What do you know about the Stiles-Crawford effect in a healthy eye? What if I told you this effect is how we sharpen central vision and narrow the periphery of the retina from too much blue light. Would you believe it? Did you know melanopsin has a specific topographic map on a healthy retina? A lesson no has taught you is incoming.
2. All opsins are topologic insulators. You might want to read that threadroll above now to understand topology well.
Topology changes in a cell = geometry change of cristae = UPE change from mitochondria = the optical signal changes in the same tissue altering physiology.
So what happens if you sustain mitochondrial damage in your retina's colony of mitochondria to the Stiles Crawford effect?
What are the implications?
3. The Stiles–Crawford effect (SCE) is the human eye's phenomenon of reduced light sensitivity when light enters the pupil from its periphery compared to the pupil's center. This effect is due to the optical properties of photoreceptors, which act as waveguides and are aligned to channel light towards the fovea, the central point of vision. The SCE makes vision less sensitive to light entering the periphery, thus reducing glare and improving visual clarity. It also keeps a lid on the amount of blue light the periphery the retina gets.
This sharpens vision, makes myopia, glaucoma, cataracts, hyperopia, and AMD almost impossible to get. Makes one resistant to mental illness too. Makes one impervious to diabetic transformations. Makes neurodegeneration rare.
You feeling me yet?
4. Since blue light destroys all photoreceptors what happens to the optics of the eye to the brain?
Mammalian photoreceptors aggregate numerous mitochondria, organelles chiefly for energy production, in the ellipsoid region immediately adjacent to the light-sensitive outer segment to support the high metabolic demands of phototransduction. However, these complex, lipid-rich organelles are also poised to affect light direction, polarization, and passage into the outer segment of the photoreceptor.
Did you know mitochondria in cone photoreceptors act as microlenses to enhance photon delivery and confer directional sensitivity to light? What if I told you that altering the passage of light through the eye is the first step in changing the size of the ventricles of your brain would believe that? Is this how people develop Normal Pressure hydrocephalus?
Is this why people with concussion get immediate photosensitivity as part of the TBI? Yep
5. No one in centralized medicine is making these connections because the labs studying UPEs are looking at bioelectricity instead of UPE transformation and topologic changes happening the eye.
these tightly packed mitochondria “focus” light for entry into the outer segment and that mitochondrial remodeling affects such light concentration. This “microlens”-like feature of cone mitochondria delivers light with an angular dependence that determines retinal photoreceptor damage. That damage then is propagated via electric resistance changes to the rest of the connectome via current flow.
Why are kids becoming more crazy than at any time in human history? This post explains it in detail.
Stack the lessons.
6. In primates and human cells, mitochondria form a reticular network surrounding the nucleus. However, cone photoreceptors of the retina in humans have an abundance of tightly packed mitochondria, which are arranged into an elongated bundle as seen below.
This bundle occupies the ellipsoid, the distal portion of the cone inner segment (IS), immediately proximal to the light-sensitive outer segment (OS).
7. Why has centralized opthalmology failed you?
Generally, they have assumed that such a high density of mitochondria at this unusual location is optimally situated to supply ample adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to support phototransduction in the cone OS because that is what is in the BigHarma medical school curriculum.
They never pushed back on BigHarma education because the evidence for 50 years has shown that photoreceptors ALWAYS rely more on glycolysis than mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation for their energy needs. In fact the retina uses more Warburg emtabolism than any other organ per volume in humans.
This is another reason why biochemist Seigfried beliefs that Warburg metabolism is pathologic. If he was right every humans should have cancerous retinas. We don't. The reason we use it is because this part of the retina does not get much oxygen from the RBCs.
So this means, there must be another reason that mitochondrial cones receptors in our retina operates this peculiar way, no?
Is this why the RPE is loaded with melanin? Is it an fire wall for this design?
8. The more likely reason is topology and polarization effects. This situation explains why our retina's are built backward. It allows the mitochondria to act as a posterior lens in the eye to improve the signal in light and reduce the noise. This helps craft the perfect UPE signal as an output.
9. The decentralized explanation for this precise arrangement of cone mitochondria lies in their role in shaping the path of light as it passes toward the Outer segment of cones.
The vertebrate retina has an inverted structure with many neural layers through which light must pass before successful detection by the photoreceptor OS.
Thus, there placed substantial evolutionary pressure upon the retina to facilitate light delivery to the OS for detection. This is why you always hear me rail against PhDs touting their data in nocturnal animals and thinking it links to humans.
