Flynn connection.
@GenFlynn , Trump’s first National Security Advisor, got tangled in Russian bot scandals-remember those twenty seventeen leaks?
QAnon amplified ‘em, painting Flynn as a victim while actually dooming him. Why? Q drops hinted Flynn was ‘in on it,’ but mainstream media spun it as conspiracy nut jobbery. (Qanon use it to attack Flynn to this day, others use it to push narratives)
Result? Flynn’s credibility tanked, Trump’s team fractured. And who benefited? The deep state Q railed against.
Distraction theater. Q flooded MAGA with ‘trust the plan’ mantras-Epstein lists, election steals, adrenochrome wildness. But where were the receipts? Zilch on real scandals like Ukraine aid misuse or Big Pharma ties. Instead, it buried actual leaks under layers of absurdity, keeping folks chasing shadows.
Like this BS claiming no kids Died during the Sandy Hook school Shooting. 🤦🏻♂️🤮🤬
Why not talk about what is really happening with indoctrination of our children into these ideological groups like Transgender, LGBTQ+?
You are being manipulated 🫠
Evidence trail. Check Vallely’s interviews-he bragged about ‘non-lethal warfare’ on populations.
And those 4chan posts? IP traces link to military-grade ops, not some basement genius.
Q’s timing? Right after Mueller probe kicked off-perfect to muddy waters.
Ends with: Trust the plan? Nah, question the script. Patriots, wake up-Q was the enemy in disguise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Remember @RealCandaceO before you send your goons after me, “I’m only asking questions!”
Candace Owens, isn’t it just fascinating how your entire life story seems like one big, scripted psy-op designed to flip the narrative whenever it suits you?
Let’s start right at the beginning, shall we?
Back in high school, 2005, you claimed these racist voicemails and threats came your way, right?
You sued the Stamford Board of Education, got the NAACP involved, and walked away with a tidy $37,500 settlement after one kid got suspended and pleaded out as a youthful offender.
But wait….why did you settle out of court so quietly?
Was it because the whole thing was exaggerated for a payout, or was there something deeper, like maybe you knew the threats weren’t as cut-and-dry as you painted them?
And here’s the real kicker: just two years later, in 2007, you yourself got arrested for harassment!
What was that about, Candace?
Were you the bully all along, projecting your own tactics onto those poor classmates?
Why seal the juvenile record, afraid the truth would expose the pattern you’ve been running your whole life?
Isn’t it convenient how you trot out that high school “victimhood” story only when it fits your anti-bullying grift, but bury your own harassment charge like it never happened?
The way I understand it, these kids were your friends until an argument took place in school. One of the children was suspended. But that want enough for you, was it?
you yourself was arrested for harassment but you buried that.
Does this show a pattern of go against Candice and she will destroy you?
Fast forward to your “anti-Trump, anti-conservative” phase—oh, this is rich.
As CEO of Degree180 in 2015-2016, you were all about “social change,” weren’t you?
Spewing blog posts calling Trump “racist, bigoted, and downright offensive,” even speculating if he was some twisted “social experiment” with that infamous penis joke.
Your writings were laced with harassing, ruthless jabs, mocking, tearing down, using the same bully tactics you claimed to hate from your high school days.
Who was really pulling the strings there, Candace?
Was Degree180 just a front for testing the waters, seeing how far you could push divisive rhetoric before flipping sides?
Why did the site go dark right as you “woke up” to conservatism?
Isn’t it suspicious how everything you railed against back then, bigotry, offensive speech, is exactly what you’ve accused others of while cozying up to the very people you once despised?
Remember, I am just asking questions......
Here is what I find very interesting. Before creating Degree180 @RealCandaceO you were VP-level at a private equity firm in Manhattan, why would you leave that position to start Degree180?
2010: Interned at Vogue magazine in New York. Wikipedia
2012: Took a job as an administrative assistant at a private equity firm in Manhattan and later rose to VP-level administrative duties there (firm not named in public sources???)
2015: Left to start her own marketing agency (Degree180).
Degree180 wasn’t meant to be a “tiny blog”, it was her first attempt at building a media brand.
It didn’t work, but it was her first break from obscurity.
And it directly led to:
Social Autopsy
Viral controversy
Media interviews
The “red pill” pivot
TPUSA discovering her
Her influencer career launch
Degree180 was essentially the launchpad.
