Kevin Bass PhD MS Profile picture
Oct 12 25 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The modern Western political ideologies LIBERALISM, PROGRESSIVISM, and MARXISM should be understood as fundamentalist secularized denominations of Protestant Christianity.

All three descend from the same post-Reformation religious/moral structure:
PROTESTANTISM's faith alone became moral agency.

Inner conscience guided by God became secular trust in Reason, Science, or Justice.

Salvation became Progress.

Priesthood of all believers became moral equality.

Without God though, moral worth became performance to others.
Notably, all three ideologies inherit the DISTINCTIVE Protestant anthropology: a) the conviction that the individual conscience is the supreme authority, b) the suspicion that hierarchy is inherently corrupt, and c) a belief in history as a story of redemption from bondage.
LIBERALISM is the first secularization of Protestantism.

It retains the individual conscience and freedom of belief from Protestantism, but relocates salvation into the political and moral sphere:
The State of Grace becomes freedom under law.

The Elect becomes rational, self-determining liberal citizen (believes in science, etc.)

The Kingdom of God becomes the free and open society.
LIBERALISM is the "mainline" denomination: cautious, procedural, focused on tolerance and coexistence rather than conversion.

It's the modern equivalent of a moderate Protestant church and sprang from it: moral but respectable, individualist but institutional.
PROGRESSIVISM radicalizes liberalism’s moral impulse.

It retains the Protestant moral psychology--the urgent need for inner purity and social sanctification--but directs it away from individual toward collective redemption through politics.
Where LIBERALISM said "let each follow conscience," PROGRESSIVISM says "we must reform the conscience of society."

It treats sin as structural injustice, and conversion as awakening to privilege or oppression.
It becomes in practice moralizing bureaucracy, whose function is continual purification of the social body.

PROGRESSIVISM is the revivalist sect of secular Protestantism.

It is always chasing new Great Awakenings (abolition, suffrage, civil rights, climate, DEI, etc.).
MARXISM emerges from the same millenarian impulse but actively rejects God entirely and is hostile to it, but leaving the ideological structure precisely intact:
Fall: Alienation through private property.

Sin: Exploitation

Prophets: Revolutionary theorists.

Elect: The proletariat, morally pure because oppressed.

Church: The Party.

Authority: History.

Apocalypse: The revolution.

Kingdom: Classless society, the secular New Jerusalem.
MARXISM is thus the eschatological sect: a radical offshoot that keeps the Protestant sense of history as redemptive drama but replaces the divine with dialectical materialism. It’s an atheist Puritanism.
Once God is replaced by Man, the core Protestant religious concepts do not disappear.

They simply shift from God to Man/Society:
Sin/Fall:

LIBERALISM sees sin primarily in moral fault (prejudice, irrationality).

PROGRESSIVISM reads sin in structural systems (racism, patriarchy, inequality).

MARXISM sees sin as rooted in economic relations (exploitation, alienation).
Soteriology/Redemption:

Man is redeemed, not through God, but through Progress through History.

LIBERALISM's redemption is realized within existing structures via reform, tolerance, rights.

PROGRESSIVISM is more aggressive: restructuring institutions, redistributive justice.

MARXISM demands revolution, overthrow, total reconfiguration of power.
Conversion/Justification:

LIBERALISM: virtue is publicly affirmed by conformity with norms (diversity statements, apologizing for bias, etc.).

PROGRESSIVISM demands moral awakening: recognizing complicity, converting identity, decolonizing habits.

MARXISM emphasizes "awakening" to see oneself as the actor of revolution, rejecting false consciousness.
Sacrament/Liturgy:

LIBERALISM's liturgies: public apologies, awards, statements, memorials, pronouncements of inclusion, language policing.

PROGRESSIVISM: ritual protests, symbolic repudiations, curriculum overhauls, "deadnaming" ceremonies, deplatforming, etc.
MARXISM's rituals include revolutionary festivals, anniversaries of martyrs, mass mobilizations, symbolic destruction of old monuments, party congresses.
Eschatology/End-Time:

LIBERALISM: progress is linear and irreversible; the liberal world must always expand its domain. Regression is unthinkable, horrifying (think Trump).
PROGRESSIVISM: there is a promised future of justice, full equality, ecological harmony, etc.

MARXISM: the coming of the communist society is the definitive eschaton: classless, stateless, free persons.
Enemies/Heresy:

LIBERALISM's heretics are reactionaries, illiberals, bigotry, "backsliders."