They say it because they do not understand every tweet in this thread. They are ignorant of evolution, light, and how all the pieces fit together.
For instance, in nocturnal mammals, the compact arrangement of chromatin in rod photoreceptor nuclei is believed to minimize light scatter.
CITE
Solovei, M. Kreysing, C. Lanctôt, S. Kösem, L. Peichl, T. Cremer, J. Guck, B. Joffe, Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 137, 356–368 (2009).
In addition, Müller glia, support cells that axially span the retina from its inner surface to the base of the photoreceptor IS, have been shown to have optical fiber–like light guidance properties. I told people this in my Vermont 2018 talk and showed them a cover of a journal that showed this relationship. Note the dates on the cites below.
CITES
1. K. Franze, J. Grosche, S. N. Skatchkov, S. Schinkinger, C. Foja, D. Schild, O. Uckermann, K. Travis, A. Reichenbach, J. Guck, Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 8287–8292 (2007).
2.S. Agte, S. Junek, S. Matthias, E. Ulbricht, I. Erdmann, A. Wurm, D. Schild, J. A. Käs, A. Reichenbach, Müller glial cell-provided cellular light guidance through the vital guinea-pig retina. Biophys. J. 101, 2611–2619 (2011).
3. A. M. Labin, S. K. Safuri, E. N. Ribak, I. Perlman, Müller cells separate between wavelengths to improve day vision with minimal effect upon night vision. Nat. Commun. 5, 4319 (2014).
This is not a new idea. It was ignored by centralized opthalmology at your peril.
The photoreceptor inner segmentconstitutes the last structure that light must pass through before reaching the OS. There, the SHAPE of photoreceptors and their elevated average refractive index have been recognized for their similarity to the design of miniature dielectric antennas. SHAPE and SIZE = topology effect folks. 2016 they gave a Nobel for it.
You starting to see what they all missed?
10. Where is my Vermont 2018 talk to fact check me?
The picture of the Muller cells is on the cover of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) featured on June 12, 2007, issue of the journal.
The cover illustration by Andreas H. Reichenbach accompanies a study in the issue that found Muller cells act as living optical fibers, guiding light through the vertebrate retina to the photoreceptors. The artwork showing Muller cells as fiber optic cables
The cover shows stylized Muller cells functioning as a high-tech fiber optic plate, a striking visual metaphor for the biological discovery.
The featured article, "Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina," demonstrated that these glial cells, which span the entire thickness of the retina, act as waveguides. This mechanism efficiently transports light to the light-sensitive rods and cones, minimizing scattering and distortion.
The context: This discovery helped explain how the vertebrate eye's "inverted" retinal structure, where light must pass through several layers of cells before reaching photoreceptors, is optimized to prevent image degradation.
13. When these things are all jacked up this is how eye disease like keratoconus, AMD, and cataracts occur. Centralized Opthalmology has no answers for these conditions. patreon.com/posts/decentra…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another new podcast from me with Smuggling Hope. It is good one on mental health because it explains how biomolecules absorption and emission spectra's determine reality or determine which mental illness one gets.
This is the information why Jordan Peterson is sick and why he and his daughter have stumbled multiple times in getting him well. ivoox.com/.../exposing-t…...
Biophotons are ultra-weak light emissions produced by living organisms, thought to arise from metabolic processes like oxidative reactions in mitochondria. Centralized scientists and AI bots hypothesized them to play a role in cellular communication, potentially influencing gene expression or signaling pathways. FIAF, also known as angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4), is a protein produced by tissues like fat and the gut, and it’s a key player in lipid metabolism and microbiome construction. Neither understand how UPEs control FIAF. If the UPE is coherent then FIAF inhibits lipoprotein lipase, affecting how fats are stored or broken down, and its expression ramps up during fasting. The microbiome, meanwhile, is the community of gut microbes that can shift in response to diet, fasting, or host metabolism, influencing energy balance and health. If the UPEs in mitochondria is not coherent, the UPE changes and mental illness becomes more probable. You cannot burn fat so it changes neural signaling.
Centralized scientists and technocrats who build AI systems will say no direct study says “biophotons control FIAF to affect the microbiome,” but we can hypothesize based on related mechanisms. This is patently false. Why?
FIAF has known absorption and emission spectra to light frequencies. Because of that, a study is superfluous because each chemical in the world has an optical fingerprint. Just because a scientist has not published the work is immaterial to this BASIC biophysical fact in spectroscopy. This was what I brought Ray Peat over ten years ago, and he was impotent enough to answer my critiques of his work. This podcast covers these details.