@RealCandaceO has always been about building a brand, she has stepped on or destroyed anyone that has gotten in her way, my question is who helped her?
was it someone from the private equity firm in Manhattan, how did she go from a very hard Hating, social change, Racial injustice Blogger to conservative voice overnight?
This was not Organic........
how do you go from write this, too conservative overnight?
'Many of the writers for Degree180, which Owens registered in 2015, were college students.
And many of them expressed their displeasure with Donald Trump. In a December 2015 story, “Serious Question: Is Donald Trump a Social Experiment?” the site’s editor, Zoe Weiner, wrote of Trump’s now-notorious pledge to end Muslim immigration to the US, “You guys remember Nazi Germany, right?” (Weiner, now a freelance writer, declined to comment for this story.) In a sarcastic post titled “Thank You Letter to Donald Trump” in April 2016, one contributor to the site wrote: “The idea of you being my future President makes my skin crawl, but you did provide me with a new sense of political awareness.” An article from March 1, 2016, explained that even though Trump was married to an immigrant, he could still be racist. And a March 18, 2016, article titled “Does Donald Trump Actually Have a Small Penis?” concluded that “Donald Trump most likely has a penis the size of an infant. ... Hitler is the one guy that comes to mind that may have topped him.”
And then comes Social Autopsy in 2016, your so-called anti-harassment tool that was basically a doxing machine in disguise.
Did you create the tool for Cancel culture?
You launched that Kickstarter claiming it would expose online bullies, drawing from your own “trauma,” but when actual harassment victims like Zoe Quinn and Randi Harper reached out to warn you it could be weaponized for more abuse, what did you do?
You flipped the script, sent a barrage of accusations their way, posted private conversations, mocked Zoe publicly, doing exactly the doxing and harassing you swore to fight!
Why project that they sent “accounts” after you when the threats you received look an awful lot like the fallout from your own bad idea?
Was this all a setup to “red-pill” yourself into the alt-right crowd, aligning with Gamergate trolls like Milo Yiannopoulos and Mike Cernovich?
Must watch: youtu.be/MA6jvleb5D0?si…
Isn’t it telling how you claimed liberals were the real harassers, but your actions mirrored the very mob tactics Gamergate was infamous for?
Who benefited from that chaos, @RealCandaceO , you, suddenly catapulted into conservative stardom?
Candace used a actual case of cyberbullying and harassment to elevate herself, is/was this pure evil or was another agenda at play here?
Every day, thousands of kids vanish into a broken foster care system—torn from families, lost in bureaucracy, facing abuse, neglect, or worse.
But Trump's NEW Executive Order just dropped, demanding transparency, AI-driven fixes, and REAL support to rescue these vulnerable children!
Imagine: No more kids "aging out" into homelessness. No more hidden failures.
No More children being ignored.
Project Milk Carton is ALREADY fighting exposing missing children, unmasking system horrors, and tracking every dollar to hold the powerful accountable.
This isn't just policy, it's a LIFELINE for innocent lives!
But it only works if WE make it.
Dive into how PMC is leading the charge & how YOUR voice can save kids: [Link to Article in the comments]
With Community Support, We Can Do Much More
The Executive Order sets a federal direction. Project Milk Carton is already building many of the tools and public intelligence functions this direction requires.
But to fully “shine light on the missing” and sustain meaningful accountability, we need community support and participation.
Here’s how you can help.
JOIN THE MOVEMENT NOW: Contact ceo@projectmilkcarton.org
Are children here safer or less safe than in neighboring areas?
Are we seeing high risk with relatively high funding—suggesting deeper structural issues?
Then:
Share findings with:
Your networks
Local media
Community and faith-based organizations
Local and state representatives
Information becomes power when it is widely understood.
2. Support PMC’s Work Financially
PMC is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. To maintain and expand our intelligence platform, media arm, and investigative capacity, we need:
Funding for:
Data infrastructure and hosting
Technical development
Research and analysis
Investigative operations
Donations—both one-time and recurring—help us:
Integrate more data sources
Enhance the precision of our tools
Expand coverage and improve depth in more states and localities
Your financial support enables us to keep shining light into dark corners of the system.
Imagine a big bully who doesn’t hit you but whispers mean lies to your friends so they stop playing with you.
That’s 5GW! The book says:
• The Bad Guys Aren’t Who You Think: It’s not your neighbors or people from other countries who disagree with you. They’re just confused like you. The real enemies are “shadowy governments” (sneaky leaders who hide), big companies like social media giants, and “globalists” (people who want one big boss controlling everything, like erasing country lines and taking away parents’ rights to decide for their kids). They use fake stories to make everyone hate each other, so they can make stricter rules and boss us around more.