PROGRESSIVISM's heretics are structures of oppression, institutions that resist moral change, etc.

MARXISM's heretics are bourgeois class, state, capitalists, counterrevolutionaries.
Community/Church:

LIBERALISM disperses church into NGOs, universities, civil society, state apparatus.

PROGRESSIVISM: movement organizations, advocacy NGOs, bureaucracy as priesthood.

MARXISM: party or vanguard is ordained community of the redeemed, hierarchical discipline.
However, when God is gone:

GRACE is gone.
FORGIVENESS is gone.
HUMILITY BEFORE GOD is gone (replaced by "self-esteem").

Divine relationship between man and God is replaced by moral competition between people.

"I'm A Good Person. Pls notice me lmao."
The modern West is the secular unfolding of Protestant metaphysics:

Salvation -> Liberation
Sin -> Oppression
Priest -> Expert or activist
Church -> State or NGO
Heresy -> Hate speech or misinformation

The logic is the same. Only symbols have changed.
MARXISM, LIBERALISM, and PROGRESSIVISM are not distinct species so much as denominations of one great, evangelical, fundamentalist, universalizing post-Protestant Church:

A religion of moral self-justification and world-redemption, long after it stopped believing in God.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Bass PhD MS

Kevin Bass PhD MS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kevinnbass

Sep 19
In May 2020, CDC analyzed all mask data, finding no benefit.

CDC, entirely Democrats, lied and pushed mandates anyway. It demonized right-wing dissenters as "anti-maskers".

Trust collapsed.

CDC engaged in left-wing political warfare over science.

Why should we trust the CDC? Image
CDC's study showing no evidence for masks:

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…Image
The CDC is 100% Democrat.

OK, fine, 99.94%. Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 12
CDC force-masked toddlers during Covid.

Science shows this permanently stunted development. CDC knew there was no good evidence. They knew it would hurt children.

They knew it would cause tremendous damage to America. They did it anyway. Why?

Power.

I explain everything.
This is going to be an extremely long thread.

It will explain everything about masks during Covid--both the science and political reasons why our institutions lied to us.
Prior to the pandemic, there were many clinical trials showing that masks do not prevent respiratory viral infections.

The evidence indicated they did not work.
Read 96 tweets
Sep 8
When cloth masks were first recommended and then mandated during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was only one randomized controlled trial studying the use of cloth masks to prevent viral respiratory infections.

It showed a 13-fold increased risk of infection with cloth masks. Image
Cloth masks did not just appear to increase risk compared to surgical masks. They also appeared to increase risk compared to no masks.
None of this is to say that cloth masks really increase risk.

I mean, who knows? It's just one study.

It is to say that the CDC people pushing the masking policies were just making things up and accusing critics of their fairytales of "misinformation", though.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 5
March 29, 2021 Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC:

"Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick."

Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it.

1/12
See for yourself.

Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would have been much more difficult to argue in court.

That's why she lied.

2/12 Image
The claims made by Walensky ended up in arguments at the Supreme Court, influencing Biden vs. Missouri (a 5-4 decision) about COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers at facilities receiving federal funding.

And a huge impact on vaccine mandates more broadly.



3/12web.archive.org/web/2022010802…Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 29
Here is a picture of the man resigning from CDC

Here he is wearing BDSM attire with a pentagram, a Satanic symbol, on his chest

He hates Trump and RFK Jr.

These are the kinds of freaks who used to oversee public health in this country Image
Here are some more pics.

In the one where he is posing with a man dressed as a dog, you can see an inverted pentagram tattooed on his upper chest.

He/him/his former CDC official. Image
Some are questioning whether the star is really Satanic. Here is his Instagram. It is explicitly Satanic (bottom left). This is not speculative. Again, this guy was a high-level official at CDC, and he appears to be a Satanist. Can you imagine?? Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 21
Wall Street Journal has launched another dumb attack--this time at Trump FDA appointee Marty Makary.

This article is filled with wild representations.

I explain in depth below.

I also explain the role of science in medicine and why WSJ Editorial Board is not smart. Image
WSJ is very dumb lately, and I believe that this is for an obvious reason: the people who are writing for it are dumb.

This thread will explain the dumb.

I implore you, dear reader:

As I explain, revel in the dumb. Wonder at it. Laugh at it.

Be not perturbed by the dumb.
The Editorial Board opens with an accusation: Makary is "torpedoeing" "life-saving drugs", which "raises big questions".

This is completely wrong. Image
Read 46 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(