2. Is nerve pain caused by a Lyrica deficiency?
Is Lyme disease linked to a lack of doxycycline?
Is depression due to Prozac deficiency.
Are heart attacks are due to Lipitor deficiency.
Is obesity due to Ozempic deficiency.
Are Headaches due to Tylenol deficiency?
Is Bipolar disorder due to lithium deficiency?
Any questions?
You've been conditioned by centralized medicine to ask the wrong question.
You have a solar deficiency combined with a nnEMF toxicity problem.
This alters the UPEs your mitochondria make and it is this light that changes the neural tracks that make you mentally ill. This is why your Bipolar Disorder exists. The defect is not in you; it is in your environment.
3. Light exposure,say, sunlight or specific wavelengths impacts circadian rhythms via the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the brain, which regulates hormones like dopamine, GABA,melatonin and cortisol.
These hormones influence metabolism, including fat tissue activity where FIAF is expressed. Metabolism is what makes the key UPEs.
Fasting, which boosts FIAF, is also tied to light cycles, think of how daylight affects feeding patterns. If biophotons reflect or amplify these light-driven processes at a cellular level, they might indirectly tweak FIAF production by signaling energy states or oxidative stress in cells. If you cannot burn fat you are more likely to be mentally ill.
My decentralized ideas have always been spot-on that this topic doesn’t need a scientist to spell it out in a paper, absorption/emission spectra are measurable, and biophoton emissions are detectable.
The gap isn’t in the physics; it’s in tying the specific wavelengths of biophotons (which vary by cell type and state) to FIAF’s exact optical profile in vivo. Still, if gut cells emit biophotons in, say, the 300-400 nm range, and FIAF absorbs there, the optical photonics interaction’s real, study or not. It is first principle thinking. It is obvious what they problem. It’s like saying water absorbs infrared; we don’t need a new experiment to prove it gets hot under sunlight. Biology acts like it does, but in physics they use theoretical physics and first principle thinking to make predictions when the experiments are not done or cannot be done.
When matter experiences this topologic change do you know it become capable of emitting photons? In biology we call this UPEs. That is what does all the information transferring in life to keep you alive and kicking.
2. In astronomy and cosmology Spectroscopy is a form of remote sensing, meaning it allows scientists to determine the composition of an object without physically interacting with it. This is how we examine remote atoms in deep space.
How do we know what other worlds are made of? Planets we’ve never touched, stars we’ll never reach? By reading their light. Why can't quantum biologists realize the same opportunity exists in cells?
3. Quantum biology cannot yet apply the same spectroscopic "reading of light" as astronomy because cellular components are too small to be analyzed by light in the same way, and the inherent quantum effects within cells are not easily distinguishable from background noise in typical biological systems. They do not have photomultipliers small enough to sample UPEs yet.
Just because the technology is not available or studied means we should ignore the idea. Absense of evidence is not absence of effect. This is first principle thinking that is missing from most scientists today. In physics theoretical physicists provide a first principle lens to the Standard Model to innovate. We need to do the same in quantum biology. This is what I do.
Astronomers use spectroscopy to analyze the wavelengths of light absorbed or emitted by large celestial bodies, which reveal their chemical composition. However, cellular molecules are often too small to generate a detectable light signature, and the complex, noisy environment of a living cell makes it difficult to isolate and interpret the faint quantum signals associated with specific biological processes. there is no doubt today UPEs are real and carry information. We've know that AXIOMATICALLY since the Onion root experiment in 1922.
Cutaneous antimicrobial effects of sunlight on cholesterol conversion to Vitamin D components are today's PSA boys and girls.
1,25(OH)2D made in the liver and kidneys from 25 D(OH) from the skin by the sun and cholesterol and its receptor regulate the processing of the long-chain glycosylceramides that are critical for the skin barrier formation which is crucial in defending the skin.
Do you know how the heme protein enzymes CYP control this process?
The two Vitamin D biomolecules induce toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and its coreceptor CD14, which initiate the innate immune response in the skin. Activation of these receptors leads to the induction of CYP27B1 (heme protein), which in turn induces cathelicidin resulting in the killing of invasive organisms.
What happens when blue light and nnEMF destroy heme proteins when you know this connection? Innate immunity is destroyed. This is why Fauci wanted you indoors during COVID he and Baric made in Ukraine and China. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
2. See how the heme photoreceptors are blown away?
3. Spine tumors are not common but most of them are associated with a poorly functioning immune arm and associated with low Vitamin D levels from poor solar exposure. That is something you can prevent to avoid this outcome.