• How the War Works: It’s all about “narratives” (fancy word for stories). They spread confusing info on TV, phones, and the web to make you worried or angry. If people fight, the bad guys use that as an excuse to take more control, like adding more “police” to watch everyone.
• What We Can Do: Don’t punch or yell, that’s what the bullies want! Instead, learn the truth (like reading this book), share it with everyone (even kids you don’t like), shake hands, and team up like a huge superhero squad.
The book quotes a smart guy named Malcolm X who says “fight for truth and fairness for all people, no matter who. “
And a general named McChrystal says “it takes a network (group) to beat a network” like making a big friend chain to stop the bullies.
• The Big Warning: If we lose, we’ll all be like puppets under one rich king who tells us what to do. But if we get smart and work together worldwide, we can win back our freedom. The book isn’t telling you to do anything bad, it’s just teaching so you make good choices based on facts, not feelings.
The whole thing is like a wake-up call: “Hey, war isn’t just boom-boom anymore. It’s mind games, and everyone’s in it!”
Real-Life Examples Happening Right Now (in 2025)
This stuff isn’t just in books, it’s happening today! Here are some easy examples, like schoolyard tricks but on a huge scale. I’ll show pictures to make it clearer.
1. Fake Videos (Deepfakes) Tricking People: Bad guys use computer magic to make videos where famous people say things they never said. For example, in 2025 elections around the world, like in the US or India, deepfakes show leaders “admitting” bad stuff to make voters mad or vote wrong. It’s like someone editing a video of your teacher saying “No recess forever!” when she didn’t.
Look at this picture, it shows how deepfakes are used in scams and to mess with votes.
Social Media Lies Spreading Hate:
On apps like X (Twitter) or Facebook, countries like Russia or China post fake news to make people in other places argue. Right now in 2025, during the Ukraine war, Russia spreads stories saying “Ukraine is bad” with made-up pictures to make Europeans stop helping.
It’s like a kid posting “Your friend stole my toy!” online to get everyone against them, even if it’s a lie.
The Israeli vs Hamas is being weaponized big time on social media: Similarly, in the Israel-Hamas fight right now in 2025, both sides (and outsiders) spread tons of fake stuff on social media to make the other look super mean and get the world to pick sides.
For example, there are false stories about bombings (like claiming a hospital was hit by the wrong side when it was a rocket gone wrong), fake videos of “starving people” while markets show food, or made-up claims about aid being stolen or schools being used as hideouts.
It’s like two groups yelling “They started it!” with phony pictures to make everyone hate the other team more, causing big arguments online and even hate against Jews or Muslims.
Groups like Hamas or Israel supporters use this to trick people into supporting them, and it’s led to surges in mean posts and wrong info during ceasefires.
Here’s a fun (but serious) poster showing how social media can be like old-time propaganda.
(This is also happening with Groups, if someone doesn’t agree with propaganda they push but we will touch on this a bit later 😉)
Investigation into the Open Society Foundations’ Role in Global Migration and United States Immigration Policy Influence
🚨It would be easier to ask what George Soros does not have his money/influence in🚨
The Open Society Foundations (OSF), established and funded by George Soros, represent a vast network of philanthropic influence that extends across borders, impacting migration patterns and immigration policies worldwide. This report examines OSF’s embedded role in facilitating migration from origin countries through humanitarian and advocacy programs, while simultaneously supporting legal and policy efforts within the United States to enable the long-term stay of immigrants. Drawing on documented grants and organizational ties, the analysis reveals a pattern of indirect support that, while ostensibly focused on human rights and equity, contributes to increased migration flows into the US and influences domestic policy to favor permissive immigration frameworks.
OSF’s global expenditures exceed $23 billion, with significant portions directed toward international NGOs that operate in both origin and destination countries. These organizations provide aid along migration routes, legal education on US asylum processes, and advocacy against local deterrents in countries like Mexico and Central America. In the US, OSF funds litigation, lobbying, and policy research that challenge deportation, expand asylum protections, and promote integration, often intersecting with federal programs for Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC). This dual approach—pushing from abroad and pulling from within—creates a coordinated ecosystem that amplifies migration pressures on the US border.
Key findings include:
• OSF’s grants to international NGOs in origin countries create “pull factors” by offering support during journeys, indirectly encouraging migration toward the US.
• In the US, OSF-backed advocacy influences policy through lawsuits and lobbying, benefiting NGOs that receive billions in federal funding for UAC processing and resettlement.
• Soros’s influence is deeply embedded, with OSF serving as a hub connecting global and domestic efforts, often in partnership with USAID and other entities that recycle US taxpayer dollars into these networks.
This report recommends immediate congressional oversight, including audits of OSF’s tax-exempt status, investigations into potential violations of lobbying laws, and reforms to federal funding mechanisms for migration-related NGOs to ensure transparency and alignment with national security interests.
The Open Society Foundations, funded primarily by George Soros with over $32 billion in contributions, operate as a global philanthropic entity dedicated to promoting open societies, human rights, and democratic reforms. While OSF’s mission is framed as advancing equity and justice, its funding patterns reveal a systematic approach to influencing migration and immigration policies. This influence spans from origin countries, where grants support programs that aid migrants en route to the US, to domestic advocacy that seeks to reform US laws for easier entry and prolonged stays.
OSF’s role is not limited to direct grants but extends through a web of international NGOs that receive funding for humanitarian aid, legal support, and policy lobbying. These organizations, many with headquarters in the US or Europe but operations worldwide, form a network that indirectly facilitates migration by addressing push factors abroad (e.g., poverty, violence) and advocating for pull factors in the US (e.g., expanded asylum, reduced deportations). This report details OSF’s embedded influence, listing all relevant organizations, their international connections, and how their work ties into US policy.
The analysis highlights how OSF’s grants, often routed through fiscal sponsors or partnerships with USAID, create a cycle of influence that benefits from US taxpayer dollars while shaping immigration outcomes. Although OSF maintains that its activities are lawful and humanitarian, the pattern raises concerns about organized efforts to alter US sovereignty through philanthropy.
OSF’s Global Migration Funding in Origin Countries
OSF allocates millions annually to programs in origin countries, particularly in Latin America and Mexico, that provide aid along migration routes. This funding, while presented as humanitarian, includes legal education on US asylum processes, support for migrant caravans, and advocacy against local deterrents, creating incentives for northward movement. OSF’s grants often flow through international NGOs with operations in both origin regions and the US, forming a seamless chain that indirectly pushes migration toward American borders.
• International Rescue Committee (IRC): OSF provides grants to IRC for global refugee support, including programs in Mexico and Central America where IRC operates aid stations offering food, water, medical care, and legal advice on US asylum claims. IRC’s international connections include headquarters in New York (US) and offices in over 40 countries, including Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador. These efforts tie into US policy by preparing migrants for border processing, with IRC advocating for US reforms from abroad.
• Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS): OSF funds HIAS for refugee advocacy in origin countries like Mexico, where HIAS provides legal education on US immigration laws and support for migrants en route. HIAS has international connections with offices in the US (New York headquarters), Europe, and Latin America, collaborating with UN agencies. This aid indirectly facilitates entry by equipping migrants with knowledge of US asylum pathways, while HIAS lobbies for US policy changes from its global network.
• Catholic Charities International: OSF grants support Catholic Charities’ humanitarian programs in Mexico and Central America, including aid for migrants traveling north, such as shelters and legal orientation on US rights. Catholic Charities has international connections through its US-based headquarters and affiliates in over 200 countries, partnering with Vatican networks. These efforts influence US policy by advocating for family reunification and reduced border restrictions, creating a pull toward the US.
• Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières - MSF): OSF funds MSF for medical aid in migration hotspots like the Darién Gap (between Colombia and Panama) and Mexico, where MSF provides care to US-bound migrants. MSF’s international connections include headquarters in Geneva (Switzerland) and operations in 70+ countries, with US offices advocating for policy changes. This support indirectly encourages migration by mitigating journey risks, while MSF lobbies US policymakers for humane border policies.
• Amnesty International: OSF grants to Amnesty for anti-racism and human rights advocacy in Latin America include reports on violence pushing migration toward the US. Amnesty has international connections with headquarters in London (UK) and sections in over 150 countries, including the US. Their work influences US policy through lobbying for asylum expansions, tying origin-country aid to US immigration reforms.
• Human Rights Watch (HRW): OSF provides funding for HRW’s monitoring of abuses in origin countries like Venezuela and Nicaragua, which include recommendations for US asylum protections. HRW’s international connections include headquarters in New York (US) and offices worldwide. This advocacy indirectly facilitates migration by highlighting conditions that qualify for US refugee status, while HRW lobbies Congress for policy changes.