Fire your centralized doctor by hiring nature for your reversal! Nature quantizes the precise amount of melatonin from the mitochondria needed to optimize autophagy and apoptosis. 95% of melatonin is made in human mitochondria. It is not your pineal or your gut. Your central retinal pathways have more mitochondrial density in it than any other part of the brain. The same is true with DHA to run your SCN faster than the other molecular clocks in your body to meet relativity needs. Want more info on exogenous melatonin? Use Yandex search with my name and mitohack #722. Your welcome in advance.
2. Shall we also say that sunlight plus natural darkness at night control melatonin, which in turn controls HIF-1a, which in turn controls sensing of O2?
Guess what happens to your mitochondria when oxygen tensions change? The IMJ geometry changes, metabolism morphs, geometry alters, and UPE become less common but more coherent. Mitochondria can change their physiology when the environment changes too. This is a remnant of the GOE when we had chronic hypoxia. this is why we innovated HIF1 and linked it to the PER clock genes.
Did you know UV light exposure raises oxygen tension in the venous plasma?
Guess what that all implies?
I know a lot more than any centralized MD or PhD about how we really operate.
If you have a T1D child you have a light problem. That light problem has manifested in your germ line.
If you're a Type 1 diabetic, by defintiion you have a chronic UVA and UVB deficiency and a chronic overdose of artificial blue light and nnEMF. It is also axiomatic.
Look at the chart below. T1D is almost nonexistent near the equator
2. By around 20 weeks of pregnancy, a baby girl’s ovaries already contain every egg she will ever carry.
Which means that when your grandmother was pregnant with your mother, the cell that would one day help form you was already there.
Three generations, held in one body.
This isn’t folklore. It’s embryology.
Pregnancy is sometimes called a three-generation event: grandmother, mother, child, all sharing the same environment in a single moment. Scientists call it multigenerational exposure. I call transgeneration biology.
3. But biology makes it hard to imagine these things don’t matter. The oocytes that hold potential life are shaped by the whole soup of environment, and so are the children they become:
☀️ Light and circadian rhythm
🌊 Water quality
🥬 Nutrition and minerals
🌬 The air we breathe
💊 Medications and substances
💤 The quality of rest and sleep
💭 The emotions we carry
🧲 Electromagnetic fields and magnetism
🧪 Toxins and chemicals
Even mitochondria, not just “batteries” but regulators of repair, signalling, and survival, are passed down the maternal line. It is an unbroken inheritance that centralized medicine continues to ignore at your peril.
Three generations are intertwined in every pregnancy in humans.
Biology is carrying echoes of what came before, and the possibility of restoration.
Parents need to become conscious of these risks to eradicate these diseases. The transhumanists seem to know, why don't the normies?
2. All one needs to know about the climate scam in one slide. Humans are the penultimate primate. We need more CO2 so plants make more 02 in our environment. Coupled oscillators, are C02 and 02 for the clade of silly talking monkeys.
The text in my slide below claims a "40-year hoax" and "CO₂ famine," arguing we need CO₂ at 1,200 ppm to avoid calamity, with humans as "penultimate primates" benefiting from more CO₂ for plant growth and thus more O₂.
This echoes decentralized climate views held by me: Earth has been in a relative CO₂ "famine" for millennia compared to geological highs, and rising CO₂ (now ~420 ppm as of 2025) has driven global greening, increased crop yields, and reduced famine risks.
For example, India's shift from famine-prone in the 1960s to agricultural exporter is partly attributed to CO₂ fertilization alongside green revolution tech. Some argue past low CO₂ contributed to events like the Carboniferous rainforest collapse or even the Permian extinction via "phytoplankton blackout."
Every single thing the government is behind is a bullshit story to enslave silly talking monkeys.
3. On CO₂ and O₂ coupling: Over geological scales, these two substance linked by a quantum process called photosynthesis and this process is not subjet to WEF induced government propaganda. Even a moron thrid grader knows that photosynthesis fixes CO₂ and releases O₂, while carbon burial raised O₂ in the past.
But today, O₂ (20.95%) is stable; human CO₂ emissions cause a tiny O₂ drop (~0.0001% per year), negligible for life.
More CO₂ boosts photosynthesis, potentially increasing local O₂ production, but not atmospheric levels meaningfully because our O₂ reservoirs are vast.
The key things that affect CCO water production are two paramagnetic substances. One from the GOE = NO that inhibits ATP, and the other oxygen that fueled the transition of primate to silly talking monkey. Oxygen and light were needed to sculpt that transition.